Re: [Sugar-devel] Fw: Nano and soas03/04/05

2009-11-19 Thread Sebastian Dziallas
Sorry for the late reply... I'm quite behind my e-mail. :/ Just add --nogpg to your yum call, and it should work for now. We're looking to get this generally to work in Blueberry. --Sebastian Art Hunkins wrote: > I'd really appreciate a response about this. > > On sticks make with snapshots soa

[Sugar-devel] Fw: Nano and soas03/04/05

2009-11-19 Thread Art Hunkins
I'd really appreciate a response about this. On sticks make with snapshots soas03, 04, and 05, I've attempted to install nano. (Yes, I try to do "development" with the USB sticks themselves.) Via yum, tt downloads nano 2.0.9-6.fc13.i686.rpm, but then indicates that the rpm is not signed. Can I

[Sugar-devel] [SLOBS] meeting reminder

2009-11-19 Thread Walter Bender
We'll be meeting at 10AM EST (15:00 UC) on Friday, 20 Nov. in irc.freenode.net #sugar-meeting, Please join us. The agenda can be found in the wiki: http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board/Minutes#Agenda%20items -walter -- Walter Bender Sugar Labs http://www.sugarlabs.org ___

Re: [Sugar-devel] Rationale behind the JSON -> CJSON switch in Sugar codebase?

2009-11-19 Thread James Cameron
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 03:11:07PM +0100, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > 2009/11/13 Jonas Smedegaard : > > Generally, I recommend Sugarlabs to document clearly in source of > > the various components (e.g. in an INSTALL file) which versions of > > Python the code is expected to work against, and which versi

Re: [Sugar-devel] [NEW FEATURE] write to the journal whenever you want

2009-11-19 Thread Walter Bender
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 5:37 PM, Wade Brainerd wrote: > Looks like a nice improvement to me. > > But, per thread from a few weeks ago, I think the Keep vs Stop concept > needs attention and this feature should probably become a part of > whatever solution we reach for that difficult problem. I do

Re: [Sugar-devel] [NEW FEATURE] write to the journal whenever you want

2009-11-19 Thread Wade Brainerd
Looks like a nice improvement to me. But, per thread from a few weeks ago, I think the Keep vs Stop concept needs attention and this feature should probably become a part of whatever solution we reach for that difficult problem. On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 4:10 PM, Eduardo H. Silva wrote: > I like t

Re: [Sugar-devel] [NEW FEATURE] write to the journal whenever you want

2009-11-19 Thread Eduardo H. Silva
I like the idea, and much prefer it. As for the design, what about using as a toolbar icon the journal+pencil icon? It would imply that you are writing something into the journal, in this case the title and description and tags of the current activity. There is a potential problem of adding another

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Karma] possible to meet soon to discuss new karma.js?

2009-11-19 Thread Felipe López Toledo
I'm online, why not now? 2009/11/19 Bryan Berry > I have refactored jquery.karma.js into karma.js and am now changing > adding_up to use it. > > Will u have time soon for us to talk and discuss it? > > I have made a lot of changes that I want to discuss w/ u > > -- > Bryan W. Berry > Senior Eng

[Sugar-devel] [Karma] possible to meet soon to discuss new karma.js?

2009-11-19 Thread Bryan Berry
I have refactored jquery.karma.js into karma.js and am now changing adding_up to use it. Will u have time soon for us to talk and discuss it? I have made a lot of changes that I want to discuss w/ u -- Bryan W. Berry Senior Engineer OLE Nepal, http://www.olenepal.org __

[Sugar-devel] [NEW FEATURE] write to the journal whenever you want

2009-11-19 Thread Walter Bender
Many of us love the Naming Alert, but even more seem to despise it. With this feature, it is invoked from a toolbar button instead of automatically invoked on quit. It lets the learning take notes repeatedly and at any time during an activity session. See http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Writ

Re: [Sugar-devel] configuring Socksproxy for Jabber Server on the XO-1 or XO-1.5

2009-11-19 Thread Manusheel Gupta
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 7:41 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > 2009/11/18 Manusheel Gupta : > > We did try to search around but have not been able to make much progress > towards configuring socks proxy on the XOs. Are you aware if someone would > have tried this > > before? > > Just to be sure, you wan

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar master will depend on simplejson again

2009-11-19 Thread Sascha Silbe
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 04:33:05PM +, Daniel Drake wrote: We've found that sugar's recent switch to cjson has caused issues and cjson upstream doesn't seem receptive to fixing them. The latter isn't quite true: It has rejected the specific patch for technical reasons (and proposed a differe

[Sugar-devel] sugar master will depend on simplejson again

2009-11-19 Thread Daniel Drake
Hi, We've found that sugar's recent switch to cjson has caused issues and cjson upstream doesn't seem receptive to fixing them. So the plan is to move back to simplejson on monday, like things were before. Daniel ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-dev

Re: [Sugar-devel] Rationale behind the JSON -> CJSON switch in Sugar codebase?

2009-11-19 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 04:01:55PM +0100, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 15:53, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 03:11:05PM +0100, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: 2009/11/13 Sascha Silbe : On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 10:12:11AM +, Daniel Drake wrote: As Tomeu mentions, Pyth

[Sugar-devel] [ANNOUNCE] sugar-datastore sucrose-0.86 branch

2009-11-19 Thread Aleksey Lim
Hi all, sugar-datastore was branced for 0.86 bug fixes, master branch is open for 0.88 commits. -- Aleksey ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

[Sugar-devel] sugar branched for 0.86

2009-11-19 Thread Daniel Drake
Hi, I have just created the 'sucrose-0.86' branch in the sugar git repository. Further 0.86 development will happen there, and 0.88 development will happen in master. Daniel ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sug

Re: [Sugar-devel] Python 2.6 for 0.88 (was: Re: Rationale behind the JSON -> CJSON switch in Sugar codebase?)

2009-11-19 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 16:24, Sascha Silbe wrote: > On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 03:11:05PM +0100, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > >>> Unfortunately not all distros ship Python 2.6 yet, most notably Debian. >>> So we need to at least fall back to simplejson for those. >> >> Sounds good to me, so maybe we can as

[Sugar-devel] Python 2.6 for 0.88 (was: Re: Rationale behind the JSON -> CJSON switch in Sugar codebase?)

2009-11-19 Thread Sascha Silbe
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 03:11:05PM +0100, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: Unfortunately not all distros ship Python 2.6 yet, most notably Debian. So we need to at least fall back to simplejson for those. Sounds good to me, so maybe we can ask for a minimum of 2.6 for 0.88? As mentioned Debian still doesn't

Re: [Sugar-devel] Rationale behind the JSON -> CJSON switch in Sugar codebase?

2009-11-19 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 15:53, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 03:11:05PM +0100, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >> >> 2009/11/13 Sascha Silbe : >>> >>> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 10:12:11AM +, Daniel Drake wrote: >>> > As Tomeu mentions, Python 2.6 reduces the cjson/json performance >>

Re: [Sugar-devel] Rationale behind the JSON -> CJSON switch in Sugar codebase?

2009-11-19 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 03:11:05PM +0100, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: 2009/11/13 Sascha Silbe : On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 10:12:11AM +, Daniel Drake wrote: As Tomeu mentions, Python 2.6 reduces the cjson/json performance advantage. OK, didn't see this. Yes, using python standard library seems like

Re: [Sugar-devel] configuring Socksproxy for Jabber Server on the XO-1 or XO-1.5

2009-11-19 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
2009/11/18 Manusheel Gupta : > Hi Tomeu, > > We did try to search around but have not been able to make much progress > towards configuring socks proxy on the XOs. Are you aware if someone would > have tried this > before? Just to be sure, you want to tell the presence service to connect to a ej

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugarizing an application

2009-11-19 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
2009/11/12 Daniel Castelo : > In a short term we are thinking in develop an activity to interact with > wwdial. In the future we are planning to test Sugar 0.8x and Network Manager > 0.7, and change our activity to interact with networkmanager. We should > investigate the way to interact with ne

Re: [Sugar-devel] Rationale behind the JSON -> CJSON switch in Sugar codebase?

2009-11-19 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
2009/11/13 Jonas Smedegaard : > On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 01:10:35PM +0100, Sascha Silbe wrote: >> >> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 10:12:11AM +, Daniel Drake wrote: >> As Tomeu mentions, Python 2.6 reduces the cjson/json performance advantage. >>> >>> OK, didn't see this. Yes, using python standa

Re: [Sugar-devel] Rationale behind the JSON -> CJSON switch in Sugar codebase?

2009-11-19 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
2009/11/13 Sascha Silbe : > On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 10:12:11AM +, Daniel Drake wrote: > >>> As Tomeu mentions, Python 2.6 reduces the cjson/json performance advantage. >> >> OK, didn't see this. Yes, using python standard library seems like the >> way to go. > > Unfortunately not all distros sh

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Bugs] #1447 NORM: Display a message when an activity fails to start

2009-11-19 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
2009/11/4 Gary C Martin : > Hi Wade, > > Just wanted to ping on this; have been running with your 0001-Notify- > shell-when-activity-process-terminates.patch and 0001-Added-Close- > button-to-activity-launcher-rewrote-lay.patch applied to sugar-jhbuild > for the last ~4 days, and it has been workin