Re: [Sugar-devel] Hypothetical sugar-0.90 material, draft 1.

2010-06-09 Thread Jameson Quinn
2010/6/9 Luke Faraone > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 06/09/2010 08:11 PM, Bernie Innocenti wrote: > > As far as I know, Browse is still the only hulahop user on this planet, > > so it's not like we need to keep it around for API compatibility. > > Actually, hulahop is us

Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH] Record: disable Best quality video on XO-1.5

2010-06-09 Thread Chris Ball
Hi, > I'd rather just remove this option altogether, leaving Low and > High. Comments/objections? Fine with me. Thanks, - Chris. -- Chris Ball One Laptop Per Child ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.su

Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH] Record: disable Best quality video on XO-1.5

2010-06-09 Thread Daniel Drake
On 9 June 2010 16:22, James Cameron wrote: > G'dayi Daniel, > > In our engineering meeting we decided to ship with the Best quality > disabled until we could fix it properly.  The following patch is tested > on XO-1.5 with build os125. I'd rather just remove this option altogether, leaving Low an

Re: [Sugar-devel] Hypothetical sugar-0.90 material, draft 1.

2010-06-09 Thread Luke Faraone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 06/09/2010 08:11 PM, Bernie Innocenti wrote: > As far as I know, Browse is still the only hulahop user on this planet, > so it's not like we need to keep it around for API compatibility. Actually, hulahop is used by pyjamas[1], as evidenced by thes

Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH] Set the DISPLAY env var once Xephyr has been launched

2010-06-09 Thread James Cameron
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 07:15:08AM +1000, James Cameron wrote: > Reviewed-by: James Cameron This review tag didn't reach git. http://git.sugarlabs.org/projects/sugar/repos/mainline/commits/d6ebfcbb4d93610bf30df517fcd5360fdd083b50 -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/

Re: [Sugar-devel] Hypothetical sugar-0.90 material, draft 1.

2010-06-09 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
SocialCalc depends of hulahop. My activity Elements too. Gonzalo On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 9:11 PM, Bernie Innocenti wrote: > El Wed, 09-06-2010 a las 13:30 +0100, Lucian Branescu escribió: > > > After some debate on what exactly I should be doing, I've decided that > > it's both prudent and relat

Re: [Sugar-devel] Problems adapting activity

2010-06-09 Thread James Cameron
On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 10:50:02PM -0300, Alberto Arruda de Oliveira wrote: > But one error I remember, and that draw my attention is that the log > said that the MANIFEST file was missing, even though I had it on my > activity folder. Anyone knows why this could be happening? Yes, it means you ha

Re: [Sugar-devel] Hypothetical sugar-0.90 material, draft 1.

2010-06-09 Thread Lucian Branescu
Folding hulahop into this abstraction layer could possibly make sense. Let me finish it first, though. Hulahop has a lot of weird code and a lot of XPCOM magic. Both pywebkitgtk and hulahop have very similar WebView classes. My wrapper now offers some extra methods for engine-specific bits and a f

Re: [Sugar-devel] Problems adapting activity

2010-06-09 Thread Alberto Arruda de Oliveira
Hello, I'm now using the tutorial Daniel posted and it really seems much more complete than the wiki one, thanks again for that. Now that I'm properly testing my activity on sugar-emulator ( I was using a soas emulated image on virtualbox before ) it seems that finding the error will be much easi

Re: [Sugar-devel] Inter-wiki integration example and opportunities

2010-06-09 Thread Frederick Grose
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 8:01 PM, Bernie Innocenti wrote: > El Tue, 08-06-2010 a las 23:55 -0400, Frederick Grose escribió: > >>... >> >> (If we enable inter-wiki transclusions on both wikis, we could avoid >> the divergence of source and history for pages like the HIG.) > > What should we do on the

Re: [Sugar-devel] Hypothetical sugar-0.90 material, draft 1.

2010-06-09 Thread Bernie Innocenti
El Wed, 09-06-2010 a las 13:30 +0100, Lucian Branescu escribió: > After some debate on what exactly I should be doing, I've decided that > it's both prudent and relatively easy to make that abstraction layer > after all. Since I last used it, pywebkitgtk's API has grown much > closer to hulahop's,

Re: [Sugar-devel] Inter-wiki integration example and opportunities

2010-06-09 Thread Bernie Innocenti
El Tue, 08-06-2010 a las 23:55 -0400, Frederick Grose escribió: > The page is now embedded > at http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Keyboard_shortcuts in order to > maintain single source and history while putting the title within the > search scope of wiki.laptop.org. Thanks. BTW: Mediawiki supports

Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH] Fix broken mesh support

2010-06-09 Thread James Cameron
On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 05:09:42PM -0400, Martin Abente wrote: > From: Martin Abente > Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2010 16:31:29 -0400 > Subject: [PATCH] Fix duplication of OLPC mesh icons > Organization: Paraguay Educa > > Three or more mesh icons were being added after every suspend/resume. > > There was

Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH] Fix broken mesh support

2010-06-09 Thread Martin Abente
There it goes :) and thanks for the comments and messages. On Wed, 9 Jun 2010 15:45:40 -0500, Daniel Drake wrote: > "Fix broken mesh support" not a good summary line > > On 9 June 2010 15:35, Martin Abente wrote: >> Fix the multiple mesh icons problem in the meshview > > not a good description

Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH] Fix broken mesh support

2010-06-09 Thread Daniel Drake
"Fix broken mesh support" not a good summary line On 9 June 2010 15:35, Martin Abente wrote: > Fix the multiple mesh icons problem in the meshview not a good description of the problem either nor why the existing code was broken The patch looks good otherwise (I'm only available to review it be

[Sugar-devel] [PATCH] Fix broken mesh support

2010-06-09 Thread Martin Abente
Fix the multiple mesh icons problem in the meshview Signed-off-by: Martin Abente --- src/jarabe/desktop/meshbox.py | 17 + 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/jarabe/desktop/meshbox.py b/src/jarabe/desktop/meshbox.py index a04922b..eabc737 100644

[Sugar-devel] Multitouch in Fedora

2010-06-09 Thread Peter Robinson
Hi, I know people were wondering about multitouch. In the last couple of days there's a couple of posts regarding Multitouch in fedora for those that are interested. http://www.j5live.com/2010/06/09/multitouch-working-in-fedora/ http://blogs.gnome.org/carlosg/2010/06/09/getting-multitouch-to-jus

Re: [Sugar-devel] initial commit to git?

2010-06-09 Thread Bernie Innocenti
El Sun, 06-06-2010 a las 06:44 +, Sascha Silbe escribió: > > > ssh://gitori...@git.sugarlabs.org/sun-moon-music/mainline.git > > The correct repository location is > gitori...@git.sugarlabs.org:sun-moon-music/mainline.git . > Anything else won't work (not even > ssh://gitori...@git.sugarlabs

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Heads-up: POSSE folks hacking in Fedora/Sugar thisweek and next

2010-06-09 Thread Walter Bender
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 3:26 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 7:50 PM, Art Hunkins wrote: >> I've noticed that neither the SoaS CD Boot Helper nor the SoaS Floppy Disk >> Boot Helper manage to boot SoaS Mirabelle (Fedora 13). (For that matter, the >> Floppy Disk Helper doesn't bo

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Heads-up: POSSE folks hacking in Fedora/Sugar thisweek and next

2010-06-09 Thread Peter Robinson
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 7:50 PM, Art Hunkins wrote: > I've noticed that neither the SoaS CD Boot Helper nor the SoaS Floppy Disk > Boot Helper manage to boot SoaS Mirabelle (Fedora 13). (For that matter, the > Floppy Disk Helper doesn't boot anything but Strawberry.) I don't think Floppy Disks are

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Heads-up: POSSE folks hacking in Fedora/Sugar this week and next

2010-06-09 Thread Thomas C Gilliard
Mel Chua wrote: > Some of you may have noticed some new faces in #sugar - we (Walter > Bender, Peter Robinson, and I) are hanging out with a group of > professors (mostly from the Worcester area) who are in town this week > for http://teachingopensource.org/index.php/POSSE, a workshop for > l

[Sugar-devel] [ASLO] Release Abacus-12

2010-06-09 Thread Sugar Labs Activities
Activity Homepage: http://activities.sugarlabs.org/addon/4293 Sugar Platform: 0.82 - 0.88 Download Now: http://activities.sugarlabs.org/downloads/file/26941/abacus-12.xo Release notes: * Decimal calculator * Reset button (tip of the hat to Nadimpalli Mahadev) Sugar Labs Activities http://activ

Re: [Sugar-devel] Heads-up: POSSE folks hacking in Fedora/Sugar thisweek and next

2010-06-09 Thread Art Hunkins
I've noticed that neither the SoaS CD Boot Helper nor the SoaS Floppy Disk Boot Helper manage to boot SoaS Mirabelle (Fedora 13). (For that matter, the Floppy Disk Helper doesn't boot anything but Strawberry.) Is anybody interested in working on this, or are we basically abandoning older comput

Re: [Sugar-devel] Hypothetical sugar-0.90 material, draft 1.

2010-06-09 Thread Sameer Verma
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 9:54 PM, Michael Stone wrote: > Hi folks, > > Under the temporary working hypothesis that we want to make a Sugar release in > a couple of months, I'd like to know more about what we might find ourselves > integrating. Here's my current list of, er... mostly unvetted rumors.

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar on a Stick v3 "how did we do?" release review meeting

2010-06-09 Thread Mel Chua
> On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 10:26 AM, Mel Chua wrote: >> How did the Mirabelle release cycle go? We're gearing up for making >> v4, and want to know what went well and what could have been better - >> everything from technical to deployment to documentation to process >> sustainability to... well, r

Re: [Sugar-devel] initial commit to git?

2010-06-09 Thread Art Hunkins
Bernie, I could do it, but I don't feel technically savvy enough to say what needs to be said correctly. So I'd appreciate it if someone more proficient would enter such an example of an initial git push with "master" added at the end of the commandline (as is required by an initial push). Ar

Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH] Fixes to the record UI

2010-06-09 Thread Erik Blankinship
> > This comment in ui.py explains why > > #we move offscreen to resize or else we get flashes on screen, > > and setting hide() doesn't allow resize & moves > > OK. > So this patch introduces some "flashing" ? > > [It looks like my recent post regarding this matter was not slipped into this

[Sugar-devel] Heads-up: POSSE folks hacking in Fedora/Sugar this week and next

2010-06-09 Thread Mel Chua
Some of you may have noticed some new faces in #sugar - we (Walter Bender, Peter Robinson, and I) are hanging out with a group of professors (mostly from the Worcester area) who are in town this week for http://teachingopensource.org/index.php/POSSE, a workshop for learning how to get their stu

Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH] Fixes to the record UI

2010-06-09 Thread Daniel Drake
On 8 June 2010 23:25, Anish Mangal wrote: > Hi, > > I did reply to your mail earlier today, I'll paste my comments here ... > >> Still unanswered questions from my last mail: >> There was probably a reason why it moved them off screen instead of hiding >> them. >> Do you have any idea what it is?

Re: [Sugar-devel] Hypothetical sugar-0.90 material, draft 1.

2010-06-09 Thread Peter Robinson
Hi Lucian, On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 1:30 PM, Lucian Branescu wrote: > On 8 June 2010 05:54, Michael Stone wrote: >> Hi folks, >> >> Under the temporary working hypothesis that we want to make a Sugar release >> in >> a couple of months, I'd like to know more about what we might find ourselves >>

Re: [Sugar-devel] Hypothetical sugar-0.90 material, draft 1.

2010-06-09 Thread Lucian Branescu
On 8 June 2010 05:54, Michael Stone wrote: > Hi folks, > > Under the temporary working hypothesis that we want to make a Sugar release in > a couple of months, I'd like to know more about what we might find ourselves > integrating. Here's my current list of, er... mostly unvetted rumors. :) > >  

[Sugar-devel] [PATCH] Fixes to the record UI

2010-06-09 Thread Erik Blankinship
El Wed, 09-06-2010 a las 11:39 +1000, James Cameron escribió: >* > There was probably a reason why it moved them off screen instead of*>* > >hiding them. Do you have any idea what it is?*>* *>* >b480c7ed2e4848f33f11f9df27f6cb34e7c76b82 was a move of elements*>* offscreen >instead of hiding, com

Re: [Sugar-devel] Hypothetical sugar-0.90 material, draft 1.

2010-06-09 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 12:54:01AM -0400, Michael Stone wrote: > Hi folks, > > Under the temporary working hypothesis that we want to make a Sugar release in > a couple of months, I'd like to know more about what we might find ourselves > integrating. Here's my current list of, er... mostly unvett

Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH] Record - Fix for ticket #2011

2010-06-09 Thread imm
On 9 Jun 2010, at 3:28, Anish Mangal wrote: > > The bug description suggests that ctrl+w is the standard shortcut > (maybe I got it wrong!) > > Also, I tried ctrl+w with write activity and it worked. So I figured > that ctrl+w might be the standard shortcut. We stumbled into similar territory on