Oh, awesome, COPR seems to be exactly what we need.
On Tuesday, 5 November 2013, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 1:40 PM, Daniel Narvaez
dwnarv...@gmail.comjavascript:;
wrote:
Going a bit off topic, but a pretty major issue I see in our workflow
with
Fedora is that we don't
and html5, is a very grave mistake,
probably the last.
But hey, I'm just a teacher, probably the only one in this list.
2013/11/5 Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
'dwnarv...@gmail.com');
Oh, awesome, COPR seems to be exactly what we need.
On Tuesday, 5
I don't have much of a clue about Write but... can you send the activity
log?
On 4 November 2013 16:14, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 12:45 AM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello,
we are proud to announce the release of Sugar 0.100.0
That's a segmentation fault I think. It would be good if you could launch
it with sugar-launch -d and post the backtrace., possibly after having
installed debug packages.
On 4 November 2013 21:25, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 8:13 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv
, and it was not
me. Who did that?
cjl
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Broken annotation in abiword. Trying to figure out the correct one then
I'll open a bug + patch.
On 4 November 2013 22:40, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 8:30 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com
wrote:
That's a segmentation fault I think. It would
On 5 November 2013 00:07, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 10:59 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com
wrote:
Broken annotation in abiword. Trying to figure out the correct one then
I'll
open a bug + patch.
Thanks! Let me know when you've got a patch
On 5 November 2013 00:13, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
On 5 November 2013 00:07, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 10:59 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com
wrote:
Broken annotation in abiword. Trying to figure out the correct one then
I'll
:)
On 5 November 2013 00:23, Chris Leonard cjlhomeaddr...@gmail.com wrote:
I poked my abiword friends, expect the commit shortly.
cjl
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 6:13 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 5 November 2013 00:07, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon
On 4 November 2013 22:53, Sean DALY sdaly...@gmail.com wrote:
* It's not clear to me where we are going.
I'm afraid you are not the only one feeling that way. It's much easier said
than done, but we need to figure out where we are going and to communicate
it clearly inside the community.
On 4 November 2013 23:05, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
Sugar on Android or the Raspberry Pi might have an interesting
marketing effect but the result would be truly terrible as it would be
essentially unusable and have a terrible experience.
Can you elaborate on why you think
not clear to me
that any of these devices is open enough to be viable for deployments or
ordinary users.
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
?, it's just a curiosity that
can help us solve the intrigue =).
Maybe for having a reason for
var activity = require(sugar-web/activity/activity); ?
2013/11/1 Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
'dwnarv...@gmail.com');
Yeah I think it make sense to mention
find how to copy from sugar environment, so I just copied what
made sense to me)
I think I don't have Abi word thats why I can't open it. But I can't find
a way to install Abi. I can only install the old version in Ubuntu
repositories.
Thank you for helping.
--
Daniel Narvaez
with instabilities if we
upgrade now...
Are all the OLPC abiword patches upstreamed now? Does the F20 rpm include
those?
On Friday, 1 November 2013, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
Hi Daniel,
Is not possible add abiword to the sugar-build modules?
Gonzalo
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 5:34 PM, Daniel Narvaez
dwnarv
gonz...@laptop.orgjavascript:;
wrote:
Hi Daniel,
Is not possible add abiword to the sugar-build modules?
Gonzalo
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 5:34 PM, Daniel Narvaez
dwnarv...@gmail.comjavascript:;
wrote:
Yeah that's a known issue, unfortunately Fedora 19 doesn't have abiword
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org
On 1 November 2013 21:59, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote:
Use this phase of the process as an opportunity for you and your
people to practice communicating with other developers in the
community; and measure the effort in the design process, not the
achievements.
+1
In the first
On 1 November 2013 22:09, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
On 1 November 2013 21:59, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote:
Use this phase of the process as an opportunity for you and your
people to practice communicating with other developers in the
community; and measure the effort
://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
:
gi.module.DynamicModule 'DBus' from' /
usr/lib/girepository-1.0/DBus-1.0.typelib
I do not know much about DBus, but I guess sugar3 should be using this
module and not the last.
2013/11/1 Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
'dwnarv...@gmail.com');
I cannot
include it in Sugar?
Gonzalo
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel
/sucrose/glucose/sugar-toolkit-gtk3/sugar-toolkit-gtk3-0.100.0.tar.xz
Thanks to everyone that contributed with code, translations and testing!
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo
for you and if they need
to be fixed ;-)
Cheers,
Christophe
On 6 October 2013 01:59, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I recently switched to Arch Linux and I put together a couple of things
that others might find useful.
* A trivial script to build minimal images
Hello,
here is the proposed schedule for 0.102
0.101.0 - 12/01/13
0.101.1 - 01/01/14
0.101.2 - 02/01/14
0.101.3 - 03/01/14 - Feature freeze
0.101.4 - 04/01/14 - String, UI, API freeze
0.102.0 - 05/01/14 - Final release
I entered it in trac already.
http://bugs.sugarlabs.org/roadmap
Thoughts?
you would like to
have one.
Thoughts?
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
concretely which areas
need work.
Thoughts?
If there are features you are developing and you would like to get in 0.102
this is the time to let everyone know!
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http
On 29 October 2013 20:29, David Farning dfarn...@activitycentral.comwrote:
Phase two -- Let's look at lessons learned from other projects. We can
focus on the road map and product specification. From my experience,
these two piece can provide an anchor for the rest of the project:
1. The act
On 1 November 2013 02:01, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com wrote:
1 Bug fixes. In 0.100 we added several nice features but I think the
quality
of the core components is still not at a level we can be proud of. Let's
try
to fix that for 0.102.
Be nice to get a discussion going about
list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
On 1 November 2013 02:18, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com wrote:
1 Bug fixes. In 0.100 we added several nice features but I think the
quality
of the core components is still not at a level we can be proud of.
Let's
try
to fix that for 0.102.
Be nice to get a discussion
On 31 October 2013 19:31, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Sameer Verma sve...@sfsu.edu wrote:
Here's OLPC's mission, as a reminder:
Mission Statement: To create educational opportunities for the world's
poorest children by providing each
On 1 November 2013 03:22, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 9:56 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 31 October 2013 19:31, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Sameer Verma sve...@sfsu.edu wrote
include it in Sugar?
Gonzalo
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
the code to support service_name in gtk3,
and did not affected the old activities until we ported sugar to gtk3.
About the comment you suggest, do we have any convention for this case?
Gonzalo
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 12:44 PM, Daniel Narvaez
dwnarv...@gmail.comjavascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'dwnarv
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org javascript:;
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
?
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 7:53 PM, Daniel Narvaez
dwnarv...@gmail.comjavascript:;
wrote:
On 29 October 2013 01:14, David Farning
dfarn...@activitycentral.comjavascript:;
wrote:
As two Data points:
In a private conversation with an Association employee they told me
that there is no module
called sugar3. But I discovered there is a module named sugar.
sweets-sugar is running sugar 0.94.
Thank you for help.
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org
-devel
--
Walter Bender
Sugar Labs
http://www.sugarlabs.org
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
On 23 October 2013 19:51, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 1:48 PM, David Farning
dfarn...@activitycentral.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 9:26 AM, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com
wrote:
[snip]
I don't understand what you are asking. Sugar
On 29 October 2013 01:14, David Farning dfarn...@activitycentral.comwrote:
As two Data points:
In a private conversation with an Association employee they told me
that they conciser Activity Central a competitor because Activity
Central increased deployments expectations. Their strategy with
I'm on ubuntu 12.04. What should I do now? I want to build sugar from
source.
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
--
Daniel Narvaez
On 28 October 2013 19:03, Rogelio Mita rogeliom...@activitycentral.comwrote:
set in prefs.json use_broot to false
Please don't do that unless you know exactly what you are doing. It's
likely it will work only on Fedora 19.
___
Sugar-devel mailing
with the former approach and
that's why my question.
Thanks,
Code
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
--
Daniel Narvaez
On 23 October 2013 18:26, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
Two things:
1) what's the status of the next release?
We are planning to release on 31/10. We didn't land many bug fixes, but I'm
not aware of real showstoppers at the moment.
2) I've noticed there's issues when you run
On 19 October 2013 05:35, Iain Brown Douglas i...@browndouglas.plus.comwrote:
Which git version and which distribution are you using?
Sorry that was not in OP
Ubuntu 12.04.3 LTS \n \l
git version 1.7.9.5
The pull trace still shows the error you noticed.
Should be fixed now. Thanks.
On 19 October 2013 15:04, Iain Brown Douglas i...@browndouglas.plus.comwrote:
==Fail to start==
Write
F19 libabiword doesn't seem to have gobject introspection typelib, not sure
why :(
Record
Yeah, not really sure what is going on there from the trace. Someone needs
to look at the code
...@browndouglas.plus.com wrote:
On Sat, 2013-10-19 at 11:15 +0200, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
On 19 October 2013 05:35, Iain Brown Douglas
i...@browndouglas.plus.com wrote:
Which git version and which distribution are you using?
Sorry that was not in OP
Ubuntu 12.04.3
On 19 October 2013 23:28, Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org wrote:
On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 6:22 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.comwrote:
On 19 October 2013 15:04, Iain Brown Douglas
i...@browndouglas.plus.comwrote:
==Fail to start==
Write
F19 libabiword doesn't seem to have
mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
On 18 October 2013 17:22, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com wrote:
== N/W ==
Chat opens, appears to start but cannot tx #log below
Nothing bad in the log. I suppose you need to make the activity shared and
have someone join for it to work (?).
== Fail to start ==
Memorise
On 18 October 2013 17:22, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com wrote:
This is the trace when I ran
[osbuild sugar-build]$ check
Fixed.
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
On 18 October 2013 18:29, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
Tuxpaint#log below
I guess this contains binaries compiled on another distribution or
something. You would need to rebuild on F19 (or inside the sugar-build
chroot anyway).
More precisely they seem to be built
Which distribution? Did ./osbuild pull work?
On Thursday, 17 October 2013, Cristhofer Travieso wrote:
$./osbuild build
! Failed to run command build
--
*Cft*
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http
notes. Remember my
English is not very good, language bugs can happen.
I am working in a Testing page and if have time, will update the testing
images.
Comments are welcome.
Gonzalo
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel
...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
Log attached, and the .xo file..
My os: Lubuntu 13.04 amd64
Regards, Ignacio.
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
--
Daniel Narvaez
...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
This: https://github.com/dnarvaez/sugar-web-test
Ignacio Rodríguez
2013/10/16 Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com
What are you trying to do exactly? I can't quite guess from the code. You
don't need an activity.py for a web activity.
There are instructions here on how to get
./osbuild shell
SUGAR_PROFILE=test1 run
SUGAR_PROFILE=test2 run
On Sunday, 13 October 2013, Suraj K S wrote:
Hi everyone,
Is there a way to run multiple instances of the latest sugar-build?
Regards,
Suraj
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
Sugar-devel
%, overflow-y: auto, and top: 75px), but it seem that
none are used. (Canvas lays at top = 0 px and left = 0px, width is about
300px ...)
Regards
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org
Yeah the resolution option.
On Thursday, 10 October 2013, laurent bernabe wrote:
Are you talking about options from this page :
http://developer.sugarlabs.org/dev-environment.md.html ?
Regards
2013/10/10 Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
'dwnarv...@gmail.com
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
On 9 October 2013 22:51, NoiseEHC noise...@gmail.com wrote:
Now I will not give you constructive criticism as that would allow
answering that I should not tell others what to do and it would be
getting old... Instead here is some nonconstructive criticism:
I don't know if it's constructive
On 10 October 2013 00:22, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
1 Inability to do OAuth
This has been discussed for Firefox OS too and as far as I know there is
no good solution for it yet. I won't claim to understand all the security
implications, tough the basic issue seems to run
Weird. There is no tarball but the release has been tagged in git.
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libxklavier/tag/?id=libxklavier-5.4
I wonder if they just forgot to upload the tarball...
On Tuesday, 8 October 2013, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 1:17 AM, Daniel Narvaez
dwnarv
On 8 October 2013 01:45, Ruben Rodríguez ru...@activitycentral.com wrote:
Also, there are some bits of code in both Sugar and the activities
that assume to be running on Fedora, or even on an XO, and those need
cleaning.
Please fix those bits directly upstream! I have not seen any patch
On 8 October 2013 09:11, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 12:42 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello,
here is 0.99.4, thanks to everyone that contributed!
Highlights:
* Enable use of a proxy in the activities updater.
* Make
On 8 October 2013 12:13, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
here is 0.99.4, thanks to everyone that contributed!
Highlights:
* Enable use of a proxy in the activities updater.
* Make journal updates more reliable
* Artwork now licensed also under Apache
On 8 October 2013 15:18, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 12:17 AM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
I think we should certainly *not* branch until January/Australia
release. If
anyone disagrees now it's the time to speak up.
I think
On 8 October 2013 15:18, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
It depends if it's proper continuous development where it's all
small and incremental improvements with the platform being constantly
usable and features and it also depends on the end users of the
product.
I agree and I
On 8 October 2013 15:14, Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org wrote:
Continuos development do not work well with downstream/upstream projects.
Well, I think that statement would need to be justified.
We need go back to release cycles aligned with Fedora/Gnome if possible.
See, I'm not sure
On 8 October 2013 17:19, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com wrote:
We (Gonzalo and I) have some new features we'd like to land in 102.
How to proceed? Can we schedule an IRC discussion?
Maybe just start a 0.102 features email thread? The details of what you
would like to land and a rough
Hello,
we had a discussion in irc, of which Walter posted the log. The current
proposal on the table is
On 31/10
* Release 0.100
* Create a branch
* Discuss the 0.102 features
* Schedule another 6 months cycle
Other outcomes
* Australia would be using 0.101 in some schools. I think that would
On 8 October 2013 23:16, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Daniel,
I just noticed it missing from the rpm, in the old sugar it was used
at least as the icon for the desktop icon for sugar-emulator so there
should likely be a similar click and run means of running sugar-runner
On 7 October 2013 05:14, Sebastian Silva sebast...@fuentelibre.org wrote:
El 05/10/13 18:59, Daniel Narvaez escribió:
* AUR -git packages for the Sugar core and the browse activity. They
makes it pretty easy to install the very latest sugar. (I tested them on my
laptop, not on the XO yet
http://buildbot.sugarlabs.org/builders/quick/builds/265/steps/shell_2/logs/log
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
On 7 October 2013 18:59, Manuel Quiñones ma...@laptop.org wrote:
2013/10/7 Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com:
http://buildbot.sugarlabs.org/builders/quick/builds/265/steps/shell_2/logs/log
Oh, we have to change the check. Now sugar.less is imported by
sugar-*.less, so those are the ones
Hello,
I setup a buildbot instance to build the packages daily, using the XO as a
build slave for arm
http://sugarlabs.org:8011/waterfall
https://github.com/dnarvaez/archbot
You can pull them by adding this to your /etc/pacman.conf
[sugar]
SigLevel = Never
Server =
What about skipping less files whose first line is exactly
// recess: ignore
Adding a list of files to ignore in sugar-build would suck a bit.
On 7 October 2013 19:26, Manuel Quiñones ma...@laptop.org wrote:
2013/10/7 Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com:
On 7 October 2013 18:59, Manuel
On 7 October 2013 19:24, Samuel Greenfeld greenf...@laptop.org wrote:
- Updating the Sugar release in Ubuntu sounds like something everyone
could benefit from, not just Dextrose users. Is there any reason not to
base most of this work starting with upstream Sugar existing Ubuntu
On 7 October 2013 18:41, David Farning dfarn...@activitycentral.com wrote:
Would either of these list be appropriate to continue these
discussions about this downstream efforts to port sugar to Ubuntu for
use on hardware not sold by the Association?
Phase one has been a poof of concept as
more flexible. Anyway not opposed to send all modules to the whole
mailing list if there is consensus on that.
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
On 7 October 2013 23:39, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote:
I agree with Samuel; that with the loss of public review of patches
participation in development has been confined to those who take the
trouble to visit a web site.
(The reviews by mail were also stimulating other discussion on
On 8 October 2013 00:08, Manuel Quiñones ma...@laptop.org wrote:
James, Sam, I see this as a question of taste.
Exactly.
The sooner people understand that, the sooner we will stop having
discussions about the review process over and over :)
___
On 8 October 2013 00:22, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote:
On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 12:00:47AM +0200, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
Well everyone seems to be developing their own version of Sugar
seems to be more than that. But maybe I'm just reading too much into
it.
There aren't multiple
On 8 October 2013 00:43, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 4:53 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com
wrote:
It sounds like it might be an opportunity for upstream to get feedback
from
real users, which we need desperately. So I think it would be a good
01:10, Chris Leonard cjlhomeaddr...@gmail.com wrote:
If a branch is going to be declared, we will need to address it in
Pootle as well. Please advise.
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 6:56 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 8 October 2013 00:43, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com
On 8 October 2013 01:07, Samuel Greenfeld greenf...@laptop.org wrote:
This actually is kind of what I meant (and perhaps should be a separate
thread).
To simplify things I will only answer about the 0.100 release cycle. Things
have changed a lot anyway and it's probably not worth focusing on
On 6 October 2013 01:59, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I recently switched to Arch Linux and I put together a couple of things
that others might find useful.
* A trivial script to build minimal images for the XO. It builds a kernel
from the OLPC git repository and put
. They makes
it pretty easy to install the very latest sugar. (I tested them on my
laptop, not on the XO yet).
All of these are very much a work in progress. I'm posting them mostly
because they might be of interest for Arch Linux users. Patches and bug
reports both appreciated!
--
Daniel Narvaez
-artwork-0.99.2.tar.xz
http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/glucose/sugar-datastore/sugar-datastore-0.99.2.tar.xz
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
?
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
On 3 October 2013 17:55, Chris Leonard cjlhomeaddr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com
wrote:
It sounds like it might be an opportunity for upstream to get feedback
from
real users, which we need desperately. So I think it would be a good
On 4 October 2013 00:06, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote:
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 10:47:08AM -0300, Manuel Quiñones wrote:
For the record, this is the chat we had today in #sugar dnarvaez, tch
and me:
manuq dnarvaez, I'm thinking about the release..
dnarvaez_ heh me too a bit...
support-g...@lists.laptop.org javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
'support-g...@lists.laptop.org');
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/support-gang
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo
..
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http
interested in writing a sugar web version, using
KinectJs for example.
Regards
2013/9/25 Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com
Personally I wouldn't use gtk to write a game. As far as I know, a 2d
drawing API (cairo) is pretty much all you are going to get from it.
I would either keep using
On 25 September 2013 18:53, laurent bernabe laurent.bern...@gmail.comwrote:
I thought about translating my application into a Sugar Web applications,
but :
- I don't know well sugar web library (sorry, I went to the developper
page, looking at sources :
On 25 September 2013 19:13, laurent bernabe laurent.bern...@gmail.comwrote:
Ok. First I try to finish the SugarGame version (and as it is a very basic
application, it must not be hard) : then after having intertionalized,
integrated with the toolbar ...
Maybe I will try to write it in HTML5
501 - 600 of 1729 matches
Mail list logo
