or IRC. I'm happy to mentor, as I'm sure several other
developers.
We have a *lot* to fix to make 0.100 a release we can be proud of, please
help out with it!
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http
Accidentally sent... sorry. To see the list go on
http://bugs.sugarlabs.organd click the Sugar 0.100 must fix link.
On 4 August 2013 22:12, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
we now have a list of bugs that must be fixed for the 0.100 release. There
are only four of them
On 3 August 2013 02:26, Manuel Quiñones ma...@laptop.org wrote:
The problem is: how could the activity process wait for the datastore
write to finish? If the WnckWindow close is called [1], the activity
process ends. Unless you connect a callback to 'delete-event' [2] and
handle the
On 1 August 2013 18:37, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
* Status. Set to accepted after the bug has been triaged. This will allow
us to query for bugs that needs to be triaged (status == new).
Slight correction on this. Set to new after bug has been triaged (default
is unconfirmed
Great. Simon if you have time a review would be really helpful :)
On 31 July 2013 22:14, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
On 31 Jul 2013 18:52, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
this is the first feature frozen release. We landed all the features
that we
release based on 0.100 (OLPC?), unlike me they are probably able
to allocate resources .
Thoughts?
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
On 1 August 2013 23:11, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe this is a good chance to upgrade to latest master? (see my previous
email chroot branch landed).
Otherwise I would try
rm -rf sugar-runner
./osbuild pull sugar-runner
./osbuild build sugar-runner
Maybe you don't
/sucrose/glucose/sugar-datastore/sugar-datastore-0.99.1.tar.xz
http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/glucose/sugar-toolkit-gtk3/sugar-toolkit-gtk3-0.99.1.tar.xz
http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/glucose/sugar-runner/sugar-runner-0.99.3.tar.xz
--
Daniel Narvaez
to fix it up.
* You need to ./osbuild pull before doing the first build. This used to
be automatically triggered by ./osbuild build.
* If you need to look at the logs, do it inside an osbuild shell using the
less command. This is something I plan to improve, but until I get to it...
--
Daniel
we probably need to
build a mock datastore for this test to run properly.
-walter
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 4:34 AM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com
wrote:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File views/journal_detailstoolbox.py, line 39, in module
toolbox = DetailToolbox
at 5:04 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.comwrote:
Weird. Master or chroot branch? It would be good to post the full trace.
On Monday, 29 July 2013, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
In my system, running osbuild check get:
ImportError: No module named modemconfiguration.model
in all
On 30 July 2013 03:54, Manuel Quiñones ma...@laptop.org wrote:
2013/7/28 Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com:
Hello,
the feature freeze is due on July 31. I think all the features we
originally
planned landed already, thanks and congratulations to everyone involved.
Work on web
strace and post the output. That should
tell us where it's failing exactly.
On 30 July 2013 11:08, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
I cannot reproduce on master either. Does
build/out/install/share/sugar/extensions/cpsection/modemconfiguration/model.py
exist?
On 29 July 2013 22:21
(Should be run inside an osbuild shell)
On 30 July 2013 12:25, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
I've seen from irc that you have the file... Please try to run a script
like this (edit the path)
import sys
sys.path.append(/home/broot/sugar-build/build/out/install/share/sugar
So weird, I wonder if your src/jarabe/config.py has the right ext_path?
On Tuesday, 30 July 2013, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
That run without problems, but the check gives me the same error, even
running in the osbuild shell.
Gonzalo
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 7:25 AM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv
palettes, but
the data is less likely to change.
Opinions?
--
.. manuq ..
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
--
Daniel Narvaez
this?
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http
on how to change locale for test runner in
buildbolt? I was looking where to patch but I didn't find the correct
place. I guess is sugar-build but I admit I'm completely lost.
Sorry about not asking for help before.
On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 4:21 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.comwrote
Traceback (most recent call last):
File views/journal_detailstoolbox.py, line 39, in module
toolbox = DetailToolbox()
TypeError: __init__() takes exactly 2 arguments (1 given)
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel
On 25 July 2013 17:15, James Simmons nices...@gmail.com wrote:
I finally got sugar-build working on Fedora 19 last night. I plan to
update Make Your Own Sugar Activities! to discuss this. Some stuff I
plan to include:
Awesome!
How to install gcc and python development, which are
On 29 July 2013 11:48, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
Running multiple copies of sugar-build as different users to test
collaboration with just one PC.
I suppose that's why you are playing with the profile pref. I tested it
now and it seems broken, will fix.
I figured out
):
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi Miguel,
I think I misunderstood your analysis of the issue. sugar-build sets LANG
to C and I think that's something that should be supported... So I think we
should go with 2 in your list of alternatives
at 12:33 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.comwrote:
Landed your pull request. Now it fails in gconf but I think that's a
sugar-build issue, I will take a look at that.
Thanks.
On 29 July 2013 10:44, Miguel González
migonzal...@activitycentral.comwrote:
Here is my patch: it checks
Hello,
I'm planning to land the chroot branch by the end of the week. If you are
on master, to avoid being automatically upgraded to it, please pull the
latest sugar-build now. You can just
./osbuild pull
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
Sugar-devel mailing
, building, pulling and all.
Gonzalo
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 9:44 AM, Miguel González
migonzal...@activitycentral.com javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
'migonzal...@activitycentral.com'); wrote:
Good news! Thank you very much!
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.comwrote
Miguel,
can you please send a patch for this as soon as possible? The build has
been broken for a few days now...
On 24 July 2013 08:59, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
Being shell code I think it's fine to assume the locale has been set. So
I'd go for 1.
On Wednesday, 24 July
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo
up on
this but comments would be welcome. I would especially like to know how
Manuel and Suraj feels about it).
There is a pull request by Gonzalo, implementing a small feature, which
needs to land as soon as possible to make the freeze.
https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar/pull/67
--
Daniel
Unless someone knows what is going on, it would be good to log info
about the mount, like the path and the icon... That should help
understanding the issue.
On Sunday, 28 July 2013, Suraj K S wrote:
Nope.
I never added any external device.
On 28 July 2013 20:05, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv
more verbose and nested. Thoughts? Any other options?
--
.. manuq ..
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
--
Daniel Narvaez
On 26 July 2013 17:15, Manuel Quiñones ma...@laptop.org wrote:
Andrew pointed me to the Android ActionBar:
- http://developer.android.com/guide/topics/ui/actionbar.html
- http://developer.android.com/design/patterns/actionbar.html
It is pretty standard on Android apps, and gives consistency
On 26 July 2013 23:00, James Simmons nices...@gmail.com wrote:
I probably will not do much updating to MYOSA on sugar-build until the
chroot branch has been merged, then. As long as Xephyr is still in there
the instructions I have should be tolerable. I might put in something
about the need
) Both?
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 11:56 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.comwrote:
Still failing. Could that error be due to non functional gconf?
http://buildbot.sugarlabs.org/builders/quick/builds/46/steps/shell_2/logs/log
I see a gconf error earlier in the log. I haven't yet looked
We need to add python-mock to build/root.json, sugar group (chroot branch).
My fault for forgetting about it when approving the pull request, but I
can't fix it myself for a few days.
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel
-telepathy,
python-dateutil,
+python-mock,
gtksourceview3,
dconf,
gsettings-desktop-schemas,
--
1.8.1.6
https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar-build/pull/21
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 8:45 AM, Daniel Narvaez
dwnarv
,
telepathy-gabble,
+mobile-broadband-provider-info,
gnome-themes-standard,
xorg-x11-drv-evdev,
xorg-x11-drv-modesetting,
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 12:53 PM, Daniel Narvaez
dwnarv...@gmail.comjavascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'dwnarv...@gmail.com
-devel', u'libXtst-devel', u'yasm']'
returned non-zero exit status 1
It looks like a problem with yum as it does the same damned thing when I
try running yum from the command line after doing su. On the other hand
the graphical package manager works just fine.
James Simmons
--
Daniel
Narvaez
dwnarv...@gmail.comjavascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'dwnarv...@gmail.com');
wrote:
On Friday, 19 July 2013, Manuel Quiñones wrote:
2013/7/19 Martin Abente martin.abente.lah...@gmail.com:
Same problem here: f18, without chroot.
Reading previous emails from Daniel Narvaez, only F19
,
Kalpa Welivitigoda
Junior Treasurer | Electrical Engineering Society
Undergraduate | Department of Electrical Engineering
University of Moratuwa
Sri Lanka
http://about.me/callkalpa
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel
/callkalpa
--
Daniel Narvaez
--
Best Regards,
Kalpa Welivitigoda
Junior Treasurer | Electrical Engineering Society
Undergraduate | Department of Electrical Engineering
University of Moratuwa
Sri Lanka
http://about.me/callkalpa
--
Daniel Narvaez
virtually any distribution. If you run into
issues with your distribution please report them on the list. (There are
known issues on Suse which I will be fixing).
- With use_chroot == false (don't use that pref unless you know what you
are doing) it supports only Fedora 19.
--
Daniel Narvaez
Thanks!
On Monday, 22 July 2013, Kalpa Welivitigoda wrote:
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Daniel Narvaez
dwnarv...@gmail.comjavascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'dwnarv...@gmail.com');
wrote:
Cool. The real fix is to add a tag property to sugar-runner in
build/modules.json, to point
On Monday, 22 July 2013, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
there seem to be a bit of confusion on what distributions are supported
in sugar-build. Let me try to clear it up.
- The master branch supports the same
On Friday, 19 July 2013, Manuel Quiñones wrote:
2013/7/19 Martin Abente martin.abente.lah...@gmail.com javascript:;:
Same problem here: f18, without chroot.
Reading previous emails from Daniel Narvaez, only F19 is warrantied to
work without chroot. That is, the distro used in the chroot
/sandbox and see if the right code is pulled...
On Thursday, 18 July 2013, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Daniel Narvaez
dwnarv...@gmail.comjavascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'dwnarv...@gmail.com');
wrote:
It seems like you are running a mix of master and chroot branch code. Did
)
File
/home/gonzalo/sugar-build/build/out/sandbox/install/lib/python2.7/site-packages/osbuild/command.py,
line 39, in run
raise subprocess.CalledProcessError(result, args)
subprocess.CalledProcessError: Command '['sugar-runner']' returned
non-zero exit status 1
--
Daniel Narvaez
the best solution is make a clean start, and clone all again,
but should be good if we can decide do it a Friday at night or in the
weekend,
and not lost hours of work.
Thanks,
Gonzalo
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel
, in module
NameError: name 'gnome_version' is not defined
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
I'm probably going to delay landing this for a week or two. I'm traveling
so I wouldn't be around much to deal with the issues that will likely be
discovered. Though please keep testing!
On Wednesday, 10 July 2013, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
Hello,
I'm planning to merge the chroot branch on master
and watch the fun.
Eg: if the bundleid is *org.sugarlabs.MemorizeActivity*
change it to *org.sugarlabs.Memorize Activity*
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
/python2.7/site-packages/osbuild/git.py,
line 29, in wrapped
os.chdir(args[0].local)
OSError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory:
'/home/fedora/sugar-build/at-spi2-core'
[osbuild sugar-build]$
** **
--
Daniel Narvaez
Should be fixed now. Can you give it another try?
On 14 July 2013 03:05, S. Daniel Francis fran...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
2013/7/13 Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com:
I pushed that change. Can you retry and see if it works better?
Both when pulling the current repository and cloning
://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Some kind of problem with urlgrabber, seeing the same on debian in
buildbot. We should probably just use urllib, I will let you know when it's
fixed. Thanks!
On Sunday, 14 July 2013, S. Daniel Francis wrote:
2013/7/13 Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com javascript:;:
I pushed that change. Can
Hi Daniel,
thanks for testing! Which version of open suse are you using?
On 13 July 2013 07:35, Daniel Francis fran...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
On Friday, July 12, 2013 12:22:43 PM Daniel Narvaez wrote:
This feels ready to land now. I'll leave it there in bug fixing only mode
for another few
(2) Somewhere along the line, my activity does not launch/close
properly: a gray circle on the frame (always a bad sign) along with my
ever-flashing activity icon. Empty activity log file.
Lots of this in shell.log
1373753530.754283 DEBUG gwebsockets: Got data, length 52
1373753530.754836
On 14 July 2013 01:02, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
(2) Somewhere along the line, my activity does not launch/close
properly: a gray circle on the frame (always a bad sign) along with my
ever-flashing activity icon. Empty activity log file.
Lots of this in shell.log
On 14 July 2013 01:19, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
On 14 July 2013 01:02, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
(2) Somewhere along the line, my activity does not launch/close
properly: a gray circle on the frame (always a bad sign) along with my
ever-flashing activity
becomes
just python, tar and xz.
I pushed that change. Can you retry and see if it works better?
On 13 July 2013 10:05, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Daniel,
thanks for testing! Which version of open suse are you using?
On 13 July 2013 07:35, Daniel Francis fran...@sugarlabs.org
This feels ready to land now. I'll leave it there in bug fixing only mode
for another few days. Please switch to the chroot branch as soon as you
can, when we land you will just need to switch to master, but that won't
trigger a rebuild or anything.
___
[1]: *** [check-recursive] Error 1
INFO:root:make: *** [distcheck] Error 1
INFO:root:make[1]: Leaving directory
`/home/broot/sugar-build/sugar/sugar-0.99.0/_build'
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http
Please push. I think for obvious build fixes like this review isn't quite
required btw. Thanks.
On Thursday, 11 July 2013, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
Simple two lines patch attached
Gonzalo
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 5:00 AM, Daniel Narvaez
dwnarv...@gmail.comjavascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'dwnarv
This is now implemented
[dnarvaez@dnarvaez sugar-build]$ cat prefs.json
{use_broot: false}
On 10 July 2013 15:55, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Daniel,
yup, I'm planning to keep a non chrooted build that you can enable in
prejs.json. Automatic dependencies installation
See the prefs.json I pasted, just add that property to your (or create one
like that if you don't have a prefs.json).
On Thursday, 11 July 2013, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
Sorry, what is the procedure to enable/disable the use of chroot?
Gonzalo
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 11:26 AM, Daniel Narvaez
(perhaps without throwing away the master build until they have a working
chroot build) and to report any issue they run into.
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
testing).
I'll try to get this in before merging.
On 10 July 2013 15:49, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote:
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 6:10 AM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'm planning to merge the chroot branch on master. Though, since it's a
major change, I'm trying to avoid
On 10 July 2013 13:16, Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org wrote:
Daniel,
I am worried about two points:
* How this change impact regarding to disk space/bandwidth usage?
At the moment we are downloading 264 MB to create the chroot (installing
the deps on a default Fedora installation with
On 10 July 2013 16:17, Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org wrote:
IMHO, are two important downsides.
I don't think the first is a downside at all in general. Maybe for people
using F19 only, but if they are really worried about downloading 150 MB
more, they will be able to disable the chroot
./osbuild pull
On 10 July 2013 13:15, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com wrote:
Just did a fresh build on F19. Seems to work. Although there is some
strange behavior with webkit I am investigating.
-walter
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 8:10 AM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello
-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Buildbot is now up and running on the branch. Check is currently failing
because of github issues, but I expect it to be green once that's over.
On 10 July 2013 13:10, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I'm planning to merge the chroot branch on master. Though, since it's
.
I'm very happy with how this is shaping up, so I'm going to experiment in a
chroot branch with turning it on everywhere, it should simplify sugar-build
and the build infrastructure a lot.
On 7 July 2013 00:37, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I added support for creating
On 6 July 2013 21:27, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 9:55 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com
wrote:
Here it is
https://pypi.python.org/packages/source/g/gwebsockets/gwebsockets-0.2.tar.gz
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5581109
for the favorite objects using the same renderer.
Comments are welcome,
Gonzalo
[1] https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar/pull/48
[2] https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar-toolkit-gtk3/pull/17
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel
On 5 July 2013 15:00, Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org wrote:
Sorry, I missed this.
Certainly, we can develop activities using the rpms in F18.
Is more difficult if we want to fix some issue in sugar and you probably
will lost a few
users/testers, making more difficult found issues before
. jarabe.main imports apisocket
which imports gwebsockets.
gwebsockets is a new library developed by us (right?)
What are the plans for tarballs, packaging, etc for gwebsockets?
Thanks
Daniel
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel
Here it is
https://pypi.python.org/packages/source/g/gwebsockets/gwebsockets-0.2.tar.gz
On 5 July 2013 21:01, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
I will do a release asap.
On Friday, 5 July 2013, Peter Robinson wrote:
I'm happy to package it if someone can do tar files
Peter
Activity Central: http://www.activitycentral.com
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
Sugar-devel mailing
at 11:07 AM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
did we check what is parsing serviceproviders.xml in GNOME? It doesn't
seem to be ModemManager so maybe it's not something we can reuse but I'd
rather make sure before going with our own parser.
AFAIK, the Service Provider Database
So, what I need if we want to keep Fedora 18 support is a volunteer to
* Maintain the Fedora 18 specific bits of the sugar-build configuration.
* Maintain the Fedora 18 buildbot instance.
* Answer bug reports about sugar-build on Fedora 18.
If anyone is interested please let me know!
On 4 July 2013 19:11, Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org wrote:
Question:
Is possible do a branch 'F18' or similar, before doing more changes,
then who need work on this distro, like the people maintaining the actual
images
in the xos, can use that branch?
The main issue is that changes in
.
If you are tired of building webkit go ahead and upgrade now :)
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
-plugins-espeak'...
Retrying (attempt 1) in 1 minute
Thanks,
Andrew
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
this decisions with the community.
Gonzalo
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 3:22 PM, Daniel Narvaez
dwnarv...@gmail.comjavascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'dwnarv...@gmail.com');
wrote:
Hello,
we have been supporting Fedora 19 for a while but it was only really
released today.
That's only version we are now
Something else you can try is git pull. Basically your config is stuck to
an old version, I'm not sure exactly why. I made improvements in that area
lately but you won't get them until this is unstuck :)
On Tuesday, 2 July 2013, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
Try to run just ./osbuild first then pull
On 2 July 2013 21:01, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 7:53 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com
wrote:
It's not a change. Since I announced it, the policy with sugar-build has
been to support only the latest version of a distro.
If you want to change
On 1 July 2013 05:52, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
On 06/30/13 23:33, Samuel Greenfeld wrote:
The +n (no external messages from users not on the channel) is an
anti-spam measure and a default for all newly-created Freenode channels.
So you might not want to remove it, even
Enabled it with join/part for now, let's see if it's too annoying.
On 1 July 2013 12:17, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
On 1 July 2013 05:52, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
On 06/30/13 23:33, Samuel Greenfeld wrote:
The +n (no external messages from users
The channelname being sugar of course.
On Sunday, 30 June 2013, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
Hey,
could someone with chanserv access give this command
/msg chanserv set #channelname mlock -n
Or well, give me access and I can do it.
This is for github commits notification witout the bot joining
Hi Peter,
I'm trying to cleanup a bit bugs.sugarlabs.org and I'm wondering about the
Soas component there. Are you still using it or bugs should go to the
Fedora bugzilla these days?
There are only 28 tickets but several on them are on old milestones which
I'm trying to get rid of.
--
Daniel
Hey,
this is just to point out that the ./osbuild clean command now deletes
*everything* in the tree. So no point in doing a clean clone if you are
running into issues, you will just download more stuff than necessary.
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
Sugar
miss
required updates.
The upgrade logic is really complicated and hard to test in all the
conditions so if you notice anything weird please report the issue and I
will try to fix it asap.
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel
Done, which allowed me to drop several ancient milestones. Do you need an
Avacodo milestone/version?
On Sunday, 30 June 2013, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 1:08 PM, Daniel Narvaez
dwnarv...@gmail.comjavascript:;
wrote:
Hi Peter,
I'm trying to cleanup a bit
Added Avacodo (v9)
On Monday, 1 July 2013, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 11:45 PM, Daniel Narvaez
dwnarv...@gmail.comjavascript:;
wrote:
Done, which allowed me to drop several ancient milestones. Do you need an
Avacodo milestone/version?
That would be fab, thanks
the cleaner but now that would break API :/
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
On 28 June 2013 23:39, Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org wrote:
If obscure, probably had sense to who fill it,
and maintainer at the time.
Should be better ask for more information and status in the same ticket.
I was closing tickets with old milestones in the last weeks.
My criteria was:
Could you add me to sugartrac? I'll give it a try on -devel and see if
there are blockers.
On 29 June 2013 13:36, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
On 06/28/2013 06:57 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
Hello,
we seem to have a pretty old trac version. I'm trying to improve sugar
core
Actually maybe on -testing, -devel seems for trunk.
On 29 June 2013 14:12, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
Could you add me to sugartrac? I'll give it a try on -devel and see if
there are blockers.
On 29 June 2013 13:36, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
On 06/28/2013
Tried the update locally and it seems pretty painless. There are broken
permissions in the eggs and attachments directories though, the group
cannot write on some of the files. Can you either fix those up or give me
root?
On 29 June 2013 14:13, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote
701 - 800 of 1729 matches
Mail list logo
