Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] [Announcement] Sugarizer v1.8 - 10th Anniversary edition - is available for your device

Congratulations !! On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 4:11 PM Lionel Laské wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm proud to announce version 1.8 of Sugarizer (https://sugarizer.org), > the leading learning platform for children. It's the 10th Anniversary > edition: happy birthday Sugarizer! > > New in this version: > >

Re: [Sugar-devel] Proposal for Flatpak port project

Hi ! Thanks for sharing your proposal, I have read through it. My recommendation is that you reconsider the activities you selected. Especially those that require ports to Python 3 and GTK 3. The reason is simple; porting these activities to Python 3 and GTK 3 is a whole project in itself. Note

[Sugar-devel] Updating www-sugarlabs

Hello everyone, Can someone update sl.o ? I changed it months ago [1] to show our Flatpak apps, but it seems these changes are not deployed yet.  Refs: 1. https://github.com/sugarlabs/www-sugarlabs/commit/88bc4f1da48cd0eba2cc4072fdfc410629bdcc28 ___

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Tom Gilliard

Very sad news. Just a few months ago, Tom was helping (and encouraging) me with some projects I was working on. We were very lucky to have him in our community, and he will be greatly missed. On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 4:48 PM Walter Bender wrote: > I am saddened by the news that Tom Gilliard

Re: [Sugar-devel] happy birthday Sugar Labs

:D On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 8:37 AM Walter Bender wrote: > :) > > -- > Walter Bender > Sugar Labs > http://www.sugarlabs.org > > ___ > Sugar-devel mailing list > Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org >

Re: [Sugar-devel] About Flatpak porting

If you goal is to make Activities run as Flatpak (independently of Sugar services) then you must do the port. The port complexity varies depending on how many of these services are used (and how big the dependency is). Best case scenario the port is just a 1 liner, worst case, it requires other

Re: [Sugar-devel] Project: graphic design for resolution independence

On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 8:50 PM James Cameron wrote: > Many older activities were designed for the 4:3 aspect ratio 1200x900 > pixel display of the original OLPC XO laptop, which had a button to rotate > the screen by 90°. > > Now Sugar is being used on other laptops and computers with an aspect

Re: [Sugar-devel] Malicious code in dateutil

*"The first is "python3-dateutil," which imitated the popular "dateutil" library. The second is "jeIlyfish" (the first L is an I), which mimicked the "jellyfish" library."* If you read that carefully, it says these 2 libraries imitated the real libraries. It does not say that the original

Re: [Sugar-devel] Mentors needed

I just reviewed the port task with the longest wait time. On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 6:48 PM James Cameron wrote: > Please help now. > > While I'm at linux.conf.au there is unmet need for mentors to respond to > students on the Sugar tasks. > > Please check the task list for new tasks you are not

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Oversight Board Elections 2019-21 has begun!

Seems to work fine :) In case someone has an unmanageable inbox like myself, just search for "sugar labs election" and you should find it. On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 7:24 PM Chihurumnaya Ibiam < ibiamchihurumn...@gmail.com> wrote: > Agreed, I didn't make the suggestion earlier as I'm part of the

Re: [Sugar-devel] why cannot most of sugar apps be packaged as flatpacks?

Hello Thomas, I am actually working on packaging sugar apps with flatpak, and publushing them in Flathub. See https://blogs.gnome.org/tchx84/2019/11/22/linux-app-summit-2019-and-sugar-learning-tools/ The work goes beyond just packaging, but also doing some porting so the experience is properly

Re: [Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] Sugar Live Build 20191002 with Sugar 0.116 and Python 3

Pretty amazing James! On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 3:34 AM James Cameron wrote: > Announcing Sugar Live Build with Sugar 0.116 and the Fructose activity > set, ported to Python 3. It can be used for testing Sugar quickly and > easily. > > 1. boot from hard drive, flash drive, and optical media, >

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar Labs 2017-2019 Oversight Board Election Results

If it helps, the subject of the email I got was "Poll: Sugar Labs 2017 Oversight Board Election" and I got it from "c...@cs.cornell.edu". On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 11:53 AM, Devin Ulibarri wrote: > Samson Goddy: > > c...@cs.cornell.edu and samsongo...@gmail.com. but it is

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Sugarlabs-vote] [Important / Importante] Plazo para votar termina mañana! / Deadline to vote ends tomorrow!

Good reminder! 2017-10-14 12:37 GMT-03:00 Laura Vargas : > [English] [Español más abajo] > > > Greetings, Sugar Labs members! > > This is a reminder that the deadline for voting on the 2017-2019 > <2017%202019> Oversight Board ends tomorrow *October 15, 2017*. > > If you

Re: [Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] Sugar-Artwork 0.111-libre unstable

On Sat, Sep 16, 2017 at 8:52 AM, Sebastian Silva wrote: > > On 16/09/17 03:31, Chihurumnaya Ibiam wrote: > > Sebastian, do you mind me saying/assuming that you're bringing this up > because James released 0.111 and you think it has something to do with > OLPC?. > >

Re: [Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] Sugar-Artwork 0.111-libre unstable

Another unilateral action from Sebastian, and a unprecedented new low. This "release" cannot be taken seriously. On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 1:23 PM, Christian Stroetmann < stroetm...@ontolab.com> wrote: > Hello Walter > > I did not knew the history, so please dump my related points 1, 2, 3, and >

Re: [Sugar-devel] logo dicussion

On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 10:27 AM, Laura Vargas wrote: > > 2017-09-14 8:52 GMT-05:00 Samuel Cantero : > >> >> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 8:32 AM Laura Vargas >> wrote: >> >>> 2017-09-14 7:23 GMT-05:00 Walter Bender

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SLOBS] [SLOB] xo-computer icon

On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 7:40 AM, Laura Vargas wrote: > Walter, > > Nobody needs to be a lawyer to understand this. > > *We (sugar labs users) simply didn't have permission to do use therefore > it was removed.* > > > Any one else interested in Sugar UI in the Community is

Re: [Sugar-devel] logo dicussion

On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 6:59 AM, Laura Vargas wrote: > > > 2017-09-14 5:40 GMT-05:00 Gonzalo Odiard : > >> Samuel, >> You are right (Laura Vargas is Sebastian Silva wife). >> > > You guys have to get over the fact that we are a married couple. We are 2 >

Re: [Sugar-devel] logo dicussion

, 2017 at 9:22 PM, Martin Abente < martin.abente.lah...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 5:02 PM, Sean DALY <sdaly...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> In the past, OLPC was amenable to the use of the xo logo in Sugar, but >> asked we not use it in marketing ma

Re: [Sugar-devel] logo dicussion

On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 5:02 PM, Sean DALY wrote: > In the past, OLPC was amenable to the use of the xo logo in Sugar, but > asked we not use it in marketing materials without a formal co-branding > licensing agreement. [1,2] > > The proposed feet logo is likely a violation

Re: [Sugar-devel] logo dicussion

Regardless of the separate trademark discussion, I still don't understand why someone just decided to change the logo and merged it even though several people asked him not to (without proper discussion, and not even knowing if its really necessary). On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 2:33 PM, Walter Bender

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Sugar Digest 2017-09-12

On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 12:59 PM, Walter Bender wrote: > It has been a long time since I last wrote a Sugar Labs community new > blog. I got tied up with my day jobs: starting a new design college from > scratch and launching a new research center at MIT. (And, frankly,

Re: [Sugar-devel] Felicitaciones a Ezequiel !!

wow!! On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 4:49 PM, James Cameron wrote: > Indeed, well done Ezequiel. > > -- > James Cameron > http://quozl.netrek.org/ > ___ > Sugar-devel mailing list > Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org >

[Sugar-devel] ASLO not working?

Hey guys, Is there something wrong with ASLO? The website is up but no activities are displayed. Thanks, tch. ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] (no subject)

Just ask what you need ! :) On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 10:24 AM, samson goddy wrote: > what type of help do you need? > > -- > From: rnezferrei...@gmail.com > Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2016 10:23:09 -0400 > To: sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org > Subject:

Re: [Sugar-devel] Help us translating sugar

uages. > Best regards, > Tymon > > pon., 1.02.2016 o 03:10 użytkownik Martin Abente < > martin.abente.lah...@gmail.com> napisał: > >> Hello everyone, >> >> I spent this weekend making sure that our translation platform [1] was >> running fine and

Re: [Sugar-devel] Help us translating sugar

Many thanks to those who contacted me offering for help, just a couple recommendations: 1. Create your account in our platform [1]. 2. Contact me to provide the name of your user and the languages are you willing to translate. 3. Please use our platform to do the actual translation. The .po files

[Sugar-devel] Help us translating sugar

Hello everyone, I spent this weekend making sure that our translation platform [1] was running fine and I updated the templates for sugar and sugar-toolkit-gtk3 projects. Compared to the last release, there are *only 97 new words *to be translated in sugar [2]. I also completed the Spanish

Re: [Sugar-devel] Stable release deadline, translations and exceptional bug fixes

February 13, will be. On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 10:55 AM, Martin Abente < martin.abente.lah...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello everyone, > > According to our roadmap [1] we are supposed to release our stable version > on February 1st, which is basically in a week. > > Even though

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Announcing] UNSTABLE 0.107.2 release (API, UI and Strings freeze)

sor is moved. This, of course, requires one more > step in 'onboarding' to make users aware of the disabling nature of modal > dialogs. > > Tony > > > On 01/23/2016 05:27 PM, Martin Abente wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > I am pleased to announce the release of Sugar 0.107.2 (unst

[Sugar-devel] Stable release deadline, translations and exceptional bug fixes

Hello everyone, According to our roadmap [1] we are supposed to release our stable version on February 1st, which is basically in a week. Even though we are not far in terms of what we wanted to achieve for this release, I honestly think we are not quite ready yet. The main reasons are: - We

[Sugar-devel] [Announcing] UNSTABLE 0.107.2 release (API, UI and Strings freeze)

Hello everyone, I am pleased to announce the release of Sugar 0.107.2 (unstable). This release means that we have reached the API, UI and Strings freeze deadline [1] and that we should focus on making sure there are no missing translations or exceptional bugs left. This release comes with the

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Default Collaboration Server

It should be fine for 0.108, also, I think OLPC images had been doing the same think for ages now. On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 12:46 PM, Walter Bender wrote: > +1 The privacy argument is a strong one. > > -walter > > On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 5:14 AM, Sam P.

[Sugar-devel] Delaying the 107.2 release for a week

Hello everyone, We had planned to do our next 107.2 release today [1], but we are still behind with some code reviews. Therefore, I think it would be good to delay this release for a week, so we can catch up. The 107.2 release is going to happen on 01/23. Regards, Martin. Refs: [1]

Re: [Sugar-devel] Current status of collaboration work

n, Dec 28, 2015 at 02:37:20PM -0300, Martin Abente wrote: > > @Sam: > > > > • Using GSettings is definitely a decent workaround instead of going > for > > detection, I checked your PR and I will send some comments, but we > will > > have to push it for as a

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Announcing] UNSTABLE 0.107.1 release (feature freeze)

@peter: the plan is to disable tubes channel by default so collaboration does not break in newer systems (with newer telepathy-gabble), but allow older systems to re-enable it if they still use older telepathy-gabble. Also, we plan to include this for the next release of 0.107 so we can test it

[Sugar-devel] [Announcing] UNSTABLE 0.107.1 release (feature freeze)

Hello everyone, Moving forward with our current development cycle, I am pleased to announce the release of Sugar 0.107.1 (unstable). This release means that we have officially passed the time [1] for including new features and that we must start focusing on stability and bug fixing. This release

Re: [Sugar-devel] Current status of collaboration work

*@Sam:* - Using GSettings is definitely a decent workaround instead of going for detection, I checked your PR and I will send some comments, but we will have to push it for as a feature freeze exception / Bug Fix. - I don't agree we should add it to the toolkit yet, still too early to

[Sugar-devel] Current status of collaboration work

Hello everyone, I have been reviewing the current state of the collaboration proposals and I am afraid it is still too early for merging it. We need to explore more use cases, and this will only happens when we start porting more Activities that actually use TUBES. Therefore, i want to share some

[Sugar-devel] Feature Freeze deadline around the corner

Hello everyone, We are a week away from the Feature Freeze deadline [1] and we still got a couple PRs queued [2,3]. I haven't been able to catch up with _all_ the recent PRs, so if there anything you want me to prioritize please let me know. I would prefer to look at the collaboration bits but,

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar Activities not working on Ubuntu

https://codein.withgoogle.com/dashboard/tasks/4659526686998528/ On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 1:51 PM, Martin Abente < martin.abente.lah...@gmail.com> wrote: > will do! > > On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 7:45 PM, Walter Bender <walter.ben...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Sounds l

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar Activities not working on Ubuntu

will do! On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 7:45 PM, Walter Bender wrote: > Sounds like a job for GCI :) Martin: Can you write something up? > > On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 5:42 PM, James Cameron wrote: > >> Agreed. >> >> Saw similar on Ubuntu 15.10 last week; this

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar Activities not working on Ubuntu

Hey Samson, Are you using this [1]? Can you send the logs? Check in ~/.sugar/default/logs/ Regards, Martin. Refs: 1. https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Ubuntu On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 12:14 PM, samson goddy wrote: > Hello guys, > > Most of the activities in sugar running

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build on F23

r fix that? >> >> Thanks, >> Sam >> >> On Tue, Dec 8, 2015, 2:24 AM Walter Bender <walter.ben...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Yes. I didn't disable broot. I'll test again and try to get you a log >>> file. >>> >>>

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build on F23

Hi Walter, Are you using broot (default)? I only tested with broot disabled and I didn't get that error... Can you paste the log here to see what exactly is asking for that file? Regards, Martin. On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 12:30 AM, Walter Bender wrote: > FYI, I finally

Re: [Sugar-devel] congrats James & All for imminent Release 13.2.6!

OLPC Release 13.2.6 has technically been released today according to > http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Releases, in anticipation of James Cameron's > formal announcement in coming days, can Gonzalo and Martin Abente provide a > bit of supportive context around the stability of "unstable" 0.1

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Announcing] UNSTABLE 0.107.0 release

GREAT! On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 7:39 PM, James Cameron wrote: > Available now are packages for testing of Sugar 0.107.0 > > http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/0.108/Testing > > These are 0.107.0 plus some cherry-picked patches; > > - in About my Computer show serial number for

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar osbuild problem

Please send a PR :) On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 8:00 AM, Samuel Cantero wrote: > Hello guys, > > I was trying to setup the development environment but there was a problem > with the command "./osbuild pull". It can not find the >

[Sugar-devel] [Announcing] UNSTABLE 0.107.0 release

Hello everyone, As an official kick-off for the 0.108 development cycle [1], we have released a new *UNSTABLE* version of Sugar. This first 0.107.x release includes a fair amount of changes and fixes, so *please* help us testing it! Tarballs:

Re: [Sugar-devel] Fwd: [Test-Announce] Fedora 23 Beta Release Candidate 1 (RC1) Available Now!

Great!! On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 7:53 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: > Hi All, > > Fedora 23 Beta RC1 with SoaS is out, the login issue is fixed, please > test test test. > > Direct download links: > > >

Re: [Sugar-devel] Simple stuff I don't know

Hey George, You could: 1) modify the sugar shell to launch it... ie., doing something similar to what was done for the welcome activity. Or... 2) use the sugar services stuff to launch the activity without having to modify sugar. I would go for the second option, and simply write a _very_

Re: [Sugar-devel] [road to 0.108] follow up development team meeting

] http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting/meetings/2015-09-16T22:15:39 On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 4:58 PM, James Cameron <qu...@laptop.org> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 10:52:40AM -0400, Martin Abente wrote: > > Would Wednesday 16th, 22:00 UTC work for you? > > Yes. > >

[Sugar-devel] [road to 0.108] follow up development team meeting

Hello everyone, It's been a while since the last development meeting, would be good to re-sync. Would Wednesday 16th, 22:00 UTC work for you? As usual, on #sugar-meeting at freenode. Regards, Martin. ___ Sugar-devel mailing list

Re: [Sugar-devel] Bug 1240354 - SoaS live x86_64 20150706 does not login from live system user

On Sat, Sep 5, 2015 at 3:29 PM, Jerry Vonau <m...@jvonau.ca> wrote: > > > > On September 5, 2015 at 10:21 AM Martin Abente > > <martin.abente.lah...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 7:01 PM, James Cameron <qu...

Re: [Sugar-devel] Bug 1240354 - SoaS live x86_64 20150706 does not login from live system user

On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 7:01 PM, James Cameron wrote: > So to briefly restate. > > Problem: Sugar does not start on F23. > > Diagnosis: the shared library libsugarext.so.0 cannot be loaded, > because of a missing symbol, yet the symbol can be found with > strings(1). > >

Re: [Sugar-devel] Bug 1240354 - SoaS live x86_64 20150706 does not login from live system user

Hello Peter, On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 5:50 AM, Peter Robinson <pbrobin...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 4 Sep 2015 00:22, "Martin Abente" <martin.abente.lah...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 6:43 PM, James Cameron

Re: [Sugar-devel] Bug 1240354 - SoaS live x86_64 20150706 does not login from live system user

Hey James, I did these tests on a fc23 system with two different builds of the sugar-toolkit-gtk3 106 package: (A) built for fc23, and (B) built for fc22. On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 7:41 AM, James Cameron wrote: > [repost, no response seen] > > Martin showed a log of > > **

Re: [Sugar-devel] Bug 1240354 - SoaS live x86_64 20150706 does not login from live system user

On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 1:12 PM, Jerry Vonau <m...@jvonau.ca> wrote: > > > > On September 3, 2015 at 11:38 AM Martin Abente > > <martin.abente.lah...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > Hello everyone, > > > > I rebuilt 0.106.0 packages from f

Re: [Sugar-devel] Bug 1240354 - SoaS live x86_64 20150706 does not login from live system user

Hello everyone, I rebuilt 0.106.0 packages from fc23 source rpms, for fc22 x86_64. It works fine, so it definitely not something with Sugar. It makes sense since nothing changed in SugarExt. Now, this might be something with fc23, but is it on build time or run time? Ideas? Maybe something

Re: [Sugar-devel] Bug 1240354 - SoaS live x86_64 20150706 does not login from live system user

On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 3:58 PM, Jerry Vonau <m...@jvonau.ca> wrote: > > > > On September 3, 2015 at 12:58 PM Martin Abente > > <martin.abente.lah...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 1:12 PM, Jerry Vonau <m...@jvonau.ca> wro

Re: [Sugar-devel] Bug 1240354 - SoaS live x86_64 20150706 does not login from live system user

hich is passed to all gir-* (gobject introspection) calls. > > If so, does removing the .so file fix the problem? > > Use of the file could also be verified with strace -e open. > > On Thu, Sep 03, 2015 at 05:39:19PM -0400, Martin Abente wrote: > > I tried creating anothe

Re: [Sugar-devel] Bug 1240354 - SoaS live x86_64 20150706 does not login from live system user

On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 4:49 PM, James Cameron wrote: > On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 05:59:06AM -0500, Jerry Vonau wrote: > > > > > > > On September 1, 2015 at 9:16 PM James Cameron > wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 09:03:28PM -0500, Jerry Vonau

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar-install-bundle in 13.2.5 is slooow

The problem caused by the race condition is that the activities were not refreshed in Sugar activities list when updated or, not added to the list when installed. By race condition I mean the situation where the BundleRegistry detects changes (e.g. in ~/Activities) too early, when activity.info is

[Sugar-devel] [Announcing] sugar and sugar-toolkit-gtk3 v0.106.1 (bug fixes release)

Hello everyone, It's been almost two months since the release of Sugar 0.106.0, and since then we have been improving things. Many of these improvements are planned for the next major release of Sugar, but there are bug fixes that will certainly be useful for those using Sugar 0.106. Therefore,

Re: [Sugar-devel] [road to 0.108] developing team meeting

Thank you everyone for coming, I think that at least we have mentioned the important topics and have opened the discussions regarding release times. We should continue with these topics via mailing list and meet again ASAP once we have a bit more details about what needs and can to be done.

Re: [Sugar-devel] [road to 0.108] developing team meeting

will be reviewing Gonzalo's fixes. See you on Monday, Regards, Martin. On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 10:10 AM, Gonzalo Odiard godi...@sugarlabs.org wrote: +1 from me On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 11:09 AM, Martin Abente martin.abente.lah...@gmail.com wrote: @Sam: 21 UTC works for me! Does it work for everybody

Re: [Sugar-devel] [road to 0.108] developing team meeting

@Sam: 21 UTC works for me! Does it work for everybody else? On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 7:56 AM, Sam P. sam@sam.today wrote: Hey Martin, I can't do 14 UTC. Would 21/22 UTC be ok for you? Otherwise, I'm always happy to write emails :) Thanks, Sam On Tue, 14 Jul 2015 12:00 am Martin

[Sugar-devel] [road to 0.108] developing team meeting

Hello everyone, Now that Sugar 0.106 has been released, it is time to think about what has been done and what needs to be done for Sugar 0.108. Therefore, I proposed we meet on: Date: Friday July 17. Time: 14:00 UTC. Place: #sugar-meeting - freenode. Does that time work for you? If not, feel

Re: [Sugar-devel] About 0.106.1

If nothing too serious comes up in the following weeks, there might be no need for that release. Regardless of that, we should definitely meet before start merging changes. I have sent an invitation email for this Friday. On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 8:37 AM, Gonzalo Odiard godi...@sugarlabs.org

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar 0.106 Video

Excelente! Lo agregue al Release Notes [1]. Refs: 1. http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/0.106/Notes#Videos On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 3:01 PM, Gonzalo Odiard godi...@sugarlabs.org wrote: Muy bueno! On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 3:56 PM, Laura Vargas la...@somosazucar.org wrote: Thank you James! Here

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar 0.106 Video

Great! Let me know if there are more versions of the video so I can add it to the Notes page :) On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 5:56 PM, Sam P. sam@sam.today wrote: Sounds like a very good way to do it! On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 7:55 AM James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote: I cannot speak for the tools

[Sugar-devel] [Release] Announcing Sugar 0.106.0 (stable)

Hello everyone, I am pleased to announce the release of Sugar 0.106.0. In this new stable release we added performance improvements, new ways of learning collaboratively, new hardware controls, more translations, and of course, a lot of bug fixes. Please visit the Release Notes page [1] for

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar 0.106 Video

Awesome! :) On Sun, Jul 5, 2015 at 6:32 AM, Sam P. sam@sam.today wrote: Hi, So the 0.106 release is tomorrow, which is pretty awesome. I have made a video summarizing the features since we did that last release and it seems like a good idea: https://youtu.be/PXFaXAGIw04 Thanks, Sam

Re: [Sugar-devel] Change request: Fix open with API

Considering that James, Sam and I have reviewed and tested these changes, the consensus is to include them to fix the API. Therefore, Gonzalo has green light for merge. On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 5:41 AM, Tony Anderson tony_ander...@usa.net wrote: Thanks James and Sam for your replies. The

Re: [Sugar-devel] adding gtk as a dependency on sugar-artwork

AM, Martin Abente martin.abente.lah...@gmail.com wrote: Will check today! Thanks Gonzalo and Sam! On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 7:29 AM, Gonzalo Odiard godi...@sugarlabs.org wrote: Martin, Are you ok with this new patch? Gonzalo On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 8:22 AM, Sam P. sam@sam.today wrote

Re: [Sugar-devel] Change request: Fix open with API

Hello Gonzalo, To me this is basically a new feature, in terms of how it does impact sugar (adding new method to the activity class and adding a new dbus endpoint to the shell). It breaks feature, API and code freezes. I believe the change is kind of sensible considering what it does and

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Announcing] an extra UNSTABLE 0.105.3 release (code-frozen)

Thanks German, I also updated packages in [1] our custom archive of Ubuntu. Refs: [1] https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Ubuntu#OLPC_Ubuntu_Sugar_14.04.2_Trusty_LTS On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 1:40 PM, German Ruiz - FundacionZT gr...@fundacionzt.org wrote: 2015-06-30 16:16 GMT-06:00 Martin Abente

[Sugar-devel] adding gtk as a dependency on sugar-artwork

Hello Sam, Different people reported an error while building sugar-artwork packages. The error is caused by this commit [1] which makes GTK a building requirement for sugar-artwork, but: a) if GTK version version is really used on building time, then the approach used in [1] is wrong, because

Re: [Sugar-devel] adding gtk as a dependency on sugar-artwork

From the tests I have done, I confirmed it is used in building time, therefore I have reverted the patch until we can determine a better solution. On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 12:05 PM, Martin Abente martin.abente.lah...@gmail.com wrote: Hello Sam, Different people reported an error while building

Re: [Sugar-devel] Delaying 0.106 for one week

On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:03 AM, Martin Abente martin.abente.lah...@gmail.com wrote: Sure, I can do that tomorrow. Regarding the triage meeting, what about tomorrow (June 30) 13:00 UTC? No quorum it seems, so I will be reviewing the remaining PRs and merging them. We should freeze code

Re: [Sugar-devel] GCI 2014 Wrapup

I knew it would be fun :) Thanks to you guys for all the code you send! On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 2:58 PM, Gonzalo Odiard godi...@sugarlabs.org wrote: Great news! Congratulations, is well deserved for both, Ignacio and you. Thanks for sharing! PS: I need change my signature :) On Fri, Jun

[Sugar-devel] [Announcing] an extra UNSTABLE 0.105.3 release (code-frozen)

Hello everyone, I just added one extra UNSTABLE release (0.105.3), basically to ease our testing before the final release on next Monday (July 6). If you are interested in helping out, the tarballs can be downloaded from: -

Re: [Sugar-devel] Delaying 0.106 for one week

, Jun 26, 2015 at 5:55 PM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 9:40 PM, Martin Abente martin.abente.lah...@gmail.com wrote: Hello everyone, I am strongly considering to delay the 0.106 release by one week, from June 29 to July 6 [1]. The reasons

Re: [Sugar-devel] Delaying 0.106 for one week

won't be able to test it properly. On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 4:42 PM, Gonzalo Odiard godi...@sugarlabs.org wrote: No problem, but could we do a meeting next Monday and triage pending bugs to see what have higher priority? Gonzalo On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 5:40 PM, Martin Abente

Re: [Sugar-devel] Integrating the translations for sugar and sugar-toolkit-gtk3

/ayc/sugar/ [2] http://translate.sugarlabs.org/ayc/sugar-toolkit-gtk3/ [3] http://people.sugarlabs.org/~tch/aymara/ 2015-06-25 13:17 GMT-04:00 Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com: 2015-06-25 12:18 GMT-04:00 Sebastian Silva sebast...@fuentelibre.org: On 25/06/15 09:06, Martin Abente wrote

[Sugar-devel] Delaying 0.106 for one week

Hello everyone, I am strongly considering to delay the 0.106 release by one week, from June 29 to July 6 [1]. The reasons for this delay are: - Aymara translations are very close to be fully completed, _very_ few translations are missing and it would be a shame to release 0.106 with

Re: [Sugar-devel] Integrating the translations for sugar and sugar-toolkit-gtk3

Hola de nuevo, @Edgar: si ingresas a las traducciones de sugar [1] y sugar-toolkit-gtk3 [2] a Aymara, verás que hay una opción que dice expand details (o expandir detalles en español). Al hacer clic en esa opción, la plataforma te va a mostrar algunos problemas con las traducciones de esos

[Sugar-devel] Integrating the translations for sugar and sugar-toolkit-gtk3

Hello everyone, We are one week away [1] from the first stable release 0.106 and its time to start integrating the new translations to sugar [2] and sugar-toolkit-gtk3 [3], so we can spend this week doing some minimal QA. Please reply to this email with the link to your Pootle language project

Re: [Sugar-devel] Integrating the translations for sugar and sugar-toolkit-gtk3

-gtk3/ On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 8:29 PM, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com wrote: Can you please make contact with Edgar to make sure his Aymara updates land? thx. -walter On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 4:38 PM, Martin Abente martin.abente.lah...@gmail.com wrote: Hello everyone, We are one

Re: [Sugar-devel] license of layout.py in Sugar Calculate activity

Hello Jonas, Thanks for taking the time to let us know. The new maintainer of Calculate is Gonzalo (cc'ed). For future reference, you can check this [1] list to see who is currently maintaining an activity (we certainly need to improve our communication channels). Regards, Martin. [1]

[Sugar-devel] This is just a test

Apologies for the wasted inbox space! ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] Making Record support external cameras

On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 10:51 AM, Gonzalo Odiard godi...@sugarlabs.org wrote: Tch, do yoou have any usb camera to test this? Not at the moment, but I borrow one on the weekend. Gonzalo On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 12:57 AM, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote: On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at

Re: [Sugar-devel] Update PO files in Pootle

I have just updated sugar and sugar-toolkit-gtk3 POs. @sebastian: I left a backup of POs and DB in a place where you can find it. On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 11:46 AM, Sebastian Silva sebast...@somosazucar.org wrote: On 01/06/15 15:38, Martin Abente wrote: If anyone is working in our Pootle

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Announcing] UNSTABLE 0.105.2 (Strings, UI and API frozen)

Thanks German! For those interested in Ubuntu, I just updated the packages for [1]. Refs: 1. http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Ubuntu On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 11:30 AM, German Ruiz - FundacionZT gr...@fundacionzt.org wrote: 2015-06-01 8:03 GMT-06:00 Martin Abente martin.abente.lah...@gmail.com

[Sugar-devel] [Announcing] UNSTABLE 0.105.2 (Strings, UI and API frozen)

Hello everyone, I am pleased to announce another release in our road to 106 development cycle [1]. This time, the release marks the end of the period for Strings, UI and API changes. From now on, and until the stable release in a month, we will be focusing on fixing critical bugs and updating

[Sugar-devel] Update PO files in Pootle

Hello everyone, We are a month away from the release of Sugar 0.106 and we need to update the sugar [1] and sugar-toolkit-gtk3 [2] PO files in Pootle. We don't have branches as we used to do in the previous instance, this means that the PO files will be adapted to what is currently in our

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Sugar-news] Sugar DIgest 2015-05-26

I never had to chance to meet Marco but I can say that I only have heard wonderful things about him, as a human being and as an engineer. My most sincere condolences to his family and friends. On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 5:07 PM, Christoph Derndorfer christ...@olpcnews.com wrote: On Tue, May 26,

[Sugar-devel] Bundlebuilder and mime-type related files

Hello everyone, Recently, when packaging activities for Debian/Ubuntu, I noticed that my packaged activities contained many unexpected/unnecessary files under /usr/share/mime. These files were clashing with other activities files I packaged, because they were under the exact same path and name.

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Announcing] UNSTABLE 0.105.1 (feature frozen)

Many thanks German! On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 4:25 PM, German Ruiz - FundacionZT gr...@fundacionzt.org wrote: 2015-05-18 7:45 GMT-06:00 Martin Abente martin.abente.lah...@gmail.com: Hello everyone, I am pleased to announce a new release of our road to 0.106 development cycle

  1   2   3   4   5   >