Re: [Sugar-devel] multiple activity versions installed simultaneously (was Re: [Bugs] #1042 UNSP: cannot install new activity version)

2009-08-11 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 03:24, Gary C Martin wrote: > On 10 Aug 2009, at 17:24, Daniel Drake wrote: > >> 2009/8/10 Martin Dengler : >>> Learner-generated activity patches, perhaps?  Like, we're under a >>> tree >>> and here's my patched Terminal/Pippy/Speak that you may want to try >>> but not comm

Re: [Sugar-devel] How to not make a window?

2009-08-11 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 07:09, Benjamin M. Schwartz wrote: > I am trying to create a sugar activity that wraps a simple X application. >  Specifically, my activity is a standard python activity, inheriting from > the sugar.activity.activity.Activity, but it has no GUI.  set_canvas is > never called

Re: [Sugar-devel] multiple activity versions installed simultaneously (was Re: [Bugs] #1042 UNSP: cannot install new activity version)

2009-08-10 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 17:48, Martin Dengler wrote: > On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 09:26:58PM +0545, Daniel Drake wrote: >> 2009/8/10 Tomeu Vizoso : >> > Hi, >> > >> > any opinions on this? >> >> I dislike the idea of having multiple versions installed

[Sugar-devel] multiple activity versions installed simultaneously (was Re: [Bugs] #1042 UNSP: cannot install new activity version)

2009-08-10 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
Hi, any opinions on this? Thanks, Tomeu On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 18:44, SugarLabs Bugs wrote: > #1042: cannot install new activity version > --+- >    Reporter:  sascha_silbe               |          Owner:  tomeu >        T

Re: [Sugar-devel] XO wireless interface problem when AP down

2009-08-10 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
Hi Andres, On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 15:50, Andrés Nacelle wrote: > Hello, I´ve been working recently with something like 70 XO and during the > tests where I had 2 Access Point working, it happened that the electric > supply from one of this failed without me realising. So I keep trying to > associ

Re: [Sugar-devel] Deployment feedback braindump

2009-08-10 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
Hi, some thoughts follow. Please keep in mind that these are just my personal opinions and that not everybody at Sugar Labs share the same idea of what SLs is or should be. On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 19:41, Daniel Drake wrote: > Hi, > > In response to the thread I started recently about feedback from

Re: [Sugar-devel] Backup and Restore for Sugar on a Stick

2009-08-08 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
ing the preparations. Thanks, feedback about the process and its documentation is much appreciated. Tomeu > Thanks, > > Ham > > On Fri, 2009-08-07 at 10:39 +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 15:29, Caroline Meeks >> wrote: >> > This email is e

Re: [Sugar-devel] ESSIDs and BSSIDs, NM and Sugar

2009-08-07 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 16:19, Martin Langhoff wrote: > Following the "let's make Sugar more deployable" theme that Daniel > started a while ago, I am looking at something that Reuben mentioned > last week he discovered in the field. Apparently, the Sugar + NM > combination we ship (on XO OS 802) ca

Re: [Sugar-devel] activity not getting installed with sugar-install-bundle

2009-08-07 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 14:20, sumit singh wrote: > Hello all, > > The xo bundle of my activity is not gettting installed on the xo using > the sugar-install-bundle command, however, when i unzip the xo bundle > in the /home/olpc/Activities folder , it is gettng installed > correctly. The error I am

Re: [Sugar-devel] F11 for XO1 - Fonts

2009-08-07 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 16:55, Daniel Drake wrote: > 2009/8/4 Tomeu Vizoso : >> I meant to ask to which UI elements this font size would apply to. > > All of them, the same way that the currently written "10" value does. But not all text is rendered with that default fon

Re: [Sugar-devel] Backup and Restore for Sugar on a Stick

2009-08-07 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 15:29, Caroline Meeks wrote: > This email is especially for Miguel Salazar and the Chiapas deployment. > The code for backup and restore of Sugar Sticks using the XS is awaiting > code review, if you can please test it. > http://dev.sugarlabs.org/ticket/916 > http://dev.sugar

Re: [Sugar-devel] XML markup capability for a gtk.Button label (PyGTK)?

2009-08-07 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
o no > avail. > > Do you (or anyone else) have further ideas? May this help? http://lists-archives.org/gtk/08302-gtk_widget_anchored-assertion-failure.html The toplevel widget in your case is the Activity class. Please keep posting about these issues in the Sugar lists, but you may also c

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Activities] Issues Clock Maze Measure Physiscs

2009-08-07 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 19:05, David Farning wrote: > Andrés, > Most of it** is looking like a hardware gfx card driver issue under > Fedora.  I am not sure how to fix that or even who is knowledgeable > about the issue.  I have Cced Tomeu and Simon maybe they have some > advice. Yeah, I guess when

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Fwd: [Grassroots-l] Anyone using the Map activity?

2009-08-06 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
Hi Nick, what about asking in the olpc-sur mailing list? Teachers there seem to be willing to try out new activities and give feedback. You will need someone with Spanish skills, though. Regards, Tomeu On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 05:53, Frederick Grose wrote: > Forwarding to the Sugar community lis

Re: [Sugar-devel] Getting a gtk.image from the get_preview function

2009-08-06 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
be/20216 >> . The log error can be found at --- http://pastebin.be/20214 . Kindly >> give your suggestions. >> >> Regards, > >> >> On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 1:15 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >>> On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 13:05, sumit singh wrote: >>>>

Re: [Sugar-devel] Getting a gtk.image from the get_preview function

2009-08-06 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
self.window. Regards, Tomeu > Regards, > VIJIT > > On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 1:15 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 13:05, sumit singh wrote: >>> Hi Tomeu, >>> >>> Thanx for your reply. I tried using the it , but it doesn't s

Re: [Sugar-devel] XML markup capability for a gtk.Button label (PyGTK)?

2009-08-06 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 03:43, Art Hunkins wrote: > Hello, Victor and Mike (et al.), > > In reference to Victor's csndsugui.py (PyGTK): > > With gtk.Label and gtk.Frame, I've been able to use the set_use_markup() > property to get larger fonts, bold, italics, etc - by including XML markup > in my te

Re: [Sugar-devel] Getting a gtk.image from the get_preview function

2009-08-06 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
ntation: http://www.pygtk.org/pygtktutorial/sec-pixmaps.html http://www.pygtk.org/docs/pygtk/class-gdkpixmap.html http://tronche.com/gui/x/xlib/pixmap-and-cursor/pixmap.html HTH, Tomeu > Regards, > sumit > > On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 12:33 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 03

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Marketing] First stab at a questionnaire for deployments (was: First step towards an efficient feedback process)

2009-08-05 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 10:34, Christoph Derndorfer wrote: > On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 1:22 AM, Christoph Derndorfer > wrote: >> >> On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 12:46 AM, Christoph Derndorfer >> wrote: >>> >>> So, to end this with an actionable item I would suggest that we start >>> flashing out a process

Re: [Sugar-devel] code review (was Re: buddy tags)

2009-08-05 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 15:23, Michael Stone wrote: > > Tomeu, > > I like your response but I'm surprised that you're confused about why your > review process is getting bogged down, so I'll share my perspective in the > hopes that you will find it helpful. > > In short, expecting the submitter to d

Re: [Sugar-devel] buddy tags

2009-08-05 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 04:06, Gary C Martin wrote: > On 5 Aug 2009, at 01:53, Benjamin M. Schwartz wrote: > >> Eben Eliason wrote: >>> >>> I >>> still kind of like "likes" as the prompt, but something more general >>> like "profile" could also work. >> >> I think Facebook's solution is very elegant

Re: [Sugar-devel] Getting a gtk.image from the get_preview function

2009-08-05 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 03:06, sumit singh wrote: > Hi all, > > I would like to ask what is the best way to get a gtk.Image from the > data returned by get_preview function of activity.Activity fn of > sugar. I want to make an image buttton using this data. Currently, I > am doing it by saving the d

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar and nfs

2009-08-04 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
2009/8/4 Philippe Clérié : > OK! So I'm covered. :-) Simon is using Sugar with NFS in schools, so in case of trouble he (and others in this list) may be able to help. Regards, Tomeu > Thanks > > -- > > > Philippe > > -- > The trouble with common sense is that it is so uncommon. > > > On Tu

[Sugar-devel] code review (was Re: buddy tags)

2009-08-04 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 21:39, Gary C Martin wrote: [snip] > > Though I'm not sure I have the stamina to get past your code reviews for any > original coding. It's hard enough to get a bug fix r+ accepted when making a > minimal tweak to existing code! ;-) I'm not sure what I can say about this. I

Re: [Sugar-devel] buddy tags

2009-08-04 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 21:39, Gary C Martin wrote: > On 2 Aug 2009, at 15:00, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > >> Hi Gary (and others), >> >> what was decided about buddy tagging? > > No one else has commented yet :-( Doesn't hurt pinging people, sometimes one doesn'

Re: [Sugar-devel] F11 for XO1 - Fonts

2009-08-04 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 10:48, Daniel Drake wrote: > 2009/8/4 Tomeu Vizoso : >>> A method to specify the font size (measured in points). >> >> What font size would be that? > > That would be up to the deployments. > For example, OLPC would choose 7. I meant to a

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Sur] sitio sugarlabs

2009-08-04 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
Hi, I'm forwarding this email from Paola, a teacher in Uruguay, about the recent changes in activities.sugarlabs.org. Please tell if translate.google.com is not good to enough to understand it and we'll see about getting a translation by a human. Regards, Tomeu 2009/8/3 Paola Bruccoleri : > Ho

Re: [Sugar-devel] F11 for XO1 - Fonts

2009-08-04 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 10:08, Daniel Drake wrote: > 2009/8/4 Tomeu Vizoso : >> Ok, what do you propose? > > A method to specify the font size (measured in points). What font size would be that? > This should be geared towards deployments, so it should be something > that can

Re: [Sugar-devel] Problems with Trac account

2009-08-04 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
[forwarding to the systems list] On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 10:16, Christoph Derndorfer wrote: > Hi, > while submitting some bugs to Trac earlier today I ran into an odd issue: > I had forgotten my previous password so I used the forgotten password > function, got the mail, logged in, changed my passw

Re: [Sugar-devel] F11 for XO1 - Fonts

2009-08-04 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 09:55, Daniel Drake wrote: > 2009/8/4 Tomeu Vizoso : >> We could make it a GConf property if it's really needed, but as you >> already know, I think we should have all the UI use a default of 10 >> and solely use Xft.dpi to scale it up and down. W

Re: [Sugar-devel] Can I use the keep or title_set_by_user key of metadata to store info about my activity

2009-08-04 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 03:09, sumit singh wrote: > Hi Tomeu, > > This is in continuation with our chat yesterday. The write/report > activity would be having 3 states , I mean whether the user is working > on a blank document , designing a new template or using a previously > designed template. So,

Re: [Sugar-devel] F11 for XO1 - Fonts

2009-08-04 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 05:25, Daniel Drake wrote: > 2009/8/3 Tomeu Vizoso : >> On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 18:52, Daniel Drake wrote: >>> 2009/8/3 Tomeu Vizoso : >>>> On which build I can see that? >>> >>> Any of the recent F11-for-XO, so try Stephen Par

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Major Changes in the latest Snapshot

2009-08-04 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 08:45, Christoph Derndorfer wrote: > On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 5:57 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >> >> On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 10:48, Christoph >> Derndorfer wrote: >> > Hi, >> > thanks a lot for the release, I downloaded the appliance

Re: [Sugar-devel] Screen Reposition?

2009-08-03 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 17:12, Benjamin M. Schwartz wrote: > Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 16:55, Art Hunkins wrote: >>> Is it still possible that resize capability, at least for PyGTK code without >>> absolute positioning, might be included in SoaS?

Re: [Sugar-devel] Screen Reposition?

2009-08-03 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
t; with >>>>> python. >>>>> >>>>> If you'd like to see it running as intended, install it on the XO - but >>>>> first enable three lines in csndsugui.py: >>>>> take out the leading #'s in these three spots: >&g

Re: [Sugar-devel] Screen Reposition?

2009-08-03 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
r working as well as possible on the XO, we still need more help. Regards, Tomeu > Art Hunkins > > - Original Message - From: "Tomeu Vizoso" > To: "Art Hunkins" > Cc: > Sent: Sunday, August 02, 2009 5:45 AM > Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] Screen R

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Karma] Resolution considerations

2009-08-03 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
2009/8/3 Philippe Clérié : > At the moment, I can't see the entire dialog for Network settings on > the HP Mini 110 and there's not even a scrollbar to make visible the > part I can't see. > > And chances are that a year from now we'll have still better > definitions, possibly 1366 x 768 for a 10"

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Major Changes in the latest Snapshot

2009-08-03 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 10:48, Christoph Derndorfer wrote: > Hi, > thanks a lot for the release, I downloaded the appliance and tested it for a > bit with VirtualBox 3.0.2. These are very helpful comments. If you or someone else could find the time to enter tickets in trac, I hope to get to them so

Re: [Sugar-devel] Local Collaboration with an ethernet bug 1113

2009-08-02 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
ards, Tomeu > Thanks, > Caroline > > > On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 10:08 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >> >> On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 16:05, Caroline Meeks >> wrote: >> > Hi, >> > This is an important priority for GPA for Sept.  Its also something we >>

Re: [Sugar-devel] Local Collaboration with an ethernet bug 1113

2009-08-02 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 16:05, Caroline Meeks wrote: > Hi, > This is an important priority for GPA for Sept.  Its also something we want > to work for conferences and expos where we demo.  Any ideas? > For the GPA School I would like to set up 4-6 computers in the back of >  classrooms. We may well

[Sugar-devel] buddy tags

2009-08-02 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
Hi Gary (and others), what was decided about buddy tagging? Were you interested in working on it? >From the last Sugar releases tags are broadcasted along the rest of the buddy info when using gabble. Was it decided that we also needed tags in Salut for 0.86? Or it could come in a later stage? R

[Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] sugar-presence-service-0.85.1

2009-08-02 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
Hi, this release adds broadcastign of buddy tags to the connection managers that support it (Gabble right now). == Source == http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/glucose/sugar-presence-service/sugar-presence-service-0.85.1.tar.bz2 ___ Sugar-d

Re: [Sugar-devel] Maintaining activities for older releases (was Re: Initial implementation of toolbars design)

2009-08-02 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 04:38, Aleksey Lim wrote: > On Sat, Aug 01, 2009 at 05:48:57PM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >> On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 16:48, Aleksey Lim wrote: >> > On Sat, Aug 01, 2009 at 04:37:24PM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >> >> On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 16:33,

Re: [Sugar-devel] Screen Reposition?

2009-08-02 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
weren't developed with this in mind? Maybe we should ask Victor Lazzarini? Also, reading the "Packing Widgets" section in the Gtk+ tutorial may help: http://library.gnome.org/devel/gtk-tutorial/stable/ Regards, Tomeu > Art Hunkins > > - Original Message - From: &q

Re: [Sugar-devel] Screen Reposition?

2009-08-02 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
seen discussion on this list recently. And what does this mean for > the future viability of the XO?) > > Art Hunkins > > - Original Message - From: "Tomeu Vizoso" > To: "Art Hunkins" > Cc: > Sent: Saturday, August 01, 2009 10:47 AM > Subject

[Sugar-devel] Fwd: [pygtk] ANNOUNCE: the return of pygtkscintilla

2009-08-01 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
Hi, this might be interesting to activity authors and also for editing source in the shell. Regards, Tomeu -- Forwarded message -- From: Date: Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 19:20 Subject: [pygtk] ANNOUNCE: the return of pygtkscintilla To: py...@daa.com.au Hi all, I've done a prelimin

[Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] sugar-0.85.3

2009-08-01 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
Hi, this Sugar release restores Rainbow support, meaning that you can try and give feedback after installing Rainbow. == Source == http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/glucose/sugar/sugar-0.85.3.tar.bz2 ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel

[Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] sugar-toolkit-0.85.3

2009-08-01 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
Hi, this release includes the new toolbar design. Congratulations to everybody that worked together to accomplish this. Now let's fix the bugs :) == Source == http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/glucose/sugar-toolkit/sugar-toolkit-0.85.3.tar.bz2 == Fixed tickets == * #1102 Make the

[Sugar-devel] Maintaining activities for older releases (was Re: Initial implementation of toolbars design)

2009-08-01 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 16:48, Aleksey Lim wrote: > On Sat, Aug 01, 2009 at 04:37:24PM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >> On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 16:33, Aleksey Lim wrote: >> > On Sat, Aug 01, 2009 at 03:19:46PM +0100, Gary C Martin wrote: >> >> On 1 Aug 2009, at 14:51, Alek

Re: [Sugar-devel] Book bundles and Read

2009-08-01 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 04:17, Samuel Klein wrote: > Journal needs to cover these features (whatever they resolve to be). Every >> activity author should not be inventing various implementations of a "book >> shelf" UI concepts for dealing with a monoculture 'collection' of objects. >> Imagine if I

Re: [Sugar-devel] Screen Reposition?

2009-08-01 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 21:13, Art Hunkins wrote: > I finally managed to see a mockup of my XO Activity on one of my SoaS setups > (large monitor). > > As I feared, everything displayed in the upper left corner of the screen. > > I know this issue has been frequently discussed here. > > Can someone

Re: [Sugar-devel] Call for Help: SoaS & Display Manager (Auto-Login)

2009-08-01 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 16:48, Sebastian Dziallas wrote: > Hi everybody, > > I could use a hand with auto-login on SoaS. We've been using slim so far > but will switch in the near future (in fact, I already committed a > change in GIT), as we also need to login automatically after killing / > resta

Re: [Sugar-devel] Initial implementation of toolbars design

2009-08-01 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 16:33, Aleksey Lim wrote: > On Sat, Aug 01, 2009 at 03:19:46PM +0100, Gary C Martin wrote: >> On 1 Aug 2009, at 14:51, Aleksey Lim wrote: >> >> >On Sat, Aug 01, 2009 at 02:12:50PM +0100, Gary C Martin wrote: >> >>On 31 Jul 2009, at 10:54, Simon Schampijer wrote: >> >> >>

[Sugar-devel] About the need for .xo bundles (again) (was Re: safer customization key (was Re: will the one true browse please stand up?))

2009-08-01 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 15:47, Daniel Drake wrote: > 2009/8/1 Tomeu Vizoso : >> What do you propose doing? > > Leaving packaging to the experts (the distributions) and focusing on > being a good upstream -- only stepping into the packaging areas where > the distro people are

Re: [Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] Browse-110

2009-08-01 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 20:38, Sayamindu Dasgupta wrote: > Hi, > I think the version jump is intentional to allow for intermediate > stable releases targetted for 0.84 if the need arises. If someone > finds a critical issue in Browse 103, Simon can always release 104 > with the fix and nothing more

Re: [Sugar-devel] safer customization key (was Re: will the one true browse please stand up?)

2009-08-01 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 20:23, Daniel Drake wrote: > 2009/7/31 Joshua N Pritikin : >> On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 03:52:06PM +0545, Daniel Drake wrote: >>> 2009/7/31 Joshua N Pritikin : >>> > That was not my experience. Where does the customization key code live >>> > in GIT? >>> >>> Here: >>> http://d

Re: [Sugar-devel] logo for hulahop? https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=507499

2009-07-31 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
Mathieu makes a good point, but forgot to keep the list in CC. On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 14:10, Mathieu Bridon (bochecha) wrote: >>> hi folks if you'd like hulahop to have a chance of getting onto the >>> featured apps page a logo / icon would be needed.  as this is a chance >>> for promotion of OLP

Re: [Sugar-devel] Reducing Stick Failures - Was Re: [Marketing] press release opportunity...

2009-07-31 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 13:50, Caroline Meeks wrote: > > > On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 4:30 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >> >> On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 22:15, Caroline Meeks >> wrote: >> >> >> >> But anyway, we don't _need_ an expert. Rather an ad

Re: [Sugar-devel] Share button in the activity toolbar (from the toolbar redesign thread)

2009-07-31 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 13:47, Simon Schampijer wrote: > Another question that came up today: > > Should the activity toolbar contain the "share" option by default? > Disabled by default? Maybe we could use the max_participants property to know when to disable the button? Regards, Tomeu > a) t

Re: [Sugar-devel] logo for hulahop? https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=507499

2009-07-31 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 13:01, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > hi folks if you'd like hulahop to have a chance of getting onto the > featured apps page a logo / icon would be needed.  as this is a chance > for promotion of OLPC, sugarlabs as well as hulahop, could someone > consider logging i

Re: [Sugar-devel] Initial implementation of toolbars design

2009-07-31 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 12:08, Simon Schampijer wrote: > On 07/31/2009 12:02 AM, Eben Eliason wrote: [snip] >>> >>> Personally, I see more the issue of naming an activity, since as said in >>> another post I am not really convinced about the naming alert. >> >> I'll have to think about this idea

Re: [Sugar-devel] How big might a full install of Fedora Sugar be?

2009-07-31 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 11:40, Simon Schampijer wrote: > [re-adding sugar-devel to CC] > > On 07/31/2009 11:33 AM, Mathieu Bridon (bochecha) wrote: >  >>> But even if Sugar was in the DVD, can we install Fedora with Sugar and >  >>> not GNOME? If so, any pointers to instructions? >  >>> >  >>> Rega

Re: [Sugar-devel] How big might a full install of Fedora Sugar be?

2009-07-31 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
[re-adding sugar-devel to CC] On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 11:03, Mathieu Bridon (bochecha) wrote: >>> Id love to try it. Does anyone know where I can find instructions? >> >> See download and instructions here: >> >> http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora >> >> Once you are in GNOME, you can install Suga

Re: [Sugar-devel] review of the new toolbars implementation

2009-07-31 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 06:27, Aleksey Lim wrote: > On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 07:51:07PM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >> Hi, >> +class _Palette(gtk.Window): >> >> The palette class is very tricky and is a frequent source of bugs, we >> shouldn't duplicate

Re: [Sugar-devel] How big might a full install of Fedora Sugar be?

2009-07-31 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 03:23, Caroline Meeks wrote: > Id love to try it. Does anyone know where I can find instructions? See download and instructions here: http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora Once you are in GNOME, you can install Sugar as any other program. See instructions about how to insta

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] community influence on development

2009-07-31 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 23:46, Bert Freudenberg wrote: > > On 30.07.2009, at 22:23, Martin Dengler wrote: > >> On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 04:17:56PM -0300, Bert Freudenberg wrote: >>> >>> On 28.07.2009, at 07:22, Martin Dengler wrote: >>> On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 03:24:13PM +0545, Daniel Drake wro

Re: [Sugar-devel] Reducing Stick Failures - Was Re: [Marketing] press release opportunity...

2009-07-31 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 22:15, Caroline Meeks wrote: >> >> But anyway, we don't _need_ an expert. Rather an advanced linux user >> that can ask the right questions, read shell scripts, inspect a >> running system, etc. Already asked in the local linux user groups? > > Hi Tomeu, > I'm trying to put

[Sugar-devel] review of the new toolbars implementation

2009-07-30 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
Hi, have been looking at the code and have these comments: +def set_toolbar_box(self, toolbar_box): +# make more consistent using ToolbarBox instead of Toolbox +self.set_toolbox(toolbar_box) Maybe mark set_toolbox as DEPRECATED? +ToolButton.__init__(self, 'activity-s

Re: [Sugar-devel] review of the new toolbars API

2009-07-30 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 17:36, Aleksey Lim wrote: > On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 03:55:44PM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >> Hi Aleksey, >> >> I think this is excellent work, we are very close to commit this and >> start moving activities to the new toolbars design. >> &g

Re: [Sugar-devel] Wireless connection

2009-07-30 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 14:14, Abhishek Indoria wrote: > Hello, > I live in India, there are not so many hotspots here. Is there really, > any way with which I can connect wirelessly to the internet without USB > modems? There are USB modems wireless connections, Can I connect to them > too, WITHOU

[Sugar-devel] review of the new toolbars API

2009-07-30 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
Hi Aleksey, I think this is excellent work, we are very close to commit this and start moving activities to the new toolbars design. Let me share some thoughts about the API before reviewing the actual sugar-toolkit patch. >        main_toolbar = Toolbar() We already have gtk.Toolbar, which is

Re: [Sugar-devel] Assessment in Karma

2009-07-30 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
2009/7/30 Christoph Derndorfer : > On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 6:28 PM, Bryan Berry wrote: >> >> ChristophD, we really need to talk to sunil and kamana about assessment >> as they probably have a lot of good ideas. Well, actually they created >> all the assessments for EPaath but we need to abstract t

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Marketing] press release opportunity...

2009-07-30 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 03:23, Caroline Meeks wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 9:14 PM, Gary C Martin wrote: >> >> On 29 Jul 2009, at 21:35, Walter Bender wrote: >> >>> Begin handwaving. >>> >>> LiveUSB came from the world of LiveCD and with it came an "overlay" >>> concept to enable writing i

Re: [Sugar-devel] buddy tagging

2009-07-29 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 18:27, Benjamin M. Schwartz wrote: > Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >> have added a "tags" property to buddies but it will work only for >> Jabber connections for now. > > Which model?  Can I tag others, or only myself? Are the tags I make > visi

Re: [Sugar-devel] Documenting the SoaS file system

2009-07-29 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 14:32, Caroline Meeks wrote: > Hi, > > I want to better understand what I see when I browse the file system of the > stick. > > One developer tells me that the squashfs is just the system files and is > never rewritten. > Another person writes that all our user files are sto

Re: [Sugar-devel] community influence on development

2009-07-29 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 14:24, Greg Smith wrote: > Hi Tomeu, > > Thanks for the feedback. > > On this: >>> I'm working on the GPA list (see: >>> http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Gardner_Pilot_Academy). If others have >>> lists of requirements, send them out. Then perhaps Simon, Tomeu et al >>> can link

[Sugar-devel] buddy tagging

2009-07-29 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
Hi, have added a "tags" property to buddies but it will work only for Jabber connections for now. In order to make it work for Salut, quite a bit of work would be needed in the connection manager. Things get a bit more complex because telepathy-salut is going to be heavily refactored really soon

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] A Fine Tradition...

2009-07-29 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 07:40, Michael Stone wrote: > Carrying on a fine tradition of July-based Sugar reflections [1, 2], I'm going > to offer some mostly unsolicited advice. (Sorry, Tomeu, but you asked me to > write. :^) > >   Dear Sugar Labs, > >   In the past year, you succeeded in removing tw

Re: [Sugar-devel] community influence on development

2009-07-29 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 06:05, Daniel Drake wrote: > 2009/7/29 Walter Bender : >> Daniel, could you start the ball rolling by being more explicit about >> some specific unmet needs of deployments that might be actionable? > > OK, where should we make such a list? You can put such requests in a new

Re: [Sugar-devel] community influence on development

2009-07-28 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
2009/7/28 Philippe Clérié : > On Tuesday 28 July 2009 04:48:25 Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > >> Yes, if deployers make very clear what is a priority for them and >> do so in a compelling way, I'm sure volunteer developers will >> make their plans accordingly. > > Perha

Re: [Sugar-devel] community influence on development

2009-07-28 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
ion page. We may be further > along than we think. What about entering Feature pages? Or is that intended to happen only once we have a technical plan for the feature? http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Policy Thanks, Tomeu > HTHs. Comments, corrections and additions welcom

Re: [Sugar-devel] community influence on development

2009-07-28 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 14:58, Bastien wrote: > Tomeu Vizoso writes: > >> About having a person at every deployment, some months ago I started >> creating this list of contacts: >> >> http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Deployment_Team/Places > > Thanks for the remi

Re: [Sugar-devel] community influence on development

2009-07-28 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 14:43, Bastien wrote: > Caroline Meeks writes: > >> I personally don't hear the voice of the XO deployments saying what is >> needed for them. > > When I was in Haiti, being able to interact with Greg was really > helpful.  I knew there was someone I could nag about things

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activity as regular objects proposal

2009-07-28 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 13:36, Sascha Silbe wrote: > On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 12:59:43PM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > >>> The more important point is that it also works for people installing >>> Sugar >>> from packages on their own system, without manual symlink f

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activity as regular objects proposal

2009-07-28 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 12:55, Sascha Silbe wrote: > On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 12:38:32PM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > >>>> To avoid space duplication in LTSP environments, ~/Activities can >>>> contain symlinks to somewhere in /usr if the deployer wants users to

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activity as regular objects proposal

2009-07-28 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 12:30, Sascha Silbe wrote: > On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 12:18:58PM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > >> To avoid space duplication in LTSP environments, ~/Activities can >> contain symlinks to somewhere in /usr if the deployer wants users to >> be able

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activity as regular objects proposal

2009-07-28 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 12:14, Sascha Silbe wrote: > On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 05:14:57AM +, Aleksey Lim wrote: > >> * it can't upgrade activities if they were pre-installed from >>  native packages; it makes process of upgrading activities >>  from .xo impossible > > Yeah, this is really a PITA.

Re: [Sugar-devel] TuxPaint and saving to journal (Was: Duplication of effort)

2009-07-28 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 12:03, Christoph Derndorfer wrote: > I'm surprised that nobody has mentioned the Sugar Almanac so far: > http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Development_Team/Almanac > > IMHO this is the best place to get you started with Sugar development. Yeah, but for now it's only python :/ W

Re: [Sugar-devel] Using Nutch for lesson search in Karma

2009-07-28 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
2009/7/28 Christoph Derndorfer : > Hi, > > while reading Mike Dawson's e-mail on the SDLI I stumbled across his > reference to Nutch (http://wiki.apache.org/nutch/Features) and was now > wondering whether this might a potential solution for lesson search in > Karma? > > What do you think? Well, my

Re: [Sugar-devel] community influence on development

2009-07-28 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
[adding IAEP to cc] On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 11:39, Daniel Drake wrote: > quoting Tomeu from another thread (with no bad feelings at all): > > "Sugar Labs has currently no resources to focus on anything, it > depends on volunteers doing whatever they want. I chose to spend my > time to make easier

Re: [Sugar-devel] Object Bundles review and inclusion to 0.86/Feature_List request

2009-07-28 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
Martin, SJ, do you have anything to say? Do you know anyone in the field who has anything to say about this? Thanks, Tomeu On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 07:46, Aleksey Lim wrote: > Hi all, > > Object Bundles feature page > http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Object_Bundles > > OB deprecates .xol an

Re: [Sugar-devel] Duplication of Effort: Don't do it.

2009-07-28 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 08:23, Daniel Drake wrote: > 2009/7/28 Tomeu Vizoso : >> Regardless of what I said, I think your point of increased memory >> usage is a valid one and the community should voice its opinions on >> this trade off. > > My opinion: > >

Re: [Sugar-devel] Initial implementation of toolbars design

2009-07-28 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 04:51, Aleksey Lim wrote: > On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 11:26:20PM +0200, Simon Schampijer wrote: >> On 07/18/2009 04:17 AM, Gary C Martin wrote: >> >Hi Caroline, >> > >> >On 17 Jul 2009, at 22:14, Caroline Meeks wrote: >> > >> >>We can put it in front of actual kids once you ge

Re: [Sugar-devel] TuxPaint and saving to journal (Was: Duplication of effort)

2009-07-28 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 04:40, Bert Freudenberg wrote: > > On 27.07.2009, at 21:04, Ton van Overbeek wrote: > >> On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 7:43 PM, Luke Faraone wrote: >>> On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 19:36, Ton van Overbeek >>> >>> wrote: I need the low-level dbus interface to the journal (or

Re: [Sugar-devel] TuxPaint and saving to journal (Was: Duplication of effort)

2009-07-28 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 02:29, Edward Cherlin wrote: > If those who know where things are and how things work are willing, we > can create proper Sugar API documentation. I'll help. I will be happy to answer any questions you have about that. Thanks, Tomeu > On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 5:04 PM, Ton

Re: [Sugar-devel] Fwd: Transifex

2009-07-28 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 01:42, Rafael Enrique Ortiz Guerrero wrote: > We have been working great with pootle, although it has some > technical inconveniences (IIRC), they are working towards a django > development to solve issues (don't know which though) > > IMHO,  pootle  is very  intuitive for t

Re: [Sugar-devel] Why am I so popular?

2009-07-28 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 00:28, Jim Simmons wrote: > Aleksey, > > If I was responsible for this I'd cover my tracks better.  I would > make Bastien's video insanely popular too. > > I was paying at least some attention to these numbers and it bugs me > that I can't trust them. Oh, well. Maybe all d

[Sugar-devel] 0.85.2 tarballs

2009-07-27 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
Hi, by the schedule we are a few days late for the 0.85.2 Sucrose release. Plan to do it tomorrow but will go first through the patch queue to get in what I can. See http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Development_Team/Release/Roadmap Regards, Tomeu ___ Suga

Re: [Sugar-devel] Duplication of Effort: Don't do it.

2009-07-27 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 20:52, Edward Cherlin wrote: > On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 10:38 AM, Benjamin M. > Schwartz wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> I have lately seen a lot of duplication of effort in Sugar.  I think this >> is bad.  The success of Sugar demands discipl

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Marketing] SL at NECC 2010

2009-07-27 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 19:47, Gary C Martin wrote: > On 27 Jul 2009, at 17:15, Mel Chua wrote: > >> * I don't know what big developments are likely to hit in the near >> future, but if the "use Activities online, in browsers!" thing works, >> then we have a *huge* winner to demo. > > Just wanted t

<    7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   >