Re: [Sugar-devel] Feature cleanup meeting: 11.01.10 --- Summary

2010-01-14 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 18:44, Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de wrote: Hi, today we went through the list of Features proposed for the 0.88 release and pending Feature requests. I will summarize here the outcome: *** Accepted: Enhanced Color Selector:

Re: [Sugar-devel] [POLL] Dotted Activity Versions

2010-01-14 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 19:45, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote: On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 06:44:36PM +0100, Simon Schampijer wrote: *** Pending Dotted activity Versions: http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Dotted_Activity_Versions --- needs an owner --- final poll to take a decision

Re: [Sugar-devel] Automated coverage testing?

2010-01-14 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 11:47, Sascha Silbe sascha-ml-ui-sugar-de...@silbe.org wrote: On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 04:06:46PM +0530, Sayamindu Dasgupta wrote:  From what I understand, you need to have the accessibility bits in Sugar enabled first (atk, etc) for dogtail/ldtp to work. IIRC it

Re: [Sugar-devel] Automated coverage testing?

2010-01-14 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 17:19, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote: On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 11:47, Sascha Silbe sascha-ml-ui-sugar-de...@silbe.org wrote: On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 04:06:46PM +0530, Sayamindu

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] GCompris was Re: Sugar Digest 2010-01-07

2010-01-14 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 02:44, Caroline Meeks carol...@solutiongrove.com wrote: On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 3:15 PM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote: On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 19:24, Caroline Meeks solutiongr...@gmail.com wrote: === In the community === 2. Bruno Coudoin announced

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] [POLL] collab.sugarlabs.org

2010-01-14 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 18:52, Ed McNierney e...@laptop.org wrote: Tomeu - I think everyone should understand that things have changed quite a bit since January of 2009, and interpreting year-old emails may be a little misleading. I think Chris is both right and wrong here.  You need to

Re: [Sugar-devel] Please tag tarball releases in git repository, e.g. Sugar 0.87.2

2010-01-12 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
Ping! On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 13:14, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote: On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 14:04, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote: Hi, Please do remember to tag tarball releases in Git repositories.  Those tags are helpful for (some) distributors - like me :-) Oops

[Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] sugar-0.87.3

2010-01-12 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
== Source == http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/glucose/sugar/sugar-0.87.3.tar.bz2 == News == * shell breaks if system bus cannot be accessed #1403 * sugar-emulator: kill X server on exit #1440 * move ~/.i18n parsing from sugar-emulator to sugar #1441 * can't create ad-hoc network

Re: [Sugar-devel] Please tag tarball releases in git repository, e.g. Sugar 0.87.2

2010-01-12 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 18:35, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote: On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 05:51:32PM +0100, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: Ping! Was that targeted me? If so, why? Sorry, this as targeted to Simon about committing the patch for sugar-tools. Regards, Tomeu Sugar 0.87.2 was packaged

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] GCompris was Re: Sugar Digest 2010-01-07

2010-01-12 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 19:24, Caroline Meeks solutiongr...@gmail.com wrote: === In the community === 2. Bruno Coudoin announced the release of GCompris Version 9.0. Aleksey is already working on making sure that it is properly packaged for Sugar and available on

Re: [Sugar-devel] SOAS 2 problems

2010-01-11 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
Hi David, the most practical way of making sure that your download isn't corrupted is to verify the checksum: http://techcityinc.com/2009/02/06/calculate-md5-and-sha1-on-windows/ The SHA-1 checksum of the file should be the one in this file: http://download.sugarlabs.org/soas/releases/SHA1SUM

Re: [Sugar-devel] SoaS with Sugar 0.87.2 coming to a system near you

2010-01-11 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 13:00, Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de wrote: On 12/28/2009 09:14 PM, Sebastian Dziallas wrote: Hi everybody, by popular request, there's now a Sugar on a Stick snapshot with the latest Sugar development release available. Please note that this snapshot is

Re: [Sugar-devel] SOAS 2 problems

2010-01-11 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 17:25, Art Hunkins abhun...@uncg.edu wrote: Your byte count is the same as mine, and I've no problems. I use the Live USB Creator as well on WinXP. I second Tomeu's suggestion about checksum.. If Live USB Creator is already checking the checksum, then there's no point

Re: [Sugar-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Toolkit in Vala

2010-01-11 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 17:30, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote: Hi all, While packagin GCompris-9 for sugar, it was decided to have sugar native toolbas for GCompris in sugar environment. So, instead of coding them in plain C, new project was initiated to port sugar-toolkit to

Re: [Sugar-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Toolkit in Vala

2010-01-11 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 17:46, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote: On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 05:33:28PM +0100, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 17:30, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote: Hi all, While packagin GCompris-9 for sugar, it was decided to have sugar native

Re: [Sugar-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Toolkit in Vala

2010-01-11 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 18:33, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote: On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 12:22:25PM -0500, Wade Brainerd wrote: On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 12:20 PM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 5:16 PM, Wade Brainerd wad...@gmail.com wrote: On

Re: [Sugar-devel] [DESIGN] 'Resume' vs 'Start a new' Activity

2010-01-08 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 17:19, Benjamin M. Schwartz bmsch...@fas.harvard.edu wrote: Simon Schampijer wrote: When they resume a previous activity, and they wanted to start a new one, I have seen learners erasing the previous content and keep on working in that activity. This is the purpose of

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Mockup for collab.sugarlabs.org

2010-01-08 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 05:28, Wade Brainerd wad...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 9:47 AM, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote: All mentioned above could be(already) done in existed env. But the major idea of collab.sl.o proposal is bringing life to existed scheme by stimulating

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Mockup for collab.sugarlabs.org

2010-01-08 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 11:30, Gerald Ardito gma...@gmail.com wrote: Wade, You said: if only we could put every Sugar developer at a deployment for a week. I am a teacher and doctoral student managing a deployment of 150 XOs/SOAS and would love to have this happen! Is your deployment in

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Mockup for collab.sugarlabs.org

2010-01-08 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 11:37, Walther Neuper neu...@ist.tugraz.at wrote: Hi Wade, thanks for your initiative ! We would like to adjust (contribute?) to your efforts, since we just begin to try the same in a mini-environment: (student-)developers at our university + teacher students +

Re: [Sugar-devel] suggestions for additions to platform page

2010-01-05 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 11:54, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote: vte (and Python bindings) should be added (Terminal requires this) and it should be noted explicitly that python bindings for csound are required (Pippy and other activities use these) What's the process for making such

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] [POLL] collab.sugarlabs.org

2010-01-05 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
Excellent suggestion! +1 Tomeu On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 17:50, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote: Hi all, Background:  Step in issue, sugar is not unique here, thats the problem for other  FOSS projects as well. But sugar has it's own specific nature - sugar  stimulates(at least

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] [POLL] collab.sugarlabs.org

2010-01-05 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 17:58, Benjamin M. Schwartz bmsch...@fas.harvard.edu wrote: Aleksey Lim wrote: So, the question is should we have special place to treat such issues in convenient and casual developer/requester friendly manner. -1 1.  Fragmentation is bad.  We should instead attempt

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] [POLL] collab.sugarlabs.org

2010-01-05 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 18:05, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 11:50 AM, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote: Hi all, Background:  Step in issue, sugar is not unique here, thats the problem for other  FOSS projects as well. But sugar has it's own

Re: [Sugar-devel] Browse questions for Karma

2010-01-03 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 14:13, Bryan Berry br...@olenepal.org wrote: I am trying to run the Karma lessons using Browse instead of regular Firefox. Using Browse will enable me to create sugar bundle for karma that doesn't include binaries I have tested it on os10 of 0.86

Re: [Sugar-devel] [FEATURE] [DESIGN] Journal Reload a new attempt

2010-01-03 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 03:20, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote: (oops, wrong subject) Hi all, This post is not about particular feature but about proposed to 0.88 features that can be composited to one set. IMHO, instead of proposing (apparently out of the blue) new features that

Re: [Sugar-devel] File Share Activity

2010-01-03 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
Hola, creo que os puede interesar esta actividad, que facilita mucho la distribucion de contenido y actividades en el aula. http://activities.sugarlabs.org/en-US/sugar/addon/4266 Saludos, Tomeu On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 22:24, Justin Lewis jtl1...@rit.edu wrote: I have been building a File

Re: [Sugar-devel] Please tag tarball releases in git repository, e.g. Sugar 0.87.2

2010-01-03 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 14:04, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote: Hi, Please do remember to tag tarball releases in Git repositories.  Those tags are helpful for (some) distributors - like me :-) Oops, was a problem with the release script, git push failed because I had some non-uptodate

Re: [Sugar-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Sugar Services

2010-01-03 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 19:12, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote: Happy New Year to all, http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Activity_Team/Services I don't think I fully understand your plan with services yet, but when you feel this is ready to receive feedback from deployments, ask me, though

Re: [Sugar-devel] g.sl.o issues for Karma and perhaps other activities

2010-01-02 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 03:50, Bryan Berry br...@olenepal.org wrote: On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 6:16 AM, Wade Brainerd wad...@gmail.com wrote: This sounds like the ideal conditions for Git. Just set up a server at your office using any Git related software you want, like Gitorious or even GitWeb.

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar Development

2009-12-30 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 06:33, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote: On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 07:40:01AM -0500, Walter Bender wrote: Informally, we have such a list from Peru, which is our largest Sugar deployment. They use a core set of activities and have expressed the desire to see that set

[Sugar-devel] undo stack in gtk+

2009-12-30 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
Interesting thread, given that Undo is important for our learning goals: http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gtk-devel-list/2009-December/msg00082.html Regards, Tomeu -- «Sugar Labs is anyone who participates in improving and using Sugar. What Sugar Labs does is determined by the participants.» -

[Sugar-devel] Fwd: [olpc-nz] Inventing games in python

2009-12-30 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
-- Forwarded message -- From: Tabitha Roder tabitha.ro...@gmail.com Date: Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 01:11 Subject: [olpc-nz] Inventing games in python To: olpc-nz olpc...@lists.laptop.org, OLPC Devel de...@lists.laptop.org, Support Gangsters support-g...@laptop.org Useful website:

[Sugar-devel] Fwd: [Testing] Quick run-through of Activities that launch with build 802

2009-12-29 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
For activity authors that wish to know if their new versions still run on 8.2.x, Mikus have given some testing to several activities: -- Forwarded message -- From: Mikus Grinbergs mi...@bga.com Date: Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 18:20 Subject: [Testing] Quick run-through of Activities

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar Development

2009-12-29 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 22:50, Mark Symmonds msymmo...@codegladiator.com wrote: Hello! I am a freelance developer and LAMP architect with over twelve years experience.  I would like to get involved in the OLPC development project where my skills may be of best use.  Please let me know if

Re: [Sugar-devel] Accessibility - control panel

2009-12-29 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 20:09, Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 7:02 PM, Esteban Arias ear...@plan.ceibal.edu.uy wrote: In Uruguay, we have section of control panel: Accessibility. This item configurate keyboard accessibility options: mouse keys, bounce

Re: [Sugar-devel] Weekly Fedora Sugar Meetings

2009-12-29 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 22:06, Sebastian Dziallas sebast...@when.com wrote: Hi all, you've probably heard the rumor, that SoaS v3 will only ship Fedora packages. Now let me tell you this: It's true. What this means is that we can use a lot of help with packaging all kinds of crazy-awesome

[Sugar-devel] packaging accessibility tools

2009-12-29 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
Hi, Uruguay is working on adding some accessibility features to Sugar and they are using some stuff that, though old, is not properly packaged in any distro I know of: http://slappy.cs.uiuc.edu/fall98/Linux/download.html Do we have any volunteers to tackle packaging in their distro of choice?

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Debian-olpc-devel] packaging accessibility tools

2009-12-29 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 19:37, Sascha Silbe sascha-ml-ui-sugar-debian-olpc-de...@silbe.org wrote: On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 06:49:31PM +0100, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: http://slappy.cs.uiuc.edu/fall98/Linux/download.html xkbset is an alternative CLI (for the AccessX interface) and already packaged

Re: [Sugar-devel] Ticket 8104

2009-12-23 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 17:33, Cecilia Abalde caba...@plan.ceibal.edu.uy wrote: Hi, I have a question about the patch in ticket 8104. to which version of networkmanager was done? Hi Cecilia, I'm forwarding our email to the devel mailing list at OLPC because NetworkManager is a component that

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Marketing] Ad Design for StackOverflow

2009-12-21 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 15:56, Sean DALY sdaly...@gmail.com wrote: thanks all for these suggestions I think we can include both a call for motivation (kids education) and competence (python) I like the idea of Activities as an on-ramp - we certainly want to grow the ASLO ecosystem my

[Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] sugar-0.87.2

2009-12-21 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
== Source == http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/glucose/sugar/sugar-0.87.2.tar.bz2 == News == * Name input screen should be deactivable #1497 * Create temporary files for DS in ~/.sugar #1452 * can't connect to WEP shared key networks #1602 * intro screen doesn't unfreeze dcon #1601

[Sugar-devel] [DESIGN] multiple selection in the journal

2009-12-20 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
Hi, often have heard from the field about the need to select multiple entries and delete them. Should we add a checkbox to every entry in the list, or allow the user to select with shift-click and ctrl-click? Or anything else? Thanks, Tomeu -- «Sugar Labs is anyone who participates in

Re: [Sugar-devel] [DESIGN] multiple selection in the journal

2009-12-20 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 10:39, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote: Hi, often have heard from the field about the need to select multiple entries and delete them. Should we add a checkbox to every entry in the list, or allow the user to select with shift-click and ctrl-click? Or anything

[Sugar-devel] [DESIGN] Re: #1493 UNSP: Keep preferable activities

2009-12-20 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
What do people think about this? Thanks, Tomeu On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 09:46, Sugar Labs Bugs bugtracker-nore...@sugarlabs.org wrote: #1493: Keep preferable activities --+-    Reporter:  alsroot                    |      

[Sugar-devel] [DESIGN] what looks like an activity developer?

2009-12-20 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
Looks like this or can we find something more appropriate? http://activities.sugarlabs.org/img/amo2009/developers/hub-addon-fox.png Regards, Tomeu -- «Sugar Labs is anyone who participates in improving and using Sugar. What Sugar Labs does is determined by the participants.» - David Farning

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Marketing] Ad Design for StackOverflow

2009-12-20 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 17:54, Sean DALY sdaly...@gmail.com wrote: Many thanks Luke, a good catch as developers are difficult to reach in fact I've been thinking of placing such an ad with the Ad Bard network after our December free run for Blueberry is done - they cycle ads on dev-oriented

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Marketing] Ad Design for StackOverflow

2009-12-20 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 20:37, Gary C Martin g...@garycmartin.com wrote: Hi Tomeu, On 20 Dec 2009, at 19:31, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 17:54, Sean DALY sdaly...@gmail.com wrote: Many thanks Luke, a good catch as developers are difficult to reach in fact I've been thinking

[Sugar-devel] Fwd: Turtleart and Arduino

2009-12-19 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
Hola, creo que oi a alguien en esta lista comentar algo sobre arduino y olpc? Saludos, Tomeu -- Forwarded message -- From: Sayamindu Dasgupta sayami...@gmail.com Date: Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 13:00 Subject: [Sugar-devel] Turtleart and Arduino To: Sugar devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] [DESIGN][FEATURE] 3G modem support

2009-12-18 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 19:36, mabe...@paraguayeduca.org wrote: It has been discussed before and i have been working on it with Daniel Castelo from Uruguay. This is the link of the formal proposal, I will be updating it soon. http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/3G_Support I support this

Re: [Sugar-devel] [FEATURE] Journal Backup Restore

2009-12-18 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 14:38, crodas cro...@paraguayeduca.org wrote: Hello Everybody, Last year, Daniel Drake, while he was in Paraguay, he wrote a set of scripts to perform backups from SugarJournal to Schoolserver and a restore script. Everybody can see it: +

Re: [Sugar-devel] Technique to extract all records from xapian DB?

2009-12-16 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 17:48, Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote: I think it's worth trying, but not sure if worth merging and deploying. 0.82 didn't used directly the python xapian bindings, but some

Re: [Sugar-devel] Technique to extract all records from xapian DB?

2009-12-16 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 20:21, Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 9:46 PM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote: On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 17:48, Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Tomeu Vizoso

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Future of Zero Sugar

2009-12-15 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
-technical part of the problem. Regards, Tomeu On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 12:04 AM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote: On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 11:25, Benjamin M. Schwartz bmsch...@fas.harvard.edu wrote: Aleksey Lim wrote: So, I have strong intension to switching development focus

Re: [Sugar-devel] [FEATURE] [DESIGN] Frame Panels

2009-12-15 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 17:40, Wade Brainerd wad...@gmail.com wrote: +1 overall. The one thing that jumps out to me here is the idea that I could download frame components from ASLO, like a Clock or a Calendar.  That sounds fantastic. Yes, but what about security? Right now the shell process

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Future of Zero Sugar

2009-12-15 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 12:19, Bert Freudenberg b...@freudenbergs.de wrote: On 15.12.2009, at 15:09, Daniel Drake wrote: I believe there are still various well-known 0.86 regressions (over 0.84). For example, Record not working. These regressions are going to be a huge headache to anyone who

Re: [Sugar-devel] [FEATURE] [DESIGN] for Journal Plugins feature

2009-12-15 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
: On 6 Dec 2009, at 21:19, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: 2009/11/27 Aleksey Limalsr...@member.fsf.org: On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 06:13:55AM +, Aleksey Lim wrote: Hi all, Want to know what people think about Journal Plugins feature[1] and particularly that design team think about UI changes[2

Re: [Sugar-devel] [FEATURE] TableView Widget request for inclusion to 0.88

2009-12-15 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 14:53, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote: On Sun, Dec 06, 2009 at 02:37:07PM +0100, Simon Schampijer wrote: On 11/28/2009 05:00 AM, Aleksey Lim wrote: Hi all, Hi Aleksey, thanks for proposing this feature!

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Sharing work between XOs/SOAS devices

2009-12-15 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 15:36, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com wrote: Sugar 0.86 has sharing built into the Journal. But that doesn't help you (yet) on your XO machines :( Paraguay is coming to the rescue :) http://lists.laptop.org/pipermail/devel/2009-December/026947.html Regards,

Re: [Sugar-devel] [FEATURE] TableView Widget request for inclusion to 0.88

2009-12-15 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 16:33, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote: On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 03:28:23PM -0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 14:53, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote: On Sun, Dec 06, 2009 at 02:37:07PM +0100, Simon Schampijer wrote: On 11/28/2009 05:00

Re: [Sugar-devel] Glucose and Frame

2009-12-15 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 16:39, Cilyan Olowen gak...@gmail.com wrote: Hello ! I'm all new in the Sugar community, but I'm very interested in Sugar's very simple and intuitive interface for my grand parents who are completely new to computers. As I need a light and very strong system, I

Re: [Sugar-devel] Glucose and Frame

2009-12-15 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 16:58, Cilyan Olowen gak...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks for the reply, here is the log and indeed, it seems there is a problem with the presence service. http://pastebin.com/mdac6658 Ok, and what says sugar-presence-service? Regards, Tomeu 2009/12/15 Tomeu Vizoso

Re: [Sugar-devel] [NEW FEATURE] write to the journal whenever you want

2009-12-14 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 15:49, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 9:47 AM, Gary C Martin g...@garycmartin.com wrote: Hi Walter, On 19 Nov 2009, at 19:32, Walter Bender wrote: Many of us love the Naming Alert, but even more seem to despise it. With this

Re: [Sugar-devel] Backwards compatible Browse

2009-12-14 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 01:00, Wade Brainerd wad...@gmail.com wrote: I cloned Browse v114 and spent a few hours hacking on backwards compatibility.  I added compatibility fallbacks for the toolbars and a few other modules. The repository is here:

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activity Versioning - Dotted Scheme

2009-12-14 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 01:42, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote: On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 04:38:56PM +0100, Bert Freudenberg wrote: On 30.11.2009, at 21:24, Bert Freudenberg wrote: On 30.11.2009, at 20:02, Aleksey Lim wrote: On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 07:49:15PM +0100, Simon

Re: [Sugar-devel] [FEATURE] [DESIGN] Frame Panels

2009-12-14 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 03:42, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote: Hi all, At the end Journal Plugins mutated to Frame Panles feature. All UI visible changes I wanted to implement in plugins could be done via Frame Panle components(the rest of code are shell agnostic). I'm having

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Future of Zero Sugar

2009-12-14 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 11:25, Benjamin M. Schwartz bmsch...@fas.harvard.edu wrote: Aleksey Lim wrote: So, I have strong intension to switching development focus from core team, which develops sucrose - glucose(core) and fructose(some core activities) to wide range of developers/doers thus

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Future of Zero Sugar

2009-12-14 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 17:01, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote: On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 04:19:51PM -0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 11:25, Benjamin M. Schwartz bmsch...@fas.harvard.edu wrote: Aleksey Lim wrote: So, I have strong intension to switching

Re: [Sugar-devel] moving some more configuration to gconf (was Re: some efforts that would be really useful for deployments)

2009-12-14 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 06:56, Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de wrote: On 12/07/2009 11:39 AM, Mathieu Bridon (bochecha) wrote: On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 10:11, Simon Schampijersi...@schampijer.de  wrote: Yes, I think it makes sense to control settings via gconf - this should be our standard

Re: [Sugar-devel] File Share Activity

2009-12-12 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
Would you like for people in Uruguay to test it? 0.84 and later Sugar releases have file transfer in the journal, but most OLPC machines are stuck with 0.82 for the time being. Btw, are you the author of Bundle or is it another Lewis? http://dev.laptop.org/git/activities/bundleactivity/

Re: [Sugar-devel] Technique to extract all records from xapian DB?

2009-12-11 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 12:49, Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote: I am trying to add minimal support on 0.84 for the old 0.82 format in which JE metadata was saved on external disks. By minimal I mean read-only, fail-safe, and generally with small impact on the codebase. I sure

[Sugar-devel] branches for sugar-base and hulahop

2009-12-11 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
Hi, hulahop lacks any branch and sugar-base has only 0.82 and 0.86. Can the missing branches be created in the points where new development started? Thanks, Tomeu -- «Sugar Labs is anyone who participates in improving and using Sugar. What Sugar Labs does is determined by the participants.» -

[Sugar-devel] resource for understanding git

2009-12-11 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
Unfortunately, for learning git you need to have some knowledge of its architecture. This link has helped me understand quite a bit of things: http://www.newartisans.com/2008/04/git-from-the-bottom-up.html Regards, Tomeu -- «Sugar Labs is anyone who participates in improving and using Sugar.

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Feature] activity.info enhancements

2009-12-11 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 17:18, Sayamindu Dasgupta sayami...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 11:13 PM, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com wrote: Summary: It would facilitate the packaging of Sugar activities into RPMs and DEBs if there were additional information available in the

Re: [Sugar-devel] links and commands for supporting development

2009-12-10 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
http://bradthemad.org/tech/notes/patching_rpms.php http://www.rpm.org/max-rpm/s1-rpm-miscellania-rpm2cpio.html http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/F-11/sugar/sugar.spec?view=markup http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=144037 Regards, Tomeu On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 17:20, Tomeu

Re: [Sugar-devel] Fructose - What is it? What should it be?

2009-12-06 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
2009/11/27 Gary C Martin g...@garycmartin.com: Hi Tomeu, On 26 Nov 2009, at 12:41, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 17:44, Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de wrote: On 11/24/2009 03:18 PM, Aleksey Lim wrote: On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 02:57:16PM +0100, Simon Schampijer wrote: Hi

[Sugar-devel] [DESIGN] activity upgrading (was Re: some efforts that would be really useful for deployments)

2009-12-06 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
2009/11/25 Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org: [snip] Automatic activity upgrading Activity updating is too difficult for young children to understand and is very hard to coordinate across a classroom. This one I have never had time to hack a fix into place. Also the You should upgrade your

[Sugar-devel] translation updates (was Re: some efforts that would be really useful for deployments)

2009-12-06 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
2009/11/25 Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org: Another constant headache is with translations. How do you roll out new translations for old software? The best we have right now is language packs but they install files which conflict with both system packages and activity bundles. And they are

Re: [Sugar-devel] some efforts that would be really useful for deployments

2009-12-06 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
2009/11/25 Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org: Hi, After revisiting some of the changes I have made to the software while working on deployments I just wanted to post the list again as a refresher. Thanks for doing this, I think it really helps to ping people until the important stuff gets finally

Re: [Sugar-devel] 0.84 maintenance

2009-12-06 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
2009/12/1 Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org: Hi, Earlier this year, OLPC began developing a new laptop (XO-1.5) and OLPC OS (based on Fedora 11). Sugar-0.84 was hot off the presses at that time so even though it may feel a little dated today, it's what we've been working with and will soon be

[Sugar-devel] moving some more configuration to gconf (was Re: some efforts that would be really useful for deployments)

2009-12-06 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
2009/11/25 Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org: [snip] Customizing browse homepage The procedure to do this is too complicated for most deployments, and is undocumented. Customizing which activities are in the favourites view by default You can do this just by editing a file, but that file is a

Re: [Sugar-devel] [FEATURE] [DESIGN] for Journal Plugins feature

2009-12-06 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
2009/11/27 Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org: On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 06:13:55AM +, Aleksey Lim wrote: Hi all, Want to know what people think about Journal Plugins feature[1] and particularly that design team think about UI changes[2] involved in this feature. [1]

[Sugar-devel] registering/unregistering to XS (was Re: some efforts that would be really useful for deployments)

2009-12-06 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
2009/11/25 Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org: Unregistering from an XSes / registering with multiple XSes A hack available here: http://dev.sugarlabs.org/ticket/362 Still no user-friendly or documented way of doing this. From the other day's conversation in #sugar, seemed like the command line

Re: [Sugar-devel] [FEATURE] Activity as a regular Journal Object request for inclusion to 0.88

2009-12-06 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
2009/12/3 Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org: On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 12:23:37AM -0500, Eben Eliason wrote: On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 5:54 AM, Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 9:40 PM, Wade Brainerd wad...@gmail.com wrote: When deleting an object from

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] [ANNOUNCE] Feature Policy updated

2009-12-06 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
2009/11/29 Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de: On 11/27/2009 09:00 PM, Sascha Silbe wrote: On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 07:40:26PM +0100, Simon Schampijer wrote: * Backup up by the community * The proposer of the feature has to get feedback from the community. This includes technical feedback,

Re: [Sugar-devel] Removing Log and Terminal from favorites view

2009-12-04 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 11:21, Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de wrote: On 12/04/2009 12:15 PM, Daniel Drake wrote: Hi, For the OLPC builds we're removing Log and Terminal from the default favorites view. Is there any interest in making this change in upstream sugar too? The reasons

Re: [Sugar-devel] adding 3G devices support to sugar

2009-12-03 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 18:44, Martin Abente mabe...@paraguayeduca.org wrote: Today i finished the systray device icon. (but i still need the icon graphic... any artist around?) What would be a good symbol? A GSM base station?

[Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] sugar-0.87.1

2009-12-01 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
== Source == http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/glucose/sugar/sugar-0.87.1.tar.bz2 == News == * Several Access Points with the same essid #330 ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org

[Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] sugar-presence-service-0.87.1

2009-12-01 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
== Source == http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/glucose/sugar-presence-service/sugar-presence-service-0.87.1.tar.bz2 ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

[Sugar-devel] adding 3G devices support to sugar

2009-12-01 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
Hi all, have heard about progress from the different people involved in this effort, but it's being a bit hard to track who is doing what and where the problems are. Could you write a small note in this thread saying what the status are, plans going forward and any problems you are finding? As

Re: [Sugar-devel] maintenance of 0.84 branches

2009-11-27 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 13:43, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote: On Thu, 2009-11-26 at 09:53 +, Daniel Drake wrote: On Thu, 2009-11-26 at 09:45 +, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: We'll need that they make explicit which modules want to take maintenance of and then each current maintainer

Re: [Sugar-devel] [DESIGN] CMDA/GSM/3G Modem Support in Sugar

2009-11-27 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 12:48, Daniel Castelo dcastelo.sugarl...@gmail.com wrote: We are thinking in add CMDA/GSM/3G Modems Support in Sugar. We want to discuss the best interface to allow user configure and use this type of connections. Awesome! The basical idea that we managed is to have

[Sugar-devel] maintenance of 0.84 branches

2009-11-26 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
Hi, Daniel Drake and Sayamindu Dasgupta have offered to take maintenance of the 0.84 branches of some modules in glucose and fructose. I'm happy about this because apart from their technical capabilities, they are working for OLPC's deployments so can know better what their needs are. Any

Re: [Sugar-devel] Ooo4Kids in several languages - how to let it appear on aslo?

2009-11-26 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
Hi Bastien, On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 09:27, Bastien bastiengue...@googlemail.com wrote: Dear all, I just uploaded Ooo4Kids 0.5.1 on aslo:  http://activities.sugarlabs.org/fr/sugar/addon/4241 There is an spanish version here:  http://download.ooo4kids.org/es/descargar-ooo4kids-xo-intel How

Re: [Sugar-devel] Ooo4Kids in several languages - how to let it appear on aslo?

2009-11-26 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 09:48, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote: Hi Bastien, On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 09:27, Bastien bastiengue...@googlemail.com wrote: Dear all, I just uploaded Ooo4Kids 0.5.1 on aslo:  http://activities.sugarlabs.org/fr/sugar/addon/4241 There is an spanish version

Re: [Sugar-devel] GSM/CDMA Modems support (part II)

2009-11-26 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 14:47, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote: On Wed, 2009-11-25 at 09:36 -0500, Martin Abente wrote: Would a patch that extends the allowed connection types be accepted in the 0.84 branch (that will be shipped with F11) ? Depends on the patch, but in general one

Re: [Sugar-devel] Fructose - What is it? What should it be?

2009-11-26 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 17:44, Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de wrote: On 11/24/2009 03:18 PM, Aleksey Lim wrote: On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 02:57:16PM +0100, Simon Schampijer wrote: Hi, this came up several times now. People where wondering what Fructose is.   From the definition it is:

Re: [Sugar-devel] .swf files visualization and bundling

2009-11-26 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 11:02, Wade Brainerd wad...@gmail.com wrote: Good question - the SWF author would have to manually add support for sharing to the activity.  I believe Gnash has DBus bindings, so that might be a possibility.  If there is interested by at least one SWF author, I could

Re: [Sugar-devel] Record rewrite -- was Re: [SoaS] SoaS v2 approaching RC state

2009-11-26 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 14:41, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote: On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 12:25:12AM +, Aleksey Lim wrote: On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 11:51:55PM +, Peter Robinson wrote: On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 9:13 PM, Sebastian Dziallas sebast...@when.com wrote: Hi all,

Re: [Sugar-devel] [ANNOUNCE] development team meeting thursday at 14.00 UTC

2009-11-26 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
And here are the logs: http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting.minutes.20091126_0919.html http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting.log.20091126_0919.html Regards, Tomeu On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 09:15, Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de wrote: On 11/24/2009 06:27 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote

<    2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   >