Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SOAS 33/34 Changes.

Thanks for testing, can you share a log of the activity after it fails to start? -- Ibiam Chihurumnaya ibiamchihurumn...@gmail.com On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 3:17 AM Alex Perez wrote: > I tested today's nightly rawhide of SoaS, and can confirm it behaves as > expected/desired, with session

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SOAS 33/34 Changes.

Thanks for testing! On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 06:17:42PM -0800, Alex Perez wrote: > I tested today's nightly rawhide of SoaS, and can confirm it behaves as > expected/desired, with session auto-login. All activities start _except_ > FotoToon. > > Downloaded from

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SOAS 33/34 Changes.

I tested today's nightly rawhide of SoaS, and can confirm it behaves as expected/desired, with session auto-login. All activities start _except_ FotoToon. Downloaded from 

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SoaS 32 is silent?

Correct, this is a function of multiple audio outputs, and how they are enumerated. I have verified that SoaS boots and runs, with sound and no changes required, on an old iMac5,2, form 2007. As an aside, this is one of those weird Apple-manufactured 32-bit EFI machines (but 64-bit CPUs).

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SoaS 32 is silent?

Good, that makes it not-Sugar. Get it fixed on Workstation is your best bet. I've seen this kind of thing happen with laptops that have HDMI output capability. Audio is being clocked out a disconnected port. Sugar predates PulseAudio. Sugar has no support for anything other than ALSA. An

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SoaS 32 is silent?

On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 12:20:57AM -0400, Frederick Grose wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 11:18 PM James Cameron <[1]qu...@laptop.org> wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 10:25:28PM -0400, Frederick Grose wrote: > > I've opened [2]https://bugs.sugarlabs.org/ticket/4998 and attached the

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SoaS 32 is silent?

On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 10:25:28PM -0400, Frederick Grose wrote: > I've opened https://bugs.sugarlabs.org/ticket/4998 and attached the > zipped logs from some test sessions. Thanks. I've reviewed the logs. They show successful playback by GStreamer into a sound sink of some sort, but no

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SoaS Fedora 27 beta fails to launch Sugar session

On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 8:50 PM, James Cameron wrote: > On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 11:36:13AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 9:29 PM, James Cameron wrote: >> > On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 10:00:11AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: >> >> On Thu,

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SoaS Fedora 27 beta fails to launch Sugar session

On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 11:36:13AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 9:29 PM, James Cameron wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 10:00:11AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > >> On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 9:54 AM, James Cameron wrote: > >> > On

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SoaS Fedora 27 beta fails to launch Sugar session

On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 9:19 PM, James Cameron wrote: > Everybody is talking not listening. Listen up. ;-) > > Frederick showed traceback from shell.log which said > viewhelp_webkit2.py is missing. > > viewhelp_webkit2.py is missing from sugar-0.110.0-5.fc27.noarch.rpm > >

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SoaS Fedora 27 beta fails to launch Sugar session

Everybody is talking not listening. Listen up. ;-) Frederick showed traceback from shell.log which said viewhelp_webkit2.py is missing. viewhelp_webkit2.py is missing from sugar-0.110.0-5.fc27.noarch.rpm viewhelp_webkit2.py was added by sugar-0.110.0-5.fc27.src.rpm sugar-dropWebKitGtk3.patch

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SoaS Fedora 27 beta fails to launch Sugar session

On 10/26/2017 01:29 PM, James Cameron wrote: On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 10:00:11AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 9:54 AM, James Cameron wrote: On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 08:58:01AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 12:24 AM, James

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SOAS

On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 2:46 AM, David Leeming wrote: > Hi, > > Well my old Toshiba laptop for instance, a Qosmio i7, a few years old but was > a $2000 laptop when new. On this I can't boot and run SOAS. It never > completes booting, you go through the name, colour,

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SOAS

rt intervention. Regards, Iain > David > > > -Original Message- > From: qu...@laptop.org [mailto:qu...@laptop.org] > Sent: Wednesday, 9 September 2015 11:05 a.m. > To: David Leeming > Cc: s...@lists.sugarlabs.org; sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org > Subject: Re:

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SOAS

15 10:58 a.m. > To: Development of live Sugar distributions > Cc: Sugar-dev Devel; Iain Brown Douglas > Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SOAS > > Hi David, > > I'm the SoaS maintainer. > >> I want to demonstrate SOAS to teachers in Vanuatu. I would like to be more >

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SOAS

...@lists.sugarlabs.org [mailto: > sugar-devel-boun...@lists.sugarlabs.org] On Behalf Of Peter Robinson > > Sent: Wednesday, 22 July 2015 10:58 a.m. > > To: Development of live Sugar distributions > > Cc: Sugar-dev Devel; Iain Brown Douglas > > Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS]

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SOAS

do > > that either. > > > > Hope this feedback is useful, > > > > David Leeming > > Solomon Islands > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Peter Robinson [mailto:pbrobin...@gmail.com] > > Sent: Tuesday, 8 September 2

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SOAS

: Peter Robinson [mailto:pbrobin...@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, 8 September 2015 8:04 p.m. > To: David Leeming > Cc: Development of live Sugar distributions; Sugar-dev Devel; Iain Brown > Douglas > Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SOAS > > Hi David, > > Sorry, th

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SOAS

distributions; Sugar-dev Devel; Iain Brown Douglas Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SOAS Hi David, Sorry, this seem to have fallen through the cracks. > Iain referred me to a Fedora community where LinuxliveUSB installer was > recommended and it works just fine. It also installs a Linux em

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SOAS

r 2015 8:04 p.m. > To: David Leeming > Cc: Development of live Sugar distributions; Sugar-dev Devel; Iain Brown > Douglas > Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SOAS > > Hi David, > > Sorry, this seem to have fallen through the cracks. > > > Iain referred me to

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SOAS

not very reliable way to do > > that either. > > > > Hope this feedback is useful, > > > > David Leeming > > Solomon Islands > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Peter Robinson [mailto:pbrobin...@gmail.com] > >

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SOAS

Message- > From: qu...@laptop.org [mailto:qu...@laptop.org] > Sent: Wednesday, 9 September 2015 10:37 a.m. > To: David Leeming > Cc: s...@lists.sugarlabs.org; sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org > Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SOAS > > G'day David, > > I've no

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SOAS

Inline quoted reply. On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 12:46:37PM +1100, David Leeming wrote: > Well my old Toshiba laptop for instance, a Qosmio i7, a few years > old but was a $2000 laptop when new. On this I can't boot and run > SOAS. It never completes booting, you go through the name, colour, >

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SOAS

Leeming Cc: s...@lists.sugarlabs.org; sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SOAS The same hardware requirements for the corresponding version of Fedora, since SOAS is based on Fedora. SOAS itself has no hardware requirements beyond what Fedora has. SOAS and Sugar

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SOAS

September 2015 1:00 p.m. To: David Leeming Cc: s...@lists.sugarlabs.org; sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SOAS Inline quoted reply. On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 12:46:37PM +1100, David Leeming wrote: > Well my old Toshiba laptop for instance, a Qosmio i7, a few ye

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SOAS

sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org > Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SOAS > > Inline quoted reply. > > On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 12:46:37PM +1100, David Leeming wrote: > > Well my old Toshiba laptop for instance, a Qosmio i7, a few years > > old but was a $2000 lapto

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SOAS

-boun...@lists.sugarlabs.org [mailto:sugar-devel-boun...@lists.sugarlabs.org] On Behalf Of Peter Robinson Sent: Wednesday, 22 July 2015 10:58 a.m. To: Development of live Sugar distributions Cc: Sugar-dev Devel; Iain Brown Douglas Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SOAS Hi David, I'm the SoaS

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SOAS

Hi David, 2GB should be an OK size for a soas stick. I think you'd get 1GB of journal storage if your lucky. What operating system are you trying to create the sugar stick on? If your on windows, maybe try the win32 disk imager program [1]. If your on Linux, try using the plan dd command.

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SOAS

Hi David, I'm the SoaS maintainer. I want to demonstrate SOAS to teachers in Vanuatu. I would like to be more useful, but actually don't have the luxury of time to research these arcane technical issues in which I am not an expert. I just want to know, is there a version of SOAS that is

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SoaS v10 testing and a few minor issues with 0.100

Hi, Hello, I would like to test SoaS v10 beta directly on a USB key. I have a G1G1 XO-1 computer but XO computers are not easily available for the public at large. So during my demonstrations I prefer to present Sugar on a Stick in parallel with the XO :

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SoaS v10 testing and a few minor issues with 0.100

On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 12:15 PM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Hello, I would like to test SoaS v10 beta directly on a USB key. I have a G1G1 XO-1 computer but XO computers are not easily available for the public at large. So during my demonstrations I prefer to present

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SoaS v10 testing and a few minor issues with 0.100

- The eToys activity (version 116) does not start properly then displays « cannot find image file: squeak, did you run 'inisqueak-m' ? » The eToys developers are basically unresponsive, I'm in two minds whether we even bother to ship it because they can't be bothered doing things

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SoaS v10 testing and a few minor issues with 0.100

On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 5:27 PM, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 12:15 PM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Hello, I would like to test SoaS v10 beta directly on a USB key. I have a G1G1 XO-1 computer but XO computers are not easily

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SoaS v10 testing and a few minor issues with 0.100

On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 5:33 PM, Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org wrote: - The eToys activity (version 116) does not start properly then displays « cannot find image file: squeak, did you run 'inisqueak-m' ? » The eToys developers are basically unresponsive, I'm in two minds

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SoaS v10 testing and a few minor issues with 0.100

On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Jean THIERY jean.thi...@modlibre.info wrote: Hello, I would like to test SoaS v10 beta directly on a USB key. I have a G1G1 XO-1 computer but XO computers are not easily available for the public at large. So during my demonstrations I prefer to present Sugar

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SoaS v7?

This is an example of a dd writable SoaS-v2.img file which produces a fully functional Conventional install on a USB. This is equivalent to a liveinst install to USB.[1] It was first suggested by bernie [2] in early 2010 as a better alternative to the currently used live USB SoaS

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SoaS v7?

Devel Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2011 1:17 PM Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SoaS v7? This is an example of a dd writable SoaS-v2.img file which produces a fully functional Conventional install on a USB. This is equivalent to a liveinst install to USB.[1] It was first suggested

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SoaS v7?

On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 7:18 PM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, So there's no rest for the wicked its time to think about what you would like to develop for SoaS v7. I know upstream is all very busy already the sugar team are full pelt into the conversion of sugar

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SoaS v7?

Any chance of trying to get Tam Tam to work on SoaS? Caryl Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 00:18:36 + From: pbrobin...@gmail.com To: s...@lists.sugarlabs.org; sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org Subject: [SoaS] SoaS v7? Hi All, So there's no rest for the wicked its time to think about what

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SoaS fixes this week!!

On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 6:16 PM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: Hello Fans! So we've had a lot of movement and fixes submitted this week! Actually. I've fixed a few things in the last day or so. So what's happened recently (ie: what's in the snapshot below: - Latest 0.92.1

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SoaS fixes this week!!

On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 11:27 PM, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 6:16 PM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: Hello Fans! So we've had a lot of movement and fixes submitted this week! Actually. I've fixed a few things in the last day or so.

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SoaS fixes this week!!

Preliminary testing: Acer and MacBook + activities http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Community/Distributions/Fedora-SoaS#SoaSv5-20110415-i686 Looks Good : ) Tom Gilliard satellit Peter Robinson wrote: On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 11:27 PM, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Apr 15,

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SoaS v5 status

Thomas, 1. Multiple pop-ups of keychain on starting sugar-emulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690586 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=649013 http://bugs.sugarlabs.org/ticket/2652 Thanks for reminding me of that one. I believe we have a fix, I'll dig it out.

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SoaS v5 status

On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 1:13 AM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, Sorry for a lot of the recent radio silence. In short I've been travelling a lot and work and my personal life took over pretty close to completely since FUDCon at the end of January :-( That said I've spent

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SoaS v5 status

Peter Robinson wrote: On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 9:13 AM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, Sorry for a lot of the recent radio silence. In short I've been travelling a lot and work and my personal life took over pretty close to completely since FUDCon at the end of January

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SoaS v5 status

On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 4:08 PM, Thomas C Gilliard satel...@bendbroadband.com wrote: Peter Robinson wrote: On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 9:13 AM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, Sorry for a lot of the recent radio silence. In short I've been travelling a lot and work and my

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SoaS v5 status

Peter: Marketing Meeting just ended: Take a look Tom Gilliard satellit http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting/meetings/2011-04-05T14:05:39 http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting/meetings/2011-04-05T14:05:39.html Peter Robinson wrote: On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 4:08 PM, Thomas C Gilliard

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SoaS v5 status

Damn, I was watching IRC for it and it seems I was having some connectivity issues. GRR! Thanks, Peter On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 4:35 PM, Thomas C Gilliard satel...@bendbroadband.com wrote: Peter: Marketing Meeting just ended: Take a look Tom Gilliard satellit

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SoaS v5 status

On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 10:18 AM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 9:13 AM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, Sorry for a lot of the recent radio silence. In short I've been travelling a lot and work and my personal life took over pretty close

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SoaS v5 status

Peter: These are the major problems I see with sugar-desktop 0.92.0 installed to f15: yum install@sugar-desktop --skip-broken sugar-emulator http://serverbeach1.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/15-Beta.TC1/Live/i686/Fedora-15-Beta-i686-Live-Desktop.iso 1. Multiple pop-ups of keychain on

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SoaS v5 status

On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 11:25 AM, Thomas C Gilliard satel...@bendbroadband.com wrote: Peter: These are the major problems I see with sugar-desktop 0.92.0 installed to f15: yum install@sugar-desktop --skip-broken sugar-emulator

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SoaS v5 status

Rafael Ortiz wrote: On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 11:25 AM, Thomas C Gilliard satel...@bendbroadband.com wrote: Peter: These are the major problems I see with sugar-desktop 0.92.0 installed to f15: yum install@sugar-desktop --skip-broken sugar-emulator

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SoaS 5 feature list

I added this to the Soas_v-5 list: Implement feature: Revised_Browse_default-bookmarks proposed and approved for v-4 SoaS http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Revised_Browse_default-bookmarks.html We need to discuss on list what would included on the wiki page linked from the sugar-browse

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SoaS 5 feature list

On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 9:50 AM, Thomas C Gilliard satel...@bendbroadband.com wrote: I added this to the Soas_v-5 list: Implement feature: Revised_Browse_default-bookmarks proposed and approved for v-4 SoaS http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Revised_Browse_default-bookmarks.html What was

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SoaS 5 feature list

Peter Robinson wrote: On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 9:50 AM, Thomas C Gilliard satel...@bendbroadband.com wrote: I added this to the Soas_v-5 list: Implement feature: Revised_Browse_default-bookmarks proposed and approved for v-4 SoaS

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SoaS 4 - Mango Lassi is out.

- From: sugar-devel-boun...@lists.sugarlabs.org [mailto:sugar-devel-boun...@lists.sugarlabs.org] On Behalf Of Thomas C Gilliard Sent: Wednesday, 3 November 2010 5:14 p.m. To: Development of live Sugar distributions Cc: Sugar Labs Marketing; Sugar devel Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SoaS 4

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SoaS 4 - Mango Lassi is out.

, 2010 7:08 PM Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SoaS 4 - Mango Lassi is out. Testing SOAS 4 Mango Lassi on a 32-bit PC. Image used is Fedora-14-i686-Live-SoaS.iso and installed using Fedora LiveUSB Creator 3.9.2 on a 2GB flashdrive that has been tested OK with Marabelle. I used 498 MB

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] soas-i386-20100921.15.iso CD Boot test bug report

On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Thomas C Gilliard satel...@bendbroadband.com wrote: CD Boot test soas-i386-20100921.15.iso f14(Laughlin) Sugar on a stick (Mango Lassi) 1-)grey boot screen, boots to Name__ 2-) pops up enter keychain password 6+times (does not work) then it lets soas

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] soas-i386-20100921.15.iso CD Boot test bug report

Peter Robinson wrote: On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Thomas C Gilliard satel...@bendbroadband.com wrote: CD Boot test soas-i386-20100921.15.iso f14(Laughlin) Sugar on a stick (Mango Lassi) 1-)grey boot screen, boots to Name__ 2-) pops up enter keychain password 6+times (does not

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] soas-i386-20100921.15.iso CD Boot test bug report

Thomas C Gilliard wrote: Peter Robinson wrote: On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Thomas C Gilliard satel...@bendbroadband.com wrote: CD Boot test soas-i386-20100921.15.iso f14(Laughlin) Sugar on a stick (Mango Lassi) 1-)grey boot screen, boots to Name__ 2-) pops up enter keychain

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SOAS-3: Final Activity List - Attention needed!

On 05/05/2010 02:45 AM, Mel Chua wrote: Regarding inclusion of the Get (Internet Archive) Books Activity - while the goals of including this Activity are admirable, it simply isn't going to happen for v.3.0 due to the timing of deadlines beyond our control. Let's take a look at why, and see

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SOAS-3: Final Activity List - Attention needed!

No, the version numbers in the press releases were changes I proposed fom the existing numbering. So SoaS-1 became the beta-1, SoaS-2 became the v1. The objective was to make the numbers instantly understandable, and allow us to build omentum wth each release. Unfortunately, we can't do that with

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SOAS-3: Final Activity List - Attention needed!

Oh yes Tom I saw that - fabulous! thanks Sean On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 5:51 PM, Thomas C Gilliard satel...@bendbroadband.com wrote: Sean DALY wrote: No, the version numbers in the press releases were changes I proposed fom the existing numbering. So SoaS-1 became the beta-1, SoaS-2 became

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SOAS-3: Final Activity List - Attention needed!

On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 3:15 PM, Sean DALY sdaly...@gmail.com wrote: No, the version numbers in the press releases were changes I proposed fom the existing numbering. So SoaS-1 became the beta-1, SoaS-2 became the v1. The objective was to make the numbers instantly understandable, and allow us

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SOAS-3: Final Activity List - Attention needed!

On the contrary, the wide press coverage we had last June was because we baptized SoaS-2 as v1 (reread the BBC article for example). v2 had less coverage, which was to be expected; so the objective there was to underline Sugar's e-book readers. Mirabelle has neither of James Simmons' Get Books or

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SOAS-3: Final Activity List - Attention needed!

On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 6:03 PM, Sean DALY sdaly...@gmail.com wrote: On the contrary, the wide press coverage we had last June was because we baptized SoaS-2 as v1 (reread the BBC article for example). v2 had less coverage, which was to be expected; so the objective there was to underline

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SOAS-3: Final Activity List - Attention needed!

On 26.04.2010, at 15:37, Peter Robinson wrote: On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 11:26 PM, Bert Freudenberg b...@freudenbergs.de wrote: On 27.04.2010, at 00:17, Peter Robinson wrote: On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 11:10 PM, Bert Freudenberg b...@freudenbergs.de wrote: * There is no sound in Etoys.

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SOAS-3: Final Activity List - Attention needed!

I also hear sounds in Etoys Version 115 running soas-i386-20100501.07.iso as a booted 2 GB USB with acer aspire one 324h I heard the coyote howl Tom Gilliard satellit Bert Freudenberg wrote: On 26.04.2010, at 15:37, Peter Robinson wrote: On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 11:26 PM, Bert

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SOAS-3: Final Activity List - Attention needed!

Regarding inclusion of the Get (Internet Archive) Books Activity - while the goals of including this Activity are admirable, it simply isn't going to happen for v.3.0 due to the timing of deadlines beyond our control. Let's take a look at why, and see what we can learn from this in terms of

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SOAS-3: Final Activity List - Attention needed!

==Preliminary soas-i386-20100426 testing== 2GB USB: ./livecd-iso-to-disk --format --reset-mbr --overlay-size-mb 1200 /home//Desktop/soas-i386-20100426.16.iso /dev/sdg Boot in ACER Aspire One no Plymouth startup screen: barf12 hangs at end of progress bar ===- f13 Reboot edit boot

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SOAS-3: Final Activity List - Attention needed!

On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 12:45 PM, Thomas C Gilliard satel...@bendbroadband.com wrote: ==Preliminary soas-i386-20100426 testing== 2GB USB: ./livecd-iso-to-disk  --format --reset-mbr --overlay-size-mb 1200 /home//Desktop/soas-i386-20100426.16.iso /dev/sdg Boot in ACER Aspire One no

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SOAS-3: Final Activity List - Attention needed!

Peter Robinson wrote: On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 12:45 PM, Thomas C Gilliard satel...@bendbroadband.com wrote: ==Preliminary soas-i386-20100426 testing== 2GB USB: ./livecd-iso-to-disk --format --reset-mbr --overlay-size-mb 1200 /home//Desktop/soas-i386-20100426.16.iso /dev/sdg Boot in

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SOAS-3: Final Activity List - Attention needed!

On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 1:34 PM, Thomas C Gilliard satel...@bendbroadband.com wrote: Peter Robinson wrote: On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 12:45 PM, Thomas C Gilliard satel...@bendbroadband.com wrote: ==Preliminary soas-i386-20100426 testing== 2GB USB: ./livecd-iso-to-disk  --format

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SOAS-3: Final Activity List - Attention needed!

Peter Robinson wrote: On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 1:34 PM, Thomas C Gilliard satel...@bendbroadband.com wrote: Peter Robinson wrote: On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 12:45 PM, Thomas C Gilliard satel...@bendbroadband.com wrote: ==Preliminary soas-i386-20100426 testing== 2GB USB:

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SOAS-3: Final Activity List - Attention needed!

I'd much rather we work together. Making Sugar and its Activities robust is a challenge and doing so on Sugar on a Stick even more. We have a resources problem that needs to be solved; part of the solution is to make Sugar better known, to developers, to teachers, and to the industry (OEMs...).

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SOAS-3: Final Activity List - Attention needed!

Sean, I would much rather we work together as well! Firstly your point (SoaS-1 was beta-1, SoaS-2 was v1, etc.) is a completely different point of view than your previous official press releases from SugarLabs [1] and [2]. I believe one of the major points of marketing is about consistency. To

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SOAS-3: Final Activity List - Attention needed!

As stated previously, it's a mistake for this release to be numbered v3. I won't be able to do anything with it. Sean On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 9:16 PM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, So as it stands the final Activity list that we're pushing for SOAS-3 will be as below

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SOAS-3: Final Activity List - Attention needed!

Hi Sean, I'm so pleased that you think that all the hard work that Sebastian, myself and all the other Sugar developers that have put into the Sugar 0.88 release and associated SoaS release is so 0.5. and a whole lot less than previous releases. I think your choice is demeaning to the hard work

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SOAS-3: Final Activity List - Attention needed!

Peter; I know it is not an activity, but it affects all of them: Will the presence service get fixed in time for the release? All I am able to see is xmpp local on any of the f13 Composes of Soas log application has no entries No Jabber server access for collaboration. (Or are we

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SOAS-3: Final Activity List - Attention needed!

On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 9:09 PM, Thomas C Gilliard satel...@bendbroadband.com wrote: Peter; I know it is not an activity, but it affects all of them: Will the presence service get fixed in time for the  release? All I am able to see is xmpp local on any of the f13 Composes of Soas log

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SOAS-3: Final Activity List - Attention needed!

Yes it has jabber.sugarlabs.org in Control Panel / Network Tom Gilliard satellit Peter Robinson wrote: On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 9:09 PM, Thomas C Gilliard satel...@bendbroadband.com wrote: Peter; I know it is not an activity, but it affects all of them: Will the presence service get fixed

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SOAS-3: Final Activity List - Attention needed!

On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 11:04 PM, Thomas C Gilliard satel...@bendbroadband.com wrote: Yes it has jabber.sugarlabs.org in Control Panel / Network It looks very much like this, which seems to be pretty much a blocker, yup: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=585413 Tom Gilliard satellit

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SOAS-3: Final Activity List - Attention needed!

One more important suggestion for a non activity for the release: liveusb-creator gedit on the Mirabelle.iso would also allow making persistent USB's without having to first make a persistent USB and then yum installing them onto it. (the source.iso can be on a 1st USB and target on 2nd.) It

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SOAS-3: Final Activity List - Attention needed!

soas-i386-20100421.18.iso as USB: booted on acer aspire one sugar terminal: r...@localhost liveuser]# setenforce 0 [r...@localhost liveuser]# python /usr/bin/sugar-presence-service Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/bin/sugar-presence-service, line 24, in module main.main() File

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SOAS-3: Final Activity List - Attention needed!

On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 11:26 PM, Bert Freudenberg b...@freudenbergs.de wrote: On 27.04.2010, at 00:17, Peter Robinson wrote: On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 11:10 PM, Bert Freudenberg b...@freudenbergs.de wrote: * There is no sound in Etoys. Pulseaudio is running but padsp is not installed (which

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SoaS 3 Activity list

So the original proposal was the following list of Activities: - browse - physics - turtleart - irc - log - terminal I'm proposing adding the following: - Record - Write - Chat. - Some sort of shareable game such as memorize The reason for the above 4 is that they are a great

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SoaS 3 Activity list

On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 10:01 AM, Bert Freudenberg b...@freudenbergs.de wrote: On 29.03.2010, at 12:51, Peter Robinson wrote: Hi All, Having had some feedback on the proposal of shipping just 6 Activities for SoaS 3 I'm modifying the proposal a little and increasing the number to 10 [1].

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SoaS 3 Activity list

On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 3:05 PM, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 10:01 AM, Bert Freudenberg b...@freudenbergs.de wrote: On 29.03.2010, at 12:51, Peter Robinson wrote: Hi All, Having had some feedback on the proposal of shipping just 6 Activities for

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SoaS update?

Hi Sebastian, On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 3:31 AM, Sebastián Codas s...@paraguayeduca.org wrote: Hello devel and SoaS members, I will introduce myself, I work in the Caacupé deployment and am working also on setting up one to one learning projects elsewhere in Paraguay. I really believe in the

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SoaS with Sugar 0.87.2 coming to a system near you

Hi Sebastian, by popular request, there's now a Sugar on a Stick snapshot with the latest Sugar development release available. Please note that this snapshot is already part of our way to Sugar on a Stick v3. It's still based on F12 for stability reasons, though (this will change in the

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SoaS with Sugar 0.87.2 coming to a system near you

Peter Robinson wrote: Hi Sebastian, by popular request, there's now a Sugar on a Stick snapshot with the latest Sugar development release available. Please note that this snapshot is already part of our way to Sugar on a Stick v3. It's still based on F12 for stability reasons, though (this

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SoaS v2 approaching RC state

Bert Freudenberg wrote: On 24.11.2009, at 22:13, Sebastian Dziallas wrote: Hi all, with the next SoaS release coming up really soon (final image is supposed to be composed this weekend, release date is Dec 8), there's a new snapshot ready for you. It includes a lot of fixes and smaller

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SoaS v2 approaching RC state

On 25.11.2009, at 23:07, Sebastian Dziallas wrote: Bert Freudenberg wrote: On 24.11.2009, at 22:13, Sebastian Dziallas wrote: Hi all, with the next SoaS release coming up really soon (final image is supposed to be composed this weekend, release date is Dec 8), there's a new snapshot

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SoaS v2 approaching RC state

On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 9:13 PM, Sebastian Dziallas sebast...@when.com wrote: Hi all, with the next SoaS release coming up really soon (final image is supposed to be composed this weekend, release date is Dec 8), there's a new snapshot ready for you. It includes a lot of fixes and smaller

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SoaS v2 approaching RC state

On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 11:51:55PM +, Peter Robinson wrote: On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 9:13 PM, Sebastian Dziallas sebast...@when.com wrote: Hi all, with the next SoaS release coming up really soon (final image is supposed to be composed this weekend, release date is Dec 8), there's a