On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 10:07, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
I'd also like to propose using the URL http://trac.sugarlabs.org to
refer to our trac instance. The dev. cname was appropriate when trac
was supposed to be the central part of our development infrastructure.
Now it
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 10:00, Luke Faraonel...@faraone.cc wrote:
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 10:07, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
I'd also like to propose using the URL http://trac.sugarlabs.org to
refer to our trac instance. The dev. cname was appropriate when trac
was supposed to
On 24.08.2009, at 10:09, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 10:00, Luke Faraonel...@faraone.cc wrote:
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 10:07, Bernie Innocenti
ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
I'd also like to propose using the URL http://trac.sugarlabs.org to
refer to our trac instance. The
El Mon, 24-08-2009 a las 04:00 -0400, Luke Faraone escribió:
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 10:07, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org
wrote:
I'd also like to propose using the URL
http://trac.sugarlabs.org to
refer to our trac instance. The dev. cname was appropriate
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 9:29 AM, Bernie Innocentiber...@codewiz.org wrote:
El Mon, 24-08-2009 a las 11:17 +0200, Bert Freudenberg escribió:
-1 to trac.sugarlabs.org too
*If* a name change is desired then at least make it a generic one
(like bugs.s.o), otherwise we have to change again should
Hello
I'd also like to propose using the URL http://trac.sugarlabs.org to
refer to our trac instance. The dev. cname was appropriate when trac
was supposed to be the central part of our development infrastructure.
Now it would make more sense to use it for Gitorious, if at all.
+1 for me
6 matches
Mail list logo
