[Sugar-devel] Activity idea; infant protection from hazards

Yesterday heard a podcast about the product safety issues with coin cell batteries, which can lodge, cause pain, and breach aorta. https://www.abc.net.au/radionational/programs/backgroundbriefing/tiny-battery-kills-kids/13145142 Imagine an activity for older children to protect the very young by

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activity Idea for Sugarizer

ngh > To: sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org > Subject: [Sugar-devel] Activity Idea for Sugarizer > Message-ID: > < > cacyvxwgq0dntodcu3dsv9n+e_88gpol2mbfnjusb7mqstvb...@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > Hello, > > I

[Sugar-devel] Activity Idea for Sugarizer

Hello, I am a part of a team which is undergoing training in pedagogy for primary and secondary school children. In the classes for Introductory Mathematical Thinking, we teach flowcharts to students. The basic elements like start, stop, process, user I/O and diamond boxes, along with

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activity for sugarizer

Hi Sarthak, Implode is still on the wish list: https://github.com/llaske/sugarizer/issues/710 Regards. Lionel. Le sam. 4 avr. 2020 à 18:00, a écrit : > From: Sarthak gupta > To: sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org > Subject: [Sugar-devel] Activity for sugarizer >

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activity

Thanks. I've reviewed it. You're welcome to modify it, but I've no suggestions. It is nice to see a proposal that isn't one of our prepared list of project ideas. On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 08:14:36AM +0530, kushagra nigam wrote: > Dear Sir,  > I'm waiting for a review of my proposal so that I

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activity

Dear Sir, I'm waiting for a review of my proposal so that I can modify it before the final submission. Sincerely Kushagra Nigam kushagra1...@gmail.com On Sun, 31 Mar 2019 at 16:05, kushagra nigam wrote: > Dear Sir, > Please find my draft proposal of new activity for the GSoC'19. Kindly > review

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activity

Yes, I have, thanks. On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 10:22:24AM +0530, kushagra nigam wrote: > This is with reference to that GNOME cursor thing. I have created a pull > request [1]https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar/pull/828. Kindly review it and > let me know if it needs any changes. > > Sincerely >

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activity

This is with reference to that GNOME cursor thing. I have created a pull request https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar/pull/828. Kindly review it and let me know if it needs any changes. Sincerely Kushagra Nigam On Tue, 26 Mar 2019 at 02:59, James Cameron wrote: > Thanks. Further discussion in

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activity

Thanks. Further discussion in pull request. Please also read https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar-docs/blob/master/src/contributing.md On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 04:36:34PM +0530, kushagra nigam wrote: > Dear Sir, > > You are indeed right! However after tinkering with the Sugar files, I got to >

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activity

Dear Sir, You are indeed right! However after tinkering with the Sugar files, I got to know that cursor theme of the instance Gio.Settings changes the cursor theme of the GNOME Desktop but does not affect the Default folder (/usr/share/icons/default) which contains the settings of the default

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activity

Yes, the Sugar cursor affects the GNOME desktop environment. This is caused by https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar/blob/master/src/jarabe/main.py#L205 where the GNOME desktop cursor theme is changed to the Sugar theme. Workaround is to use gsettings to change cursor-theme in

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activity

Alright! On Sat, 23 Mar 2019 at 18:46, Chihurumnaya Ibiam < ibiamchihurumn...@gmail.com> wrote: > I agree with Sumit, code contributions show us that you're capable of > doing what is required. > In addition to that, writing a detailed proposal of how you'll get along > with the project every

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activity

I agree with Sumit, code contributions show us that you're capable of doing what is required. In addition to that, writing a detailed proposal of how you'll get along with the project every week would be great as this would tell if your timeline is realistic, you can look at this year's proposal

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activity

Hey Kushagra! Regarding your first question: You'd need to show us that you can actually code and would be able to code what you proposed in three months of GSoC. This can be done by fixing some issues, or contributing to the codebase, etc. Welcome to Sugar Labs! On Sat, 23 Mar 2019, 11:28 am

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activity

Subject : Help needed for the proposal Dear Sir, Last day I was working with with the Sugar activities. I read the documentation and setup the environment. I made this hello-world activity which was instructed there and even used some of the artworks. I want to ask how should I proceed with the

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activity

Dear Sir, I have searched through the Sugar activities like Hangman, Memorize etc. What I meant by the game repositories are the activity repositories of games like these so that I can install these into my device, get to know about the environment better, think about how will I go on to do my

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activity

kushagra nigam wrote: > You are absolutely right. The "they are cheating button" will not > only serve the purpose of someone writing the text but also if someone > speaking it up in the public. Yes, indeed. > I'm up for this task. Great! > Could you please help me with some of the game

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activity

Welcome Kushagra. I like 95% of the idea. Well done. However, the optical character recognition machine learning component will have problems; * there may not be enough processor power to run the model quick enough, or battery may decline quickly when using activity, * the model would need

[Sugar-devel] Activity

Dear Sir, I have an idea/activity which will invoke learning and fun simultaneously. The game will be called the "Guess the Word". How the game works : Each of the student will get their turn to draw something on their screen. The screen will contain a word at the top, which you have to draw and

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Activity-Team] Request to review GSoC Proposal

Hi On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 11:37 AM, Tony Anderson wrote: > As always, the question is the impact on our users. The traditional source > of information for users is http://www.sugarlabs.org and > http://www.laptop.org and, especially the wiki pages. The traditional > source

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Activity-Team] Request to review GSoC Proposal

As always, the question is the impact on our users. The traditional source of information for users is http://www.sugarlabs.org and http://www.laptop.org and, especially the wiki pages. The traditional source for activities is http://activities.sugarlabs.org (ASLO). So far the effect of gitHub

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Activity-Team] Request to review GSoC Proposal

My assessment of project impact; Originally documentation was separate because we had non-coding developers and tool chains that varied by type of developer. Now we use GitHub the tool chains are combined. With the project as described, documentation will be concentrated in the source code

[Sugar-devel] [Activity-Team] Request to review GSoC Proposal

Hello, I have submitted the first draft of my GSoC proposal and shared it with edit access permission on Google GSoC website with Sugar Labs. Please review, comment and write a review how my proposal would help the community. Even if it is just one line. I would really like to work on this

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Activity-Team] Request to review GSoC Proposal

Can you provide a link to your proposal please? I do not have access to the Google GSoC website for Sugar Labs. -- James Cameron http://quozl.netrek.org/ ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org

[Sugar-devel] [Activity-Team] Request to review GSoC Proposal

Hello, I have completed the first draft of my GSoC proposal and shared it with edit access permission on Google GSoC website with Sugar Labs. Please review, comment and write a review how my proposal would help the community. Even if it is just one line. I would really like to work on this

[Sugar-devel] Activity Updates

Hello, I have now sugarized all of my activities' icons and fixed some of their bugs. Please review them and share your suggestions. link - http://activities.sugarlabs.org/en-US/sugar/users/info/13555 Thank you, Utkarsh Tiwari ___

Re: [Sugar-devel] activity instance directory

Thanks, I await your testing of my pull request. On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 07:13:47AM +0200, Tony Anderson wrote: > Hi, James > > It would seem the correct solution is to have Sugar implement > the procedure specified in the 'low level activity'. The instance folder > should be cleared when the

Re: [Sugar-devel] activity instance directory

Hi, James It would seem the correct solution is to have Sugar implement the procedure specified in the 'low level activity'. The instance folder should be cleared when the activity quits. If an activity needs longer persistence, it can put the file in the data folder and then manage it. The

Re: [Sugar-devel] activity instance directory

We can't know what is wrong, because the logs aren't available, but my guess is one or more downloads were started, and the total for the day reached 1.2 Gb. That's all it takes. Downloads in progress are invisible to a user of Browse, so it is an easy mistake to make. For data shared between

Re: [Sugar-devel] activity instance directory

Tony, Please test this pull request; https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar-toolkit-gtk3/pull/306 "Remove Rainbow, clear activity instance/ and tmp/ Sugar depended on Rainbow for clearing the activity instance/ and tmp/ directories. But Rainbow is no longer used downstream. - remove support for

Re: [Sugar-devel] activity instance directory

Thanks for the good analysis James! I don't think that deleting on startup is an optimal idea. It is counter-intuitive that the user must open every activity on their computer when they want to reclaim space. It is also bad in the case of infrequently used activities. I think that a

Re: [Sugar-devel] activity instance directory

G'day Sam, The pull request I've made will handle a preserved .sugar directory on upgrade by deleting the directories the next time an activity is started, as well as when an activity is closed or crashes. Implemented in the shell, or sugar-launch, or activity to activity start, on behalf of the

Re: [Sugar-devel] activity instance directory

A few issues: * Browse already have a mechanism to remove the temporary downloaded files, we need to know what is wrong [1]. * Temporary directories are shared between instances, if we remove temporary directories at activity start or stop, we need check if there are other instances of the

Re: [Sugar-devel] activity instance directory

The API documentation was wrong, and has been edited. https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Development_Team/Low-level_Activity_API Rainbow did delete instance and tmp. Sugar did not. Rainbow has not been in OLPC OS for some time. (/etc/olpc-security must exist, /usr/bin/rainbow-run must be

[Sugar-devel] activity icon in svg ?

Hey, Just wished to ask that is it necessary for the activity icon to be in svg ? or we can also have it in png / jpg format ? Thanks, Puneet ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org

Re: [Sugar-devel] activity icon in svg ?

svg is needed On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 8:11 AM, Puneet Kaur puneet.gk...@gmail.com wrote: Hey, Just wished to ask that is it necessary for the activity icon to be in svg ? or we can also have it in png / jpg format ? Thanks, Puneet ___

Re: [Sugar-devel] activity icon in svg ?

Thanks :-) On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 4:49 PM, Gonzalo Odiard godi...@sugarlabs.org wrote: svg is needed On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 8:11 AM, Puneet Kaur puneet.gk...@gmail.com wrote: Hey, Just wished to ask that is it necessary for the activity icon to be in svg ? or we can also have it in

Re: [Sugar-devel] activity icon in svg ?

It is needed for the XO colors. That is when the icons start to have the same colors as your XO Person. You can always embed an image as base 64 in a svg (just drag it in using inkscape from memory). On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 9:19 PM, Gonzalo Odiard godi...@sugarlabs.org wrote: svg is needed

Re: [Sugar-devel] activity icon in svg ?

But should not be needed We want all the icons have the same style. http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Human_Interface_Guidelines/The_Sugar_Interface/Icons On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 8:33 AM, Sam Parkinson sam.parkins...@gmail.com wrote: It is needed for the XO colors. That is when the icons

[Sugar-devel] Activity Hiding

Hi, I have a very distinct question here. For a part of educational learning research study, we are using Sugar-Learning-Platform. But due to some constraints, we have to use same set of XOs with different batches of students. One batch using Activity1 and other batch using Activity2. For

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activity Hiding

I've had some success by renaming the Activities/Activity1 directory to /home/olpc to hide an activity, and rename it back later. Requires skill with Terminal activity. e.g. mv Activities/Chat.activity ~ # to hide mv Chat.activity Activities/ # to show Might cause errors, not sure.

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activity Hiding

that'll work. It may leave some funny artifacts in the journal: entries associated with missing activities, but otherwise, it is not really any different than uninstalling/ reinstalling. -walter On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 6:12 AM, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote: I've had some success by

[Sugar-devel] Activity Idea

Hi All, I am planning to work upon an sugar activity which will be an native Sugar app of SlideShare platform. This will enable children using Sugar to share presentations on content network(SlideShare). For the first cut, I am planning to include search, content viewer and offline storage of

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activity Idea

maybe consider making this a webservice like the facebook webservice? See wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Webservices regards -walter On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 12:26 PM, Kartik Kumar Perisetla kartik.p...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, I am planning to work upon an sugar activity which will be an native

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activity Idea

correct URL wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Web_Services Putlocker or gdrive may be the best examples On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 12:34 PM, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.comwrote: maybe consider making this a webservice like the facebook webservice? See wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Webservices regards

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activity Idea

Hi Walter, So what I understand is we allow children to share/upload their content on Slideshare through Web service(consuming SlideShare web service natively in sugar inspite of a separate activity altogether). Like child can upload a presentation through context menu on presentation within

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activity Idea

On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 12:48 PM, Kartik Kumar Perisetla kartik.p...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Walter, So what I understand is we allow children to share/upload their content on Slideshare through Web service(consuming SlideShare web service natively in sugar inspite of a separate activity

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activity Idea

+1 Sure ! I assume I should be able to see and use facebook, twitter and Google Drive web service within sugar which I am getting from here: http://sugarlabs.org/~buildbot/docs/dev-environment.md.html Please let me know whether I am cloning the right version of sugar to get feel of web services

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activity Idea

Please let me know whether I am cloning the right version of sugar to get feel of web services within sugar. Yes, the GitHub repositories are the most latest https://github.com/sugarlabs More information about Web Services (You can ask here, in the list :))

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activity Idea

Thanks Ignacio ! :) Saw your video as well: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vw_SiGs6nEc Thanks ! Kartik On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 7:18 PM, Ignacio Rodríguez nachoe...@gmail.comwrote: Please let me know whether I am cloning the right version of sugar to get feel of web services within sugar.

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activity Idea

Hi, When I am trying to access ~/.sugar/default from terminal in order to install web service it gives me an error: [image: Inline image 1] Also, If I manually create that directory structure, the web service is not listed under Configure web service section. Any help will be appreciated.

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activity Idea

No no.. Its normal because I've simulate that was on XO Go: cd ~/sugar-build/home/default/.sugar I think (I dont remember now) Ignacio Rodríguez fb.com/Ignacio.Rodriguez.UY @NachoDeTodos https://twitter.com/NachoDeTodos nachoe...@gmail.com 2014-05-10 11:12 GMT-03:00 Kartik Kumar Perisetla

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activity failed to start!

Try to run sugar-launch inside a sugar terminal, it doesn't work outside sugar. On Saturday, 22 March 2014, Kamal Kaur kamal.kaur...@gmail.com wrote: Hello developers Can you please help me know the right way to download/install activities in sugar? I downloaded Etoys and Develop 40 from

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activity failed to start!

On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 7:46 PM, Kamal Kaur kamal.kaur...@gmail.com wrote: Hello developers Can you please help me know the right way to download/install activities in sugar? I downloaded Etoys and Develop 40 from http://activities.sugarlabs.org/en-US/sugar/ from browser activity. Both are

[Sugar-devel] Activity failed to start!

Hello developers Can you please help me know the right way to download/install activities in sugar? I downloaded Etoys and Develop 40 from http://activities.sugarlabs.org/en-US/sugar/ from browser activity. Both are shown in journal. But when opened, activity icon flashes and there is a message:

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activity Central's Sugar related priorities.

On 22 October 2013 21:41, NoiseEHC noise...@gmail.com wrote: You are right. The problem is that my views are exactly the opposite of the decided path to take. I don't think that's true. I'm one of the three developers involved in the web activities work and I like many of your ideas. Manuel

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activity Central's Sugar related priorities.

Hi! Took some time but finally set up my git account... 2 Journal This is probably the issue we have been most aware of. I've been thinking in the per activity datastore direction too and I think it's probably the best one. Though as you say that involves UI redesign and we would need to

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activity Central's Sugar related priorities.

So that was my $0.02. Obviously it can be too late to change plans but who knows. I have uploaded the source anyway so you can use it if you want. What I really don't understand is, if is all that easy why not be involved and help? The development of the web activities stuff was done in

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activity Central's Sugar related priorities.

I have put the ?latest? sources here: https://github.com/NoiseEHC/sugar-webkit-native It requires a yum install webkitgtk3-devel to be able to compile, unfortunately my XO-1.75 says that there are no more mirrors to try for mesa and libdrm dependencies so I could not try it under an ARM

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activity Central's Sugar related priorities.

On 22/10/2013 21:21, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: So that was my $0.02. Obviously it can be too late to change plans but who knows. I have uploaded the source anyway so you can use it if you want. What I really don't understand is, if is all that easy why not be involved and help?

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activity Central's Sugar related priorities.

Hi NoiseEHC, No, it won't... It already happened when Bryan Berry moved OLPC Nepal's lessons from EToys to Flash, then to HTML5 and there were not any more contributors. I mean, there are much more JS developers, so if you pay them you can get cheaper talent, but there will be not too much

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activity Central's Sugar related priorities.

On 07/10/2013 18:41, David Farning wrote: Activity Central supports the recent HTML5 + JS work that is going into sugar .100. It has the potential to take the OLPC vision to any device which runs a browser while simultaneously *increasing* the potential activity *developer* *pool* by several

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activity Central's Sugar related priorities.

On 9 October 2013 22:51, NoiseEHC noise...@gmail.com wrote: Now I will not give you constructive criticism as that would allow answering that I should not tell others what to do and it would be getting old... Instead here is some nonconstructive criticism: I don't know if it's constructive

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activity Central's Sugar related priorities.

On 10 October 2013 00:22, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote: 1 Inability to do OAuth This has been discussed for Firefox OS too and as far as I know there is no good solution for it yet. I won't claim to understand all the security implications, tough the basic issue seems to run

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activity Central's Sugar related priorities.

Excuse the top post: FWIW, I have most of a Sugar authentication with Google Drive working. (For the almost finished Gdrive webservice.) -walter On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 8:04 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote: On 10 October 2013 00:22, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote: 1

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activity Central's Sugar related priorities.

On 8 October 2013 01:45, Ruben Rodríguez ru...@activitycentral.com wrote: Also, there are some bits of code in both Sugar and the activities that assume to be running on Fedora, or even on an XO, and those need cleaning. Please fix those bits directly upstream! I have not seen any patch

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activity Central's Sugar related priorities.

On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 6:07 PM, Samuel Greenfeld greenf...@laptop.org wrote: This actually is kind of what I meant (and perhaps should be a separate thread). My understanding is that deployments nowadays are the primary parties funding Sugar development. And the deployments or their

[Sugar-devel] Activity Central's Sugar related priorities.

As a data point for other decision makers and a follow up to some of the recent threads on the future of Sugar, I would like to share Activity Central's Sugar priorities for the next six months. Activity Central supports the recent HTML5 + JS work that is going into sugar .100. It has the

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activity Central's Sugar related priorities.

Disclaimer: These are my personal views, and are not the official views of OLPC. - It should be fine to discuss anything Sugar-related on the sugarlabs.org development lists. Sugar Labs does not use any OLPC hosting services, and is an independent group as part of the Software

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activity Central's Sugar related priorities.

On 7 October 2013 19:24, Samuel Greenfeld greenf...@laptop.org wrote: - Updating the Sugar release in Ubuntu sounds like something everyone could benefit from, not just Dextrose users. Is there any reason not to base most of this work starting with upstream Sugar existing Ubuntu

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activity Central's Sugar related priorities.

On 7 October 2013 18:41, David Farning dfarn...@activitycentral.com wrote: Would either of these list be appropriate to continue these discussions about this downstream efforts to port sugar to Ubuntu for use on hardware not sold by the Association? Phase one has been a poof of concept as

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activity Central's Sugar related priorities.

In general one of my frustrations lately is that now that we no longer publicly review patches on this mailing list, everyone seems to be developing their own version of Sugar. Can you elaborate on this one? I haven't noticed this kind of change (and we have not been reviewing most patches on

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activity Central's Sugar related priorities.

On Monday, 7 October 2013, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: In general one of my frustrations lately is that now that we no longer publicly review patches on this mailing list, everyone seems to be developing their own version of Sugar. Can you elaborate on this one? I haven't noticed this kind of

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activity Central's Sugar related priorities.

On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 3:58 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote: On 7 October 2013 18:41, David Farning dfarn...@activitycentral.comwrote: Would either of these list be appropriate to continue these discussions about this downstream efforts to port sugar to Ubuntu for use on

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activity Central's Sugar related priorities.

On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 12:41 PM, David Farning dfarn...@activitycentral.com wrote: As a more incremental approach, Activity Central will continue our deployment-centric work by porting Dextrose to Ubuntu. From a deploy to XOs PoV that sounds like a ton of work. You'll grind against a lot of

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activity Central's Sugar related priorities.

I agree with Martin on the odd directions Ubuntu is exhibiting; it may be safer to target Debian instead, from which support for Ubuntu will generally follow. (On the other hand, I lack evidence to agree with claims about the stability or direction of Fedora. So few people I know use it.) --

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activity Central's Sugar related priorities.

Daniel Narvaez wrote: Gonzalo Odiard wrote: Daniel wrote: Gonzalo Odiard wrote: Samuel Wrote: In general one of my frustrations lately is that now that we no longer publicly review patches on this mailing list, everyone seems to be developing their own version of Sugar.

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activity Central's Sugar related priorities.

On 7 October 2013 23:39, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote: I agree with Samuel; that with the loss of public review of patches participation in development has been confined to those who take the trouble to visit a web site. (The reviews by mail were also stimulating other discussion on

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activity Central's Sugar related priorities.

2013/10/7 James Cameron qu...@laptop.org: Daniel Narvaez wrote: Gonzalo Odiard wrote: Daniel wrote: Gonzalo Odiard wrote: Samuel Wrote: In general one of my frustrations lately is that now that we no longer publicly review patches on this mailing list, everyone seems to be

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activity Central's Sugar related priorities.

On 8 October 2013 00:08, Manuel Quiñones ma...@laptop.org wrote: James, Sam, I see this as a question of taste. Exactly. The sooner people understand that, the sooner we will stop having discussions about the review process over and over :) ___

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activity Central's Sugar related priorities.

On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 12:00:47AM +0200, Daniel Narvaez wrote: Well everyone seems to be developing their own version of Sugar seems to be more than that. But maybe I'm just reading too much into it. There aren't multiple groups of people or individuals developing sugar on their own. As

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activity Central's Sugar related priorities.

On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 10:10 PM, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote: I agree with Martin on the odd directions Ubuntu is exhibiting; it may be safer to target Debian instead, from which support for Ubuntu will generally follow. (On the other hand, I lack evidence to agree with claims about

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activity Central's Sugar related priorities.

On 8 October 2013 00:22, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote: On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 12:00:47AM +0200, Daniel Narvaez wrote: Well everyone seems to be developing their own version of Sugar seems to be more than that. But maybe I'm just reading too much into it. There aren't multiple

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activity Central's Sugar related priorities.

My 2 cents: Since the switch to github, we've have a much better turn-around on reviews and we've attacked new reviewers. I think those data speak for themselves. As Daniel said, we welcome help further shaping the process. regards. -walter On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 6:08 PM, Manuel Quiñones

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activity Central's Sugar related priorities.

On 8 October 2013 01:07, Samuel Greenfeld greenf...@laptop.org wrote: This actually is kind of what I meant (and perhaps should be a separate thread). To simplify things I will only answer about the 0.100 release cycle. Things have changed a lot anyway and it's probably not worth focusing on

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activity Central's Sugar related priorities.

On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 6:00 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote: On 7 October 2013 23:39, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote: I agree with Samuel; that with the loss of public review of patches participation in development has been confined to those who take the trouble to visit a

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activity Central's Sugar related priorities.

2013/10/7 Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com: I would like to understand better what you mean with porting. It should just be matter of writing package specs (or really fixing the existing ones...), no? Mainly, but since we work with Ubuntu LTS for the deployment's benefit we had to backport

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activity Central's Sugar related priorities.

On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 7:45 PM, Ruben Rodríguez ru...@activitycentral.com wrote: Also, there are some bits of code in both Sugar and the activities that assume to be running on Fedora, or even on an XO, and those need cleaning. Be nice to know about these so we can fix them. thx -- Rubén

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activity Central's Sugar related priorities.

2013/10/7 Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org: I agree. Have Sugar working on Ubuntu would be great, but would be mainly: * Solve dependencies in ubuntu (update/fix packages) * Make Sugar work with other dependencies when is not possible. In the first case, upstream is Ubuntu, in the second

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activity Central's Sugar related priorities.

2013/10/8 Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com: Be nice to know about these so we can fix them. Sure thing! We just finished with the first leg of the project and the resultant image is getting tested now, so soon I'll start sending patches. There are usually small things, like scripts written

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activity Central's Sugar related priorities.

On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 02:00:06AM +0200, Ruben Rodríguez wrote: 2013/10/8 Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com: Be nice to know about these so we can fix them. Sure thing! We just finished with the first leg of the project and the resultant image is getting tested now, so soon I'll start

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activity Central's Sugar related priorities.

On Mon, 2013-10-07 at 19:48 -0400, Walter Bender wrote: On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 7:45 PM, Ruben Rodríguez ru...@activitycentral.com wrote: Also, there are some bits of code in both Sugar and the activities that assume to be running on Fedora, or even on an XO, and those need cleaning.

[Sugar-devel] Activity updater crash

Hi Walter, the updater crash seems to be a bug in your code It looks like you should use get_data to get a python array from GBytes. (unref_to_array shouldn't really be exposed in python) diff --git a/extensions/cpsection/updater/backends/aslo.py b/extensions/cpsectio index e244af0..7c41ae6

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activity updater crash

On 7 May 2013 22:59, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Walter, the updater crash seems to be a bug in your code It looks like you should use get_data to get a python array from GBytes. (unref_to_array shouldn't really be exposed in python) Thanks. /me wonders why it ever

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activity updater crash

On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote: On 7 May 2013 22:59, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Walter, the updater crash seems to be a bug in your code It looks like you should use get_data to get a python array from GBytes. (unref_to_array

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activity updater crash

On 7 May 2013 23:01, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com wrote: It's memory corruption, so it could have worked once if really lucky :) I guess I should have bought a lottery ticket, because it worked many many times in my testing. Hehe. It might be that the glib we are now building

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activity updater crash

On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 4:20 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Walter, the updater crash seems to be a bug in your code It looks like you should use get_data to get a python array from GBytes. (unref_to_array shouldn't really be exposed in python) Thanks. /me wonders why it

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activity to improve collaboration in the classroom

Thanks James, I will look at this activity too. Gonzalo On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 6:21 PM, James Simmons nices...@gmail.com wrote: Gonzalo, This sounds a bit like the Library Activity that Aleksey Lim worked on: http://activities.sugarlabs.org/en-US/sugar/addon/4089 The sharing part was

[Sugar-devel] Activity to improve collaboration in the classroom

A few times, we found simple operations are not so simple for teachers in Sugar, one case is share one file with all the kids in a class, request a task to do and later get all the work done by the kids. I am working in one activity to try to solve this issue, I want share a prototype, and a few

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activity to improve collaboration in the classroom

Gonzalo, This sounds a bit like the Library Activity that Aleksey Lim worked on: http://activities.sugarlabs.org/en-US/sugar/addon/4089 The sharing part was supposed to be something like you would create a list of Journal entries that you wished to share (something like a bookshelf), and these

  1   2   3   4   >