Hello everyone,
We are a week away from the Feature Freeze deadline [1] and we still got a
couple PRs queued [2,3]. I haven't been able to catch up with _all_ the
recent PRs, so if there anything you want me to prioritize please let me
know.
I would prefer to look at the collaboration bits but,
Thanks Martin.
I don't advocate for prioritisation of any particular PRs. Best if
you decide what goes into 0.107.1, on technical merit and schedule
constraints.
For testing, I'm daily rebasing my OLPC branches of Sugar, which are
Sugar master plus my pull requests, plus some yet to be
Hello everyone,
This is just a friendly reminder that we are less than 2 weeks (May 18)
away from our Features Freeze deadline [1]. For those working in features I
recommend to prioritize and focus on those that have been actively
reviewed. Quality over quantity will be ;)
Also, make sure to
+1 on the idea!
But I suggest we do it in a separate fork, for 4 reasons: (1) sometimes we
can't merge both patches when presents competing features, ie., improve
vs re-design activities list, so we will probably need more branches and
(2) we just passed feature freeze deadline, so we should
Hi Martin,
I was just noticing that the GCI started today, meaning lots of unfamiliar
contributors will come with their feature patches.
Can we make a new-features branch to merge them into? I think that is a
better idea than patches; patches get lost really easily! Maybe we could
just tag pull
yes. I think it is a very good idea.
-walter
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 7:06 AM, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote:
I like that idea. The effort in merging later is much less than the
effort in negotiating with the contributors through patches alone, and
there's less risk of contributions
Hello everyone,
Following with our roadmap [1], we are now feature freezed. Thanks to all
who contributed with new features this cycle, now is time for testing and
fixing bugs! I will be providing 0.103.1 tarballs and release notes soon.
@commiters: please keep this in mind while reviewing and
On 29 March 2014 11:30, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
We are not approaching 0.101.4 and the feature freeze, three days left.
There are three pull requests that I feel the freeze would apply to
https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar/pull/192
I am not sure how they fell through the cracks. Turns out that they
were made obsolete by PR #312, which replaced the combo boxes. Sam
(the author) has closed both PRs.
-walter
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 5:39 AM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
On 29 March 2014 11:30, Daniel Narvaez
We are not approaching 0.101.4 and the feature freeze, three days left.
There are three pull requests that I feel the freeze would apply to
https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar/pull/192
https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar-toolkit-gtk3/pull/88
(These are probably in manuq court).
I have been trying to fix a problem with
https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar/pull/316 (which fixes SL #800)
If I disable interaction with GNOME, it seems to work, but somehow it
gets confused when sending/receiving notifications between Sugar and
GNOME. Hope to track it down over the weekend.
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 12:37 AM, Manuel Quiñones ma...@laptop.org wrote:
in my humble opinion, I would also like to see the feature freeze
delayed. several features are almost done.
How long away is almost done? A few days, weeks? While I'm happy to
see it delayed I want the delay defined so
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 4:50 AM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.comwrote:
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 12:37 AM, Manuel Quiñones ma...@laptop.org
wrote:
in my humble opinion, I would also like to see the feature freeze
delayed. several features are almost done.
How long away is almost done?
On 13 March 2014 08:50, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
To the people writing and reviewing is that enough rime to review and
land the remaining features?
Just fyi I'm unlikely to have time to review major patches.
___
Sugar-devel mailing
On 13 March 2014 08:50, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
Daniel would you be amicable to stretching it out by a month so we
have one more round of dev releases before entering freeze?
Sorry for the delay on closing down this issue, I have been busy. I'll try
to keep it short so that
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 9:31 AM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
On 13 March 2014 08:50, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
Daniel would you be amicable to stretching it out by a month so we
have one more round of dev releases before entering freeze?
Sorry for the delay
in my humble opinion, I would also like to see the feature freeze
delayed. several features are almost done.
I see our community is still rearranging, and we need to put more
effort in reviews. considering the load of PRs, we should embrace
pair-reviewing.
2014-03-09 22:25 GMT-03:00 Daniel
We just finished the review of the design issues the last week,
and we agreed in the general points.
I think we should make a effort to finalize the features already discussed,
and not include anything more.
Maybe we can discuss postpone feature freeze by one or two weeks more,
but of course this
Feel free to propose delaying feature freeze. The release was already a
week late, if we want more time to work on features, I tend to think the
final release should be pushed off accordingly too.
On 10 March 2014 01:21, Gonzalo Odiard godi...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
We just finished the review
For what it's worth it would be a -1 from me. I would be fine to delay a
bit to fix important bugs, but not to add more features, it seems to go
completely against the rationale of time based releases. But that's just my
opinion.
On 10 March 2014 01:34, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 9:40 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
For what it's worth it would be a -1 from me. I would be fine to delay a
bit to fix important bugs, but not to add more features, it seems to go
completely against the rationale of time based releases. But that's just my
On 10 March 2014 01:48, Gonzalo Odiard godi...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 9:40 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.comwrote:
For what it's worth it would be a -1 from me. I would be fine to delay a
bit to fix important bugs, but not to add more features, it seems to go
Hello,
I'm releasing 0.101.3 and we are now feature frozen. I marked the pull
requests that introduce new features with a [Feature] prefix. I considered
closing them to unclutter the queue but then I thought it would be better
to keep them around to make sure they are not forgotten. If new pull
Hello,
only two weeks are left to feature freeze on March 1. Looking at review
queue we have the following feature being worked on
* Notification system
Martin, what is the status of this?
* Backup
This was posted a while ago but no one reviewed yet. Tests are missing.
Gonzalo, is it supposed
We have the icon-journal view that Samdroid has been working on.
I will make a last-ditch effort to replace two very clumsy
combo-boxes: in the language selector cp section and the activity
sector on in the Journal search.
-walter
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 1:27 PM, Daniel Narvaez
Oh right. I think Manuel looked into this, what's the status?
On 14 February 2014 19:29, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com wrote:
We have the icon-journal view that Samdroid has been working on.
I will make a last-ditch effort to replace two very clumsy
combo-boxes: in the language
On 14 February 2014 19:34, Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org wrote:
* Backup
This was posted a while ago but no one reviewed yet. Tests are missing.
Gonzalo, is it supposed to be otherwise complete? I feel we are risking to
miss the train here. Any reviewer volunteering to look at it? I'm
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 3:27 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
only two weeks are left to feature freeze on March 1. Looking at review
queue we have the following feature being worked on
* Notification system
Martin, what is the status of this?
Just spoke to Sam in
On 30 July 2013 03:54, Manuel Quiñones ma...@laptop.org wrote:
2013/7/28 Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com:
Hello,
the feature freeze is due on July 31. I think all the features we
originally
planned landed already, thanks and congratulations to everyone involved.
Work on web
2013/7/30 Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com:
On 30 July 2013 03:54, Manuel Quiñones ma...@laptop.org wrote:
2013/7/28 Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com:
Hello,
the feature freeze is due on July 31. I think all the features we
originally
planned landed already, thanks and
2013/7/28 Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com:
Hello,
the feature freeze is due on July 31. I think all the features we originally
planned landed already, thanks and congratulations to everyone involved.
Work on web activities is and probably should be continuing. We need to
figure out how
Hello,
the feature freeze is due on July 31. I think all the features we
originally planned landed already, thanks and congratulations to everyone
involved.
Work on web activities is and probably should be continuing. We need to
figure out how that interacts with the freeze (I'll try to follow
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 01:24, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote:
Hi all,
Implement sorting in the Journal UI. Also adds support for the two new
properties (filesize and ctime).
Feature page:
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Journal_Sort
Hi,
is there anything we could have
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 01:24, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote:
Hi all,
Implement sorting in the Journal UI. Also adds support for the two new
properties (filesize and ctime).
Feature page:
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Journal_Sort
Implementations:
On 08/18/2010 03:28 PM, Walter Bender wrote:
I am requesting an exception to Feature Freeze. I just completed what
I hope to be the final clean up of the spiral extension to the Home
View.
The ticket is here:
http://bugs.sugarlabs.org/ticket/2143
The patch is here:
On 08/23/2010 08:59 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 01:24, Aleksey Limalsr...@member.fsf.org wrote:
Hi all,
Implement sorting in the Journal UI. Also adds support for the two new
properties (filesize and ctime).
Feature page:
Hi Aleksey,
On 08/23/2010 09:25 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 01:24, Aleksey Limalsr...@member.fsf.org wrote:
Hi all,
Implement sorting in the Journal UI. Also adds support for the two new
properties (filesize and ctime).
thanks for proposing this Feature. Thanks as well
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 4:20 AM, Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de wrote:
On 08/18/2010 03:28 PM, Walter Bender wrote:
I am requesting an exception to Feature Freeze. I just completed what
I hope to be the final clean up of the spiral extension to the Home
View.
The ticket is here:
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 08:59:10AM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 01:24, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote:
Hi all,
Implement sorting in the Journal UI. Also adds support for the two new
properties (filesize and ctime).
Feature page:
On 08/23/2010 01:51 PM, Walter Bender wrote:
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 4:20 AM, Simon Schampijersi...@schampijer.de wrote:
On 08/18/2010 03:28 PM, Walter Bender wrote:
I am requesting an exception to Feature Freeze. I just completed what
I hope to be the final clean up of the spiral extension
On Monday, August 23, 2010 04:25:48 am Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 01:24, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote:
Hi all,
Implement sorting in the Journal UI. Also adds support for the two new
properties (filesize and ctime).
Feature page:
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 01:08:30PM -0300, Andrés Ambrois wrote:
On Monday, August 23, 2010 04:25:48 am Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
- creation time will be always displayed as '%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%S' ? What
about those countries where they expect the fields being ordered in a
different way? (may be
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 18:08, Andrés Ambrois andresambr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, August 23, 2010 04:25:48 am Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 01:24, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote:
Hi all,
Implement sorting in the Journal UI. Also adds support for the two new
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 11:58:01AM +0200, Simon Schampijer wrote:
Hi Aleksey,
On 08/23/2010 09:25 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 01:24, Aleksey Limalsr...@member.fsf.org wrote:
Hi all,
Implement sorting in the Journal UI. Also adds support for the two new
properties
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 04:48:33PM +, Aleksey Lim wrote:
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 01:08:30PM -0300, Andrés Ambrois wrote:
On Monday, August 23, 2010 04:25:48 am Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
- creation time will be always displayed as '%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%S' ? What
about those countries where
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 19:09, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote:
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 04:48:33PM +, Aleksey Lim wrote:
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 01:08:30PM -0300, Andrés Ambrois wrote:
On Monday, August 23, 2010 04:25:48 am Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
- creation time will be always
On Monday, August 23, 2010 02:12:38 pm Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 19:09, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote:
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 04:48:33PM +, Aleksey Lim wrote:
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 01:08:30PM -0300, Andrés Ambrois wrote:
On Monday, August 23, 2010
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 15:28, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com wrote:
I am requesting an exception to Feature Freeze. I just completed what
I hope to be the final clean up of the spiral extension to the Home
View.
The ticket is here:
http://bugs.sugarlabs.org/ticket/2143
The patch is
Hi all,
Implement sorting in the Journal UI. Also adds support for the two new
properties (filesize and ctime).
Feature page:
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Journal_Sort
Implementations:
http://git.sugarlabs.org/projects/sugar-datastore/repos/journal_sort
I am requesting an exception to Feature Freeze. I just completed what
I hope to be the final clean up of the spiral extension to the Home
View.
The ticket is here:
http://bugs.sugarlabs.org/ticket/2143
The patch is here:
On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 17:49, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com wrote:
I made a somewhat invasive change to Turtle Art in order to make the
toolbars backward compatible with Sugar 0.82-0.84. Essentially, I
catch an exception when trying to create a ToolbarBox. In the
exception handler, I
I made a somewhat invasive change to Turtle Art in order to make the
toolbars backward compatible with Sugar 0.82-0.84. Essentially, I
catch an exception when trying to create a ToolbarBox. In the
exception handler, I create the old-style toolbars.
try:
# Use 0.86 toolbar
On 09/09/2009 12:01 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
== Source ==
http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/fructose/Chat/Chat-66.tar.bz2
== News ==
* Utilize new toolbars design
* Add new translations: mg, sq, ta
Looks good to me.
Regards,
Simon
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 15:09, Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de wrote:
On 09/09/2009 12:01 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
== Source ==
http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/fructose/Chat/Chat-66.tar.bz2
== News ==
* Utilize new toolbars design
* Add new translations: mg, sq, ta
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 16:18, Walter Benderwalter.ben...@gmail.com wrote:
I updated Turtle Art to use the new toolbars (thanks for all the help,
Simon) for which I would like an exception to the feature freeze. The
source tarball is:
On 09/09/2009 11:40 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 16:18, Walter Benderwalter.ben...@gmail.com wrote:
I updated Turtle Art to use the new toolbars (thanks for all the help,
Simon) for which I would like an exception to the feature freeze. The
source tarball is:
== Source ==
http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/fructose/Chat/Chat-66.tar.bz2
== News ==
* Utilize new toolbars design
* Add new translations: mg, sq, ta
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
I updated Turtle Art to use the new toolbars (thanks for all the help,
Simon) for which I would like an exception to the feature freeze. The
source tarball is:
http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/fructose/TurtleArt/TurtleArt-64.tar.bz2
Thank you fr your consideration.
-walter
--
I managed to mess up the View Toolbar by accident. This version works:
http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/fructose/TurtleArt/TurtleArt-65.tar.bz2
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 10:18 AM, Walter Benderwalter.ben...@gmail.com wrote:
I updated Turtle Art to use the new toolbars (thanks for all
On 21 Jan 2009, at 01:01, Gary C Martin wrote:
On 21 Jan 2009, at 00:18, Simon Schampijer wrote:
Gary C Martin wrote:
On 17 Jan 2009, at 15:30, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 15:54, Sascha Silbe
sascha-ml-ui-sugar-de...@silbe.org wrote:
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 02:45:54PM
Write-61 (G1G1 is at 60) - No .xo bundle provided used git to get
Browse-103 (G1G1 is at 101) - No .xo bundle provided used git to get
Please remember those out there who are not using 'git'.
.xo bundles should be available for persons using only 'wget'.
Thanks, mikus
Gary C Martin wrote:
On 21 Jan 2009, at 01:01, Gary C Martin wrote:
On 21 Jan 2009, at 00:18, Simon Schampijer wrote:
Gary C Martin wrote:
On 17 Jan 2009, at 15:30, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 15:54, Sascha Silbe
sascha-ml-ui-sugar-de...@silbe.org wrote:
On Sat, Jan 17,
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 01:48:57PM +0100, Sascha Silbe wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 01:40:46PM +0200, Morgan Collett wrote:
On Ubuntu we're not supporting jhbuild on hardy any more, due to newer
dependencies that are only in Intrepid.
Thanks for the info. Would be nice if there were a list
Gary C Martin wrote:
On 17 Jan 2009, at 15:30, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 15:54, Sascha Silbe
sascha-ml-ui-sugar-de...@silbe.org wrote:
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 02:45:54PM +0100, Simon Schampijer wrote:
Issues: We do not have a don't save those changes option. If you
On 21 Jan 2009, at 00:18, Simon Schampijer wrote:
Gary C Martin wrote:
On 17 Jan 2009, at 15:30, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 15:54, Sascha Silbe
sascha-ml-ui-sugar-de...@silbe.org wrote:
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 02:45:54PM +0100, Simon Schampijer wrote:
Issues: We do not
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 20:03, Sascha Silbe
sascha-ml-ui-sugar-de...@silbe.org wrote:
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 04:30:51PM +0100, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
After talking for some time with Simon, we have agreed on requesting
input from people willing to install the last code and giving it a
try.
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 01:40:46PM +0200, Morgan Collett wrote:
On Ubuntu we're not supporting jhbuild on hardy any more, due to newer
dependencies that are only in Intrepid.
Thanks for the info. Would be nice if there were a list of dependencies
including versions. sugar-jhbuild build
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 13:48, Sascha Silbe
sascha-ml-ui-sugar-de...@silbe.org wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 01:40:46PM +0200, Morgan Collett wrote:
On Ubuntu we're not supporting jhbuild on hardy any more, due to newer
dependencies that are only in Intrepid.
Thanks for the info. Would be
On Sat, 2009-01-17 at 12:49 +0100, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/8822 - Create an mmap'able icon cache
Without this new feature, we have a limited size cache kept in memory.
Meaning that icons need to be fully rendered the first time that are
shown in the UI and that once
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 1:33 PM, Benjamin Berg
benja...@sipsolutions.net wrote:
Advantages:
* One mmaped cache, that is shared between activities
(and file backed).
* Cached icons work for *any* color combination
Disadvantages:
* If the correct size is not in the cache, the icon need
My suggestion would be to keep developing it until we have something
we are satisfied about from the user experience point of view. Then we
can make a call about risk. If we complete in the next few days I'd
expect it's something we will want to land.
Marco
Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
Hi,
one more issue we should discuss is a modification that came in last
week by which the favorites view in the home view displays the last
entries for each activity and allows easy resuming. See Eben's designs
in http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Designs/Activity_Management .
The journal's search and browsing capabilities are less useful if all
entries are named the same regardless of their actual content or
meaning to the user.
What I cannot understand is why, after some two years of
development, the only view of Journal entries that has been
implemented is by
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 02:45:54PM +0100, Simon Schampijer wrote:
Issues: We do not have a don't save those changes option. If you
resume by default you could overwrite something you needed. So we
loose the undo functionality.
That sounds _REALLY_ bad. I remember looking at some versioning
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 15:54, Sascha Silbe
sascha-ml-ui-sugar-de...@silbe.org wrote:
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 02:45:54PM +0100, Simon Schampijer wrote:
Issues: We do not have a don't save those changes option. If you resume by
default you could overwrite something you needed. So we loose the
On 17 Jan 2009, at 15:30, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 15:54, Sascha Silbe
sascha-ml-ui-sugar-de...@silbe.org wrote:
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 02:45:54PM +0100, Simon Schampijer wrote:
Issues: We do not have a don't save those changes option. If you
resume by
default you
Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
Hi all,
yesterday we entered in feature freeze, meaning that no new features
can be committed without prior discussion in the community.
The journal's search and browsing capabilities are less useful if all
entries are named the same regardless of their actual content
77 matches
Mail list logo
