Replying to quoted text is hard from my phone; bear with me.
On Monday, April 26, 2010, Sascha Silbe
wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 06:54:13PM -0400, C. Scott Ananian wrote:
>
> and NM supports a number of static data files for configuration if that's
> what you want yo do.
>
> What I want to
Brief tutorial on Gobject: http://cananian.livejournal.com/58744.html
Sorry, Bernie you don't get any sympathy from me: XFConfig deserves to
die, no matter how much you liked it. And are you really running
Gentoo and complaining whenthings break? Seriously? That's the price
of unstable (and pro
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 11:20 AM, C. Scott Ananian wrote:
> Martin, I'm not sure NetworkManager is really the right tool for your
> (server) job. NetworkManager's goal in life is dynamic roaming, not
> static setups.
You'd be surprised: people are proposing complete removal of
networks-scripts i
Sorry, Sascha, didn't mean for the attack to seem personal. And
Martin, I'm not sure NetworkManager is really the right tool for your
(server) job. NetworkManager's goal in life is dynamic roaming, not
static setups.
I'm not necessarily defending NM: lord knows I wish it had better docs
and a mo
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 14:25, Martin Langhoff
wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 5:51 AM, Sascha Silbe
> wrote:
>> What I want to be able to do is exactly the same I can do using nm-applet.
>
> That would be a good start. Reasonable feature parity with the old
> network scripts would also be great
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 5:51 AM, Sascha Silbe
wrote:
> What I want to be able to do is exactly the same I can do using nm-applet.
That would be a good start. Reasonable feature parity with the old
network scripts would also be great.
The best that I can say of NM is that Dan moves quickly, and c
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 12:04, Sascha Silbe
wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 11:57:45AM +0200, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
>
>>> That wasn't the point, though: I'm not asking for _API_ access to
>>> NetworkManager (I already got that using python), but for a CLI _tool_ to
>>> use as an _administrator_ o
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 11:57:45AM +0200, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
That wasn't the point, though: I'm not asking for _API_ access to
NetworkManager (I already got that using python), but for a CLI
_tool_ to
use as an _administrator_ or _user_, not as a developer.
system-config-network has a cli
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 11:51, Sascha Silbe
wrote:
> That wasn't the point, though: I'm not asking for _API_ access to
> NetworkManager (I already got that using python), but for a CLI _tool_ to
> use as an _administrator_ or _user_, not as a developer.
system-config-network has a cli tool to con
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 06:54:13PM -0400, C. Scott Ananian wrote:
I am failing to resist responding to this troll.
I'm rather puzzled why you are resorting to personal attacks on me; I've
had a rather high opinion of you up to now.
I'll try an objective answer nevertheless.
Dbus access from
On Sun, 2010-04-25 at 18:54 -0400, C. Scott Ananian wrote:
> I am failing to resist responding to this troll.
>
> Dbus access from the command line is fairly good, and NM supports a
> number of static data files for configuration if that's what you want
> yo do. Fear not, scriptability of Unix sy
I am failing to resist responding to this troll.
Dbus access from the command line is fairly good, and NM supports a
number of static data files for configuration if that's what you want
yo do. Fear not, scriptability of Unix systems is, if anything,
*increasing*, as there are now powerful ways t
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 02:16:34PM -0400, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
unified, perhaps, except that access from shell (last i looked)
was fairly inadequate.
So I'm not the only one to be disgusted by this trend?
Certainly not.
Modern Linux is becoming worryingly similar to MacOS and Windows.
In
13 matches
Mail list logo