> My understanding is that we didn't make that decision yet. In the release
> thread we agreed to delay it until we had a better idea of the features we
> are going to target. I think the marketing team should have his word on
> this too.
>
> When Simon is back we should probably bring up this agai
On 9 April 2013 23:27, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 6:17 PM, Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn <
> alan...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Yes.. the small first :-)
>>
>> Maybe I lose the discussion: why 0.100 instead 1.00 ?
>>
>>
> The short story is we don't feel ready for 1.0.
> While ca
Thanks
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 7:27 PM, Aleksey Lim wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 06:13:10PM -0300, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
> > Trying to add a new activity version in ASLO, the default values for
> Sugar
> > versions
> > are now 0.100 - 0.98.
> >
> > I think should be 0.98 - 0.100, right?
>
> S
On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 06:13:10PM -0300, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
> Trying to add a new activity version in ASLO, the default values for Sugar
> versions
> are now 0.100 - 0.98.
>
> I think should be 0.98 - 0.100, right?
Should work for now.
>
> Gonzalo
--
Aleksey
__
t; To: sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org; alsr...@activitycentral.org
> Subject: [Sugar-devel] New default values for compatibility in ASLO
>
>
> Trying to add a new activity version in ASLO, the default values for Sugar
> versions
> are now 0.100 - 0.98
Yes.. the small first :-)
Maybe I lose the discussion: why 0.100 instead 1.00 ?
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2013 18:13:10 -0300
From: gonz...@laptop.org
To: sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org; alsr...@activitycentral.org
Subject: [Sugar-devel] New default values for compatibility in ASLO
Trying to add a new
Trying to add a new activity version in ASLO, the default values for Sugar
versions
are now 0.100 - 0.98.
I think should be 0.98 - 0.100, right?
Gonzalo
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sug
7 matches
Mail list logo
