Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar-devel Digest, Vol 11, Issue 94

2009-09-18 Thread Bill Bogstad
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 4:06 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 19:45, Daniel Drake wrote: >> 2009/9/17 David Farning : >>> One step in that direction might be to clearly communicate and try to >>> gather momentum around a series of stable releases. >>> >>> One thought that might w

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar-devel Digest, Vol 11, Issue 94

2009-09-18 Thread Jim Simmons
Tomeu, You can put me down as an XO owner that is willing to try new images and file bug reports. I don't have any immediate plans to enhance my three Activities so I should have time for other work. James Simmons > I personally think that making possible for XO-1 owners to upgrade to > recent

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar-devel Digest, Vol 11, Issue 94

2009-09-18 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 19:45, Daniel Drake wrote: > 2009/9/17 David Farning : >> One step in that direction might be to clearly communicate and try to >> gather momentum around a series of stable releases. >> >> One thought that might work is to set .84, .88, .94, and 1.0 as stable >> releases fo

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar-devel Digest, Vol 11, Issue 94

2009-09-17 Thread Raul Gutierrez Segales
On Thu, 2009-09-17 at 23:30 +0545, Daniel Drake wrote: > 2009/9/17 David Farning : > > One step in that direction might be to clearly communicate and try to > > gather momentum around a series of stable releases. > > > > One thought that might work is to set .84, .88, .94, and 1.0 as stable > > rel

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar-devel Digest, Vol 11, Issue 94

2009-09-17 Thread Daniel Drake
2009/9/17 David Farning : > One step in that direction might be to clearly communicate and try to > gather momentum around a series of stable releases. > > One thought that might work is to set .84, .88, .94, and 1.0 as stable > releases for down streams to unite around. That would be useful but a

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar-devel Digest, Vol 11, Issue 94

2009-09-17 Thread David Farning
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 5:41 AM, Daniel Drake wrote: > 2009/9/17 Jim Simmons : >> So the real answer to your question is, how will the other kids >> upgrade and when will they be able to do it? > > In the majority of cases (i.e. large deployments) it will be done as a > coordinated effort by the o

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar-devel Digest, Vol 11, Issue 94

2009-09-17 Thread Daniel Drake
2009/9/17 Jim Simmons : > So the real answer to your question is, how will the other kids > upgrade and when will they be able to do it? In the majority of cases (i.e. large deployments) it will be done as a coordinated effort by the overseeing deployment team. The deployment team will make the de

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar-devel Digest, Vol 11, Issue 94

2009-09-17 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 00:02, Jim Simmons wrote: > Jonas, > > As an Activity developer I want to have my stuff run well for as many > children as possible.  As an XO owner I want my XO set up as much as > possible like the XOs out in the field, so I can be sure that children > with XOs have the b

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar-devel Digest, Vol 11, Issue 94

2009-09-16 Thread Jim Simmons
Jonas, As an Activity developer I want to have my stuff run well for as many children as possible. As an XO owner I want my XO set up as much as possible like the XOs out in the field, so I can be sure that children with XOs have the best experience possible. .82 has some serious deficiencies: n