Re: [Sugar-devel] core maintainers

2010-06-21 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 21:02, David Farning dfarn...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 12:36 PM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote: On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 18:39, David Farning dfarn...@gmail.com wrote: Over the past couple of months it has appeared that the ramp up of deployment

Re: [Sugar-devel] core maintainers

2010-06-21 Thread Martin Dengler
David, When you have the time, some clarity here would be appreciated. Martin On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 12:49:33AM +0100, Martin Dengler wrote: On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 01:58:32PM -0500, David Farning wrote: Over the past couple of months, Activity Central has been establishing a network of

Re: [Sugar-devel] core maintainers

2010-06-21 Thread Martin Dengler
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 02:02:57PM -0500, David Farning wrote: On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 12:36 PM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote: On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 18:39, David Farning dfarn...@gmail.com wrote: Over the past couple of months it has appeared that the ramp up of deployment

Re: [Sugar-devel] core maintainers

2010-06-21 Thread David Farning
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 3:11 AM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote: On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 21:02, David Farning dfarn...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 12:36 PM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote: On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 18:39, David Farning dfarn...@gmail.com wrote: Over

Re: [Sugar-devel] core maintainers

2010-06-21 Thread David Farning
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 6:59 AM, Martin Dengler mar...@martindengler.com wrote: On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 02:02:57PM -0500, David Farning wrote: On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 12:36 PM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote: On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 18:39, David Farning dfarn...@gmail.com wrote: Over

Re: [Sugar-devel] core maintainers

2010-06-21 Thread David Farning
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 6:57 AM, Martin Dengler mar...@martindengler.com wrote: David, When you have the time, some clarity here would be appreciated. Martin On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 12:49:33AM +0100, Martin Dengler wrote: On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 01:58:32PM -0500, David Farning wrote:

Re: [Sugar-devel] core maintainers

2010-06-21 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 4:11 AM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote: Hmm, I have never heard of a company taking over maintenance of a module, anybody has references? It uses to be the individuals who accept the responsibility of maintaining a module. I do. In the case of Moodle, both

Re: [Sugar-devel] core maintainers

2010-06-21 Thread Martin Dengler
[we're just arguing for fun now, I guess] On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 12:59:01PM -0500, David Farning wrote: On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 6:57 AM, Martin Dengler mar...@martindengler.com wrote: David, When you have the time, some clarity here would be appreciated. Martin On Sat, Jun 12,

Re: [Sugar-devel] core maintainers

2010-06-14 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 18:39, David Farning dfarn...@gmail.com wrote: Over the past couple of months it has appeared that the ramp up of deployment submitted patches has stretched the core maintainers rather short. I would like to consider having Deployment Support Network developers start

Re: [Sugar-devel] core maintainers

2010-06-14 Thread David Farning
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 12:36 PM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote: On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 18:39, David Farning dfarn...@gmail.com wrote: Over the past couple of months it has appeared that the ramp up of deployment submitted patches has stretched the core maintainers rather short. I

[Sugar-devel] core maintainers

2010-06-11 Thread David Farning
Over the past couple of months it has appeared that the ramp up of deployment submitted patches has stretched the core maintainers rather short. I would like to consider having Deployment Support Network developers start accepting additional maintainership responsibility and authority.

Re: [Sugar-devel] core maintainers

2010-06-11 Thread Walter Bender
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 12:39 PM, David Farning dfarn...@gmail.com wrote: Over the past couple of months it has appeared that the ramp up of deployment submitted patches has stretched the core maintainers rather short. I would like to consider having Deployment Support Network developers

Re: [Sugar-devel] core maintainers

2010-06-11 Thread David Farning
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 12:39 PM, David Farning dfarn...@gmail.com wrote: Over the past couple of months it has appeared that the ramp up of deployment submitted patches has stretched the core maintainers rather

Re: [Sugar-devel] core maintainers

2010-06-11 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 12:39 PM, David Farning dfarn...@gmail.com wrote: Over the past couple of months it has appeared that the ramp up of deployment submitted patches has stretched the core maintainers rather short. How about the old classic of F/OSS: whoever is doing the most good work on

Re: [Sugar-devel] core maintainers

2010-06-11 Thread Martin Dengler
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 01:58:32PM -0500, David Farning wrote: Over the past couple of months, Activity Central has been establishing a network of developers to provide service and support for deployments. I assume they're paid, otherwise why would you (Activity Central) not just establish

Re: [Sugar-devel] core maintainers

2010-06-11 Thread James Cameron
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 03:29:44PM -0400, Martin Langhoff wrote: The linux kernel and all the successful projects I've done work with use this fluid notion. Whenever I wonder who's the maintainer for something I use git log path/to/dir/or/file. And a MAINTAINER{S,} file. -- James Cameron