I've rebranded Browse-webkit to Surf-115.
http://people.sugarlabs.org/lucian/Surf-115.xo
On 22 July 2010 19:03, Lucian Branescu lucian.brane...@gmail.com wrote:
I was planning to simply pretend that Browse-webkit is a newer version
of Surf. In a way it is, since they share some ancient git
On 07/22/2010 12:18 PM, Lucian Branescu wrote:
In order to better test Browse-webkit, we'd need to package and distribute it.
If it isn't heavily tested and known to work perfectly, definitely don't
call it Browse, and definitely don't use the same icon. Browse is by
far the #1 most important
If bobbyp agrees, I'll rebrand it to Surf until it gets merged to
master. Would that be ok?
On 22 July 2010 17:24, Benjamin M. Schwartz bmsch...@fas.harvard.edu wrote:
On 07/22/2010 12:18 PM, Lucian Branescu wrote:
In order to better test Browse-webkit, we'd need to package and distribute
it.
On 07/22/2010 12:26 PM, Lucian Branescu wrote:
If bobbyp agrees, I'll rebrand it to Surf until it gets merged to
master. Would that be ok?
I think that's a good solution.
--Ben
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Sugar-devel
On 22 Jul 2010, at 17:26, Lucian Branescu lucian.brane...@gmail.com wrote:
If bobbyp agrees, I'll rebrand it to Surf until it gets merged to
master. Would that be ok?
Need a new svg icon, temp or otherwise? Happy to cook something up, similar to
the old surf svg involving a breaking wave (I'd
I was planning to simply pretend that Browse-webkit is a newer version
of Surf. In a way it is, since they share some ancient git history :)
So unless Bobby minds us using Surf's brand, we shouldn't need a new
icon. Thanks for offering, though.
On 22 July 2010 18:54, Gary Martin
6 matches
Mail list logo
