Hi,
I try the TurtleBlocks 149.1 in a XO-1 with Sugar 0.88When install, I get this
error:
[olpc@xo-1e-66-9e DB1D-2012]$ sugar-install-bundle turtle_art-149.1.xo
Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/bin/sugar-install-bundle, line
17, in modulebundle = ActivityBundle(sys.argv[1])
I see in the final screenshots that all of the selected items are
deselected.
Is this automatic, or does the user have to choose the deselect all
button to do this?
Personally I would prefer if the checkboxes remain selected in the source
view (if not an erase operation that removes the item).
Hi Samuel.
Please find the replies inline.
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 7:03 PM, Samuel Greenfeld greenf...@laptop.orgwrote:
I see in the final screenshots that all of the selected items are
deselected.
Is this automatic, or does the user have to choose the deselect all
button to do this?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 18 July 2012 07:56 PM, Ajay Garg wrote:
Hi Samuel.
Please find the replies inline.
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 7:03 PM, Samuel Greenfeld
greenf...@laptop.org mailto:greenf...@laptop.org wrote:
I see in the final screenshots that
Convert all the gtk2 and sugar-toolkit code to launch this Activity
using Gtk3.
All these steps are documented here:
* http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/GTK3/Porting/Log
Signed-off-by: Manuel Kaufmann humi...@gmail.com
---
logviewer.py | 140
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 10:26 AM, Ajay Garg a...@activitycentral.comwrote:
Hi Samuel.
Please find the replies inline.
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 7:03 PM, Samuel Greenfeld greenf...@laptop.orgwrote:
I see in the final screenshots that all of the selected items are
deselected.
Is this
Maybe until there is a solution, we just use odd numbers for gtk-2 and
even numbers for gtk-3?
-walter
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 2:37 AM, Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn
alan...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I try the TurtleBlocks 149.1 in a XO-1 with Sugar 0.88
When install, I get this error:
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 8:03 PM, Anish Mangal an...@activitycentral.comwrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 18 July 2012 07:56 PM, Ajay Garg wrote:
Hi Samuel.
Please find the replies inline.
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 7:03 PM, Samuel Greenfeld
On 17 July 2012 23:55, Caspar Bothmer cas...@activitycentral.com wrote:
-test -n ${srcdir} || srcdir=`dirname $0`
-test -n ${srcdir} || srcdir=$(pwd)
Shouldn't this be based on master rather than on my patch?
+# We temporarily jump into srcdir to allow
+# autoreconf to take into account the
On 16 Jul 2012, at 14:51, Gary C Martin wrote:
Hi folks,
It's time to start reviving the IRC Design Meetings for the next Sugar
release cycle! The plan is to keep the meetings to 1 hour, or under, and use
our realtime meeting to keep the various design efforts ticking over and
everyone
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe until there is a solution, we just use odd numbers for gtk-2 and
even numbers for gtk-3?
-walter
Not to be contrary, but wouldn't even numbers for GTK2 and odd numbers
for GTK3 be more mnemonic?
cjl
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Chris Leonard
cjlhomeaddr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com
wrote:
Maybe until there is a solution, we just use odd numbers for gtk-2 and
even numbers for gtk-3?
-walter
Not to be contrary, but
Agenda item: TTS, e-speak and voices
Summary:
We now have text-to-spech everywhere via e-speak, before we get too
far into speech engine technology lock-in we should thoughtfully
assess festival (or other options). In particular, we need to think
about how we can improve upstream voices to cover
Works. The problem is the dot in the activity version.Maybe all xx.x activities
must will updated to xx+1
Regards!
Alan
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 17:18:53 -0400
From: walter.ben...@gmail.com
To: alan...@hotmail.com
CC: sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org; a...@lists.sugarlabs.org
Subject: Re:
2012/7/18 Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn alan...@hotmail.com:
Works. The problem is the dot in the activity version.
Maybe all xx.x activities must will updated to xx+1
Regards!
Alan
The better in this case would be: xx+1(same as gtk3 version) in the
activity.info and xx.x in ASLO. But I
Hi folks,
On 19 Jul 2012, at 00:06, Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn wrote:
Works. The problem is the dot in the activity version.
Maybe all xx.x activities must will updated to xx+1
For what it's worth: Digging through git commits, dotted version number support
was added by commit c7a80a
We should not be using dotted version numbers for activities intended to be
installed at deployments running builds older than Sugar 0.92.0.
In Uruguay, one week ago, the latest image was Sugar 0.88 !Now (by luck) we
have Sugar 0.94 :-)
In others deployments, what Sugar version are their
Peru is slowing moving to 11.3 (Sugar 0.94) but there are many 0.84
machines in the field.
-walter
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 9:26 PM, Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn
alan...@hotmail.com wrote:
We should not be using dotted version numbers for activities intended to
be installed at deployments running
18 matches
Mail list logo
