Re: [Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] Browse-108

2009-05-02 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 8:29 PM, David Farning wrote: > Ahh, sorry I misunderstood.  Activities.sugarlabs.org does support > multiple concurrent versions of an activity.  This is how amo updates > addons for the various versions of Firefox.  I don't clearly > understand how the system works.  But i

Re: [Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] Browse-108

2009-05-02 Thread David Farning
On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 1:00 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Sat, May 02, 2009 at 11:30:22AM -0500, David Farning wrote: >>On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 7:23 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >>> On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 06:04:06PM -0500, David Farning wrote:

Re: [Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] Browse-108

2009-05-02 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, May 02, 2009 at 11:30:22AM -0500, David Farning wrote: >On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 7:23 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >> On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 06:04:06PM -0500, David Farning wrote: >>>The conical source of information on activities _should_ be >

Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH] add clock to frame

2009-05-02 Thread Martin Dengler
On Sat, May 02, 2009 at 07:43:36AM -0500, Jameson Quinn wrote: > In other words, IMO this should be two patches: a clock device icon; and the > ability to put device icons in lower left, lower right, or upper > right. Fair enough. > now-I-can-go-back-to-building-my-own-bikeshed-ly y'rs, ;) > Ja

Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH] add clock to frame

2009-05-02 Thread Martin Dengler
On Sat, May 02, 2009 at 08:08:29AM -0400, p...@laptop.org wrote: > sounds like there is, but to be sure: it's easy for people to > remove or disable if they don't like having a stopped clock on > their screen during idle suspend on an XO? The clock refreshes itself when the Frame is shown, so it'

Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH] add clock to frame

2009-05-02 Thread Martin Dengler
On Sat, May 02, 2009 at 10:49:05AM -0400, Eben Eliason wrote: > On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 7:04 AM, Martin Dengler > wrote: > > On Sat, May 02, 2009 at 10:28:06AM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > >> Hi Martin, > >> > >> I was hoping the frame clock could be implemented as a device icon > >> extension, so

[Sugar-devel] Sugar on Nokia N810

2009-05-02 Thread Sameer Verma
One of my all time favorite devices gets one of my all time favorite environments! Read on. http://guysoft.wordpress.com/2009/05/01/nokia-n810-running-olpc-sugar/ cheers, Sameer -- Dr. Sameer Verma, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Information Systems San Francisco State University San Francisco CA 9

Re: [Sugar-devel] LiveUSB-creator 3.6.5 may fail silently on Windows

2009-05-02 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 18:16, Frederick Grose wrote: > Would this trac instance serve the same purpose?: > https://fedorahosted.org/liveusb-creator/ticket/613 Yeah, it may be better. > I've put a caution on this page for users, > http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_on_a_Stick/Windows Thanks! To

Re: [Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] Browse-108

2009-05-02 Thread David Farning
On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 7:23 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 06:04:06PM -0500, David Farning wrote: >>The conical source of information on activities _should_ be >>activities.download.org.  What activities download page were

Re: [Sugar-devel] LiveUSB-creator 3.6.5 may fail silently on Windows

2009-05-02 Thread Frederick Grose
Would this trac instance serve the same purpose?: https://fedorahosted.org/liveusb-creator/ticket/613 I've put a caution on this page for users, http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_on_a_Stick/Windows --Fred On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 11:39 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 01:42, Fr

Re: [Sugar-devel] LiveUSB-creator 3.6.5 may fail silently on Windows

2009-05-02 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 01:42, Frederick Grose wrote: > In Windows Vista32, I found that LiveUSB-creator 3.6.5 reported success in > creating a Sugar Stick from Soas2-200904231400.iso, but the image failed to > boot. Could you please enter a ticket in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/ ? Would be produ

Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH] add clock to frame

2009-05-02 Thread Eben Eliason
On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 7:04 AM, Martin Dengler wrote: > On Sat, May 02, 2009 at 10:28:06AM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >> Hi Martin, >> >> I was hoping the frame clock could be implemented as a device icon >> extension, so people could add it, remove it and customize it more >> easily. Why is it in

Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH] add clock to frame

2009-05-02 Thread Jameson Quinn
+2 to having a clock +0 to being able to place it in any of the 8 corners of the frame by a one-line code change -1 to those two pieces of code being in the same patch In other words, IMO this should be two patches: a clock device icon; and the ability to put device icons in lower left, lower righ

Re: [Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] Browse-108

2009-05-02 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 06:04:06PM -0500, David Farning wrote: >The conical source of information on activities _should_ be >activities.download.org. What activities download page were you >looking at? They should all be pointing to activities.suga

Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH] add clock to frame

2009-05-02 Thread pgf
martin wrote: > On Sat, May 02, 2009 at 10:28:06AM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > > Hi Martin, > > > > I was hoping the frame clock could be implemented as a device icon > > extension, so people could add it, remove it and customize it more > > easily. Why is it inside the shell instead? >

Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH] add clock to frame

2009-05-02 Thread Martin Dengler
On Sat, May 02, 2009 at 10:28:06AM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > Hi Martin, > > I was hoping the frame clock could be implemented as a device icon > extension, so people could add it, remove it and customize it more > easily. Why is it inside the shell instead? The code (clock.py) is in fact a dev

Re: [Sugar-devel] SD card / USB stick support (was: Re: [IAEP] Project Gutenberg, etc.)

2009-05-02 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 09:50, Sascha Silbe wrote: > > Following up on a discussion on iaep... > > On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 04:10:59PM -0500, James Simmons wrote: > >> The SD card cannot do everything the Journal can do, [...] > > This is something that we should fix. The way the SD card / USB stic

Re: [Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] Browse-108

2009-05-02 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 02:15, Dave Bauer wrote: > > > On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 6:46 PM, Martin Langhoff > wrote: >> >> Hi Simon, Sugaristas, >> >> Dave Bauer was asking where could he find recent Browse.xo releases, >> and I did a bit of browsing and googling, and couldn't find it. >> Searching my

Re: [Sugar-devel] Keyboard shortcuts

2009-05-02 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 22:52, Jameson Quinn wrote: > Martin: >> >> 1. What I think we're talking about: > > You're right. While I actually think that, with a cheatsheet, alt-f is > slightly *more* discoverable (though less convenient/accessible) than F9, > your point is good. Let's stop fighting f

Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH] add clock to frame

2009-05-02 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
Hi Martin, I was hoping the frame clock could be implemented as a device icon extension, so people could add it, remove it and customize it more easily. Why is it inside the shell instead? Btw, do you want me to ask in olpc-sur how people already using 8.2 would like the clock to look like? Than