[Sugar-devel] 2 idea's to train people dyslexia

2009-09-16 Thread Marten Vijn
Hi, I am not a dyslexia expert, maybe a bit more that average. idea 1 Today I read in a newspaper that it helps people to let them hear what they (words not the characters). People made commerial software for and improved really the performance of kids. idea 2 typetrainers (learning to type

Re: [Sugar-devel] 2 idea's to train people dyslexia

2009-09-16 Thread Marten Vijn
On Wed, 2009-09-16 at 09:34 +0200, Marten Vijn wrote: Hi, I am not a dyslexia expert, maybe a bit more that average. idea 1 Today I read in a newspaper that it helps people to let them hear what they (words not the characters). __^ type* *Actually I do knwo a lot

Re: [Sugar-devel] Searching for datastore entries by title

2009-09-16 Thread Bert Freudenberg
On 16.09.2009, at 03:11, Gary C Martin wrote: Hi Bert, On 16 Sep 2009, at 00:51, Bert Freudenberg wrote: I want to find a datastore entry with a specific title and mime_type. But it returns *all* entries with that mimetype instead. Here's the log: 1253058031.600170 DEBUG root:

Re: [Sugar-devel] Searching for datastore entries by title

2009-09-16 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 12:09, Bert Freudenberg b...@freudenbergs.de wrote: On 16.09.2009, at 03:11, Gary C Martin wrote: Hi Bert, On 16 Sep 2009, at 00:51, Bert Freudenberg wrote: I want to find a datastore entry with a specific title and mime_type. But it returns *all* entries with that

Re: [Sugar-devel] Searching for datastore entries by title

2009-09-16 Thread Bert Freudenberg
On 16.09.2009, at 13:48, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 12:09, Bert Freudenberg b...@freudenbergs.de wrote: On 16.09.2009, at 03:11, Gary C Martin wrote: Hi Bert, On 16 Sep 2009, at 00:51, Bert Freudenberg wrote: I want to find a datastore entry with a specific title and

Re: [Sugar-devel] Searching for datastore entries by title

2009-09-16 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 14:05, Bert Freudenberg b...@freudenbergs.de wrote: On 16.09.2009, at 13:48, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 12:09, Bert Freudenberg b...@freudenbergs.de wrote: On 16.09.2009, at 03:11, Gary C Martin wrote: Hi Bert, On 16 Sep 2009, at 00:51, Bert

Re: [Sugar-devel] Searching for datastore entries by title

2009-09-16 Thread Bert Freudenberg
On 16.09.2009, at 14:11, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: Right now we only index what the journal needs, see the _PREFIX_ constants below: http://git.sugarlabs.org/projects/sugar-datastore/repos/mainline/blobs/master/src/carquinyol/indexstore.py#line32 That's good info. Can you say in which version

Re: [Sugar-devel] Searching for datastore entries by title

2009-09-16 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 14:22, Bert Freudenberg b...@freudenbergs.de wrote: On 16.09.2009, at 14:11, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: Right now we only index what the journal needs, see the _PREFIX_ constants below:

Re: [Sugar-devel] Searching for datastore entries by title

2009-09-16 Thread Bert Freudenberg
On 16.09.2009, at 14:40, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 14:22, Bert Freudenberg b...@freudenbergs.de wrote: On 16.09.2009, at 14:11, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: Right now we only index what the journal needs, see the _PREFIX_ constants below:

Re: [Sugar-devel] Searching for datastore entries by title

2009-09-16 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 14:50, Bert Freudenberg b...@freudenbergs.de wrote: On 16.09.2009, at 14:40, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 14:22, Bert Freudenberg b...@freudenbergs.de wrote: On 16.09.2009, at 14:11, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: Right now we only index what the journal needs,

[Sugar-devel] sugaronastick.com (was Re: Beta Test of Sugar on a Stick Backup Service.)

2009-09-16 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 20:04, Caroline Meeks carol...@solutiongrove.com wrote: I'd like to announce to just the sugar development list at this point. We are ready for the first tests of backup and restore on a Sugar Stick.  We will be using this code for both Sugaronastick.com and the GPA but

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SLOBS] SLOBs Position on SoaS

2009-09-16 Thread David Farning
As Sean and Martin point out the consequences of this decision extend past SoaS. The effects seem to centre on four levels: 1. Procedural. 2. Mission, Vision, and Values. 3. Operations. 4. SoaS the project. As we work through the levels, a pretty good decision _should_ emerge. Procedural-- As

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SLOBS] SLOBs Position on SoaS

2009-09-16 Thread Peter Robinson
Hi, On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 3:08 PM, David Farning dfarn...@sugarlabs.org wrote: As Sean and Martin point out the consequences of this decision extend past SoaS.  The effects seem to centre on four levels: 1. Procedural. 2. Mission, Vision, and Values. 3. Operations. 4. SoaS the project.

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] SLOBs Position on SoaS

2009-09-16 Thread Daniel Drake
2009/9/16 Sebastian Dziallas sebast...@when.com: Let me rephrase again, to make things clear. I'd love to hear an official answer on this. Soon. Is the current SoaS going to be the primary way Sugar Labs distributes a Sugar-centric GNU/Linux distribution? Isn't there a wider question first?

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SLOBS] [IAEP] SLOBs Position on SoaS

2009-09-16 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 16:24, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote: 2009/9/16 Sebastian Dziallas sebast...@when.com: Let me rephrase again, to make things clear. I'd love to hear an official answer on this. Soon. Is the current SoaS going to be the primary way Sugar Labs distributes a

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] SLOBs Position on SoaS

2009-09-16 Thread Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 16:24, Daniel Drake wrote: 2009/9/16 Sebastian Dziallas: Let me rephrase again, to make things clear. I'd love to hear an official answer on this. Soon. Is the current SoaS going to be the primary way Sugar Labs distributes a Sugar-centric GNU/Linux distribution?

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SLOBS] [IAEP] SLOBs Position on SoaS

2009-09-16 Thread Caroline Meeks
I went to a talk at the Hauser Nonprofit Institute at Harvard yesterday. Someone asked a question the director, who teachers nonprofit administration, about why they choose the 5 areas they focused on. he said: Some people think the opposite of Strategic Management is bad management. Actually

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SLOBS] [IAEP] SLOBs Position on SoaS

2009-09-16 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 16:38, Mathieu Bridon (bochecha) boche...@fedoraproject.org wrote: On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 16:24, Daniel Drake wrote: 2009/9/16 Sebastian Dziallas: Let me rephrase again, to make things clear. I'd love to hear an official answer on this. Soon. Is the current SoaS

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SLOBS] [IAEP] SLOBs Position on SoaS

2009-09-16 Thread Caroline Meeks
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 10:36 AM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote: On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 16:24, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote: 2009/9/16 Sebastian Dziallas sebast...@when.com: Let me rephrase again, to make things clear. I'd love to hear an official answer on this. Soon.

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar-devel Digest, Vol 11, Issue 89

2009-09-16 Thread Jim Simmons
Art, Being a frugal person I do all my home computing on legacy machines like the ones you've tested with. As far as SoaS is concerned, I agree with your conclusions. I got better results than you did with my Pentium III because I've installed a USB 2.0 expansion card on it. I haven't tried a

[Sugar-devel] new journal and datastore maintainer

2009-09-16 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
Hi, the other day I passed maintenance of the Journal and the Datastore to Aleksey, who has been doing already a great job at helping with new features, bug fixes, design discussions and all the rest of what makes a maintainer. But I would like to warn that Aleksey codes very fast and lives very

Re: [Sugar-devel] SLOBs Position on SoaS

2009-09-16 Thread Daniel Drake
2009/9/16 Jim Simmons nices...@gmail.com: Sebastian, I have a similar question.  What I want to know is, when I am finally able to upgrade my XO from .82 to something better, will I use SoaS to do it?  Or will I be able to do upgrades over the network as I have done in the past? You will

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] [SLOBS] SLOBs Position on SoaS

2009-09-16 Thread Sebastian Dziallas
Tomeu Vizoso wrote: On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 16:24, Daniel Draked...@laptop.org wrote: 2009/9/16 Sebastian Dziallassebast...@when.com: Let me rephrase again, to make things clear. I'd love to hear an official answer on this. Soon. Is the current SoaS going to be the primary way Sugar Labs

Re: [Sugar-devel] SLOBs Position on SoaS

2009-09-16 Thread Art Hunkins
This is a basic question I have as well. Art Hunkins - Original Message - From: Jim Simmons nices...@gmail.com To: sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org; Sebastian Dziallas s...@sugarlabs.org Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2009 10:31 AM Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] SLOBs Position on SoaS

[Sugar-devel] new sugar-artwork maintainer

2009-09-16 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
Hi all, Benjamin Berg has accepted becoming the maintainer of sugar-artwork. He is the main developer of the GTK+ theme that gives the Sugar look to our UI controls and one of the most knowledgeable people on GTK+ theming. Also, Gary has became a peer of the sugar-artwork module, where he will

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] [SLOBS] SLOBs Position on SoaS

2009-09-16 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 17:11, Sebastian Dziallas sebast...@when.com wrote: Tomeu Vizoso wrote: On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 16:24, Daniel Draked...@laptop.org  wrote: 2009/9/16 Sebastian Dziallassebast...@when.com: Let me rephrase again, to make things clear. I'd love to hear an official

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] [SLOBS] SLOBs Position on SoaS

2009-09-16 Thread Daniel Drake
2009/9/16 Sebastian Dziallas sebast...@when.com: Args! I notice that what I asked could have been misunderstood. I didn't mean to imply SoaS being only way of distributing Sugar. That's out of question and was never my intention. I apologize for any confusion if this feeling has been created.

Re: [Sugar-devel] SLOBs Position on SoaS

2009-09-16 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Hi Jim, On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 09:31:19AM -0500, Jim Simmons wrote: I have a similar question. What I want to know is, when I am finally able to upgrade my XO from .82 to something better, will I use SoaS to do it? Or will I be able to do upgrades over the network as I have done in the

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] [SLOBS] SLOBs Position on SoaS

2009-09-16 Thread Greg DeKoenigsberg
On Wed, 16 Sep 2009, Daniel Drake wrote: I wonder, though, if the current SoaS is going to be the primary LiveUSB distribution of Sugar supported by upstream (known as SoaS). I think Sugar should treat all downstreams equally, so there would be no primary distro. But users/deployments may

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SLOBS] [IAEP] SLOBs Position on SoaS

2009-09-16 Thread Sebastian Dziallas
Caroline Meeks wrote: [...] snip! I agree with Daniel's question. Sebastian, what is your theory of change here? What do you think we should do and why does doing it and doing it now as an official strategic decision get us closer to having all the world's children use Sugar? So well. I

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] [SLOBS] SLOBs Position on SoaS

2009-09-16 Thread Luke Faraone
On 2009-09-16, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote: 2009/9/16 Sebastian Dziallas sebast...@when.com: I wonder, though, if the current SoaS is going to be the primary LiveUSB distribution of Sugar supported by upstream (known as SoaS). I think Sugar should treat all downstreams equally, so

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] SLOBs Position on SoaS

2009-09-16 Thread Philippe Clérié
Isn't there a wider question first? the one that asks if Sugar Labs is actually interested in being a distributor rather than just an upstream. Sugar Labs needs to be a distributor because: 1) You need a product to market. The comparison with Gnome does not hold. There have always been

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SLOBS] [IAEP] SLOBs Position on SoaS

2009-09-16 Thread Sean DALY
SoaS is a game-changer. In a world where approximately 93% of desktops run a version of Windows, 5% run a version of Mac OSX, and GNU/Linux distros make up the remaining 1-2%, SoaS offers the possibility to boot on 90% of them and run in a VM in the other 10%. Not to mention reader devices neither

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar-devel Digest, Vol 11, Issue 89 (SoaS performance/hard drive swapping)

2009-09-16 Thread Bill Bogstad
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 10:51 AM, Jim Simmons nices...@gmail.com wrote: Art, Being a frugal person I do all my home computing on legacy machines like the ones you've tested with.  As far as SoaS is concerned, I agree with your conclusions.  I got better results than you did with my Pentium

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] SLOBs Position on SoaS

2009-09-16 Thread Peter Robinson
2009/9/16 Philippe Clérié phili...@gcal.net: Isn't there a wider question first? the one that asks if Sugar Labs is actually interested in being a distributor rather than just an upstream. Sugar Labs needs to be a distributor because: I disagree. 1) You need a product to market. The

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SLOBS] [IAEP] SLOBs Position on SoaS

2009-09-16 Thread Chris Ball
Hi Sebastian, In my opinion, Sugar Labs has about four options how to act wrt SoaS. (1) SL decides the current SoaS to be *the* SoaS and enforces the brand. (Did you know that you're able to lose a trademark when not enforcing it?) Exceptions could be granted by a

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SLOBS] [IAEP] SLOBs Position on SoaS

2009-09-16 Thread Daniel Drake
2009/9/16 Sebastian Dziallas sebast...@when.com: Now it comes to what I think is important in a project. And that is - also - certainty and trust. Those are pretty important factors. For developers, as well as for users, to know where one stands. Personally i would just get on with it and let

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] [SLOBS] SLOBs Position on SoaS

2009-09-16 Thread Daniel Drake
2009/9/16 Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org: That's true for SoaS, Sugar and for any other FOSS project, but I think it's a reasonable request to ask for some explicit commitment from the umbrella organization, just to not have to switch orgs every release. What kind of commitment do you have

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] SLOBs Position on SoaS

2009-09-16 Thread Bill Bogstad
This note is only tangentially a response to Peter Robinson's... Here's my thought process... Computer technology can improve education for children. Collaboration (i.e. Sugar) and free software (i.e. Linux) is the best way to make this happen. The question is how do we get educators/schools

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] [SLOBS] SLOBs Position on SoaS

2009-09-16 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 18:37, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote: 2009/9/16 Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org: That's true for SoaS, Sugar and for any other FOSS project, but I think it's a reasonable request to ask for some explicit commitment from the umbrella organization, just to not have

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] [SLOBS] SLOBs Position on SoaS

2009-09-16 Thread Daniel Drake
2009/9/16 Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org: I cannot speak for Sebastian nor the whole SoaS community, but something like making SoaS an official project in SLs could go a long way. This would mean saying that Sugar on a Stick is a project with this vision, this mission, this roadmap, this

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] [SLOBS] SLOBs Position on SoaS

2009-09-16 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 18:58, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote: 2009/9/16 Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org: I cannot speak for Sebastian nor the whole SoaS community, but something like making SoaS an official project in SLs could go a long way. This would mean saying that Sugar on a Stick

[Sugar-devel] [ASLO] Release Measure-27

2009-09-16 Thread Sugar Labs Activities
Activity Homepage: http://activities.sugarlabs.org/addon/4197 Sugar Platform: from 0.82 to 0.86 Download Now: http://activities.sugarlabs.org/downloads/version/29238 Release notes: 27 * added exception for gconf for old builds 26 * fixed toolbar display bug * cleaned up sound record code *

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] SLOBs Position on SoaS

2009-09-16 Thread Benjamin M. Schwartz
Peter Robinson wrote: 2009/9/16 Philippe Clérié phili...@gcal.net: 1) You need a product to market. The comparison with Gnome does not hold. There have always been distributions that made Gnome their official desktop environment, even very early on. That is not the case for Sugar. Whether in

[Sugar-devel] [DESIGN] Some pics from the new GNOME Activity Journal

2009-09-16 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
Hi, this may interest you: http://seilo.geekyogre.com/2009/09/some-pics-from-the-new-gnome-activity-journal/ We are going to meet with some of the Zeitgeist team in Bolzano later this year and we'll talk about ways to work together. Regards, Tomeu -- «Sugar Labs is anyone who participates

[Sugar-devel] gtk.TreeView alternatives

2009-09-16 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
Hi Aleksey, this may be a source for ideas if we decide to drop gtk.TreeView in the Journal for 0.88: http://abock.org/2007/06/27/my-hack-week-the-new-banshee Regards, Tomeu -- «Sugar Labs is anyone who participates in improving and using Sugar. What Sugar Labs does is determined by the

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] SLOBs Position on SoaS

2009-09-16 Thread Thomas C Gilliard
It is now possible to install Sugar-Desktop ONLY to a Hard disk using the F11 net install .iso. It is no longer required to have Gnome or KDE as a companion desktop. So we do have a Sugar-Desktop distribution already in F11. Benjamin M. Schwartz wrote: Peter Robinson wrote: 2009/9/16

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] SLOBs Position on SoaS

2009-09-16 Thread Philippe Clérié
First, by secondary, I did not mean to imply second class. I use KDE on both Ubuntu and Fedora. And I know they are not in anyway second class citizens on either distribution. In this case, secondary meant alternate, other, whatever is not the default. I apologize if I wasn't clear. It seems

Re: [Sugar-devel] #606 UNSP: SoaS includes lots of fonts that don't work in Write (Soas2-200903211320)

2009-09-16 Thread Edward Cherlin
The fonts in your list that render as tiny letters that all overprint are mainly fixed-size bitmap console fonts that should not be used in a GUI. I don't understand why Lucida Typewriter would have a problem, nor do I understand why only one Lucida font is inclueded in SOAS. The Lucida family of

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] SLOBs Position on SoaS

2009-09-16 Thread Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
I admit to having some difficulties understanding why you would want to keep Sugar as an upstream only.  Perhaps the arguments have already been made. I'm a late comer to the list so I am certainly unaware of what's been discussed prior to my joining in July. If so could someone please give me

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar-devel Digest, Vol 11, Issue 89 (SoaS performance/hard drive swapping)

2009-09-16 Thread Art Hunkins
Two questions: 1) Is there a difference between Fedora 11 and SoaS with regard to how many sound cards are supported? 2) Would it be possible to configure a SoaS USB drive so that the unused portion could function as a swap drive? Frankly, if a full Fedora 11 supported more sound cards and

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SLOBS] [IAEP] SLOBs Position on SoaS

2009-09-16 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 6:20 PM, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote: Personally i would just get on with it and let the code do the talking... Produce the best distribution that you can and people will use, respect and protect it. +1. Sebastian -- you have unending respect from both

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar-devel Digest, Vol 11, Issue 89 (SoaS performance/hard drive swapping)

2009-09-16 Thread Jim Simmons
Art, Sugar on the XO does not have a swap partition because swapping to disk would quickly wear out the solid state drive. You'd have the same problem on a thumb drive, plus swapping to a drive connected to a USB 1.0 port would not be fast. Now the other idea of checking to see if the computer

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar-devel Digest, Vol 11, Issue 94

2009-09-16 Thread Jim Simmons
Jonas, As an Activity developer I want to have my stuff run well for as many children as possible. As an XO owner I want my XO set up as much as possible like the XOs out in the field, so I can be sure that children with XOs have the best experience possible. .82 has some serious deficiencies:

[Sugar-devel] Jabber on the server

2009-09-16 Thread Philippe Clérié
Is there any reason to prefer ejabberd on the server rather than another Jabber server? I am thinking of using jabberd2 instead. I can't seem to wrap my head around ejabberd's configuration file but I am quite comfortable with the xml used by jabberd2. -- Philippe -- The trouble with

Re: [Sugar-devel] Jabber on the server

2009-09-16 Thread Luke Faraone
2009/9/16 Philippe Clérié phili...@gcal.net Is there any reason to prefer ejabberd on the server rather than another Jabber server? I am thinking of using jabberd2 instead. From what I can understand, ejabberd was the only jabber server which supported Sugar collaboration extensions. --

Re: [Sugar-devel] Any pull with HP?

2009-09-16 Thread David Farning
No, not really. We are not big enough for the major vendors to keep on us their watch list. If you ping me with what you need off list, I can help you with ZaReason contacts. david 2009/9/16 Philippe Clérié phili...@gcal.net: :-) Does anybody have any pull with HP? For some incomprehensible

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] SLOBs Position on SoaS

2009-09-16 Thread Douglas McClendon
Bill Bogstad wrote: This note is only tangentially a response to Peter Robinson's... Here's my thought process... Computer technology can improve education for children. Collaboration (i.e. Sugar) and free software (i.e. Linux) is the best way to make this happen. The question is

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar-devel Digest, Vol 11, Issue 89 (SoaS performance/hard drive swapping)

2009-09-16 Thread Douglas McClendon
Bill Bogstad wrote: On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 10:51 AM, Jim Simmons nices...@gmail.com wrote: Art, Being a frugal person I do all my home computing on legacy machines like the ones you've tested with. As far as SoaS is concerned, I agree with your conclusions. I got better results than you

Re: [Sugar-devel] Any pull with HP?

2009-09-16 Thread James Cameron
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 06:36:45PM -0500, Philippe Cl??ri?? wrote: Does anybody have any pull with HP? Not any more, I was retrenched a couple of months ago. For some incomprehensible reason they refuse to deliver the Mini 110 to Haiti. Try asking them why. Not all models are sold in all

[Sugar-devel] Sugar Digest 2009-09-16

2009-09-16 Thread Walter Bender
=== Sugar Digest === 1. At the urging of Yama Ploskonka, I went to Washington to the Interamerican Development Bank (IADB) to attend a seminar [http://www.iadb.org/news/detail.cfm?Language=Englishid=5654], “Reinventing the Classroo: Social and Educational Impact of the Incorporation of

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar-devel Digest, Vol 11, Issue 89 (SoaS performance/hard drive swapping)

2009-09-16 Thread Bill Bogstad
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 7:56 PM, Douglas McClendon d...@filteredperception.org wrote: Bill Bogstad wrote: [swapping on hard disk with SoaS Anybody want to code/script this up? does /etc/rc.d/init.d/livesys (search for swapon) in f11/soas not already do just that? I just checked both F11

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] SLOBs Position on SoaS

2009-09-16 Thread Bill Bogstad
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 8:22 PM, Douglas McClendon dmc.su...@filteredperception.org wrote: Bill Bogstad wrote: ... I also don't think we can leave Sugar LiveUSB to any distribution. My impression is that both LiveCD and LiveUSB Linux distributions are essentially gimmicks for all of them. I

Re: [Sugar-devel] cleanup on few karma pages needed

2009-09-16 Thread Felipe López Toledo
hi roshan actually, Bryan and Christoph have been worked on the html files, so, I'm a little unfamiliar with them. ie. I don't if my changes will affect other documents anyway I will take a look of those pages. thanks :) On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 12:27 AM, roshan karki ros...@olenepal.org wrote:

[Sugar-devel] [Karma] let's stick w/ Javascript 1.6

2009-09-16 Thread Bryan Berry
Felipe, I noticed that you said we are using Javascript 1.8 for Karma. I strongly recommend that we stick w/ Javascript 1.6 or even 1.5 Only Firefox supports Js 1.8. Chrome does not and Safari does not. Chrome does seem to support some aspects of Js 1.8 like map(), filter() , some(),

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar-devel Digest, Vol 11, Issue 89 (SoaS performance/hard drive swapping)

2009-09-16 Thread Edward Cherlin
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 8:49 AM, Bill Bogstad bogs...@pobox.com wrote: As for swap, if you are repurposing discarded machines on any kind of scale you are going to end up with non-functional machines which are a great source of parts.  Strip the RAM from the dead machines and upgrade the

[Sugar-devel] Development Bank seminar (was Re: [IAEP] Sugar Digest 2009-09-16)

2009-09-16 Thread Edward Cherlin
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 7:35 PM, Gerald Ardito gerald.ard...@gmail.com wrote: Walter, Your report from the meeting from Washington is inspiring. Particularly, the what are we waiting for. +1 As you know, I am in the process of documenting similar outcomes as part of a doctoral study for a