Re: [Sugar-devel] Ubuntu bugs

2012-07-04 Thread Daniel Narvaez
Yeah, sugar-build runs out of the box, except for Write. On 4 July 2012 03:57, Rafael Ortiz raf...@activitycentral.com wrote: On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 5:50 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I'm trying to support ubuntu in sugar-build, currently there are a couple of

Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH sugar-toolkit-gtk3 (shell-port)] The icon consists of an GtkEventBox and an IconBuffer. The GtkEventBox is a subclass of GtkBin which has its own window and therefor is used t

2012-07-04 Thread Benjamin Berg
On Fri, 2012-06-22 at 16:08 +0200, Simon Schampijer wrote: The EventIcon does emit the 'activated' signal when clicked and uses the CursorInvoker to invoke a palette the same way as the CanvasIcon did. We keep the same API as with the CanvasIcon, only the 'size' property is changed to be

Re: [Sugar-devel] Two strange files in sugar-toolkit-gtk3

2012-07-04 Thread Benjamin Berg
On Tue, 2012-07-03 at 17:40 -0300, S. Daniel Francis wrote: I was looking at the sources of sugar-toolkit-gtk3 and y found the following 'strange' things to comment or ask why there are in sugar-toolkit: First: The module sugar.graphics.panel with this code: class Panel(Gtk.VBox):

Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH sugar-toolkit (shell-port)] SugarEventIcon: Port the CanvasIcon to a hippo-free implementation

2012-07-04 Thread Benjamin Berg
On Fri, 2012-06-22 at 15:58 +0200, Simon Schampijer wrote: The icon consists of an GtkEventBox and an IconBuffer. The GtkEventBox is a subclass of GtkBin which has its own window and therefor is used to catch events for our IconBuffer which does not have it's own window. The EventIcon does

Re: [Sugar-devel] Update on sugar-build

2012-07-04 Thread Manuel Kaufmann
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 8:36 AM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote: I now consider sugar-build pretty much feature complete and in a decent shape bug-wise. Since it doesn't make sense to do a release, I thought I'd post an update. Congrats! -- Kaufmann Manuel Blog:

[Sugar-devel] [PATCH sugar] Drop the sugar-ui-check script

2012-07-04 Thread Daniel Narvaez
From: Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com This was used by the old buildbot implementation. Now it's unused and it's not working anymore anyway. --- bin/Makefile.am|3 +- bin/sugar-ui-check | 161 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 163

Re: [Sugar-devel] Update on sugar-build

2012-07-04 Thread Ajay Garg
Hi Daniel. Is sugar-build an alternative to sugar-jhbuild? Or does it do something more? Thanks and Regards, Ajay On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 6:50 PM, Manuel QuiƱones ma...@laptop.org wrote: 2012/7/4 Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com: Hello, I now consider sugar-build pretty much

[Sugar-devel] Wanted to test sugar-build, compiles but does not run

2012-07-04 Thread laurent bernabe
Hello everyone, As I read the previous message Update on Sugar-build, I wanted to install it. The compilation goes fine, but the command make run fails $ make run xinit

Re: [Sugar-devel] Wanted to test sugar-build, compiles but does not run

2012-07-04 Thread laurent bernabe
Thanks, I've corrected the problem. But I still have sevreral warnings : -- The XKEYBOARD keymap compiler (xkbcomp) reports: Warning: Type FOUR_LEVEL_X has 4 levels, but KPDV has 5 symbols Ignoring extra

Re: [Sugar-devel] Wanted to test sugar-build, compiles but does not run

2012-07-04 Thread Daniel Narvaez
The warnings should not be a problem, assuming sugar is working fine. Maybe we should not display X output on stdout, logging it should be enough. About shutdown, what did you expect it to do? I tend to think it should shutdown the system since unlike the emulator this a full X session, but I see

[Sugar-devel] Fwd: Update on sugar-build

2012-07-04 Thread Daniel Narvaez
-- Forwarded message -- From: *Daniel Narvaez* Date: Wednesday, 4 July 2012 Subject: Update on sugar-build To: Ajay Garg ajaygargn...@gmail.com On 4 July 2012 15:29, Ajay Garg ajaygargn...@gmail.com javascript:; wrote: Hi Daniel. Is sugar-build an alternative to sugar-jhbuild?

Re: [Sugar-devel] Wanted to test sugar-build, compiles but does not run

2012-07-04 Thread laurent bernabe
Oh sorry, I can't shut it down because it is based on a full X session. And, is it possible to choose the screen size ? If not, that does not really matter. Thanks 2012/7/4 Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com The warnings should not be a problem, assuming sugar is working fine. Maybe we should

Re: [Sugar-devel] Update on sugar-build

2012-07-04 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
I have tested it here (Fedora 17 - 64 bits) and is working ok. Anybody as tested it in Ubuntu? What versions are supported? I ask because is a common request in new volunteers, and in the next weekend I will go to a developer meeting. Gonzalo On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 8:36 AM, Daniel Narvaez

[Sugar-devel] Fwd: Wanted to test sugar-build, compiles but does not run

2012-07-04 Thread Daniel Narvaez
Sigh, I will learn to reply all. -- Forwarded message -- From: *Daniel Narvaez* Date: Wednesday, 4 July 2012 Subject: [Sugar-devel] Wanted to test sugar-build, compiles but does not run To: laurent bernabe laurent.bern...@gmail.com On Wednesday, 4 July 2012, laurent bernabe

Re: [Sugar-devel] Update on sugar-build

2012-07-04 Thread Daniel Narvaez
12.04 (supported distro are in the readme). See Laurent email, worked for him with a little bit of manual fiddling (again see the readme if you want to see what that is exactly). Planning to make that less manual very soon. On Wednesday, 4 July 2012, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: I have tested it here

Re: [Sugar-devel] Fwd: Wanted to test sugar-build, compiles but does not run

2012-07-04 Thread laurent bernabe
Thanks for your answers :) The installation of sugar build was very easy :) 2012/7/4 Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com Sigh, I will learn to reply all. -- Forwarded message -- From: *Daniel Narvaez* Date: Wednesday, 4 July 2012 Subject: [Sugar-devel] Wanted to test

[Sugar-devel] [Design] Proposal on some Help toolbar design details

2012-07-04 Thread Gary C Martin
Hi folks, I just wanted to try and formally clarify some design details regarding the activity Help toolbar. The actual Help content UI varies quite a bit from activity to activity depending on the activity needs and how the developer wants to tackle it (drop down palette of text and icons,

Re: [Sugar-devel] Enable gnome-keyring to autostart in sugar-emulator

2012-07-04 Thread Sascha Silbe
Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com writes: Thanks. Can you please push the patch with updated log? Pushed as f0ee9e9 [1] to master. AFAIK (and the commit message doesn't state the opposite), it doesn't fix any user-visible issue, so I haven't pushed to the stable branch (sucrose-0.96). Sascha

Re: [Sugar-devel] Update on sugar-build

2012-07-04 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 4 July 2012 13:36, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote: * Simple to use git clone git://git.sugarlabs.org/sugar-build/sugar-build.git cd sugar-build make build make run will give you a running sugar with fructose activities. Ok, now this should be fully true under Ubuntu too, the

Re: [Sugar-devel] Update on sugar-build

2012-07-04 Thread James Cameron
Tested sugar-build 36924c714e00a3b59071031ae1c1ff4eaabeb643 on Ubuntu 12.04 (freshly installed). It worked fine. Budget 200 MB of downloads. Budget roughly 0.5 GB of disk space. I was able to use make shell, change a control panel string, make install, and start-sugar to see the effect. I