Re: [Sugar-devel] Web activities and i10n

2013-06-03 Thread Daniel Narvaez
ce for web activities that directory shouldn't exist. On 4 June 2013 00:21, Daniel Narvaez wrote: > We could have activity authors provide the reference properties files in > the locale directory. Bundle builder would generate the pot file from those > using > > prop2po -P &

[Sugar-devel] Datastore web API status

2013-06-04 Thread Daniel Narvaez
tests. * Make the implementation more solid. And of course we need to start using the API in real activities and see if there are things that can be improved. -- Daniel Narvaez ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlab

Re: [Sugar-devel] Gtk3 sugar on Android

2013-06-05 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 5 June 2013 14:43, Simon Schampijer wrote: > On 06/03/2013 01:15 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> It seems like things are coming together pretty nicely for a port of gtk3 >> sugar on Android. >> >> * libhybris is making progress >> >

Re: [Sugar-devel] Issue building Jukebox in sugar-build

2013-06-05 Thread Daniel Narvaez
ctivity.linfo > > [line 4]: 'les chansons que tu aimes, regarde des films et des > vid\xc3\xa9os p\xc3\xa9dagogiques, et\n' > > [line 5]: 'bien plus !\n' > > [osbuild sugar-build]$ > > ** ** > &g

Re: [Sugar-devel] m4 error when building sugar-build

2013-06-05 Thread Daniel Narvaez
__ > Sugar-devel mailing list > Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel > > -- Daniel Narvaez ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] Gtk3 sugar on Android

2013-06-05 Thread Daniel Narvaez
By the way, I think this should not be too difficult to try out. Building a Fedora 19 chroot with pygobject and weston should be easy. libhybris could be manually built inside the chroot. Then it should be possible to run it in the x86 emulator, ld preloading libhybris and enabling the gtk wayland

Re: [Sugar-devel] Web activities and i10n

2013-06-05 Thread Daniel Narvaez
We discussed this in irc a bit more. The plan is to fork webL10N to make it an amd module. Activity authors will provide a reference translation in locales/, bundlebuilder will generate a .pot from it. When building a xo or installing, bundlebuilder will also convert .po files to .properties. I tr

Re: [Sugar-devel] Web activities and i10n

2013-06-05 Thread Daniel Narvaez
iard wrote: > On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 2:34 PM, Daniel Narvaez > > > wrote: > >> We discussed this in irc a bit more. The plan is to fork webL10N to make >> it an amd module. Activity authors will provide a reference translation in >> locales/, bundlebuilder will gen

Re: [Sugar-devel] Gtk3 sugar on Android

2013-06-05 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On Wednesday, 5 June 2013, Peter Robinson wrote: > > On 5 Jun 2013 17:02, "Daniel Narvaez" 'cvml', 'dwnarv...@gmail.com');>> > wrote: > > > > By the way, I think this should not be too difficult to try out. > Building a Fedora 19 chroot

Re: [Sugar-devel] volo add slowness

2013-06-05 Thread Daniel Narvaez
A work around for this landed. I'll test volojs master and update if it works. On Sunday, 26 May 2013, Daniel Narvaez wrote: > Hey, > > the extreme slowness with "volo add" seems to be a bug. Everything is > apparently done in a few secs but the process is not exit

Re: [Sugar-devel] Web activities and i10n

2013-06-05 Thread Daniel Narvaez
generated, may be we can put it in the po directory? > > Gonzalo > > > On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 3:32 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote: > >> I was thinking we would not have locale for web activities so it wouldn't >> be confusing. Though I just realised we will actually have

Re: [Sugar-devel] Web activities and i10n

2013-06-05 Thread Daniel Narvaez
I played with the tools. moz2po seems to work, but po2moz is not working. I opened a bug http://bugs.locamotion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2996 Bit surprised because it seems mozilla is using these tools... maybe they didn't upgrade to 1.10 yet. ___ Sugar-deve

Re: [Sugar-devel] Web activities and i10n

2013-06-05 Thread Daniel Narvaez
; >> Bit surprised because it seems mozilla is using these tools... maybe they >> didn't upgrade to 1.10 yet. >> >> _______ >> Sugar-devel mailing list >> Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org >> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel >&

Re: [Sugar-devel] Web activities and i10n

2013-06-05 Thread Daniel Narvaez
Hello, I setup a fork of webL10n. I amdified it and replaced API with the gaia one minus the b2g specific stuff. https://github.com/sugarlabs/webL10n I sent a pull request to integrate this in sugar-web. https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar-web/pull/38 Left to do * The naming of the .js file is

Re: [Sugar-devel] Web activities and i10n

2013-06-05 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 6 June 2013 01:17, Daniel Narvaez wrote: > Left to do > > * The naming of the .js file is sometimes l10n.js (which is what I want), > sometimes webL10n.js. Let's see what we get when it's pulled from git, if > it's wrong I'll have to understand the volo log

Re: [Sugar-devel] Web activities and i10n

2013-06-06 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On Thursday, 6 June 2013, Simon Schampijer wrote: > On 06/06/2013 01:17 AM, Daniel Narvaez wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I setup a fork of webL10n. I amdified it and replaced API with the gaia >> one >> minus the b2g specific stuff. >> >> https://g

Re: [Sugar-devel] Web activities and i10n

2013-06-06 Thread Daniel Narvaez
I'm not sure they really need to be on a branch btw. I've doing that to keep master the same of upstream. But maybe fetching the upstream repo on another remote gives everything you need. On Thursday, 6 June 2013, Daniel Narvaez wrote: > On Thursday, 6 June 2013, Simon Schampijer w

Re: [Sugar-devel] Web activities and i10n

2013-06-06 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On Thursday, 6 June 2013, Simon Schampijer wrote: > On 06/06/2013 11:34 AM, Daniel Narvaez wrote: > >> On Thursday, 6 June 2013, Simon Schampijer wrote: >> >> On 06/06/2013 01:17 AM, Daniel Narvaez wrote: >>> >>> Hello, >>>> >>>&

Re: [Sugar-devel] Web activities and i10n

2013-06-06 Thread Daniel Narvaez
The sugar-web bits have landed. I used it to implement translations in sugar-web-template but it turns out using multiple translation files we trigger a webkit bug. SIgh. https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=117313 ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-

Re: [Sugar-devel] Web activities and i10n

2013-06-06 Thread Daniel Narvaez
. Is due to limitations on the use of > file:// ? > > Gonzalo > > > On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 4:01 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote: > >> The sugar-web bits have landed. I used it to implement translations in >> sugar-web-template but it turns out using multiple translation files w

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Systems] Moving pootle to github

2013-06-07 Thread Daniel Narvaez
d longer, we need to fix that even if temporarily breaks pootle. On 2 June 2013 21:33, Bernie Innocenti wrote: > +rralcala,alsroot > > Roberto, this might be a good task to get you started on Pootle. > Chris and Aleksey can probably assist you. > > On 06/02/2013 10:09 AM, Dani

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Systems] Moving pootle to github

2013-06-07 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 7 June 2013 15:07, Aleksey Lim wrote: > On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 02:55:09PM +0200, Daniel Narvaez wrote: > > Hi, > > > > not sure what Simon and Manuel think about this, but unless someone help > us > > out with this asap, I think we should go ahead, resync git.

[Sugar-devel] developer.sugarlabs.org index

2013-06-07 Thread Daniel Narvaez
her layout changes (separated index and links at the top a la flask.pooco.org?), so that we don't waste time on the sidebar if we want something different. Thoughts? -- Daniel Narvaez ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sug

Re: [Sugar-devel] developer.sugarlabs.org index

2013-06-07 Thread Daniel Narvaez
http://flask.pocoo.org/docs/foreword/#configuration-and-conventions On Friday, 7 June 2013, Daniel Narvaez wrote: > Hey, > > I think for the introductory docs it would be much better to have index > with titles rather then filenames. I don't think docker supports it but > perhaps we co

Re: [Sugar-devel] developer.sugarlabs.org index

2013-06-07 Thread Daniel Narvaez
Well perhaps that's too fancy... Going somewhat crazy with all these nice js libs. Might be enough to add the top links in the markdown (I think you can put plain html in it?). A bit more annoying to maintain but probably not much On Friday, 7 June 2013, Daniel Narvaez wrote: > An eas

Re: [Sugar-devel] developer.sugarlabs.org index

2013-06-07 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 7 June 2013 21:49, Daniel Narvaez wrote: > An easy way to generate a custom index would be to generate sidebar-less > pages with docker and put them inside an iframe, building links/index with > handlebars templates, from an index.json. > > I'm not in love with the side

Re: [Sugar-devel] Licensing of the javascript libraries

2013-06-07 Thread Daniel Narvaez
system integration. On Friday, 3 May 2013, Daniel Narvaez wrote: > Hello, > > we need to decide how to license the new javascript libraries. I am mostly > clueless about the topic and I'm honestly scared to start this thread, > please be gentle :) > > Following is the ra

Re: [Sugar-devel] Licensing of the javascript libraries

2013-06-07 Thread Daniel Narvaez
I'm still undecided really but since it's important to make a call soon, my vote goes for Apache, both for sugar-web and for activities we develop. On Saturday, 8 June 2013, Daniel Narvaez wrote: > We really need to make a call here, we start to have a sizeable amount of > co

Re: [Sugar-devel] Licensing of the javascript libraries

2013-06-07 Thread Daniel Narvaez
Marco Pesenti Gritti Tomeu Vizoso Still around Scott Ananian benzea erikos Martin Abente Walter Bender godiard Manuel Quinones >From the git log of the icons dir. On Saturday, 8 June 2013, Daniel Narvaez wrote: > I'm still undecided really but since it's important to make a call

Re: [Sugar-devel] Licensing of the javascript libraries

2013-06-07 Thread Daniel Narvaez
Well permission to double license really. On Saturday, 8 June 2013, Daniel Narvaez wrote: > Ugh one issue with Apache is that I think we would need to get permission > to relicense the svg icons under apache from all the people that > contributed to them. Do you think that will be

Re: [Sugar-devel] Licensing of the javascript libraries

2013-06-07 Thread Daniel Narvaez
e Selectricity page linked in the original voting ticket email. > > Thanks, > > Luke FaraoneSugar Labs, Systems > ✉: l...@sugarlabs.org > I: lfaraone on irc.freenode.net > > > > On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 8:59 PM, Daniel Narvaez > > > wrote: > >> Well

Re: [Sugar-devel] Licensing of the javascript libraries

2013-06-07 Thread Daniel Narvaez
is to bring activities on devices where tivoization might be an issue. On Saturday, 8 June 2013, Daniel Narvaez wrote: > Yes I think it's very different because using GPLv2 would mean we can't > use Apache licensed libraries, which are a big percentage of available js > libraries.

Re: [Sugar-devel] Licensing of the javascript libraries

2013-06-08 Thread Daniel Narvaez
ntributions are using > GPLv3. > > I checked and it turns out Apache 2.0 license is compatible with GPLv3 > (but incompatible with GPLv2): > http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#apache2 > > Regards, > Sebastian > > El 07/06/13 19:38, Daniel Narvaez escribió: >

Re: [Sugar-devel] Licensing of the javascript libraries

2013-06-08 Thread Daniel Narvaez
Cool. Maybe since you are talking to the SFC already you could ask how to get the contributors permission? I wonder if the mailing list should be cced for example, so that we get a record of it. On Saturday, 8 June 2013, Walter Bender wrote: > On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 7:58 PM, Daniel Narv

Re: [Sugar-devel] Licensing of the javascript libraries

2013-06-08 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 8 June 2013 13:09, Walter Bender wrote: > Let me sum up where I think we are and what questions we have for > Tony/Bradley at SFC: > > (1) We have some of the core Sugar code still under LGPLv2 (e.g., > sugar-artwork) which we would like to change to LGPLv3. > (2) We would like to add a second

[Sugar-devel] js-beautify proper max line length

2013-06-08 Thread Daniel Narvaez
It's pretty bad that js-beautify doesn't have a proper max line length option. I opened a bug about it https://github.com/einars/js-beautify/issues/284 -- Daniel Narvaez ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlab

Re: [Sugar-devel] developer.sugarlabs.org index

2013-06-08 Thread Daniel Narvaez
eveloper.sugarlabs.org. > > - keep the current behaviour ("files" and "headings" tabs) in > documented code, like > http://developer.sugarlabs.org/sugar-web/graphics/radiobuttonsgroup.js.html > > What do you think? > > 2013/6/7 Daniel Narvaez : &g

Re: [Sugar-devel] js-beautify proper max line length

2013-06-08 Thread Daniel Narvaez
Yeah would be good to file bugs. The maintainer is quite responsive. On 8 June 2013 16:02, Manuel Quiñones wrote: > 2013/6/8 Daniel Narvaez : > > It's pretty bad that js-beautify doesn't have a proper max line length > > option. I > > opened a bug about it >

Re: [Sugar-devel] developer.sugarlabs.org index

2013-06-08 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 8 June 2013 17:11, Manuel Quiñones wrote: > The index link can also be inside a site header, which can be > consistently in every page of the developer site. We can use this > image: > > http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/images/e/e2/Join_Developer_BW.png > > Can also be the favicon :) > The way I'm

[Sugar-devel] [sugar-build] Build breakage on Debian jessy

2013-06-09 Thread Daniel Narvaez
Hello, automake was upgraded but gnome-common was not. This breaks the build of many gnome modules. The new gnome-common is in unstable, so hopefully it will make it soon to testing. -- Daniel Narvaez ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] [sugar-build] Build breakage on Debian jessy

2013-06-09 Thread Daniel Narvaez
As a workaround you can install the unstable deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/pool/main/g/gnome-common/gnome-common_3.7.4-1_all.deb On 9 June 2013 11:31, Daniel Narvaez wrote: > Hello, > > automake was upgraded but gnome-common was not. This breaks the build of > many gnome

Re: [Sugar-devel] EllipsizeMode error trying to port an activity to Gtk3

2013-06-09 Thread Daniel Narvaez
in set_tooltip > > self.palette = Palette(tooltip) > > File > "/home/fedora/sugar-build/build/out/install/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sugar3/graphics/palette.py", > line 135, in __init__ > > self._label.set_ellipsize(Pango.EllipsizeMode.MIDDLE) > > AttributeError: type object &

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Systems] Moving pootle to github

2013-06-09 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 9 June 2013 01:38, Bernie Innocenti wrote: > On 06/07/2013 09:10 AM, Daniel Narvaez wrote: > > No, just glucose. You can see the exact list of modules on > > https://github.com/sugarlabs/ > > By the way, what is "sugarlabs", a shared account? > > It'

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Systems] Moving pootle to github

2013-06-09 Thread Daniel Narvaez
, Daniel Narvaez wrote: > On 9 June 2013 01:38, Bernie Innocenti wrote: > >> On 06/07/2013 09:10 AM, Daniel Narvaez wrote: >> > No, just glucose. You can see the exact list of modules on >> > https://github.com/sugarlabs/ >> >> By the way, what is &quo

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Systems] Moving pootle to github

2013-06-09 Thread Daniel Narvaez
;> >> >> >> Original Message >> Subject: Re: [Systems] Moving pootle to github >> Date: Sun, 02 Jun 2013 15:33:05 -0400 >> From: Bernie Innocenti >> Organization: Codewiz - http://codewiz.org/ >> To: Daniel Narvaez >&g

Re: [Sugar-devel] EllipsizeMode error trying to port an activity to Gtk3

2013-06-09 Thread Daniel Narvaez
If it turns out to be that please close the ticket. On 9 June 2013 13:17, Walter Bender wrote: > yes. I had a similar error with activities that inadvertently had some > mixed code between gtk2 and gtk3. > > -walter > > On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 5:44 AM, Daniel Narvaez > w

Re: [Sugar-devel] Requiring test coverage for new code

2013-06-09 Thread Daniel Narvaez
The first patch with tests landed just now! I'd say it went pretty smoothly. Thanks to Walter for trying this out first :) ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] Requiring test coverage for new code

2013-06-09 Thread Daniel Narvaez
And the tests are doing their job :) http://buildbot.sugarlabs.org/builders/raring-amd64-quick/builds/189/steps/shell_4/logs/stdio On 9 June 2013 14:30, Daniel Narvaez wrote: > The first patch with tests landed just now! I'd say it went pretty > smoothly. Thanks to Walter for tryi

Re: [Sugar-devel] EllipsizeMode error trying to port an activity to Gtk3

2013-06-09 Thread Daniel Narvaez
Pango.ALIGN_CENTER) > > layout.set_wrap(Pango.WRAP_WORD) > > ** ** > > *De :* Daniel Narvaez [mailto:dwnarv...@gmail.com] > *Envoyé :* dimanche 9 juin 2013 13:22 > *À :* Walter Bender > *Cc :* Lionel Laské; sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org > *Ob

[Sugar-devel] osbuild check

2013-06-09 Thread Daniel Narvaez
Hi, since not everyone seem to know about the tool... Before submitting patches make sure to run "./osbuild check". That will run all the code checks and the unit tests making sure you won't break the build when the patches are pushed. --

Re: [Sugar-devel] Gtk3 sugar on Android

2013-06-09 Thread Daniel Narvaez
I made some decent progress on this. I have a tool that will build an F19 chroot (tested on Fedora, but supposed to work on any distro where you have yum packages). https://github.com/dnarvaez/broot Must be installed in system path. Then create a dir with a manifest like this dnarvaez@dnarvaez:~

Re: [Sugar-devel] Gtk3 sugar on Android

2013-06-09 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 9 June 2013 17:07, Daniel Narvaez wrote: > > Now ideally we would > > emulator -partition-size 4096 > Heh 2048 seems to work, which should be enough. Now I can't adb shell for some reason, perhaps just uncleaned state from the arm build I made before. Rebuilding a clea

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Saucy Salamander] Sugar-Emulator

2013-06-09 Thread Daniel Narvaez
86-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (__libc_start_main+0xf5) > [0xb700e935] > (EE) 12: Xephyr (0xb759a000+0x21d19) [0xb75bbd19] > (EE) > (EE) Segmentation fault at address 0x10 > > Fatal server error: > Caught signal 11 (Segmentation fault). Server aborting > > > http://elsalvador.t

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Saucy Salamander] Sugar-Emulator

2013-06-09 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On Sunday, 9 June 2013, Daniel Narvaez wrote: > Try to run "Xephyr :100", if it crashes it's an Ubuntu bug, report it to > launchpad. > > (sugar-emulator is gone in master btw) > > On Sunday, 9 June 2013, Ignacio Rodríguez wrote: > >> Trying to st

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Saucy Salamander] Sugar-Emulator

2013-06-09 Thread Daniel Narvaez
Might be this btw https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg-server/+bug/635523 Don't think that's ever going to be fixed. On Sunday, 9 June 2013, Daniel Narvaez wrote: > Try to run "Xephyr :100", if it crashes it's an Ubuntu bug, report it to > launchpad.

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Saucy Salamander] Sugar-Emulator

2013-06-09 Thread Daniel Narvaez
ugar-Emulator not work > > > 2013/6/9 Daniel Narvaez 'dwnarv...@gmail.com');>> > >> Try to run "Xephyr :100", if it crashes it's an Ubuntu bug, report it to >> launchpad. >> >> (sugar-emulator is gone in master btw) >&g

Re: [Sugar-devel] Gtk3 sugar on Android

2013-06-09 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 9 June 2013 17:07, Daniel Narvaez wrote: > Busybox needs to be added to the stuff we build > > dnarvaez@dnarvaez:~/android$ cat .repo/local_manifests/busybox.xml > > > fetch="git://github.com/Gnurou/"/> > name="busybox-andr

[Sugar-devel] [sugar-build] Not possible to fast-forward

2013-06-10 Thread Daniel Narvaez
inconvenience, this was necessary to solve the diverging history issue we had with pootle. -- Daniel Narvaez ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Systems] Moving pootle to github

2013-06-10 Thread Daniel Narvaez
We went ahead and renamed the repositories to *-old. Gonzalo is trying to fixup pootle to point to github. On 9 June 2013 12:22, Daniel Narvaez wrote: > Awesome! > > As a first step, could you please turn off pottle pushing to gitorious? I > need to resync github with gitorious a

[Sugar-devel] Fwd: Fwd: Licensing of the javascript libraries

2013-06-10 Thread Daniel Narvaez
-- Forwarded message -- From: Bradley M. Kuhn Date: 10 May 2013 16:34 Subject: Re: Fwd: [Sugar-devel] Licensing of the javascript libraries To: Daniel Narvaez Cc: Walter Bender , Tony Sebro < t...@sfconservancy.org> Daniel Narvaez wrote at 13:08 (EDT) on Thursday: >

Re: [Sugar-devel] Licensing of the javascript libraries

2013-06-10 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 10 June 2013 18:17, Walter Bender wrote: > > I am guessing it is LGPLv2 only. The license is in the COPYING file, > not in each SVG. > > https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar-artwork/blob/master/COPYING > > Is the "or later" something that goes in the per file headers only (vs the COPYING file)?

Re: [Sugar-devel] Licensing of the javascript libraries

2013-06-10 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 10 June 2013 18:27, Daniel Narvaez wrote: > Does it actually matter here though? We are talking of relicensing to > Apache now, not gpl3. > Oh I see that Walter had brought up the relicensing to gplv3 which is sort of a separate issue. Sorry for the

Re: [Sugar-devel] Gtk3 sugar on Android

2013-06-10 Thread Daniel Narvaez
Made some more progress on this. I built busybox from source, with "make menuconfig", selecting static build option, then "CPPFLAGS=-m32 LDFLAGS=-m32 make". I had to transfer the chroot to the image through shell.sugarlabs.orgbecause adb push doesn't seem to like big files (sigh). That allowed me

Re: [Sugar-devel] Gtk3 sugar on Android

2013-06-10 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 10 June 2013 19:44, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 6:11 PM, Daniel Narvaez > wrote: > > Made some more progress on this. I built busybox from source, with "make > > menuconfig", selecting static build option, then "CPPFLAGS=-m32 > LD

Re: [Sugar-devel] Blocked on testing icon.load

2013-06-10 Thread Daniel Narvaez
image/svg+xml,NOT%20FOUND' > Chrome 25.0 (Linux): Executed 20 of 20 SUCCESS (9.27 secs / 8.504 secs) > > The test succeeds but is not what I want. > > Suggestions? > > -- > .. manuq .. > ___ > Sugar-devel mail

[Sugar-devel] Broken build, sugar-web-template

2013-06-10 Thread Daniel Narvaez
http://buildbot.sugarlabs.org/builders/schroedinger-x86-64-quick/builds/7/steps/shell_4/logs/stdio I'd fix it but not on a keyboard. -- Daniel Narvaez ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/lis

Re: [Sugar-devel] Broken build, sugar-web-template

2013-06-10 Thread Daniel Narvaez
Back green thanks. On 11 June 2013 00:45, Manuel Quiñones wrote: > My fault, sorry. Fix pushed. > > 2013/6/10 Daniel Narvaez : > > > http://buildbot.sugarlabs.org/builders/schroedinger-x86-64-quick/builds/7/steps/shell_4/logs/stdio > > > > I&

Re: [Sugar-devel] [sugar-build] Build breakage on Debian jessy

2013-06-12 Thread Daniel Narvaez
This seems fixed now. On 9 June 2013 11:31, Daniel Narvaez wrote: > Hello, > > automake was upgraded but gnome-common was not. This breaks the build of > many gnome modules. The new gnome-common is in unstable, so hopefully it > will make it soon to testing. > >

[Sugar-devel] Easy task, resync tree.py

2013-06-12 Thread Daniel Narvaez
took ages to get tree.py integrated in toolkit. It would be great to fix it. (I just made an API update that will need to be made in toolkit too at some point, for example). Happy to answer questions and give guidance on the task of course :) -- Daniel Na

Re: [Sugar-devel] [FEATURE] Automatic activity updates

2013-06-12 Thread Daniel Narvaez
> Sugar-devel mailing list > Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel > -- Daniel Narvaez ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

[Sugar-devel] 0.100 features update

2013-06-12 Thread Daniel Narvaez
he feature? * Multiple selection in the Journal Patches needs to be submitted in a way reviewers feels comfortable to review. No way around that. What do you intend to do? -- Daniel Narvaez ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlab

Re: [Sugar-devel] [FEATURE] Automatic activity updates

2013-06-12 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 12 June 2013 22:19, Daniel Drake wrote: > On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Daniel Narvaez > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > we are going to code freeze on Sep 4, and that's when it would also > probably > > make sense to branch master. Which is a bit la

Re: [Sugar-devel] 0.100 features update

2013-06-12 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 12 June 2013 22:47, Walter Bender wrote: > On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Daniel Narvaez > wrote: > > Hello, > > > > as we are approaching 0.99.0, I would like to update the features status. > > Here is a summary of what I know about the features status, I

Re: [Sugar-devel] 0.100 features update

2013-06-12 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 12 June 2013 22:55, Walter Bender wrote: > > There was some disagreement about the implementation since I tried to > tiptoe around the existing code to minimize changes, so there was more > redundancy than necessary. Easy to address. > That we can address during reviews. There was dissatisfa

Re: [Sugar-devel] 0.100 features update

2013-06-12 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 12 June 2013 22:33, Ignacio Rodríguez wrote: > """ > * Icon customization > > No patch submitted yet. Are we still planning to land the feature? > """ > > I'll work on a new version, as I recall Walter Bender have this patch. > > Ignacio, if you have a patch already please submit it as soon as

Re: [Sugar-devel] developer.sugarlabs.org index

2013-06-12 Thread Daniel Narvaez
It's a bit annoying when you navigate that you easily lose the header (because you scroll down the text). I wonder if the header should take the whole width and be always at the top. On 10 June 2013 16:53, Manuel Quiñones wrote: > 2013/6/8 Daniel Narvaez : > > On 8 June 2013

Re: [Sugar-devel] Licensing of the javascript libraries

2013-06-13 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 13 June 2013 11:26, Simon Schampijer wrote: > On 06/13/2013 01:32 AM, Manuel Quiñones wrote: > >> 2013/6/7 Daniel Narvaez : >> >>> I'm still undecided really but since it's important to make a call soon, >>> my >>> vote goes for A

Re: [Sugar-devel] [FEATURE] Automatic activity updates

2013-06-13 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 13 June 2013 07:56, James Cameron wrote: > On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 01:54:24AM -0300, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: > > Yes, but somebody should provide patches, and do any change needed > > when the maintainers do the review, to be sure we have the quality > > needed upstream. > > Maintainers could do

Re: [Sugar-devel] [FEATURE] Automatic activity updates

2013-06-13 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 13 June 2013 11:33, Jerry Vonau wrote: > cc'ing Ajay > > On 13 June 2013 00:56, James Cameron wrote: > >> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 01:54:24AM -0300, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: >> > Yes, but somebody should provide patches, and do any change needed >> > when the maintainers do the review, to be sure

Re: [Sugar-devel] Licensing of the javascript libraries

2013-06-13 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 13 June 2013 13:00, Simon Schampijer wrote: > In our case, if we make our libraries licensed under Apache 2 > an activity author could use Apache 2 or GPL3 for his activity but not > GPL2, correct? > That's my understanding yeah. ___ Sugar-devel mai

Re: [Sugar-devel] [FEATURE] Automatic activity updates

2013-06-13 Thread Daniel Narvaez
ase manager, I need to know if you intend to keep working on the two features you proposed by playing to the current rules. If you want to convince maintainers to change them you can try but please let's keep that as a separate topic. -- Daniel Narvaez ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] Use ObjectChooser filtering by activity

2013-06-13 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 13 June 2013 17:58, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: > What you think about switch to filter by all the mime type the activity > selected can open? > I suspect the reason we are filtering by generic type is just that the code was initially written for the journal, which exposes a filter by generic type

Re: [Sugar-devel] Use ObjectChooser filtering by activity

2013-06-13 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 13 June 2013 18:12, Manuel Quiñones wrote: > 2013/6/13 Daniel Narvaez : > > On 13 June 2013 17:58, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: > >> > >> What you think about switch to filter by all the mime type the activity > >> selected can open? > > > > > >

Re: [Sugar-devel] Use ObjectChooser filtering by activity

2013-06-13 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 13 June 2013 18:14, Daniel Narvaez wrote: > On 13 June 2013 18:12, Manuel Quiñones wrote: > >> 2013/6/13 Daniel Narvaez : >> > On 13 June 2013 17:58, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: >> >> >> >> What you think about switch to filter by all the m

Re: [Sugar-devel] Use ObjectChooser filtering by activity

2013-06-13 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 13 June 2013 18:20, Manuel Quiñones wrote: > > Good. Yes I also think the object chooser dialog should display all > the entries that an activity can open. So looks like a bug, as > Gonzalo said. > > What should the filtering combo display when we are filtered by a custom list of mime types?

Re: [Sugar-devel] Use ObjectChooser filtering by activity

2013-06-13 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 13 June 2013 18:23, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: > > That is the reason is better modify the behavior of the activity filter, > than allow any random list of mime types. > I'm not sure to understand this. You are proposing to show all the files with mime types the activity can open right? That's pre

Re: [Sugar-devel] Use ObjectChooser filtering by activity

2013-06-13 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 13 June 2013 18:26, Daniel Narvaez wrote: > On 13 June 2013 18:23, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: > >> >> That is the reason is better modify the behavior of the activity filter, >> than allow any random list of mime types. >> > > I'm not sure to understan

Re: [Sugar-devel] Use ObjectChooser filtering by activity

2013-06-13 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On Thursday, 13 June 2013, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 1:26 PM, Daniel Narvaez > > > wrote: > >> On 13 June 2013 18:23, Gonzalo Odiard > 'cvml', 'gonz...@laptop.org');> >> > wrote: >> >>

[Sugar-devel] [sugar-build] prefs -> prefs.json

2013-06-14 Thread Daniel Narvaez
I changed the prefs file to use json. Nicer format for lists etc. I updated the documentation which has an example. -- Daniel Narvaez ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] Easy task, resync tree.py

2013-06-14 Thread Daniel Narvaez
Never mind, I had to do this myself after all, to fix a bug we was running into. On 12 June 2013 21:13, Daniel Narvaez wrote: > Hello, > > I've seen people asking about easy tasks to get started with sugar > development. A simple one would be to resync the tree.py in sugar-bui

[Sugar-devel] Build broken, sugar

2013-06-15 Thread Daniel Narvaez
http://buildbot.sugarlabs.org/builders/jessie-amd64-full/builds/5/steps/shell_4/logs/stdio -- Daniel Narvaez ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

[Sugar-devel] GSOC weekly updates

2013-06-15 Thread Daniel Narvaez
. -- Daniel Narvaez ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] Build broken, sugar

2013-06-15 Thread Daniel Narvaez
Please push it directly, I'm on a phone so I'm not going to be able to. On Saturday, 15 June 2013, Walter Bender wrote: > I thought I changed that one. Will submit a patch now. > > -walter > > On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 8:32 AM, Daniel Narvaez > > > wrote: &

Re: [Sugar-devel] Build broken, sugar

2013-06-15 Thread Daniel Narvaez
Merged. Failing in a different way now http://buildbot.sugarlabs.org/builders/schroedinger-x86-64-quick/builds/40/steps/shell_4/logs/stdio On Saturday, 15 June 2013, Walter Bender wrote: > Push request submitted > > -walter > > On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 8:59 AM, Daniel Narva

Re: [Sugar-devel] Build broken, sugar

2013-06-15 Thread Daniel Narvaez
what is going on. I've got a broken sugar-build at the > > moment, so I am having a difficult time testing. Will keep looking. > > > > -walter > > > > On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 9:22 AM, Daniel Narvaez > > > > wrote: > >> Merged. Failing in a dif

[Sugar-devel] [sugar-build] Build failure on Jessie

2013-06-15 Thread Daniel Narvaez
The next time you build you are likely to get a build failure in gtk+. To fix it just ./osbuild clean gtk+ At some point I need to add support to force rebuilds per distro/modules. I didn't feel like to trigger a full rebuild for everyone especially with webkitgtk :) -- Daniel Na

Re: [Sugar-devel] [FEATURE] Automatic activity updates

2013-06-15 Thread Daniel Narvaez
Cool. I'd say it's in then... Added a feature page https://github.com/sugarlabs/roadmap/issues/9 On 13 June 2013 01:42, Manuel Quiñones wrote: > 2013/6/12 Daniel Narvaez : > > On 12 June 2013 22:19, Daniel Drake wrote: > >> > >> On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 a

Re: [Sugar-devel] About customization of xo icon

2013-06-16 Thread Daniel Narvaez
automatically configured for me and ways to tweak a bit the sugar appeareance... -- Daniel Narvaez ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

[Sugar-devel] [sugar-build] Support for github forks and ssh

2013-06-16 Thread Daniel Narvaez
I added a pref to automatically setup remotes for github forks and ssh. This follows github docs recommended approach. http://developer.sugarlabs.org/dev-environment.md.html#github -- Daniel Narvaez ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] developer.sugarlabs.org index

2013-06-16 Thread Daniel Narvaez
anuel Quiñones > wrote: > >> > >> +1 this can be done with a few lines of CSS. Can be a good task for a > >> contributor to get in touch with the docs and CSS. Adding Suraj to > >> the CC. The recent change in sugar-web to make the toolbar always on >

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >