Hi Simon,
On 29 Aug 2012, at 12:41, Simon Schampijer wrote:
> On 08/28/2012 05:53 PM, Gary Martin wrote:
>> Hi Simon,
>>
>> On 28 Aug 2012, at 14:12, Simon Schampijer wrote:
>>
>>> On 08/28/2012 02:14 PM, Manuel Quiñones wrote:
So now the filtering is shared between the three views. I t
On 29 Aug 2012, at 18:19, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
> I am pretty sure Aleksey knows who was involved :)
>
> There are more info here [1] and here [2]
>
> Solve the packaging issues (specially the dependencies required)
> is another different beast, but we can add the following without problem:
>
I am pretty sure Aleksey knows who was involved :)
There are more info here [1] and here [2]
Solve the packaging issues (specially the dependencies required)
is another different beast, but we can add the following without problem:
summary (will be translated)
license
homepage
And at the risk o
Hi Gonzalo,
On 29 Aug 2012, at 13:51, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
>
> Btw, re Activity list view. We said at one point that the date displayed in
> the list has not much meaning (at least at the moment). Did we have an idea
> for a replacement?
>
> +1
>
> I know is not a trivial change, but IMHO,
>
>
> Btw, re Activity list view. We said at one point that the date displayed
> in the list has not much meaning (at least at the moment). Did we have an
> idea for a replacement?
>
>
+1
I know is not a trivial change, but IMHO, would be great have a short
description here.
We can add it in the a
On 08/28/2012 05:53 PM, Gary Martin wrote:
Hi Simon,
On 28 Aug 2012, at 14:12, Simon Schampijer wrote:
On 08/28/2012 02:14 PM, Manuel Quiñones wrote:
So now the filtering is shared between the three views. I think this
is worth noting in the commit message.
Thanks for the review and catch
Hi Simon,
On 28 Aug 2012, at 14:12, Simon Schampijer wrote:
> On 08/28/2012 02:14 PM, Manuel Quiñones wrote:
>> So now the filtering is shared between the three views. I think this
>> is worth noting in the commit message.
>
> Thanks for the review and catching this! I did note it in the commi
Simon Schampijer writes:
> - if you did a search in View A and then switch to View B the search
> from A will not be applied in B, if you switch back to A the search you
> did before in A has been cached and is still applied (behavior before
> 0.97.2)
IMO this makes the most sense to the user
On 08/28/2012 02:14 PM, Manuel Quiñones wrote:
So now the filtering is shared between the three views. I think this
is worth noting in the commit message.
Thanks for the review and catching this! I did note it in the commit
message before pushing.
Gary, we did discuss the following:
There
9 matches
Mail list logo
