On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 11:14, Martin Dengler wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 11:02:21AM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>> I guess there's some other package that installs files in those dirs,
>> thus the conflict.
>
> That is one of the cracktastic-est ways to resolve that conflict that
> I can think
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 11:02:21AM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> I guess there's some other package that installs files in those dirs,
> thus the conflict.
That is one of the cracktastic-est ways to resolve that conflict that
I can think of :). I was told on IRC that the rpm has never worked,
so I
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 11:02 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> I guess there's some other package that installs files in those dirs,
> thus the conflict. Maybe we should check rainbow?
>
IIRC, it'd be olpc-update. Those libs should be split off...
m
--
martin.langh...@gmail.com
mar...@laptop.org --
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 02:43, Martin Dengler wrote:
> ---
> sugar-update-control.spec | 2 --
> 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/sugar-update-control.spec b/sugar-update-control.spec
> index d5e16aa..09eda58 100644
> --- a/sugar-update-control.spec
> +++ b/suga
---
sugar-update-control.spec |2 --
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sugar-update-control.spec b/sugar-update-control.spec
index d5e16aa..09eda58 100644
--- a/sugar-update-control.spec
+++ b/sugar-update-control.spec
@@ -33,8 +33,6 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
mkdi
5 matches
Mail list logo