Re: [Sugar-devel] 0depend feature request

2009-11-24 Thread Michael Stone
Aleksey wrote: > yeah, in my testing environment I have remains from previous 0install > sessions > > I've pushed new commits with fixed these issues and added cancel button Aleksey, Your test case passes on my system with these additional commits. Nice work, Michael _

Re: [Sugar-devel] 0depend feature request

2009-11-24 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 03:01:07PM -0500, Michael Stone wrote: > Aleksey wrote: > > > To have some implementation mockups for next 0install debates, > > I've coded how(I'm thinking) 0install integration could be implemented > > in sugar[1]. To check existed code, pull sugar and sugar-toolkit clone

[Sugar-devel] 0depend feature request

2009-11-24 Thread Michael Stone
Aleksey wrote: > To have some implementation mockups for next 0install debates, > I've coded how(I'm thinking) 0install integration could be implemented > in sugar[1]. To check existed code, pull sugar and sugar-toolkit cloned > repos[2] and follow simple test case[3]. > > [1] http://wiki.sugarla

Re: [Sugar-devel] 0depend feature request

2009-11-23 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 08:00:49PM +, Aleksey Lim wrote: > On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 07:22:23PM +, Aleksey Lim wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 07:06:19PM +, Gary C Martin wrote: > > > Example: Teacher travels from a remote village to an education ministry > > > or town with internet a

Re: [Sugar-devel] 0depend feature request

2009-11-23 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 07:22:23PM +, Aleksey Lim wrote: > On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 07:06:19PM +, Gary C Martin wrote: > > Example: Teacher travels from a remote village to an education ministry or > > town with internet access once a month. Downloads a selection of new > > activities and

Re: [Sugar-devel] 0depend feature request

2009-11-23 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 08:05:21PM +0100, Martin Langhoff wrote: > On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 7:45 PM, Aleksey Lim wrote: > >>  - Why is the depcheck happening at "first start" time? Install time > >> seems be more appropriate: install time means there is a src of > >> software, needed deps can be gr

Re: [Sugar-devel] 0depend feature request

2009-11-23 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 07:06:19PM +, Gary C Martin wrote: > Hi Aleksey, > > On 23 Nov 2009, at 18:45, Aleksey Lim wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 07:39:14PM +0100, Martin Langhoff wrote: > >> On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 7:31 PM, Aleksey Lim > >> wrote: > >>> I've changed this feature a bi

Re: [Sugar-devel] 0depend feature request

2009-11-23 Thread Gary C Martin
Hi Aleksey, On 23 Nov 2009, at 18:45, Aleksey Lim wrote: > On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 07:39:14PM +0100, Martin Langhoff wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 7:31 PM, Aleksey Lim wrote: >>> I've changed this feature a bit, so now its a Zero Install integration[4] >> >> Good to see progress on this. Mu

Re: [Sugar-devel] 0depend feature request

2009-11-23 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 7:45 PM, Aleksey Lim wrote: >>  - Why is the depcheck happening at "first start" time? Install time >> seems be more appropriate: install time means there is a src of >> software, needed deps can be grabbed from the same src if present... > > in that case we entirely depend

Re: [Sugar-devel] 0depend feature request

2009-11-23 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 07:39:14PM +0100, Martin Langhoff wrote: > On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 7:31 PM, Aleksey Lim wrote: > > I've changed this feature a bit, so now its a Zero Install integration[4] > > Good to see progress on this. Much appreciated. Some questions... > > - Why is the depcheck ha

Re: [Sugar-devel] 0depend feature request

2009-11-23 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 7:31 PM, Aleksey Lim wrote: > I've changed this feature a bit, so now its a Zero Install integration[4] Good to see progress on this. Much appreciated. Some questions... - Why is the depcheck happening at "first start" time? Install time seems be more appropriate: instal

Re: [Sugar-devel] 0depend feature request

2009-11-23 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 05:51:27AM +, Aleksey Lim wrote: > Hi all, > > To have some implementation mockups for next 0install debates, > I've coded how(I'm thinking) 0install integration could be implemented > in sugar[1]. To check existed code, pull sugar and sugar-toolkit cloned > repos[2] an

Re: [Sugar-devel] 0depend feature request

2009-11-12 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 08:10:11PM +0100, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 06:51, Aleksey Lim wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > To have some implementation mockups for next 0install debates, > > I've coded how(I'm thinking) 0install integration could be implemented > > in sugar[1]. To check

Re: [Sugar-devel] 0depend feature request

2009-11-12 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 06:51, Aleksey Lim wrote: > Hi all, > > To have some implementation mockups for next 0install debates, > I've coded how(I'm thinking) 0install integration could be implemented > in sugar[1]. To check existed code, pull sugar and sugar-toolkit cloned > repos[2] and follow si

[Sugar-devel] 0depend feature request

2009-11-11 Thread Aleksey Lim
Hi all, To have some implementation mockups for next 0install debates, I've coded how(I'm thinking) 0install integration could be implemented in sugar[1]. To check existed code, pull sugar and sugar-toolkit cloned repos[2] and follow simple test case[3]. [1] http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Zero_Depe