On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 4:20 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
> Hi Walter,
>
> the updater crash seems to be a bug in your code
>
> It looks like you should use get_data to get a python array from GBytes.
> (unref_to_array shouldn't really be exposed in python)
>
Thanks. /me wonders why it ever worked.
On 7 May 2013 23:01, Walter Bender wrote:
>
> It's memory corruption, so it could have worked once if really lucky :)
>>
>
> I guess I should have bought a lottery ticket, because it worked many many
> times in my testing.
>
Hehe. It might be that the glib we are now building with sugar-build i
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
> On 7 May 2013 22:59, Walter Bender wrote:
>
>> Hi Walter,
>>
>>>
>>> the updater crash seems to be a bug in your code
>>>
>>> It looks like you should use get_data to get a python array from GBytes.
>>> (unref_to_array shouldn't really be e
On 7 May 2013 22:59, Walter Bender wrote:
> Hi Walter,
>
>>
>> the updater crash seems to be a bug in your code
>>
>> It looks like you should use get_data to get a python array from GBytes.
>> (unref_to_array shouldn't really be exposed in python)
>>
>
> Thanks. /me wonders why it ever worked. I
Hi Walter,
the updater crash seems to be a bug in your code
It looks like you should use get_data to get a python array from GBytes.
(unref_to_array shouldn't really be exposed in python)
diff --git a/extensions/cpsection/updater/backends/aslo.py
b/extensions/cpsectio
index e244af0..7c41ae6 1006
On 06/14/2010 11:02 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 23:51, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
>> El Sun, 13-06-2010 a las 20:55 +0100, Gary C Martin escribió:
>>> OK, not strictly a patch but attached is an updated version of
>>> the currently malformed svg module-updater icon that's not
>>
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 8:14 AM, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> El Mon, 14-06-2010 a las 11:41 -0500, David Farning escribió:
>
>> To give credit where credit is due, the ASLO updater is just a update
>> of Scott's code to parse the xml ASLO dynamically creates rather than
>> micoroformat.
>
> Ah, I th
El Mon, 14-06-2010 a las 11:41 -0500, David Farning escribió:
> To give credit where credit is due, the ASLO updater is just a update
> of Scott's code to parse the xml ASLO dynamically creates rather than
> micoroformat.
Ah, I thought it was a rewrite because the codebase is so much shorter
and
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 4:51 PM, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> El Sun, 13-06-2010 a las 20:55 +0100, Gary C Martin escribió:
>> OK, not strictly a patch but attached is an updated version of
>> the currently malformed svg module-updater icon that's not
>> drawing correctly in F13. Not sure who this ne
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 23:51, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> El Sun, 13-06-2010 a las 20:55 +0100, Gary C Martin escribió:
>> OK, not strictly a patch but attached is an updated version of
>> the currently malformed svg module-updater icon that's not
>> drawing correctly in F13. Not sure who this need
El Sun, 13-06-2010 a las 20:55 +0100, Gary C Martin escribió:
> OK, not strictly a patch but attached is an updated version of
> the currently malformed svg module-updater icon that's not
> drawing correctly in F13. Not sure who this needs to get to
> (could only find it in Bernie's old depreciate
El Tue, 01-06-2010 a las 20:11 +, Aleksey Lim escribió:
> I'm planing to finish GCompris/TuxPaint/OOo4Kids(hope it won't be hard)
> sugarizing and will start work to provide all these blobs from ASLO
> (experimental activities, per arch blobs, more QA useful workflow) and
> can start microform
On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 03:22:08PM -0400, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> El Fri, 28-05-2010 a las 09:23 +, Aleksey Lim escribió:
>
> > But what about more trivial way, just create new php generated page
> > (like update-aslo.php) to generate page with what updater needs. In that
> > case such scrip
El Fri, 28-05-2010 a las 09:23 +, Aleksey Lim escribió:
> But what about more trivial way, just create new php generated page
> (like update-aslo.php) to generate page with what updater needs. In that
> case such script will be stored out of AMO code base and won't contain
> any AMO UI element
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 12:50:10PM -0400, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> El Sun, 23-05-2010 a las 14:50 -0400, Michael Stone escribió:
> > The only purposes of the list comprehension in UpdateModel.check_updates()
> > is
> > to set self._bundles_to_check to a list containing the elements returned by
>
El Sun, 23-05-2010 a las 14:50 -0400, Michael Stone escribió:
> The only purposes of the list comprehension in UpdateModel.check_updates() is
> to set self._bundles_to_check to a list containing the elements returned by
> bundleregistry.get_registry(). This purpose can be more succinctly achieved b
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 8:13 AM, Ties Stuij wrote:
> - atm the updater checks both the pages supplied by the urls in the
> relevant groups file and the update url entry in the activity.info
> file of the installed bundle. Whichever of them is higher, wins the
> contract, so to say. The problem here
This might be a nice time to convey some observations about the
activity updater:
- Lets first set the premise straight here: we foremost cater
organisations that have to centrally manage large batches of XO's in
some way. Their preferences have priority over individual XO owners
that know what th
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 7:00 AM, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> What "Debian package"?
>>
>> I found no mention of "olpc-update" anywhere in the source code for
>> Sugar, so I guess you are talking about something OLPC-specific _below_
>> Sugar, right?
>
> olpc-update is the o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 01:00:53PM +0100, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
>Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> What "Debian package"?
>>
>> I found no mention of "olpc-update" anywhere in the source code for
>> Sugar, so I guess you are talking about something OLPC-s
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 13:00, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> What "Debian package"?
>>
>> I found no mention of "olpc-update" anywhere in the source code for
>> Sugar, so I guess you are talking about something OLPC-specific _below_
>> Sugar, right?
>
> olpc-update is the off
Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> What "Debian package"?
>
> I found no mention of "olpc-update" anywhere in the source code for
> Sugar, so I guess you are talking about something OLPC-specific _below_
> Sugar, right?
olpc-update is the official updater for the core OS of the OLPC
distribution. It is
22 matches
Mail list logo
