Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-launch, with brief activity name

2010-02-15 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 01:04, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote: G'day, The sugar-launch [0] utility used to accept a brief activity name, such as Maze.  It was changed [1] to require a bundle id, such as vu.lux.olpc.Maze. This is less easy to use [2]. Can we discuss whether a brief

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-launch, with brief activity name

2010-02-15 Thread James Cameron
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 05:03:36PM +, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: Sure, I think this is a bug and the older behavior was correct. Do we have a patch already? I've no patch yet. I've looked into what would be required. There are two possibilities: 1. change to shell service D-Bus API

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-launch, with brief activity name

2010-02-15 Thread James Cameron
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 11:57:55AM +1100, James Cameron wrote: On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 05:03:36PM +, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: Sure, I think this is a bug and the older behavior was correct. Do we have a patch already? [...] 1. change to shell service D-Bus API GetBundlePath to have it

[Sugar-devel] sugar-launch, with brief activity name

2010-02-10 Thread James Cameron
G'day, The sugar-launch [0] utility used to accept a brief activity name, such as Maze. It was changed [1] to require a bundle id, such as vu.lux.olpc.Maze. This is less easy to use [2]. Can we discuss whether a brief activity name can be used instead or as well as a bundle id? References: