Re: [Sugar-devel] translating MaMaMedia to spanish

2009-02-19 Thread Morgan Collett
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 04:23, Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés r...@paraguayeduca.org wrote: Hi!, I am working on the deployment of 4000 XOs in Paraguay (south america - just in case!). Teachers here , during their training, have found out about MaMaMedia and would like to use it in Spanish. Is there

Re: [Sugar-devel] translating MaMaMedia to spanish

2009-02-19 Thread s . boutayeb
Hi Morgan, We at OLPC France are as well interested in contributing to the translation effort into French. So, we will welcome any addition to the Pootle server. Thank you in advance Best regards Samy Quoting Morgan Collett morgan.coll...@gmail.com: On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 04:23, Raúl

[Sugar-devel] Exception for 'View Source' strings in the sugar component

2009-02-19 Thread Simon Schampijer
Hi, the following patch does fix #360 and #365 and fixes the regression of being able to store the source in the Journal. Additions: _('Instance Source') _('Activity Bundle Source') _('View Source') Those two were present before, so we even could copy the translations we have for them

Re: [Sugar-devel] What should we call it? Addons of Activities

2009-02-19 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 10:24:38PM -0500, Mick Weiss wrote: We do need to take into consideration that not every language has activities, some have actividades or Aktivitäten etc. Is this something that we can support through CNAMEs? The config file

Re: [Sugar-devel] git.sugarlabs.org difficulties

2009-02-19 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
2009/2/19 Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org: Martin Langhoff wrote: On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 10:01 AM, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote: You should be using gitorious@ rather than vepla...@. Yes, it's awkward, but it's explained somewhere on the repository page. Internally,

Re: [Sugar-devel] What should we call it? Addons of Activities

2009-02-19 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
2009/2/18 Chris Ball c...@laptop.org: Hi, activities.sugarlabs.org +1 to activities here. Makes it clear and straightforward that it's the place to get Sugar activities, which is what it's for. Agreed, +1 to activities in spite of what I will write below. Since an argument against it

Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH] Reduce default emulator resolution to 1024x768

2009-02-19 Thread Sascha Silbe
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 12:22:50PM +0100, Bernie Innocenti wrote: if dimensions is not None: cmd.append('-screen') cmd.append(dimensions) -elif gtk.gdk.screen_width() 1200 or gtk.gdk.screen_height() 900: +elif gtk.gdk.screen_width() DEFAULT_WIDTH or \ +

Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH] Reduce default emulator resolution to 1024x768

2009-02-19 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 12:22:50PM +0100, Bernie Innocenti wrote: This patch seems controversial enough to deserve a public flam^Wreview before hitting gitorious. One possible counterargument for this could be that destabilizing changes should wait

Re: [Sugar-devel] git.sugarlabs.org difficulties

2009-02-19 Thread Bernie Innocenti
Tomeu Vizoso wrote: ### START KEY 7 ### command=gitorious bernie,no-port-forwarding,no-X11-forwarding,no-agent-forwarding,no-pty ssh-rsa B3Nz...gJVNrOZuw== ber...@trinity.develer.com ### END KEY 7 ### ### START KEY 9 ### command=gitorious

Re: [Sugar-devel] What should we call it? Addons of Activities

2009-02-19 Thread David Farning
Ok, Then activities it shall be. Due to the complexity of the code, it uses mod_extensively, The move is going to have to be cold turkey. Steps. 1 . Bernie point activities.sugarlab.org, activities-testing.sugarlabs.org, and activities-devel.sugarlabs.org at sunjammer. 2. I will create the

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] addons.sugarlabs.org is starting to work

2009-02-19 Thread Sascha Silbe
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 08:56:41PM -0500, Luke Faraone wrote: Since dependancy installation is not something most children can do, If we reach that point, we've already failed (IMO). CU Sascha -- http://sascha.silbe.org/ http://www.infra-silbe.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] addons.sugarlabs.org is starting to work

2009-02-19 Thread Luke Faraone
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 8:21 AM, Sascha Silbe sascha-ml-ui-sugar-de...@silbe.org wrote:On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 08:56:41PM -0500, Luke Faraone wrote: Since dependancy installation is not something most children can do, If we reach that point, we've already failed (IMO).I meant from an

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] addons.sugarlabs.org is starting to work

2009-02-19 Thread Sascha Silbe
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 08:42:16AM -0500, Luke Faraone wrote: Since dependancy installation is not something most children can do, If we reach that point, we've already failed (IMO). I meant from an administrative perspective. -v, please? CU Sascha -- http://sascha.silbe.org/

Re: [Sugar-devel] Running jhbuild on Debian Unstable and Ubuntu Intrepid

2009-02-19 Thread Sascha Silbe
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 11:32:46AM -0200, Andrés Ambrois wrote: sudo chrpath -d \ /usr/lib/python-support/python-gnome2/python2.5/gtk-2.0/gconf.so Some other libraries need to be fixed as well. The following invocation did the trick for me: find

[Sugar-devel] ugar-Developers meeting REMINDER (19 February, 2009 - 14.00 (UTC)) --- irc.freenode.net, #sugar-meeting

2009-02-19 Thread Simon Schampijer
Hi, AGENDA: This Friday is 0.84 Release Candidate 2 [1] - look at the state of the release and talk about outstanding issues. [1] http://sugarlabs.org/go/DevelopmentTeam/Release/Roadmap#Schedule See you there, Simon ___ Sugar-devel mailing list

Re: [Sugar-devel] What should we call it? Addons of Activities

2009-02-19 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 07:21:23AM +1800, David Farning wrote: Ok, Then activities it shall be. Due to the complexity of the code, it uses mod_extensively, The move is going to have to be cold turkey. Wauw, mod_extensively. That indeed sounds

Re: [Sugar-devel] What should we call it? Addons of Activities

2009-02-19 Thread David Farning
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 8:10 AM, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 07:21:23AM +1800, David Farning wrote: Ok, Then activities it shall be. Due to the complexity of the code, it uses mod_extensively, The move is going to

[Sugar-devel] Testing Sugar 0.84, Monday 2/23 and Tuesday 2/24

2009-02-19 Thread Greg Dekoenigsberg
We're getting close to release of 0.84, and we can still use some focused testing. Testing is a lot more fun, and effective, when you do it with friends. (Collaboration testing absolutely requires it.) So if you have time, *please* join us on Monday and Tuesday. The developers will all show

Re: [Sugar-devel] Testing Sugar 0.84, Monday 2/23 and Tuesday 2/24

2009-02-19 Thread Caroline Meeks
I can help on Tuesday. I'm also around this weekend if anyone needs new SoaS images smoke tested ahead of time. On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 9:44 AM, Greg Dekoenigsberg g...@redhat.com wrote: We're getting close to release of 0.84, and we can still use some focused testing. Testing is a lot

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Testing Sugar 0.84, Monday 2/23 and Tuesday 2/24

2009-02-19 Thread Mel Chua
+1 Tuesday, and I'll do my best to stop by in between meetings on Monday morning. On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 9:44 AM, Greg Dekoenigsberg g...@redhat.com wrote: We're getting close to release of 0.84, and we can still use some focused testing. Testing is a lot more fun, and effective, when you

Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH] Reduce default emulator resolution to 1024x768

2009-02-19 Thread Bernie Innocenti
Jonas Smedegaard wrote: +DEFAULT_WIDTH = 1024 +DEFAULT_HEIGHT = 768 How about adjusting that patch to keep old values by default, but provide commandline arguments and perhaps let environment variables overrid default too)? That would avoid surprises, while still allow testing

[Sugar-devel] production aslo update

2009-02-19 Thread David Farning
No new commits for the production instance of aslo. We will be running some clean.sh and build.sh scripts to update the .mo (translation) files. Yep, that is right, Sayamindu Dasgupta should be able to hook aslo to pootle and make them sing. How cool is that? david

Re: [Sugar-devel] production aslo update

2009-02-19 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 15:59, David Farning dfarn...@sugarlabs.org wrote: No new commits for the production instance of aslo. We will be running some clean.sh and build.sh scripts to update the .mo (translation) files. Yep, that is right, Sayamindu Dasgupta should be able to hook aslo to

Re: [Sugar-devel] production aslo update

2009-02-19 Thread David Farning
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 9:06 AM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote: On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 15:59, David Farning dfarn...@sugarlabs.org wrote: No new commits for the production instance of aslo. We will be running some clean.sh and build.sh scripts to update the .mo (translation) files.

Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH] Reduce default emulator resolution to 1024x768

2009-02-19 Thread Bert Freudenberg
On 19.02.2009, at 15:53, Bernie Innocenti wrote: Jonas Smedegaard wrote: +DEFAULT_WIDTH = 1024 +DEFAULT_HEIGHT = 768 How about adjusting that patch to keep old values by default, but provide commandline arguments and perhaps let environment variables overrid default too)? That would

[Sugar-devel] resume by default

2009-02-19 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
Hi all, as you may know, we recently added a change to the favorites view that makes easier to resume existing instances instead of always launching new ones. This option is disabled by default and users need to go to a palette and guess what that checkbox serves for. We added that option

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] resume by default

2009-02-19 Thread Luke Faraone
On 2/19/09, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote: Hi all, as you may know, we recently added a change to the favorites view that makes easier to resume existing instances instead of always launching new ones. This option is disabled by default and users need to go to a palette and guess

Re: [Sugar-devel] resume by default

2009-02-19 Thread Simon Schampijer
Tomeu Vizoso wrote: Hi all, as you may know, we recently added a change to the favorites view that makes easier to resume existing instances instead of always launching new ones. This option is disabled by default and users need to go to a palette and guess what that checkbox serves for.

Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH] Reduce default emulator resolution to 1024x768

2009-02-19 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 03:53:41PM +0100, Bernie Innocenti wrote: Jonas Smedegaard wrote: +DEFAULT_WIDTH = 1024 +DEFAULT_HEIGHT = 768 How about adjusting that patch to keep old values by default, but provide commandline arguments and perhaps

Re: [Sugar-devel] Exception for 'View Source' strings in the sugar component

2009-02-19 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
Yup, would be nice to get those in if translators agree. Regards, Tomeu 2009/2/19 Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de: Hi, the following patch does fix #360 and #365 and fixes the regression of being able to store the source in the Journal. Additions: _('Instance Source') _('Activity

Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH] Reduce default emulator resolution to 1024x768

2009-02-19 Thread Sascha Silbe
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 03:59:22PM +0100, Bernie Innocenti wrote: Since using Sugar in a window does not actually make sense for users, we might as well change the default of sugar-emulator to go full-screen by default, and make sugar-jhbuild invoke it with the 1024x768 window for developers.

Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH] Reduce default emulator resolution to 1024x768

2009-02-19 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 03:59:22PM +0100, Bernie Innocenti wrote: Sascha Silbe wrote: On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 12:22:50PM +0100, Bernie Innocenti wrote: if dimensions is not None: cmd.append('-screen')

[Sugar-devel] design team meeting

2009-02-19 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
Hi, no meeting today? Regards, Tomeu ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] Exception for 'View Source' strings in the sugar component

2009-02-19 Thread Sayamindu Dasgupta
Given the feature is a long promised one ;-), and given that at least some of the strings should appear elsewhere, and given that there is around 10 more days to go for the final release, I think this can go in. +1 -sdg- On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 2:01 PM, Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de

Re: [Sugar-devel] resume by default

2009-02-19 Thread Bert Freudenberg
On 19.02.2009, at 16:16, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: Hi all, as you may know, we recently added a change to the favorites view that makes easier to resume existing instances instead of always launching new ones. This option is disabled by default and users need to go to a palette and guess what

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] resume by default

2009-02-19 Thread Martin Dengler
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 04:40:15PM +0100, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 16:22, Luke Faraone l...@faraone.cc wrote: On 2/19/09, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote: So, who agrees and who disagrees with changing the favorite view to resume activities by default? +0 I

Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH] Reduce default emulator resolution to 1024x768

2009-02-19 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 11:21:03AM -0500, Luke Faraone wrote: div class=gmail_quoteblockquote class=gmail_quote style=border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;Anyway, I would like to try again,

Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH] Reduce default emulator resolution to 1024x768

2009-02-19 Thread Bert Freudenberg
On 19.02.2009, at 17:21, Luke Faraone wrote: Anyway, I would like to try again, hopefully more clear this time, with this related thought of mine: It would be nice if the default - whatever it is, was expressed not inside the code but in a way that it could be changed per machine. I

Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH] Reduce default emulator resolution to 1024x768

2009-02-19 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 17:47, Bert Freudenberg b...@freudenbergs.de wrote: On 19.02.2009, at 17:21, Luke Faraone wrote: Anyway, I would like to try again, hopefully more clear this time, with this related thought of mine: It would be nice if the default - whatever it is, was expressed not

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] addons.sugarlabs.org is starting to work

2009-02-19 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 18:18, Carol Farlow Lerche c...@msbit.com wrote: How does the Mozilla add-on functionality decide if there is a version or platform conflict for browser add-ons? it must be a piece of the browser that does this via some interaction with data on the server. Shouldn't

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] addons.sugarlabs.org is starting to work

2009-02-19 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 18:23, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote: On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 18:18, Carol Farlow Lerche c...@msbit.com wrote: How does the Mozilla add-on functionality decide if there is a version or platform conflict for browser add-ons? it must be a piece of the browser

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] addons.sugarlabs.org is starting to work

2009-02-19 Thread Carol Farlow Lerche
How does the Mozilla add-on functionality decide if there is a version or platform conflict for browser add-ons? it must be a piece of the browser that does this via some interaction with data on the server. Shouldn't there be a similar process here? It is frustrating to download something

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] resume by default

2009-02-19 Thread Wade Brainerd
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 12:17 PM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote: On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 18:12, Eduardo H. Silva hoboprim...@gmail.com wrote: I agree with this change. And I think it is a good idea to then make the fresh instance alert go away. This way, if a user commonly uses an

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] resume by default

2009-02-19 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 18:29, Wade Brainerd wad...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 12:17 PM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote: On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 18:12, Eduardo H. Silva hoboprim...@gmail.com wrote: I agree with this change. And I think it is a good idea to then make

Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH] Reduce default emulator resolution to 1024x768

2009-02-19 Thread Wade Brainerd
Is it possible to just make the Sugar emulator resizable during runtime? I know I spend a lot of time fixing my activities for the XO's Rotate Screen key which is a bit different than just starting up in a different resolution. Best, Wade On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 12:21 PM, Tomeu Vizoso

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] addons.sugarlabs.org is starting to work

2009-02-19 Thread Carol Farlow Lerche
After looking around I still can't find an automatic way to determine which distribution/packaging universe a machine is in. /etc/*version gives a somewhat useful but somewhat lying answer on my Ubuntu platform. It seems an obvious thing to have uname report, but no go. What have I missed? On

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] addons.sugarlabs.org is starting to work

2009-02-19 Thread David Farning
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 11:58 AM, Carol Farlow Lerche c...@msbit.com wrote: After looking around I still can't find an automatic way to determine which distribution/packaging universe a machine is in. /etc/*version gives a somewhat useful but somewhat lying answer on my Ubuntu platform. It

Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH] Reduce default emulator resolution to 1024x768

2009-02-19 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 12:36:26PM -0500, Wade Brainerd wrote: Is it possible to just make the Sugar emulator resizable during runtime? I know I spend a lot of time fixing my activities for the XO's Rotate Screen key which is a bit different than

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Testing Sugar 0.84, Monday 2/23 and Tuesday 2/24

2009-02-19 Thread Luke Faraone
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 9:44 AM, Greg Dekoenigsberg g...@redhat.com wrote: We're getting close to release of 0.84, and we can still use some focused testing. Testing is a lot more fun, and effective, when you do it with friends. (Collaboration testing absolutely requires it.) So if you

Re: [Sugar-devel] resume by default

2009-02-19 Thread Gary C Martin
On 19 Feb 2009, at 15:23, Simon Schampijer wrote: Tomeu Vizoso wrote: Hi all, as you may know, we recently added a change to the favorites view that makes easier to resume existing instances instead of always launching new ones. This option is disabled by default and users need to go

[Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] Write-62

2009-02-19 Thread Simon Schampijer
== Source == http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/fructose/Write/Write-62.tar.bz2 == Fixed tickets == * Initialize gthreads at startup (alsroot) #356 * Updated translations ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org

[Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] TurtleArt-34

2009-02-19 Thread Walter Bender
== Source == http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/fructose/TurtleArt/TurtleArt-34.tar.bz2 == Fixed tickets == dev.sugarlabs.org #389: defect: TurtleArt with sensors needs special alsaaudio.so on XO (closed: duplicate) #343: defect: TurtleArt doesn't start on amd64 due to 32bit

Re: [Sugar-devel] design team meeting (And finding a new regular time)

2009-02-19 Thread Eben Eliason
I wasn't available for a meeting today, so that's partially my fault. I'm trying to get back into the swing of things, though, and actually had the chance to meet with Christian today regarding starting up regular design meetings again. As our work on Sugar will be voluntary, we both feel that

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] design team meeting (And finding a new regular time)

2009-02-19 Thread David Farning
I talked to a designer named josh who is doing interesting stuff. see http://sugarlabs.org/go/AddonsPortal/Design Sorry, but I don't remember his email. Goes by y0shu on irc. Another design related would be to standardizing the look and feel of the various Sugar Labs web sites. david On Fri,

Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH] webactivity: seed the XS cookie at startup

2009-02-19 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 10:08 PM, Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de wrote: Ok, I pushed to browse git master now. Do you have a way to test if it is working fine against a schoolserver or should I create you the 0.82 xo bundle? I have a git checkout - but on the 8.2.x so master won't work

[Sugar-devel] (no subject)

2009-02-19 Thread martin . langhoff
___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

[Sugar-devel] [PATCH] Create a HTTP Cookie to authenticate with the Schoolserver (Martin Langhoff)

2009-02-19 Thread martin . langhoff
From: Martin Langhoff mar...@laptop.org Re-edit of the patch, based on Simon's merge to master. --- webactivity.py | 66 +++- 1 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/webactivity.py b/webactivity.py index

Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH] Create a HTTP Cookie to authenticate with the Schoolserver (Martin Langhoff)

2009-02-19 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 1:21 PM, martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote: From: Martin Langhoff mar...@laptop.org Re-edit of the patch, based on Simon's merge to master. I cherry-picked Simon's patch, resovled minor conflicts, and edited as follows: - all gconf references are gone - grab

[Sugar-devel] Moon-9, almost (Re: addons.sugarlabs.org is starting to work)

2009-02-19 Thread Gary C Martin
On 18 Feb 2009, at 15:04, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: Hi, as the site is becoming more functional, we are in need of feedback before we direct there the masses. Could activity maintainers register and upload their last activity bundles? Please try to also upload at least one screenshot, the site

Re: [Sugar-devel] Moon-9, almost (Re: addons.sugarlabs.org is starting to work)

2009-02-19 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 03:48:56AM +, Gary C Martin wrote: P.S As a member of the ActivityTeam, I am rather embarrassed to have to ask what I should now do with the Moon-9.tar.bz2 file that fell out the back of ./setup dist_source (couldn't see any ActivityTeam wiki suggestions for

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Moon-9, almost (Re: addons.sugarlabs.org is starting to work)

2009-02-19 Thread Wade Brainerd
Yeah, it seems like a lot of the buttons on the site do nothing when clicked right now. I just encountered the same problem. On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 10:48 PM, Gary C Martin g...@garycmartin.comwrote: On 18 Feb 2009, at 15:04, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: Hi, as the site is becoming more