El Mon, 21-09-2009 a las 23:50 -0400, Benjamin M. Schwartz escribió:
By having distinct packages built separately for each distribution by
experts. This is incompatible with our (or at least my) goal of allowing
users to throw packages around as atomic objects, without internet access
and
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 01:03:37AM -0400, Mel Chua wrote:
Ok - then the situation is this, then:
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/index.php?title=Talk%3ASugar_on_a_Stickdiff=37874oldid=37820
It looks like the SoaS team is unblocked
I don't see how the SoaS team was ever blocked on the things that
These are the dependencies I had for a basic demo of dojox.gfx
84K dojo/dojo.js
12K dojox/gfx.js
16K dojox/gfx/svg.js
12K dojox/gfx/shape.js
8.0Kdojox/gfx/path.js
132Ktotal
to use the entire library, it should be about 190kb and this is
excluding the silverlight, canvas,
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 07:35:25AM +0100, Martin Dengler wrote:
This is a convincing demonstration of the utter failure in
decision-making.
This is overly harsh, sorry.
Martin
pgpwsJuO6ML8E.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Sugar-devel mailing
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 11:17:09AM -0500, David Farning wrote:
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 2:51 AM, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote:
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 07:30:07PM -0500, David Farning wrote:
A couple of months ago your packaging systems was pretty new and
confusing. Yesterday I
Hi,
As I understand it, Sugarlabs wants to keep things simple for users by
only using the equivalent of major numbers when versioning Activities.
I am wondering, however, what version numbers can be expected for
potential future bugfix releases of Browse and Chat targeted 0.84, as it
seems
Subzero,
Here is an interesting article comparing the two:
http://www.lrbabe.com/?p=217
The author makes some points:
* the libraries have about equivalent functionality
* dojox.gfx is about twice the size as raphaeljs
* Animation isn't in dojox.gfx but another module, fx I think
I read
Dear Sugar community,
with September 21 the hard code freeze [1] is in effect [2].
No source code changes can be made without approval from the release
team. Translation and documentation can continue.
The Hard Code freeze will end September the 24th. Other freezes remain
in effect for
I think the .xo activities must be noarch only. These can be modified by
teachers and kids, shared, you can view-source etc.
The .xo can require the binary dependencies using PackageKit.
Now we have one hundred activities based in GCompris and avery one must add
the binaries and the activities
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 12:09 AM, Benjamin M. Schwartz
bmsch...@fas.harvard.edu wrote:
Bernie Innocenti wrote:
Why would we care to have concurrent versions of the same activity for
different user accounts? Our computing model is inherently single-user.
LTSP. NFS with shared clients. Our
Peter Robinson wrote:
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 12:09 AM, Benjamin M. Schwartz
bmsch...@fas.harvard.edu wrote:
Bernie Innocenti wrote:
Why would we care to have concurrent versions of the same activity for
different user accounts? Our computing model is inherently single-user.
LTSP. NFS with
BTW Could whoever had access to the mailing list management fix up the
reply to option. The way the list builds the reply to fields is
ridiculous!
Peter
-- Forwarded message --
From: sugar-devel-boun...@lists.sugarlabs.org
Date: Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 1:48 PM
Subject: Your
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 09:03, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
BTW Could whoever had access to the mailing list management fix up the
reply to option. The way the list builds the reply to fields is
ridiculous!
What would you recommend? We try to use the principle of least
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 3:10 PM, Luke Faraone l...@faraone.cc wrote:
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 09:03, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
BTW Could whoever had access to the mailing list management fix up the
reply to option. The way the list builds the reply to fields is
ridiculous!
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 10:19, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
I think most mailing lists (at least the ones I'm subscribed to) set
the reply to header as that of the mailing list so by default the
reply goes to the list.
This breaks multi-list communication and cross-posting, as
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 3:22 PM, Luke Faraone l...@faraone.cc wrote:
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 10:19, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
I think most mailing lists (at least the ones I'm subscribed to) set
the reply to header as that of the mailing list so by default the
reply goes to
Hi,
we have these tickets in the review queue currently marked for 0.86:
#1339 After download, 'Show in Journal' option doesnt switch you to the
Journal
#1342 range queries use lexical comparison, not numerical
#1410 Progress bar for reading volumes appears only once
#1412 Progress bar
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 04:54:44PM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
#1342 range queries use lexical comparison, not numerical
This can wait for 0.86.1 as it only occurs for entries that have a
timestamp before ~2002 or after ~2032. We might even decide to move it
to 0.88.
#1404
I'm trying to stay out of this massive time sink hole, but I couldn't
let this one float by.
On 22 Sep 2009, at 07:14, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
Last, but certainly not least,
* Activity sharing is not even implemented, yet! We'll think
about these esoteric scenarios when they come... if
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 04:54:44PM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
Hi,
we have these tickets in the review queue currently marked for 0.86:
#1339 After download, 'Show in Journal' option doesnt switch you to the
Journal
#1342 range queries use lexical comparison, not numerical
#1410 Progress
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 2:35 AM, Martin Dengler
mar...@martindengler.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 01:03:37AM -0400, Mel Chua wrote:
Sebastien's original question[2] is unanswered perhaps because it's
been deemed maybe-already-answered[3] or peripheral
To the contrary, it seems to me
I volunteer. I don't have a strong opinion yet, but am interested in
the future of SoaS. When I give talks about OLPC and Sugar, there are
almost always audience members who have used it.
SJ
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 4:27 PM, Chris Ball c...@laptop.org wrote:
Hi all,
Sebastian Dziallas has
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/F11_for_XO-1
http://dev.laptop.org/~smparrish/XO-1/builds/OS7
This release includes and custom Fedora-olpc-release which enables the
updates-testing repo by default. This repo is used in the creation of these
builds so it makes sense to enable it by default. Also
http://vimeo.com/6691519
really, the best intro to html5 and related technologies that I have
come across
--
Bryan W. Berry
Technology Director
OLE Nepal, http://www.olenepal.org
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
Thanks for this! I've tried it on an XO-1 and it updates fine. NM also
works and connects to a wifi ap properly. I just noticed some things:
1. Panel has an email launcher but there is no associated email
application for it.
2. Cheese doesn't recognize the webcam at all.
3. Buttons from dialog
Mel Chua wrote:
There's a lot going on in this thread, so here is my attempt to
summarize discussions so far. If I've missed or misstated anything, my
apologies - and it's a wiki, so go fix it. ;-)
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Talk:Sugar_on_a_Stick
By my count, there are 4 things we need to
26 matches
Mail list logo
