On Mon, 7 Jun 2010, Christoph Maser wrote:
Am Montag, den 07.06.2010, 15:20 -0400 schrieb Steve Huff:
On Jun 7, 2010, at 11:31 AM, Christoph Maser wrote:
As I am for a much more strict policy at rpmforge I vote for a complete
removal of perl-XML-LibXMl and perl-XML-LibXSLT or at most provide
Am Donnerstag, den 03.06.2010, 16:59 -0400 schrieb David Steinbrunner:
David Steinbrunner wrote:
The XML::LibXSLT and XML::LibXML packages in rpmforge are currently
incompatible. See the following as evidence:
[Mon May 03 19:19:18 2010] [error] This version of XML::LibXSLT requires
On Jun 7, 2010, at 11:31 AM, Christoph Maser wrote:
As I am for a much more strict policy at rpmforge I vote for a complete
removal of perl-XML-LibXMl and perl-XML-LibXSLT or at most provide an
old version for perl-XML-LibXSLT wich works with the perl-XML-LibXML
version from base. It is much
Am Montag, den 07.06.2010, 15:20 -0400 schrieb Steve Huff:
On Jun 7, 2010, at 11:31 AM, Christoph Maser wrote:
As I am for a much more strict policy at rpmforge I vote for a complete
removal of perl-XML-LibXMl and perl-XML-LibXSLT or at most provide an
old version for perl-XML-LibXSLT
David Steinbrunner wrote:
The XML::LibXSLT and XML::LibXML packages in rpmforge are currently
incompatible. See the following as evidence:
[Mon May 03 19:19:18 2010] [error] This version of XML::LibXSLT requires
XML::LibXML 1.6 (ABI 1), which is incompatible with currently installed
