Re: [sumo-user] MAROUTER: input flow and scale issue

2021-05-18 Thread Jakob Erdmann
The option --weight-priority is only compatible with Dijkstra at the moment. Am Mo., 17. Mai 2021 um 20:07 Uhr schrieb Sasan Amini : > A* (astar) routing algorithm works only when I pass no options. When I > pass the following options, it switches back to Dijsktra: > marouter --route-files

Re: [sumo-user] MAROUTER: input flow and scale issue

2021-05-17 Thread Sasan Amini
A* (astar) routing algorithm works only when I pass no options. When I pass the following options, it switches back to Dijsktra: marouter --route-files ./SUMO/Demand/trips_marouter.trip.xml --net-file ./SUMO/Net/sumo_secondary_filter.net.xml -o ./SUMO/Output/marouter_outputastar.rou.xml

Re: [sumo-user] MAROUTER: input flow and scale issue

2021-05-17 Thread Jakob Erdmann
CHRouter currenlty doesn't work very well with marouter: - the results are wrong because the contraction hierarchy doesn't get rebuilt - it works slowly since CHRouter doesn't support efficient 1-to-many routing try astar. Am Mo., 17. Mai 2021 um 13:02 Uhr schrieb Sasan Amini : > I am passing

Re: [sumo-user] MAROUTER: input flow and scale issue

2021-05-17 Thread Sasan Amini
I am passing the following command with almost all default values for the parameters: marouter --route-files ./SUMO/Demand/trips_marouter.trip.xml --net-file ./SUMO/Net/sumo_secondary_filter.net.xml -o ./SUMO/Output/marouter_output.rou.xml --weights.interpolate --paths.penalty 1 --junction-taz

Re: [sumo-user] MAROUTER: input flow and scale issue

2021-05-17 Thread Jakob Erdmann
There is only the code: https://github.com/eclipse/sumo/blob/64a041537ce537690f5a22edcc46ef40df8d5fa0/src/marouter/ROMAAssignments.cpp#L115-L163 astar should work fine with marouter default options. Which options are you passing? Am Mo., 17. Mai 2021 um 12:02 Uhr schrieb Sasan Amini : > Thank

Re: [sumo-user] MAROUTER: input flow and scale issue

2021-05-17 Thread Sasan Amini
Thank for the explanation. Are there any documents to help me make a realistic guesstimation of travel times? What I see in the course code is travelTime = capacityConstraintFunction(edge, newFlow / intervalLengthInHours); and thought travel times are directly exportable from Marouter. What is

Re: [sumo-user] MAROUTER: input flow and scale issue

2021-05-17 Thread Jakob Erdmann
The issue with fromJunction and toJunction is now fixed. The route costs in marouter are travel times multiplied with a traffic-density dependent capacityConstraintFunction. The actual travel time can only be guessed at at this point since it will depend on vehicle interactions. To compute

Re: [sumo-user] MAROUTER: input flow and scale issue

2021-05-14 Thread Sasan Amini
True, the scale parameter works perfectly fine. I am not sure if I was testing it on a nightly build version of 1.8.x, but now on 1.9.0 it works. However, the fromJunction - toJunction option for route files is not working, while it works perfectly fine in DUAROUTER. Moreover, for the output of

Re: [sumo-user] MAROUTER: input flow and scale issue

2021-05-03 Thread Jakob Erdmann
Scaling route file input is supposed to work since 1.9.0 (and it's working in our test). Can you send me a minimal failing example for 1.9 or later? Am Sa., 1. Mai 2021 um 14:46 Uhr schrieb Sasan Amini : > Dear all, > > I am running MAROUTER on an extremely large network and have only 1% of >