IIII at IV

2000-07-22 Thread Rod Heil
Somewhere I have read that was used instead of IV in communities where the people could more easily count to 4 than to subtract 1 from 5. It may seem absurd to our modern minds to even imagine such a situation, but understanding of simple things like subtraction has not always been as common

moonphase calculator

2000-07-22 Thread Wm. S. Maddux
Dear Jorge, John, et.al., I realize I should have sent it as e-mail text in the first place. Here is the listing for all those who couldn't make use of my ancient Q-Basic, or just want to see the pardigm: REM Moon Calendar

Re: moonphase calculator

2000-07-22 Thread Wm. S. Maddux
On Fri, 21 Jul 2000, Dave Bell wrote: >On Fri, 21 Jul 2000, Richard Koolish wrote: >> People on this list may be interested in the Moonstick >> slide rule moon phase calculator. >> >> www.moonstick.com >> >Wow! Or, shall I make that Wow! to the 4th power? (W^4) >Wonderful concept! > Beautif

Re: IIII at IV

2000-07-22 Thread PsykoKidd
I can't say for sure if this is true, but I did read that the Romans used instead of the usual IV because IV were the first two letters in the Latin spelling of Jupiter (that is the principle Roman deity). Such reverence and/or superstition around the name of a deity aren't uncommon,