I can't say for sure if this is true, but I did read that the Romans used IIII instead of the usual IV because IV were the first two letters in the Latin spelling of Jupiter (that is the principle Roman deity). Such reverence and/or superstition around the name of a deity aren't uncommon, so it does have a ring of plausibility to it. Troy Heck
- IIII at IV terry . dixon
- Re: IIII at IV Gordon Uber
- R: IIII at IV Mario Arnaldi
- Re: IIII at IV John Davis
- IIII at IV Patrick_Powers
- Re: IIII at IV PsykoKidd
- IIII at IV Rod Heil
- RE: IIII at IV Andrew James