Dear Willy: I would appreciate to have a photo of
the sundials in Alicante.
Thank you
- Original Message -
From:
Willy Leenders
To: sundial@rrz.uni-koeln.de
Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 5:30
AM
Subject: Re: A new sundial - type from
Bremen!
You can see a similar s
Hi, Mark, Rod, Fer! Hi everyone!
Now I realize that 45 deg is the
solution to the 'maximum difference between North and South'
problem.
I liked the idea from Rod and Fer of truncating an
sphere to show the Sun's movement. And of course
the results from Mark are smashingly
self-explanato
Daniel (and a large mob of others)
I have followed with considerable interest, amusement, and now increasing
irritation, the various emails on the changes introduced by Daniel.
Like many others who work for governments, large corporations, universities
etc, I have been through a couple of organi
"Th. Taudin-Chabot" wrote:
>
> Finally. Now the mechanism is equal to other mailinglists.
Yeah but the difference is that this list is not moderated...
Thierry vs
>
> A good user interface means that you have to do (and think) the least in
> most of the cases. So if you want to react on a mess
Message text written by INTERNET:sundial@rrz.uni-koeln.de
>Please let me know what I am missing in this new change
as I currently see no value at all<
Well, I must say (despite all these complaints!) that I much prefer the
'New System'. I suppose it's because I think of the list as an input of
Anselmo et All,
also I have obtained to the same conclusions of Fer ( and
others) ( Latitude =
45d)
For curiosity I attach the graph of the daily
mean number of hours of illumination of the vertical plane at different
Latitudes.
The plane is illuminated for a period (mean) of
9h 54m,
Hi Tony (& All I guess),
I just don't understand this new change to the "reply".
I do not belong to other lists so I was never confused
by "reply" to the one person who sent it or "reply all"
to everyone and the list.
Now we are already getting many unwanted personal
responses.
It seems you ju
Hello everybody, some time ago, I suggested to the list-owner to implement
the system as it is now, similar to many other lists, so maybe it is because
of my suggestion he changed it, I do not know, but certainly I prefer it
this way, his address is not so simple, & individual contact is allways
p
> Please reconsider this change if at all possible. I keep tripping
Dear all,
of course I can change the reply style back to what was before. I
changed
the style because some people on the list asked me to do so. The current
style is widely used on other mailing lists. There are pros and cons
Dear John and all,
My rule-of-thumb for the choice of a compressed graphics format is:
Photos (characterized by hue and intensity gradients): use JPG.
Drawings (characterized by patches of constant hue and intensity):
use GIF.
When in doubt, I sometimes compare both options.
For ***CAD drawing
Hello Patrick,
Patrick Powers wrote:
> Message text written by INTERNET:sundial@rrz.uni-koeln.de
> >Now, for a private comment, we have to copy the 'From' address, which is
> not so simple.
> And I'm afraid that we'll get lots of uninteresting messages like the
> 'please send me the picture' we
Hi, Richard!
Richard Mallett wrote:
>
> Reply to : Thierry
>
> >> However, it seems to me that the former configuration was more
> flexible: one could indeed easlily either reply to the 'From' address only
> (which is justified for example when requesting the direct sending of a
> proposed atta
A good user interface means that you have to do (and think) the least in
most of the cases. So if you want to react on a message just hit
reply.
Up till now I had to think: in this particular mailinglist I have to hit
the reply all and delete one address.
I actually asked this opt
>Daniel Roth wrote:
>
>> Dear Subscribers!
>>
>> Please note that I changed the default reply-to address to
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] If you press
>> reply in your mail software the sundial mailing list will be addressed
>> instead of the author of
>> the mail to which you reply.
>>
>> Thank you for y
Hello Reinhold,
Thanks for your comment: I just cc it to the list for others to see
it.
Thierry
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In einer eMail vom
03.03.02 20:21:36 (MEZ) Mitteleuropäische Zeit schreibt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I agree with you!
I apreciated the former system!
Regards
R
Rod,
At the moment I sent my message about Anselmo's question I received your
message.
At the time I started with gnomonics, some more than 20 years ago, one of
the things I did was making an instrument of simple plastic materials that
exactly does what you described. That little instrument was a
Title: Message
Dear
All,
I
concede - the same answer by logic (Fer) and by brute
force(Mark).
David
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of fer j. de vriesSent: Monday, 4 March 2002 9:05
AMTo: sundialSubject: Re: On northern vs. southe
17 matches
Mail list logo
