Dear John and all,

My rule-of-thumb for the choice of a compressed graphics format is:
Photos (characterized by hue and intensity gradients): use JPG.
Drawings (characterized by patches of constant hue and intensity): 
use GIF.

When in doubt, I sometimes compare both options.

For ***CAD drawings, GIF should be superior by factors. Moreover, 
GIF does not lose information (=quality), as JPG does. Paint Shop 
Pro or PhotoShop, among others, should be able to do the 
conversions.

Make sure you make the background, which may come more-or 
less whitish outof the scanner, into really white (or at least exactly 
the same color), and the blackish of the lines and lettering also into 
a constant color, so as to profit best from the power of GIF 
compression. 

John, please try and report us the results!

Regards, Frans


From:                   "John Carmichael" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:                     "Sundial List" <[email protected]>
Subject:                More PDF Advantages
Date sent:              Thu, 28 Feb 2002 18:11:25 -0700
Send reply to:          [email protected]

> Hi All
> 
> I often email drawings and pictures of sundials to clients and people on
> this list. But I always have to be careful not to send too many at once,
> or my email will reject my mail for being too large. To email photographs,
> I use JPEG format. And to send Delta Cad drawings I scanned the drawing
> and send it as a JPEG.  I had always thought that JPEGs where the best
> format to use for emailing because the files are small and everybody can
> open them.
> 
> It occurred to me to compare the file size of a typical JPEG photo to the
> same photo in PDF format (I thought for sure the PDF would be the larger).
> To my amazement, the PDF file was 20% of the size of the JPEG! The JPEG
> was 240 KBs. and the PDF was only 46 KBs.  This allows me to quickly email
> more pictures on my crummy 56K modem.
> 
> As for emailing Delta Cad drawings, now I don't have to scan them and send
> as JPEGs. I can save and send these as PDFs too, and the quality is much
> better than a scanned JPEG.
> 
> Perhaps PDFs will replace JPEGs as the photo format of choice in the
> future. What do you think?
> 
> John
> 
> John L. Carmichael Jr.
> Sundial Sculptures
> 925 E. Foothills Dr.
> Tucson Arizona 85718
> USA
> 
> Tel: 520-696-1709
> Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Website: <http://www.sundialsculptures.com>
> 
> 
> -



    Dr. Frans W. Maes
    Dept. of Animal Physiology
    University of Groningen
    P.O. Box 14                Tel.  : +31-50-3632357
    9750 AA Haren              Fax   : +31-50-3635205
    The Netherlands            E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
============================================================
-

Reply via email to