- Original Message -
From: Frank King frank.k...@cl.cam.ac.uk
To: Reinhold Kriegler reinhold.krieg...@gmx.de
Cc: sund...@rrz.uni-koeln.de
Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2011 12:20 PM
Subject: Re: AW: Year-round day saving time
Dear Reinhold,
snip
Oh. One more thing. Mike says...
If we
-
From: sundial-boun...@uni-koeln.de [mailto:sundial-boun...@uni-koeln.de] On
Behalf Of Frank King
Sent: 27 March 2011 12:20
To: Reinhold Kriegler
Cc: sund...@rrz.uni-koeln.de
Subject: Re: AW: Year-round day saving time
Dear Reinhold,
I see you are trying to provoke me...
Frank
If we ignore refraction effects, everywhere gets an average of 12 hours per day
with the sun above the horizon, doesn’t it?
So how can we get 17% more by changing the clocks.
Want more time in the sun? Get up earlier!
I’m losing a lot of my potential time in the sun today sitting indoors
On 27/03/2011 11:13, Mike Shaw wrote:
If we ignore refraction effects, everywhere gets an average of 12
hours per day with the sun above the horizon, doesn't it?
So how can we get 17% more by changing the clocks.
Want more time in the sun? Get up earlier!
I'm losing a lot of my potential time
Dear Reinhold,
I see you are trying to provoke me...
Frank King will tell us perhaps a nice
sounding Latin expression?!
This is the worst day of the year for me,
truly...
Dies irae, dies illa...
The day of wrath, that day... :-)
Or, perhaps, you seek my thoughts on whoever
first
[mailto:sundial-boun...@uni-koeln.de] On
Behalf Of Frank King
Sent: 27 March 2011 12:20
To: Reinhold Kriegler
Cc: sund...@rrz.uni-koeln.de
Subject: Re: AW: Year-round day saving time
Dear Reinhold,
I see you are trying to provoke me...
Frank King will tell us perhaps a nice sounding Latin
