RE: Another Sundial with VI at Midday...

2010-10-12 Thread The Thurstons
Dear Frank,

I have only just got around to reading your account of the Margaret Stanier
Memorial Dial which I downloaded a couple of weeks ago so I hope you will
treat this response as better late than never. 

Congratulations on implementing a novel dialling concept in such a beautiful
dial. Your account of the evolution and manufacture of the dial was a
delight to read and I am surprised that it has not resulted in more
widespread acclaim from this list. I must assume that your readers are
dumbfounded. My only comment is that your omission of the sunrise/sunset
hours should be regarded as of no practical disadvantage since the timings
of these phenomena are evident to the observer without the need for a dial.

You asked to be alerted to typos and I think that you might have transposed
the standard deviation values for R1 and R2 in the last sentence of the
penultimate paragraph on page 30.

Thank you for providing us with such a comprehensive and thought-provoking
account of your creation.

Best Wishes,

Geoff

-Original Message-
From: sundial-boun...@uni-koeln.de [mailto:sundial-boun...@uni-koeln.de] On
Behalf Of Frank King
Sent: 26 September 2010 17:18
To: sundial
Subject: Another Sundial with VI at Midday...

Dear All,

The beer-glass sundial spotted by Mike Cowham brought on a panic attack.
More strictly, it was his comment that caused alarm...

 The glass acts as the gnomon but the real horror ...
 midday was at VI. 

Maybe every reader should pour a glass of beer (or something stronger)
before reading any further.

I have just inaugurated my latest creation and, guess what, midday is at VI.

Should I spend my declining years designing
sundials for garden centres?

Make sure you have a first-aider to hand and take a look at:

  http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/users/fhk1/Newnham/FHK+Dial.jpg

I hope, by the way, that you like my outfit.  I chose to wear British
Sundial Society-approved colour-coordinated yellow for the occasion.

This sundial is a memorial tribute, by Newnham College, Cambridge, to
Margaret Stanier, lately Editor of the BSS Bulletin.

About 10 years ago, Margaret told me how important mass dials were so I
thought I would come up with a design which is (ever so loosely) based on a
24-line mass dial.

My goal was impossible but I am not easily
put off...

I wanted an unequal-hours sundial where the time is indicated by the
direction of the shadow of a rod gnomon.  [I didn't want to use a nodus and
its point-indicating shadow.]

Is there a best approximation?

Newnham College asked for a account written for technically-minded academics
who know nothing about sundials.  You can see this, and numerous
photographs,
at:

  http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/users/fhk1/Newnham/write-up.pdf

You will even see that this dial incorporates a few dialling jokes :-)

Here I proffer some acknowledgements to:

  Margaret Stanier for the inspiration.

  Frans Maes and many others for making me think
 about the Braunschweig dials.

  Geoff Thurston for making me think about just
 what is meant by best-fit when
 making compromises.

  Gianni Ferrari for explaining that the hour-lines
 on this design don't have great
 gnomonic meaning.

Not many unequal-hours sundials get made these days so, if you think it is a
sundial at all, make the most of this one :-)

Please let me know of all the typos that you spot.
I haven't handed the account to the College yet!

Now what was that beer that Mike was telling us about?

Frank H. King
Cambridge, U.K.

---
https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial

---
https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial



Light Based Geolocation

2010-10-12 Thread Brooke Clarke
Hi:

This is a little off topic, but bears a strong relation to sundials.

After watching a TED talk on taging of tuna with sensors that determined 
the Lat and Lon of the fish based on the length of a day and the time of 
sunrise and sunset I found this method is called Light Based 
Geolocation.  I'd like to learn more about what data the tags store and 
how smart they are.  For example is there a micro controller in the tag 
that make computations or is it just a data logger?

-- 
Have Fun,

Brooke Clarke
http://www.PRC68.com

---
https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial



Re: Light Based Geolocation

2010-10-12 Thread Chris Lusby Taylor
In a similar vein, it's just been on the news in the UK that we've learned
more about the migration of nightingales from one tagged individual than all
previous studies put together. The bird's tag recorded only the time and
date of nightfall and daybreak. From this the route from England to Africa
via Gibraltar was deduced.
See
http://dearkitty.blogsome.com/2010/06/29/nightingale-migration-discoveries/
Apparently, the tags were developed for tracking albatrosses. They can't
transmit the data, but must be recovered. So the processing power on board
would seem to be pretty primitive.
Birds, I can understand, but I'm surprised it works for fish. Perhaps tuna
never dive too deep.

Chris Lusby Taylor


- Original Message - 
From: Brooke Clarke brooke95...@att.net
To: 'sundial' sund...@rrz.uni-koeln.de
Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2010 5:54 PM
Subject: Light Based Geolocation


 Hi:

 This is a little off topic, but bears a strong relation to sundials.

 After watching a TED talk on taging of tuna with sensors that determined
 the Lat and Lon of the fish based on the length of a day and the time of
 sunrise and sunset I found this method is called Light Based
 Geolocation.  I'd like to learn more about what data the tags store and
 how smart they are.  For example is there a micro controller in the tag
 that make computations or is it just a data logger?

 -- 
 Have Fun,

 Brooke Clarke
 http://www.PRC68.com

 ---
 https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial


---
https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial



Re: Light Based Geolocation

2010-10-12 Thread Luke Coletti

Hi Brooke,

Here's a description of a light based geolocation capable tag.

http://www.wildlifecomputers.com/Products.aspx?ID=20

Geolocation using light-level Wildlife Computers has developed software, 
WC-GPE, that calculates daily longitude and latitude from recorded light 
level curves. Longitude accuracy can be as good as ±0.5 degrees. 
Latitude accuracy depends upon both the latitude and time of the year. 
Best accuracies (±1 degree) are achieved at high latitudes near the 
solstices, and worst occur near the equator near the equinoxes (±10 
degrees, where and when latitude can be calculated).

A much more detailed explanation of the computation is in the appendix 
of their users manual.

http://www.wildlifecomputers.com/Downloads/Documentation/WC-GPE%20Suite%20Manual.pdf

This solar based method is typically used if the animal is not likely to 
surface often and or there is a power budget concern. What's surprising 
is that this method can work, based on water clarity, down to 200m+ 
(limits of the euphotic zone).

http://nicholelyons.tripod.com/

Location tags requiring higher accuracy are now using this method:

http://www.wildtracker.com/fastloc.htm

Luke


On 10/12/2010 9:54 AM, Brooke Clarke wrote:
 Hi:

 This is a little off topic, but bears a strong relation to sundials.

 After watching a TED talk on taging of tuna with sensors that determined
 the Lat and Lon of the fish based on the length of a day and the time of
 sunrise and sunset I found this method is called Light Based
 Geolocation.  I'd like to learn more about what data the tags store and
 how smart they are.  For example is there a micro controller in the tag
 that make computations or is it just a data logger?

---
https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial



Re: Light Based Geolocation

2010-10-12 Thread Brent
So I am marooned on a island with nothing but I might be able to 
determine a few things that I could write on a message in a bottle 
that would help my rescuers determine my exact location.

By careful sunrise observation I could determine the solstices.
Now I have a calendar.

I know dawn to dawn is 24 hours so I could make a clock with a washed 
up bottle filled with sand and measure/mark what comes out in one day.

Then I could cut that sand in half for 12 hours and half again for 6 
hours and half again for 3 hours and then thirds for one hour.
Now I have an hour clock.

Now I can measure the hours of daylight from dawn to dusk on the 
solstice and send that in the bottle and my rescuers will be able to 
determine my latitude and longitude.

Of course I would have to say northern or southern solstice but that's 
easy because we know the sun rises in the east.

Would this be enough information?

thanks again;
brent

---
https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial



Re: Light Based Geolocation

2010-10-12 Thread Roger W. Sinnott
Brent,

I think you could determine your latitude this way, but not your longitude. 
For the longitude, you would need some way to relate your local sunrises and 
sunsets to the local time at some known longitude, such as that of 
Greenwich.

In other words, the geolocation tagging gadget must carry a time-of-day 
clock from a known longitude. This is the same as the age-old longitude 
problem that all mariners faced.

   -- Roger


- Original Message - 
From: Brent bren...@verizon.net
To: Sundial List sund...@rrz.uni-koeln.de
Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2010 5:05 PM
Subject: Re: Light Based Geolocation


 So I am marooned on a island with nothing but I might be able to
 determine a few things that I could write on a message in a bottle
 that would help my rescuers determine my exact location.

 By careful sunrise observation I could determine the solstices.
 Now I have a calendar.

 I know dawn to dawn is 24 hours so I could make a clock with a washed
 up bottle filled with sand and measure/mark what comes out in one day.

 Then I could cut that sand in half for 12 hours and half again for 6
 hours and half again for 3 hours and then thirds for one hour.
 Now I have an hour clock.

 Now I can measure the hours of daylight from dawn to dusk on the
 solstice and send that in the bottle and my rescuers will be able to
 determine my latitude and longitude.

 Of course I would have to say northern or southern solstice but that's
 easy because we know the sun rises in the east.

 Would this be enough information?

 thanks again;
 brent

 ---
 https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial

 

---
https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial



Re: Light Based Geolocation

2010-10-12 Thread Brent
The way I understand the geolocation device is that dawn rises at the 
same time along different longitudes. If you know what time sunrise is 
and how long the day is on a particular day you know your latitude as 
well as your longitude.

On a deserted island, the time of sunrise is the number of hours 
before high solar noonand maybe half way between sunrise and sunset.

This manual seems to indicate these concepts:
http://www.wildlifecomputers.com/Downloads/Documentation/WC-GPE%20Suite%20Manual.pdf

It's because of the tilt of the earth?


Roger W. Sinnott wrote:
 Brent,
 
 I think you could determine your latitude this way, but not your longitude. 
 For the longitude, you would need some way to relate your local sunrises and 
 sunsets to the local time at some known longitude, such as that of 
 Greenwich.
 
 In other words, the geolocation tagging gadget must carry a time-of-day 
 clock from a known longitude. This is the same as the age-old longitude 
 problem that all mariners faced.
 
-- Roger
 
 
 - Original Message - 
 From: Brent bren...@verizon.net
 To: Sundial List sund...@rrz.uni-koeln.de
 Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2010 5:05 PM
 Subject: Re: Light Based Geolocation
 
 
 
So I am marooned on a island with nothing but I might be able to
determine a few things that I could write on a message in a bottle
that would help my rescuers determine my exact location.

By careful sunrise observation I could determine the solstices.
Now I have a calendar.

I know dawn to dawn is 24 hours so I could make a clock with a washed
up bottle filled with sand and measure/mark what comes out in one day.

Then I could cut that sand in half for 12 hours and half again for 6
hours and half again for 3 hours and then thirds for one hour.
Now I have an hour clock.

Now I can measure the hours of daylight from dawn to dusk on the
solstice and send that in the bottle and my rescuers will be able to
determine my latitude and longitude.

Of course I would have to say northern or southern solstice but that's
easy because we know the sun rises in the east.

Would this be enough information?

thanks again;
brent

---
https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial


 
 
 ---
 https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial
 
 

---
https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial



Re: Light Based Geolocation

2010-10-12 Thread Roger Bailey
Hi Brent,

Would that it were that simple. Longitude still requires an absolute, not 
relative time fix. You still need to know the time and longitude from 
Greenwich. Sunrise and noon are relative to local time. Discovering 
longitude for many years perplexed astronomers and navigators to the point 
of insanity. Dava Sobel's book Longitude is a great read.

Roger Bailey
--
From: Brent bren...@verizon.net
Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2010 2:59 PM
To: Roger W. Sinnott rsinn...@post.harvard.edu; Sundial List 
sund...@rrz.uni-koeln.de
Subject: Re: Light Based Geolocation

 The way I understand the geolocation device is that dawn rises at the
 same time along different longitudes. If you know what time sunrise is
 and how long the day is on a particular day you know your latitude as
 well as your longitude.

 On a deserted island, the time of sunrise is the number of hours
 before high solar noonand maybe half way between sunrise and sunset.

 This manual seems to indicate these concepts:
 http://www.wildlifecomputers.com/Downloads/Documentation/WC-GPE%20Suite%20Manual.pdf

 It's because of the tilt of the earth?


 Roger W. Sinnott wrote:
 Brent,

 I think you could determine your latitude this way, but not your 
 longitude.
 For the longitude, you would need some way to relate your local sunrises 
 and
 sunsets to the local time at some known longitude, such as that of
 Greenwich.

 In other words, the geolocation tagging gadget must carry a time-of-day
 clock from a known longitude. This is the same as the age-old longitude
 problem that all mariners faced.

-- Roger


 - Original Message - 
 From: Brent bren...@verizon.net
 To: Sundial List sund...@rrz.uni-koeln.de
 Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2010 5:05 PM
 Subject: Re: Light Based Geolocation



So I am marooned on a island with nothing but I might be able to
determine a few things that I could write on a message in a bottle
that would help my rescuers determine my exact location.

By careful sunrise observation I could determine the solstices.
Now I have a calendar.

I know dawn to dawn is 24 hours so I could make a clock with a washed
up bottle filled with sand and measure/mark what comes out in one day.

Then I could cut that sand in half for 12 hours and half again for 6
hours and half again for 3 hours and then thirds for one hour.
Now I have an hour clock.

Now I can measure the hours of daylight from dawn to dusk on the
solstice and send that in the bottle and my rescuers will be able to
determine my latitude and longitude.

Of course I would have to say northern or southern solstice but that's
easy because we know the sun rises in the east.

Would this be enough information?

thanks again;
brent

---
https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial




 ---
 https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial



 ---
 https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial
 
---
https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial



Re: Light Based Geolocation

2010-10-12 Thread Brooke Clarke
Hi Bailey:

I live in Ukiah, California where one of the five Latitude observatories 
(all at 39 deg 08 min North) operated for almost 100 years starting 
around 1899.  It turns out that finding the Latitude was a much harder 
problem to solve than finding the longitude.
http://www.prc68.com/I/UkiahObs.shtml

Have Fun,

Brooke Clarke
http://www.PRC68.com


Roger Bailey wrote:
 Hi Brent,

 Would that it were that simple. Longitude still requires an absolute, not
 relative time fix. You still need to know the time and longitude from
 Greenwich. Sunrise and noon are relative to local time. Discovering
 longitude for many years perplexed astronomers and navigators to the point
 of insanity. Dava Sobel's book Longitude is a great read.

 Roger Bailey
 --
 From: Brentbren...@verizon.net
 Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2010 2:59 PM
 To: Roger W. Sinnottrsinn...@post.harvard.edu; Sundial List
 sund...@rrz.uni-koeln.de
 Subject: Re: Light Based Geolocation


 The way I understand the geolocation device is that dawn rises at the
 same time along different longitudes. If you know what time sunrise is
 and how long the day is on a particular day you know your latitude as
 well as your longitude.

 On a deserted island, the time of sunrise is the number of hours
 before high solar noonand maybe half way between sunrise and sunset.

 This manual seems to indicate these concepts:
 http://www.wildlifecomputers.com/Downloads/Documentation/WC-GPE%20Suite%20Manual.pdf

 It's because of the tilt of the earth?


 Roger W. Sinnott wrote:
  
 Brent,

 I think you could determine your latitude this way, but not your
 longitude.
 For the longitude, you would need some way to relate your local sunrises
 and
 sunsets to the local time at some known longitude, such as that of
 Greenwich.

 In other words, the geolocation tagging gadget must carry a time-of-day
 clock from a known longitude. This is the same as the age-old longitude
 problem that all mariners faced.

 -- Roger


 - Original Message -
 From: Brentbren...@verizon.net
 To: Sundial Listsund...@rrz.uni-koeln.de
 Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2010 5:05 PM
 Subject: Re: Light Based Geolocation




 So I am marooned on a island with nothing but I might be able to
 determine a few things that I could write on a message in a bottle
 that would help my rescuers determine my exact location.

 By careful sunrise observation I could determine the solstices.
 Now I have a calendar.

 I know dawn to dawn is 24 hours so I could make a clock with a washed
 up bottle filled with sand and measure/mark what comes out in one day.

 Then I could cut that sand in half for 12 hours and half again for 6
 hours and half again for 3 hours and then thirds for one hour.
 Now I have an hour clock.

 Now I can measure the hours of daylight from dawn to dusk on the
 solstice and send that in the bottle and my rescuers will be able to
 determine my latitude and longitude.

 Of course I would have to say northern or southern solstice but that's
 easy because we know the sun rises in the east.

 Would this be enough information?

 thanks again;
 brent

 ---
 https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial


  

 ---
 https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial



 ---
 https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial

  
 ---
 https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial





-- 
Have Fun,

Brooke Clarke
http://www.PRC68.com

---
https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial