[SunRay-Users] what i would love to see

2006-02-17 Thread flow
since i'm not up to complex administration and configuration anymore, i'd love to have: a DVD, with on it a vmware image of a working secure OS, pre-installed with SRSS 3.1 beta, patched and auto patching, (optionally withan open source internet cafe style access control software

[SunRay-Users] USB disks

2006-02-17 Thread Matthias Ernst
We are using Sunray 3.0 with patch 118979-01 on Solaris 9 / Sparc. In /var/opt/SUNWut/log/messages I find many error messages of the form Feb 17 13:45:18 xxx 0x0.0x10bb0359 0:3:ba:b0:4:15 USB: ohci_parse_error: Stall Feb 17 13:45:18 xxx 0x0.0x10bb0359 0:3:ba:b0:4:15 USB: ohci_control_write:

Re: [SunRay-Users] what i would love to see

2006-02-17 Thread Leigh Porter
I'll do that for you. £1500 per copy. Solaris or Linux. -- Leigh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: since i'm not up to complex administration and configuration anymore, i'd love to have: a DVD, with on it a vmware image of a working secure OS, pre-installed with SRSS 3.1 beta, patched and auto

RE: [SunRay-Users] USB disks

2006-02-17 Thread Ashley W
From: Matthias Ernst [EMAIL PROTECTED] We are using Sunray 3.0 with patch 118979-01 on Solaris 9 / Sparc. In /var/opt/SUNWut/log/messages I find many error messages of the form Feb 17 13:45:18 xxx 0x0.0x10bb0359 0:3:ba:b0:4:15 USB: ohci_parse_error: Stall Feb 17 13:45:18 xxx 0x0.0x10bb0359

Re: [SunRay-Users] SRS 3.1

2006-02-17 Thread Paul Matthews
Craig, I read in another blog that if you need a patch then that is classed as support and you would need to pay. Do you know if that is correct Cheers Paul Craig Bender wrote: Actually Mark is correct the software is now free and you are free to use. If you want support, you'll have to

[SunRay-Users] model numbers question again

2006-02-17 Thread Paul Matthews
Hi, I know from earlier posts that Sun Ray 1 model numbers 380-0299-06 and below had problems - I think to do with capacitors. I've been offered some with model number 380-0299 and no prefix. Should I assume these are the very first ones and hence to be avoided Cheers Paul

Re: [SunRay-Users] video support for SunRay

2006-02-17 Thread Jerry K
Hello Chris, I'm sorry to jump into your conversation with someone else, but in reading into your message, you obviously have some neat goodies coming down the line for us in the future. Without violating any Sun NDA's, can you share any details, or just throw us some crumbs?? Thanks,

Re: [SunRay-Users] model numbers question again

2006-02-17 Thread Dave Hwang
On Fri, 2006-02-17 at 14:50, Paul Matthews wrote: Hi, I know from earlier posts that Sun Ray 1 model numbers 380-0299-06 and below had problems - I think to do with capacitors. I've been offered some with model number 380-0299 and no prefix. Should I assume these are the very first ones

Re: [SunRay-Users] model numbers question again

2006-02-17 Thread Craig Bender
If they are still alive, then they are probably good ones. Paul Matthews wrote: Hi, I know from earlier posts that Sun Ray 1 model numbers 380-0299-06 and below had problems - I think to do with capacitors. I've been offered some with model number 380-0299 and no prefix. Should I assume

[SunRay-Users] New SR/SGD Group Blog

2006-02-17 Thread Craig Bender
Hi folks, Just wanted to let you know that I've started a new group blog (sorry only Sun folks). There's some interesting folks who've signed up, even though only two of us have published thus far. I'm even trying to bribe...er...get OttoM to join. You can check it out here:

Re: [SunRay-Users] model numbers question again

2006-02-17 Thread Marcus Young
I assume they are electrolytics and therefore polarised? Make sure they are in the right way - or bang! On Fri, 17 Feb 2006 15:38:26 -0800, Dave Hwang wrote On Fri, 2006-02-17 at 14:50, Paul Matthews wrote: Hi, I know from earlier posts that Sun Ray 1 model numbers 380-0299-06 and below