Re: [SunRay-Users] Sun Ray WAN article

2006-03-01 Thread LOEWENTHAL Simon
Dear all, Quickie Q here: I have to add a DTU in a remote office on a different subnet to the sunray server. A Cisco router will hand out the DHCP information. I think that it will have to hand out an IP(s) for the DTU to know how to download new firmware and authenticate to the Sun Ray serv

Re: [SunRay-Users] Configuring SRSS-3.1

2006-03-01 Thread Craig Bender
You're right, my apologies. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 01 Mar 2006 14:25:36 -0800 Craig Bender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: How can that be a srss bug. hostname.* files are for hostnames only. Sun documentation states that /etc/hostname.* file can have either an IP address or a name as

Re: [SunRay-Users] Configuring SRSS-3.1

2006-03-01 Thread Lars Tunkrans
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sun documentation states that /etc/hostname.* file can have either an IP address or a name associated with that interface. If SRSS cannot cope with IP addresses, it's a bug. True particulary if you are going to do some advanced network setup like IPMP -

Re: [SunRay-Users] Configuring SRSS-3.1

2006-03-01 Thread {Darkavich}
It also can't cope with hostname.domain or in my case IPMP entries. Been complaining about that since 1.3. We really need to get that fixed ;-) We should all open bug reports at the same time so maybe it will get patched. Thanks, -Steve On Mar 1, 2006, at 2:27 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED

[SunRay-Users] list of processes

2006-03-01 Thread {Darkavich}
I had a list of procs that are critical to the sunray running, but that was back in 2.x days Does anyone have a list of the process names that should always be running on your host? Thanks, -Steve ___ SunRay-Users mailing list SunRay-Users

Re: [SunRay-Users] Configuring SRSS-3.1

2006-03-01 Thread segv
On Wed, 01 Mar 2006 14:25:36 -0800 Craig Bender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > How can that be a srss bug. hostname.* files are for hostnames only. Sun documentation states that /etc/hostname.* file can have either an IP address or a name associated with that interface. If SRSS cannot cope with I

Re: [SunRay-Users] Configuring SRSS-3.1

2006-03-01 Thread Craig Bender
How can that be a srss bug. hostname.* files are for hostnames only. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 01 Mar 2006 15:33:17 -0500 Brad Lackey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: This error usually means that utadm is not able to find the server's public interface. Double check your /etc/hostname.* and

Re: [SunRay-Users] Configuring SRSS-3.1

2006-03-01 Thread segv
On Wed, 01 Mar 2006 15:33:17 -0500 Brad Lackey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This error usually means that utadm is not > able to find the server's public interface. > > Double check your /etc/hostname.* and /etc/hosts entries. OK, the problem was my /etc/hostname.qfe0 contained the actual IP add

Re: [SunRay-Users] Configuring SRSS-3.1

2006-03-01 Thread Brad Lackey
This error usually means that utadm is not able to find the server's public interface. Double check your /etc/hostname.* and /etc/hosts entries. BTW, Is your Sun Ray server the router on that subnet as well? If not then you need to input the correct router. Brad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Re: [SunRay-Users] Configuring SRSS-3.1

2006-03-01 Thread ottomeister
"Craig Bender" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Actually it configures vendor class options in DHCP, but not > addresses, subnet, etc. 'utadm -A' will do all of that, if you tell it to. '-A' can do almost everything that '-a' can do. The distinction is that '-a' tells SRSS that you're configuring a

Re: [SunRay-Users] Configuring SRSS-3.1

2006-03-01 Thread segv
On Wed, 01 Mar 2006 19:25:14 + [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > The original poster needs to sit down and figure out how he's going > to arrange for the Sun Ray to get onto the network and be put into > contact with its server. Chapter 7 of the SRSS Admin Guide goes > into great detail on the var

Re: [SunRay-Users] Configuring SRSS-3.1

2006-03-01 Thread Bill Holzapfel
The utadm -A will turn on DHCP options only for the SunRay specific stuff. Or as Craig suggested, you could modify your isc-dhcpd configuration. -Bill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 01 Mar 2006 13:59:27 -0500 Brad Lackey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: You need to do a utadm -A subnet wher

Re: [SunRay-Users] Configuring SRSS-3.1

2006-03-01 Thread ottomeister
"Brad Lackey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You need to do a utadm -A subnet You only need to do that if you want the Sun Ray server to provide DHCP data to the Sun Ray. Otherwise 'utadm -L on' is sufficient. > No you shouldn't need to touch the Xservers files. Right, SRSS will manage the Xserve

Re: [SunRay-Users] Configuring SRSS-3.1

2006-03-01 Thread Craig Bender
Actually it configures vendor class options in DHCP, but not addresses, subnet, etc. But you don't need that (it's a good idea for a variety of reasons though), -L on is typically fine. But you need to tell the Sun Ray how to get there. Try option 49. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 01 M

Re: [SunRay-Users] Configuring SRSS-3.1

2006-03-01 Thread Brad Lackey
Nope... you're right... I missed that in quickly reading your post... Like Craig Said, Option 49 is probably your quickest bet... Point it to you SRSS server, and you'll be off and running. This won't facilitate any automatic firmware upgrading/etc, but it will get the up and running. Once y

Re: [SunRay-Users] Video Solution: XVideo?

2006-03-01 Thread ottomeister
"Jimmy Fox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > First, how does [the X11 XVideo extension] work? Like any other X extension it expands the set of requests that the X server understands. Applications that know about the extension can detect its presence and can use the additional requests it provides.

Re: [SunRay-Users] Configuring SRSS-3.1

2006-03-01 Thread segv
On Wed, 01 Mar 2006 13:59:27 -0500 Brad Lackey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You need to do a utadm -A subnet > > where subnet is the subnet of the interface of the SRSS server on which > the Sun Rays are going to connect. > > utadm -A 192.168.0.0 > > It will do all of the configuration for you

Re: [SunRay-Users] Configuring SRSS-3.1

2006-03-01 Thread Brad Lackey
You need to do a utadm -A subnet where subnet is the subnet of the interface of the SRSS server on which the Sun Rays are going to connect. utadm -A 192.168.0.0 It will do all of the configuration for you... No you shouldn't need to touch the Xservers files. Brad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Re: [SunRay-Users] Configuring SRSS-3.1

2006-03-01 Thread Craig Bender
You need to tell the Sun Rays where to go. Are there routers in between the Sun Ray and the Sun Ray Server? What you've done so far is only going to work if they are on the same segment and the Sun Ray will exhaust other methods and find it via broadcast. If you want a quick way, put an arra

[SunRay-Users] Configuring SRSS-3.1

2006-03-01 Thread segv
Hi, could anyone please give me some hints on how to configure Sun Ray Server Software. I'm trying to set it up on shared LAN. I installed the software, then rebooted the server, then ran 'utconfig', followed by 'utadm -L on' and then 'utrestart'. I'm not using Sun dhcpd, but instead isc-dhcpd i

[SunRay-Users] Sun Ray User Map

2006-03-01 Thread Craig Bender
Sun Ray users sign up here (SGD/Tarantella users too!) http://www.frappr.com/sunraysgd ___ SunRay-Users mailing list SunRay-Users@filibeto.org http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users

RE: [SunRay-Users] USB mouse

2006-03-01 Thread David P. Roberts
I have used the logitech mx310 with no problems. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2006 9:05 AM > To: sunray-users@filibeto.org > Subject: Re: [SunRay-Users] USB mouse > > > On Wed, 01 Mar 2

Re: [SunRay-Users] USB mouse

2006-03-01 Thread John Tucker
All of the mice I've tried work but with some of the wheel mice the wheel isn't recognized. I haven't been able to get any of the extra buttons on the 'many buttoned' mice to work Logitech LX7 wireless works, scroller works Logitech MX500 works, scroller works Microsoft Trackball explorer works

Re: [SunRay-Users] USB mouse

2006-03-01 Thread segv
On Wed, 01 Mar 2006 07:55:12 -0800 Craig Bender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Most USB Keyboards and mice work just fine. Just plug it in a give it a > shot. Well I'd have to buy one first to give it a shot :-) But everyone says it should work, so it's good news.

Re: [SunRay-Users] USB mouse

2006-03-01 Thread Blaine Hulbert
Most any USB mouse has worked for me. I prefer a scroll mouse. > Hi, I have Sun USB keyboard for Sun Ray, but no mouse. Will any USB mouse > work, or does it have to be from Sun? > ___ > SunRay-Users mailing list > SunRay-Users@filibeto.org > http://w

Re: [SunRay-Users] USB mouse

2006-03-01 Thread Brad Lackey
Any HID compliant USB mouse should work just fine... Some newer mince are only recognized with the 3.1 firmware. Brad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I have Sun USB keyboard for Sun Ray, but no mouse. Will any USB mouse work, or does it have to be from Sun? __

Re: [SunRay-Users] USB mouse

2006-03-01 Thread Craig Bender
Most USB Keyboards and mice work just fine. Just plug it in a give it a shot. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I have Sun USB keyboard for Sun Ray, but no mouse. Will any USB mouse work, or does it have to be from Sun? ___ SunRay-Users mailing list SunR

[SunRay-Users] USB mouse

2006-03-01 Thread segv
Hi, I have Sun USB keyboard for Sun Ray, but no mouse. Will any USB mouse work, or does it have to be from Sun? ___ SunRay-Users mailing list SunRay-Users@filibeto.org http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users