Re: [SunRay-Users] 26D problems SRSS 5.1

2011-02-25 Thread Detlev Habicht
Hi all, we tried to modify gdm-2.16.0-56.el5.src.rpm (Red Hat) settings MAX_CONNECTIONS to 100. It doesn't work. Maybe we have done something wrong, but when our 2 server FOG were online again, the SunRays got no login screens. So we stopped this experiment. When we start the FOG again with

Re: [SunRay-Users] 26D problems SRSS 5.1

2011-02-16 Thread Detlev Habicht
I setup a service request at Red Hat. This is the answer: Red Hta do not have gdm version with MAX_CONNECTIONS set to 100. You may try using third party gdm or recompiling the gdm from source after changes the MAX_CONNECTIONS values in source code. But please note that as per Red hat

Re: [SunRay-Users] 26D problems SRSS 5.1

2011-02-16 Thread Karl Rossing
I'm testing with fedora 14 for the time being. I tried replacing the gdm with the one provided with the SRS install but that did not work well. I have to look into why a bit more. Karl On 02/16/11 02:10, Detlev Habicht wrote: I setup a service request at Red Hat. This is the answer: Red

Re: [SunRay-Users] 26D problems SRSS 5.1

2011-02-15 Thread Karl Rossing
On 02/08/11 09:24, Meik Hellmund wrote: in Debian you just do: apt-get build-dep gdm(install all libraries etc neccessary for building gdm) apt-get source gdm (get the source) cd gdm-2.20.11 vi daemon/gdm-net.c (change the parameter) dpkg-buildpackage -b -uc

Re: [SunRay-Users] 26D problems SRSS 5.1

2011-02-11 Thread Carsten John
On 02/08/11 16:24, Meik Hellmund wrote: On Tue, 8 Feb 2011 15:58:43 +0100 Detlev Habicht habi...@ims.uni-hannover.de wrote: We have to recompile gdmdynamic? Yes, in fact all of gdm Or is there a config file somewhere in the system? there is a comment in daemon/gdm-net.c: this

Re: [SunRay-Users] 26D problems SRSS 5.1

2011-02-09 Thread Detlev Habicht
Hello again, i am a little bit confused. Maybe i have made a mistake. And maybe a second time :-} Normally i install the gdm from Sun. Maybe i have forgotten this the last time. So i find now from Red Hat this: gdm-2.16.0-56.el5 Sun has this: gdm-2.16.7-2.1_01.sunray.x86_64.rpm Maybe some of

Re: [SunRay-Users] 26D problems SRSS 5.1

2011-02-09 Thread Bob Doolittle
You should not normally install the version of gdm included with the product manually. That version will be installed automatically by the installer *if appropriate*. I believe the only appropriate situation for installing that version is on SLES 10, which had a significantly downrev version

Re: [SunRay-Users] 26D problems SRSS 5.1

2011-02-08 Thread Meik Hellmund
On Fri, 04 Feb 2011 17:44:20 +0100 Carsten John cj...@mpi-bremen.de wrote: Hi folks, we are still having problems. What I found out in the meantime is that definitely gdm is the problem. It works for about a day (or a few days?). Then suddenly gdm does not provide login service any

Re: [SunRay-Users] 26D problems SRSS 5.1

2011-02-08 Thread Detlev Habicht
We have to recompile gdmdynamic? Or is there a config file somewhere in the system? Detlev P.S.: I am using Red Hat. Am 08.02.2011 um 15:35 schrieb Meik Hellmund: On Fri, 04 Feb 2011 17:44:20 +0100 Carsten John cj...@mpi-bremen.de wrote: Hi folks, we are still having problems. What

Re: [SunRay-Users] 26D problems SRSS 5.1

2011-02-08 Thread Meik Hellmund
On Tue, 8 Feb 2011 15:58:43 +0100 Detlev Habicht habi...@ims.uni-hannover.de wrote: We have to recompile gdmdynamic? Yes, in fact all of gdm Or is there a config file somewhere in the system? there is a comment in daemon/gdm-net.c: this should be configurable ..but it seems nobody

Re: [SunRay-Users] 26D problems SRSS 5.1

2011-02-07 Thread Detlev Habicht
Hello, we have similar problems and maybe the same. I can also see the gdm user for example. Mostly we see this problem when a user tries to login via smartcard or want to go to another terminal (with the smartcard). Sometimes this problem appears for a smartcard and so the problem goes with

Re: [SunRay-Users] 26D problems SRSS 5.1

2011-02-06 Thread Carsten John
On 02/04/2011 06:28 PM, Bob Doolittle wrote: Can you please share the output of gdmflexiserver --command VERSION? -Bob Hi Bob, root@capella: ~ # gdmflexiserver --command VERSION GDM 2.20.10 thx Carsten ___ SunRay-Users mailing list

[SunRay-Users] 26D problems SRSS 5.1

2011-02-04 Thread Carsten John
Hi folks, we are still having problems. What I found out in the meantime is that definitely gdm is the problem. It works for about a day (or a few days?). Then suddenly gdm does not provide login service any more, resulting the DTUs to hang in 26D. Obviously gdmdynamic stops communication with

Re: [SunRay-Users] 26D problems SRSS 5.1

2011-02-04 Thread Bob Doolittle
Can you please share the output of gdmflexiserver --command VERSION? -Bob On 02/04/11 11:44, Carsten John wrote: Hi folks, we are still having problems. What I found out in the meantime is that definitely gdm is the problem. It works for about a day (or a few days?). Then suddenly gdm does

[SunRay-Users] 26D problems SRSS 5.1

2011-01-19 Thread Carsten John
Hi everybody, we are experiencing serious problems after upgrading our SunRay servers to SRSS 5.1. We are running on Ubuntu 10.4 LTS (I know it's unsupported) DTUs are all SunRay 2FS (~ 50 in total), matching FW that came with SRSS 5.1 installed. The DTUs are connected via dedicated subnet.

Re: [SunRay-Users] 26D problems SRSS 5.1

2011-01-19 Thread Carl Holzhauer
...@filibeto.org [mailto:sunray-users-boun...@filibeto.org] On Behalf Of Carsten John Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2011 5:46 AM To: sunray-users@filibeto.org Subject: [SunRay-Users] 26D problems SRSS 5.1 Hi everybody, we are experiencing serious problems after upgrading our SunRay servers to SRSS

Re: [SunRay-Users] 26D problems SRSS 5.1

2011-01-19 Thread Carsten John
On 01/19/11 15:13, Carl Holzhauer wrote: We've had this happen randomly, but it doesn't sound like it's as bad as you have it. When it happens, I just go into the web console and kill the session. The user has to unplug power from the DTU, but after that, it functions normally

Re: [SunRay-Users] 26D problems SRSS 5.1

2011-01-19 Thread Carsten John
Hi everybody, in the meantime I found out, that no new logins are possible even with a newly connected DTU (so there are no hanging sessions involved). The DTU that was never connected after the last reboot also remains in 26D when connected. thx Carsten

Re: [SunRay-Users] 26D problems SRSS 5.1

2011-01-19 Thread Bob Doolittle
A few things to check: - Does gdmdynamic -l list the same set of displays as utsession -p? - Do you see an Xnewt process for every display in gdmdynamic -l? -Bob On 01/19/11 10:34, Carsten John wrote: Hi everybody, in the meantime I found out, that no new logins are possible even with a newly

Re: [SunRay-Users] 26D problems SRSS 5.1

2011-01-19 Thread Elmar Prüße
On 01/19/2011 05:38 PM, Bob Doolittle wrote: A few things to check: - Does gdmdynamic -l list the same set of displays as utsession -p? Not really... Server 1: 23 displays occur in both outputs, 4 are unique to gdmdynamic and 17 to utsession. Server 2: 18 displays occur in both outputs, 5

Re: [SunRay-Users] 26D problems SRSS 5.1

2011-01-19 Thread Bob Doolittle
On 01/19/11 16:19, Elmar Prüße wrote: On 01/19/2011 05:38 PM, Bob Doolittle wrote: A few things to check: - Does gdmdynamic -l list the same set of displays as utsession -p? Not really... Server 1: 23 displays occur in both outputs, 4 are unique to gdmdynamic and 17 to utsession. Server 2:

Re: [SunRay-Users] 26D problems SRSS 5.1

2011-01-19 Thread Elmar Prüße
I think I've found at least one major culprit. There is a line in gdm.conf that configures a backup script to be run if the X Server fails. FailsafeXServer=/etc/gdm/failsafeXServer In order to be able to run an emergency xserver on the failing display without having gdm interfere, it checks