Re: [sunset4] Sunset4 work

2016-10-06 Thread Mark Andrews
I would do this for all the mechanisms we have designed to provide IPv4 over IPv6 with a new one each meeting (I would suggest switching each day of the meeting but I suspect Jim would kill me). e.g. DS-LITE, MAP-* For DS-LITE I would even suggest that we do DS-LITE host mode at the end. Mark

Re: [sunset4] Sunset4 work

2016-10-06 Thread Marc Blanchet
On 6 Oct 2016, at 16:22, Lee Howard wrote: On 10/6/16, 3:30 PM, "sunset4 on behalf of JORDI PALET MARTINEZ" wrote: Despite how much I like all those ideas, I don't think we are ready to have an IPv6-only IETF network.

Re: [sunset4] Sunset4 work

2016-10-06 Thread Lee Howard
On 10/6/16, 3:30 PM, "sunset4 on behalf of JORDI PALET MARTINEZ" wrote: >Despite how much I like all those ideas, I don't think we are ready to have an >IPv6-only IETF network. > >Unfortunately, there are many applications,

Re: [sunset4] Sunset4 work

2016-10-06 Thread JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
Despite how much I like all those ideas, I don't think we are ready to have an IPv6-only IETF network. Unfortunately, there are many applications, VPNs, etc., which will not work just with NAT64, because literals, etc. I will suggest something alternative at this stage: Having the IETF

[sunset4] Sunset4 work

2016-10-06 Thread Lee Howard
After the last WG meeting, I walked away with seven things that I thought we needed to do: Update my v4historic draft. I intend to do this in time for the Seoul meeting. Phillip Hallam-Baker suggested something like "draft-baker-ipv4status-its-complicated." I would like to hear more about this,