Hi all,
do you know if this hum is happening ?
-Carlos
On 7 Oct 2016, at 4:12, Marc Blanchet wrote:
On 6 Oct 2016, at 15:03, Lee Howard wrote:
Run IPv6+NAT64 as the default IETF SSID. I've discussed with Jari and
Jim, and they're only reluctant if doing this impedes participants
getting
f.org>, "jordi.pa...@consulintel.es"
<jordi.pa...@consulintel.es>
Asunto: Re: [sunset4] Sunset4 work
In message
<6536e263028723489ccd5b6821d4b2132c3b8...@uk30s005exs06.eead.eeint.co.uk>,
"Heatley, Nick" writes:
> A thought provoking discussion.
&g
showcase? (I'd
> prefer a choice for long term rather than "for next meeting" and I'd go
> for something like Jordi's 464xlat in the CPE! Choose wisely :-)
> If an IPv6-only SSID is just to showcase IPsec VPNs still failing, it is
> a bit of a waste of people's time).
> Rega
<sunset4-boun...@ietf.org> en nombre de "Heatley, Nick"
<nick.heat...@ee.co.uk>
Responder a: <nick.heat...@ee.co.uk>
Fecha: lunes, 17 de octubre de 2016, 18:04
Para: "jordi.pa...@consulintel.es" <jordi.pa...@consulintel.es>,
"sunset4@ietf.org"
I would do this for all the mechanisms we have designed to provide
IPv4 over IPv6 with a new one each meeting (I would suggest switching
each day of the meeting but I suspect Jim would kill me).
e.g. DS-LITE, MAP-*
For DS-LITE I would even suggest that we do DS-LITE host mode at
the end.
Mark
On 6 Oct 2016, at 16:22, Lee Howard wrote:
On 10/6/16, 3:30 PM, "sunset4 on behalf of JORDI PALET MARTINEZ"
wrote:
Despite how much I like all those ideas, I don't think we are ready
to have an IPv6-only IETF network.
On 10/6/16, 3:30 PM, "sunset4 on behalf of JORDI PALET MARTINEZ"
wrote:
>Despite how much I like all those ideas, I don't think we are ready to have an
>IPv6-only IETF network.
>
>Unfortunately, there are many applications,
Despite how much I like all those ideas, I don't think we are ready to have an
IPv6-only IETF network.
Unfortunately, there are many applications, VPNs, etc., which will not work
just with NAT64, because literals, etc.
I will suggest something alternative at this stage:
Having the IETF