Re: [sunset4] Sunset4 work

2016-11-15 Thread Carlos M. Martinez
Hi all, do you know if this hum is happening ? -Carlos On 7 Oct 2016, at 4:12, Marc Blanchet wrote: On 6 Oct 2016, at 15:03, Lee Howard wrote: Run IPv6+NAT64 as the default IETF SSID. I've discussed with Jari and Jim, and they're only reluctant if doing this impedes participants getting

Re: [sunset4] Sunset4 work

2016-10-18 Thread JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
f.org>, "jordi.pa...@consulintel.es" <jordi.pa...@consulintel.es> Asunto: Re: [sunset4] Sunset4 work In message <6536e263028723489ccd5b6821d4b2132c3b8...@uk30s005exs06.eead.eeint.co.uk>, "Heatley, Nick" writes: > A thought provoking discussion. &g

Re: [sunset4] Sunset4 work

2016-10-17 Thread Mark Andrews
showcase? (I'd > prefer a choice for long term rather than "for next meeting" and I'd go > for something like Jordi's 464xlat in the CPE! Choose wisely :-) > If an IPv6-only SSID is just to showcase IPsec VPNs still failing, it is > a bit of a waste of people's time). > Rega

Re: [sunset4] Sunset4 work

2016-10-17 Thread JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
<sunset4-boun...@ietf.org> en nombre de "Heatley, Nick" <nick.heat...@ee.co.uk> Responder a: <nick.heat...@ee.co.uk> Fecha: lunes, 17 de octubre de 2016, 18:04 Para: "jordi.pa...@consulintel.es" <jordi.pa...@consulintel.es>, "sunset4@ietf.org"

Re: [sunset4] Sunset4 work

2016-10-06 Thread Mark Andrews
I would do this for all the mechanisms we have designed to provide IPv4 over IPv6 with a new one each meeting (I would suggest switching each day of the meeting but I suspect Jim would kill me). e.g. DS-LITE, MAP-* For DS-LITE I would even suggest that we do DS-LITE host mode at the end. Mark

Re: [sunset4] Sunset4 work

2016-10-06 Thread Marc Blanchet
On 6 Oct 2016, at 16:22, Lee Howard wrote: On 10/6/16, 3:30 PM, "sunset4 on behalf of JORDI PALET MARTINEZ" wrote: Despite how much I like all those ideas, I don't think we are ready to have an IPv6-only IETF network.

Re: [sunset4] Sunset4 work

2016-10-06 Thread Lee Howard
On 10/6/16, 3:30 PM, "sunset4 on behalf of JORDI PALET MARTINEZ" wrote: >Despite how much I like all those ideas, I don't think we are ready to have an >IPv6-only IETF network. > >Unfortunately, there are many applications,

Re: [sunset4] Sunset4 work

2016-10-06 Thread JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
Despite how much I like all those ideas, I don't think we are ready to have an IPv6-only IETF network. Unfortunately, there are many applications, VPNs, etc., which will not work just with NAT64, because literals, etc. I will suggest something alternative at this stage: Having the IETF