On 2/3/2016 9:30 AM, Steve Litt wrote:
Hi Laurent,
The situation you describe, with the maintainer of a distro's
maintainer for a specific daemon packaging every "policy" for every
init system and service manager, is certainly something we're working
toward. But there are obstacles:
* Daemon
On 03/02/2016 18:30, Steve Litt wrote:
The situation you describe, with the maintainer of a distro's
maintainer for a specific daemon packaging every "policy" for every
init system and service manager, is certainly something we're working
toward.
This is certainly a possible, even a desirable,
On Sun, 31 Jan 2016 13:08:33 -0300
Guillermo wrote:
> From this thread:
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/supervision@list.skarnet.org/msg01123.html
>
> 2016-01-27 9:16 GMT-03:00 Laurent Bercot:
> >
> > The biggest hurdle that *every* distribution faces is that every
> > daemon starting script i
On 31/01/2016 17:08, Guillermo wrote:
So, are you willing to share the plans for this? I take it you'll
write, or help the distribution's developers do so, s6-rc service
definitions for Alpine so it will be able to boot with s6 + s6-rc, as
an alternative to BusyBox init + OpenRC?
Yes. It's sti
>From this thread:
http://www.mail-archive.com/supervision@list.skarnet.org/msg01123.html
2016-01-27 9:16 GMT-03:00 Laurent Bercot:
>
> The biggest hurdle that *every* distribution faces is that every daemon
> starting script is specific to the service manager, and supervision
> systems do thing