Re: [s6] debian packaging

2015-08-12 Thread Buck Evan
These patches are correct to the best of my knowlege / ability: - https://github.com/bukzor/s6-packaging/blob/dockerize/skalibs/debian/patches/01_link_against_librt_if_necessary.patch - https://github.com/bukzor/s6-packaging/blob/dockerize/execline/debian/patches/02_link_against_lib

Re: [s6] debian packaging

2015-08-12 Thread Buck Evan
I think the Right fix is to add -lskarnet to the requirments of execline.so and s6.so similar to what I've done. I was likely overzealous when I changed the .a requirements and should back that bit out. On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 10:18 AM, Buck Evan wrote: > Removing the s6 patch gives essentially

Re: [s6] debian packaging

2015-08-12 Thread Buck Evan
Removing the s6 patch gives essentially the same issue: dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: symbol open_write used by debian/s6/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libs6.so.2.2.0.0 found in none of the libraries dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: symbol byte_chr used by debian/s6/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libs6.so.2.2.0.0 found i

Re: [s6] debian packaging

2015-08-12 Thread Buck Evan
This is the compilation line for libexecline.so exec gcc -o libexecline.so -std=c99 -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-exceptions -fno-unwind-tables -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -Wa,--noexecstack -fno-stack-protector -pipe -Wall -fPIC -Wl,--hash-style=both -L/usr/lib/skalibs -L/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gn

Re: [s6] debian packaging

2015-08-12 Thread Buck Evan
Removing the execline patch results in: dh_shlibdeps -O--parallel -O--autodest dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: symbol waitpid_nointr used by debian/execline/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libexecline.so.2.1.3.0 found in none of the libraries dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: symbol PROG used by debian/execline/usr/

Re: anopa 0.2.0

2015-08-12 Thread Steve Litt
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 13:50:19 +0200 Olivier Brunel wrote: > Hi Steve, > > On 08/11/15 20:40, Steve Litt wrote: > > On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 19:58:59 +0200 > > > > Hi j, > > > > I just got done reading http://jjacky.com/anopa/ . > > > > I love the inclusion of the needs directory, as well as directo

Re: anopa 0.2.0

2015-08-12 Thread Olivier Brunel
Hi Steve, On 08/11/15 20:40, Steve Litt wrote: > On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 19:58:59 +0200 > > Hi j, > > I just got done reading http://jjacky.com/anopa/ . > > I love the inclusion of the needs directory, as well as directory > after. > > I love the way you distinquish one-shots from long-run by whet

Re: [s6] debian packaging

2015-08-12 Thread Laurent Bercot
(Please follow-up this part of the thread to the skaware mailing-list.) On 12/08/2015 08:37, Buck Evan wrote: - https://github.com/bukzor/s6-packaging/blob/dockerize/execline/debian/patches/02_link_against_libskarnet.patch - https://github.com/bukzor/s6-packaging/blob/dockeriz

Re: [s6] debian packaging

2015-08-12 Thread Laurent Bercot
On 12/08/2015 08:29, Buck Evan wrote: apt-cache search is generally how people look for such things. Certainly the word skalibs will be mentioned and will match on such a search. Oh, that's fine then. I did some googling and I believe it derives from the apache process. http://www.apache.or

preserving a distinction between stdout and stderr in logs

2015-08-12 Thread Buck Evan
A common trend is to display stderr in red. This often makes reading a log more clear. The current practice that I see for logging stdout and stderr in the daemontools family is to run some equivalent of `exec 2>&1`, which irretrievably interleaves the two streams. Have any of you seen a clean i