Can anything be done to improve FProxy
performance? I run a permanent node and access FProxy from another machine
on the same subnet. As my node has gotten busier fproxy has gotten
slower. I've got my bandwidth limit set at 50,000. If I set it
higher my net performance will be unacceptab
Attn:Managing Director/CEO
Dear Sir,
I am the first son of the late Mobutu Sese Seko, the
former President of the Congo Democratic Republic. I am presently
under protective custody in Nigeria as a political
refugee. I got your contact during
my search for a stranger that can co-operate with me in
On Sat, Oct 26, 2002 at 06:47:57PM -0300, Allan Douglas wrote:
> After the problem with the routing table, i installed a new fresh version from
>http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/freenet/freenet-0.5rc2.tgz?download
>
> The full log:
> /*
>
> java version "1.3.1"
> Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment
After the problem with the routing table, i installed a new fresh version from
http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/freenet/freenet-0.5rc2.tgz?download
The full log:
/*
java version "1.3.1"
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build Blackdown-1.3.1-02b-FCS)
Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM
On Sat, 26 Oct 2002 21:58:14 +0100
Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 26, 2002 at 03:38:54PM -0300, Allan Douglas wrote:
> > After the "26/10/2002 15:16:24 (freenet.node.states.maintenance.Checkpoint,
>QThread-18): unhandled throwable in Checkpoint: Saving routing table cha
On Sat, Oct 26, 2002 at 02:40:02PM -0300, Allan Douglas wrote:
> Opening SSK@40FaP94HgrzsEY2BSW8rp4ZNHnAMUPAgM/cruft//media.html (or
>SSK@40FaP94HgrzsEY2BSW8rp4ZNHnAMUPAgM/cruft//) i seen this in the log:
>
>
> 26/10/2002 14:25:25 (freenet.support.io.Bandwidth, main): new
>Bandwidth(10,0,BO
On Sat, Oct 26, 2002 at 03:38:54PM -0300, Allan Douglas wrote:
> After the "26/10/2002 15:16:24 (freenet.node.states.maintenance.Checkpoint,
>QThread-18): unhandled throwable in Checkpoint: Saving routing table changes",
> i Restarted the node:
>
> Oct 26, 2002 3:24:42 PM (freenet.support.io.Band
On Sat, Oct 26, 2002 at 02:40:02PM -0300, Allan Douglas wrote:
> Opening SSK@40FaP94HgrzsEY2BSW8rp4ZNHnAMUPAgM/cruft//media.html (or
>SSK@40FaP94HgrzsEY2BSW8rp4ZNHnAMUPAgM/cruft//) i seen this in the log:
This is unlikely to have anything to do with what freesites you visit.
Can you reproduce this
After the "26/10/2002 15:16:24 (freenet.node.states.maintenance.Checkpoint,
QThread-18): unhandled throwable in Checkpoint: Saving routing table changes",
i Restarted the node:
Oct 26, 2002 3:24:42 PM (freenet.support.io.Bandwidth, main): new
Bandwidth(10,0,BOTH)
Oct 26, 2002 3:24:45 PM (fre
Opening SSK@40FaP94HgrzsEY2BSW8rp4ZNHnAMUPAgM/cruft//media.html (or
SSK@40FaP94HgrzsEY2BSW8rp4ZNHnAMUPAgM/cruft//) i seen this in the log:
26/10/2002 14:25:25 (freenet.support.io.Bandwidth, main): new Bandwidth(10,0,BOTH)
26/10/2002 14:25:26 (freenet.node.Main, main): loading node keys: node
> Hi, I downloaded freenet yesterday and have one big comment about
usability.
>
> It appears that I'm not connected to the freenet network. Is there
something I have to do? I
> didn't find anything on the FAQ and would have thought this would have
been the most
> asked question about use.
If yo
> Final release has been delayed to Wednesday,
Unless you hear otherwise from me, final release has not been delayed.
Ian.
--
Ian Clarkeian@[freenetproject.org|locut.us|cematics.com]
Latest Project http://cematics.com/kanzi
Personal Homepage
- Original Message -
From: "Matthew Toseland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> The (second) hopefully final prerelease of Freenet 0.5, the first
> "stable" release in far too long, is ready. Linux users may download it
> from
> http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/freenet/freenet-0.5rc1.tgz?download
>
The (second) hopefully final prerelease of Freenet 0.5, the first
"stable" release in far too long, is ready. Linux users may download it
from
http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/freenet/freenet-0.5rc1.tgz?download
Windows users should download the auto-installer from
http://freenetproject.org/snaps
unfortunately that doesn't seem to be the case.
i've had the node up for 19 hours now, and i've got 16 heisenbugs.
according to the global network load stats i've got 2834 requests per
hour.. that doesn't exactly add up to 65k.
yesterday tough, i had to reboot after about 23 hours uptime and
On Sat, Oct 26, 2002 at 03:44:26PM +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 26, 2002 at 10:28:33AM -0400, Joshua Allen wrote:
> > Hi, I downloaded freenet yesterday and have one big comment about usability.
> >
> > It appears that I'm not connected to the freenet network. Is there something I
On Sat, Oct 26, 2002 at 10:28:33AM -0400, Joshua Allen wrote:
> Hi, I downloaded freenet yesterday and have one big comment about usability.
>
> It appears that I'm not connected to the freenet network. Is there something I have
>to do? I didn't find anything on the FAQ and
> would have thought
Hi, I downloaded freenet yesterday and have one big comment about usability.
It appears that I'm not connected to the freenet network. Is there something I have
to do? I didn't find anything on the FAQ and
would have thought this would have been the most asked question about use.
The open conn
how can i modify the splitfile insertion depth, so that the parts are stored only
locally (thus htl=0)?
when i insert a splitfile via fproxy, the store reports only a few k in use, so i
suppose, the actual file is not stored, just a redirection or metadata
__
19 matches
Mail list logo
