On 2004-08-04T19:27:56+0200, Martin Scheffler wrote:
Kendy Kutzner wrote:
On 2004-08-04T14:50:52+0200, Zenon Panoussis wrote:
Traffic
analysis might help me figure who made a request and who served
it, but I still have to break encryption before I can figure
which file that request
Matthew Findley wrote:
Let me see if I can get caught up on whats gone on since I left work.
Oh, you were posting on your employer's time? I personally believe in
the presumed innocent until proven guilty, so rather than assuming
you guilty of misusing your work time for private activities, I'll
On 5 Aug 2004 04:42:44
[EMAIL PROTECTED]| (Matthew Findley) writes
| Let me see if I can get caught up on whats gone on since I left work.
| First I should probably clear this up. I am not a lawyer. I work at the
| U.S. Attoreny's Office yes; but, only as a clerk. So nothing I say is
| legal
woah, that's weird. afaicr, default==192
Since 5088 my Windows XP has been thrashing the disk like nothing I'd ever
seen
before. Memory load was high (440 Mb virtual on a 192 MB physical machine)
but
not extremely unusual. According to Task Manager Java and Freenet weren't
taking
Paul wrote:
What country does respect freedoms? The US is getting to the point
where emgrating becomes a serious consideration for me.
I lived in Greece during the 1967-1974 dictatorship. Later I've
lived in England, in Germany, in Sweden and the Netherlands. Of all
these countries, Greece is the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
woah, that's weird. afaicr, default==192
I thought it was 128...
Since 5088 my Windows XP has been thrashing the disk like nothing I'd ever
seen
before. Memory load was high (440 Mb virtual on a 192 MB physical machine)
but
not extremely unusual. According to Task
On 5 Aug 2004, at 04:42, Matthew Findley wrote:
Let me put it this way.
When you all fire up your nodes you know there is a very strong
likelyhood that it will end up houseing and transmiting illegal
material, correct?
So you know your computer will be doing something illegal and yet
choose to
Is it possible to add additional commandline parameters to the flaunch.ini
that is used by the bunny app to start freenet. So I can for ex. add the
server switch for java to it instead of starting freenet via a batch file?
It's nothing important, just something that might be usefull.
Since the 5089 announcement, I've been checking the FProxy main page for
an indication that 5089 is available, but it doesn't show that it is
available. I have been able to upgrade to 5089, but I'm concerned that
there are nodes out there that won't know that it's time to upgrade.
How is the
Hessi James schrieb:
Hey there,
I just updated to 5089. However, the node does not finish starting up.
Go to: http://www.freenetproject.org/snapshots and get a new seednodes.ref
If you still have trouble starting the node with it use an editor and cut
the ref down in its size (this is because the
Ignorance is not a defense and nor should it be. If it was it would be almost
impossible to arrest anyone. All you would need to do is have someone ask you to do
it beforehand.
Someone asks you to hold their box of drugs. Oh but you didn't know what was in the
box it must be a big mistake.
The USPS is a business (well not technically... but it's close enough to call it that
for now) that's purpose is to deliver mail. It can not be held accountable if someone
uses it's service illegally with out its knowledge. You as an individual are
accountable if you do something illegal;
On Thu, 05 Aug 2004 09:20:24 -0400 (EDT), [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you run a freenet node you know it's doing something illegal
No. I've already explained this to you. Short memory?
Do you get paid to post FUD?
___/
_/
--
http://troed.se - controversial views or common
Can we continue this on chat? I would bounce all the messages there but
I don't know a quick way to bounce a message and reset the reply-to.
On Thu, Aug 05, 2004 at 12:25:05PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The USPS is a business (well not technically... but it's close enough to call it
that
And as I explained one does not need 100% certain knowledge of a crime to fit the
legal requirement of knowing. It only needs to be proven that you had a good reason
to suspect that it is so.
The very fact that we're having this conversation or the fact that it's in the FAQ on
the site is more
Ok.
As for your business. I'm not totally sure how it works, businesses really aren't my
thing, but as long as you stated that you'd be running freenet as part of your
business and they rubber stamped it you should be ok. As for everyone else though
Here's something that may help
On Thu, 05 Aug 2004 14:24:35 -0400 (EDT), [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And as I explained one does not need 100% certain knowledge of a crime
to fit the legal requirement of knowing. It only needs to be proven
that you had a good reason to suspect that it is so.
The very fact
What is the recommended MaxDirectMemorySize for fred with 150 connections?
Don't tell me 256MB or something like this, I really don't think it must be
that high.
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Aug 05, 2004 at 11:10:26PM +0200, Someone wrote:
What is the recommended MaxDirectMemorySize for fred with 150 connections?
Don't tell me 256MB or something like this, I really don't think it must be
that high.
The recommended size is however big the main memory setting is.
--
Matthew
Mr Matthew Findley
You made certain claims on this list regarding the possible penal
consequences of running a freenet node. I challenged you to provide
law and/or precedent references to support your claims. You failed
to do so. In fact, you silently ignored this challenge.
I also challenged you
I'd think the sixth admendment (protection from unreasionable search
and seizure) helps people get away with crimes all the time. Should we
ditch that too?
~Paul
On Thu, 05 Aug 2004 11:55:58 -0400 (EDT), [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ignorance is not a defense and nor should it be.
21 matches
Mail list logo
