Re: [freenet-support] new ip (was can't listen on local interfaces..)

2005-02-05 Thread Paul Forgey
What I am really doing is moving an existing, somewhat established node from one machine to another more capable one. I copied over the store and all node data with it. However, I now noticing an inability to retrieve data that isn't already in my store (or so it seems). Are other nodes

Re: [freenet-support] new ip (was can't listen on local interfaces..)

2005-02-05 Thread Matthew Toseland
All node data including node, lsnodes*, rt*? On Sat, Feb 05, 2005 at 12:27:37AM -0800, Paul Forgey wrote: What I am really doing is moving an existing, somewhat established node from one machine to another more capable one. I copied over the store and all node data with it. However, I

[freenet-support] Problems with 5101; priorities

2005-02-05 Thread Matthew Toseland
I have many reports from users that 5101 sucks. Some of these seem fairly solid, reproducible results. On the other hand a few users seem satisfied with it. I have been trying to focus on 0.7 work lately. Now, should I try to debug 5101, in preference to 0.7 work? -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL

[freenet-support] Re: [Tech] Problems with 5101; priorities

2005-02-05 Thread Nathan Johnson
In my humble opinion, Focus on 0.7 . Depending on degree of severity of problems with build 5101: warn about it; deprecate it; rebuild a previous build as 5102. ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org