Re: [freenet-support] Freenet Status Update

2010-02-05 Thread alex
Matthew Toseland wrote: Everything sounds great, and I really think that freetalk may make 0.8 a real hit. Thanks for your hard work. BUILD 1240 Our last stable build, 1239, was in November. We have just released a new one, 1240. This has many changes (opennet stuff, optimisations, all

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet Status Update

2010-02-05 Thread Ian Clarke
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 6:02 PM, Dennis Nezic denn...@dennisn.dyndns.orgwrote: On Thu, 4 Feb 2010 22:35:30 +, Matthew Toseland wrote: Ian's friend pupok is working on a new AJAXy user interface mockup for Freenet. Oh god no. Make sure it's easy to disable this garbage for people who

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet Status Update

2010-02-05 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Friday 05 February 2010 15:04:41 Ian Clarke wrote: On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 6:02 PM, Dennis Nezic denn...@dennisn.dyndns.orgwrote: On Thu, 4 Feb 2010 22:35:30 +, Matthew Toseland wrote: Ian's friend pupok is working on a new AJAXy user interface mockup for Freenet. Oh god no.

[freenet-support] Freenet Status Update

2010-02-04 Thread Matthew Toseland
BUILD 1240 Our last stable build, 1239, was in November. We have just released a new one, 1240. This has many changes (opennet stuff, optimisations, all sorts of stuff), which I list in the mail about it. One of the most important is that there are several new seednodes, and many dead ones

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet Status Update

2010-02-04 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Thu, 4 Feb 2010 22:35:30 +, Matthew Toseland wrote: Ian's friend pupok is working on a new AJAXy user interface mockup for Freenet. Oh god no. Make sure it's easy to disable this garbage for people who still value control over their web pages (to read, parse, etc). Dillo doesn't (and