Toad wrote:
On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 08:19:03AM +0200, BlueStar88 wrote:
No, don't drop them, just label them, on the source node. Then, on the
router, make sure the labelled packets only go to the desired interface.
Likewise make sure that the listenPort is only accessible from that
interface.
Hum
On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 08:19:03AM +0200, BlueStar88 wrote:
> To *any port* at *any ip* and to *listen port*, that's fine with me.
> But i've noticed the use of *all local available ip adresses* for
> *outgoing* connections.
> Thought you've got that. You've said to avoid any unwanted
> connectio
Mika Hirvonen wrote:
BlueStar88 writes:
It would confuse the freenet routing at the worst case!?
No. Routing uses node identities, which are not bound to a single IP.
I know about the node-id, but if there are more than one ip address
reporting the same node-id, there could be an effect on the tar
BlueStar88 writes:
It would confuse the freenet routing at the worst case!?
No. Routing uses node identities, which are not bound to a single IP.
I don't know exactly, but if i could bound to a specific ip instead
to 0.0.0.0 there could be a chance to limit the use of only the same
ip as source i
Toad wrote:
Reverse DNS won't generally get the interesting DNS addresses..
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# host amphibian.dyndns.org
amphibian.dyndns.orgA 82.32.18.233
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# host 82.32.18.233
Name: 82-32-18-233.cable.ubr03.azte.blueyonder.co.uk
Address: 82.32.18.233
You're right.
C
On Sat, Oct 23, 2004 at 11:46:15PM +0200, BlueStar88 wrote:
> Toad schrieb:
>
> > On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 08:28:58PM +0200, BlueStar88 wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >> there is an important need to bind the external port to a specific
> >> IP-address, for some anonymity reasons:
> >> I have some virtual I
Toad schrieb:
> On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 08:28:58PM +0200, BlueStar88 wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> there is an important need to bind the external port to a specific
>> IP-address, for some anonymity reasons:
>> I have some virtual IP-adresses without reverse mapping i'd like
to use
>> freenet with.
>
> I th
Someone schrieb:
> BlueStar88 schrieb:
>
>> I have some virtual IP-adresses without reverse mapping i'd like
to use freenet with.
>
> You know that you can do a "whois" on IPs too? So if you have
static IPs
> eighter you or your hoster is registered as owner of those IPs.
In both
> cases it's no
BlueStar88 schrieb:
I have some virtual IP-adresses without reverse mapping i'd like to use
freenet with.
You know that you can do a "whois" on IPs too? So if you have static IPs
eighter you or your hoster is registered as owner of those IPs. In both
cases it's no big deal to find out who you are.
