I was under the impression that Windows can get by without any swap?
Maybe it's different on XP.
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 02:36:41PM -0800, Todd Walton wrote:
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 19:53:06 +, Matthew Toseland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually Linux does this too. IIRC the recommended
I started my freenet node again yesterday, and today I got the pop-up
message (also in event log):
***
Event Type: Information
Event Source: Application Popup
Event Category: None
Event ID: 26
Date: 2005-03-10
Time: 09:28:15
Description:
Application popup:
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 09:40:27 +0100, Level 13 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have 512 MB in the machine, and the swap file settings are set to
default, dynamic 768-1536 MB. How can I avoid this, would adding extra
RAM improve the situation (I'm guessing not, since Windows will only
make larger swap
On Thursday 10 Mar 2005 17:02, Todd Walton wrote:
adding extra RAM would help avoid the badly named Virtual Memory
Minimum Too Low message. With more physical memory, Windows should
require a *smaller* swap space. It only creates more swap space when
it runs out of physical memory and the
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 07:44:27PM +, Stephen Mollett wrote:
On Thursday 10 Mar 2005 17:02, Todd Walton wrote:
adding extra RAM would help avoid the badly named Virtual Memory
Minimum Too Low message. With more physical memory, Windows should
require a *smaller* swap space. It only
Unfortunately, because of the absurd way in which the Windows VMM
allocates memory, the more physical RAM you have, the more swap you
must add. (About 1.5x physical RAM is a typical value for the minimum
pagefile size.) Having less swap than physical memory is very bad
because Windows
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 19:53:06 +, Matthew Toseland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually Linux does this too. IIRC the recommended setting is 2x RAM for
swap on linux. :)
No it doesn't. (My word against yours!) The recommended setting of
2xRAM is very old and outdated. There's nothing about
