Re: [freenet-support] Wget'ing freenet:USKs

2009-11-22 Thread Evan Daniel
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 6:15 PM, Jonas Islander wrote: > Evan Daniel skrev: > > On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 9:17 PM, Dennis Nezic > wrote: > > > Hrrm. I'm no expert, but doesn't the "/freenet:u...@..." URL syntax seem > wrong? The protocol should be the first thing, not in the pathname? And > it woul

Re: [freenet-support] Wget'ing freenet:USKs

2009-11-22 Thread Jonas Islander
Evan Daniel skrev: On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 9:17 PM, Dennis Nezic wrote: Hrrm. I'm no expert, but doesn't the "/freenet:u...@..." URL syntax seem wrong? The protocol should be the first thing, not in the pathname? And it would only make sense if it was from some external non-fproxy source, no

Re: [freenet-support] Wget'ing freenet:USKs

2009-11-21 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Thursday 19 November 2009 18:47:05 Andrew wrote: > Evan Daniel wrote: > > Your browser has no clue how to handle a freenet: URL. > > Would it be possible to create a web browser plug-in to support freenet: > URLs? > > If so, maybe the plug-in could control some things like no caching, no > c

Re: [freenet-support] Wget'ing freenet:USKs

2009-11-19 Thread Andrew
Evan Daniel wrote: > Your browser has no clue how to handle a freenet: URL. Would it be possible to create a web browser plug-in to support freenet: URLs? If so, maybe the plug-in could control some things like no caching, no cookies, no maximum number of connections, etc. for freenet URLs? Als

Re: [freenet-support] Wget'ing freenet:USKs

2009-11-18 Thread Evan Daniel
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 9:17 PM, Dennis Nezic wrote: > On Sun, 15 Nov 2009 10:44:07 -0500, Evan Daniel wrote: >> On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 7:36 AM, Dennis Nezic >> wrote: >> > What is the purpose of the "freenet:" notation? (Besides >> > complicating things.) >> > >> > When I try to "wget -r -np" a

Re: [freenet-support] Wget'ing freenet:USKs

2009-11-18 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Sun, 15 Nov 2009 10:44:07 -0500, Evan Daniel wrote: > On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 7:36 AM, Dennis Nezic > wrote: > > What is the purpose of the "freenet:" notation? (Besides > > complicating things.) > > > > When I try to "wget -r -np" a freesite, most links will not be > > fetched > > -- namely th

Re: [freenet-support] Wget'ing freenet:USKs

2009-11-15 Thread Evan Daniel
On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 7:36 AM, Dennis Nezic wrote: > What is the purpose of the "freenet:" notation? (Besides complicating > things.) > > When I try to "wget -r -np" a freesite, most links will not be fetched > -- namely those that still use the ubiquitous "/USK..." url. (Because > -np, --no-par

[freenet-support] Wget'ing freenet:USKs

2009-11-15 Thread Dennis Nezic
What is the purpose of the "freenet:" notation? (Besides complicating things.) When I try to "wget -r -np" a freesite, most links will not be fetched -- namely those that still use the ubiquitous "/USK..." url. (Because -np, --no-parent, is meant to only fetch files within a particular directory a